You believe Rita has a supply of my bodily fluids!?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:
This proposed Truth Serum, Judy, surely you would insist that it contain one
your bodily
fluids?!
On Monday, December 2, 2013 2:57 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@...
You believe Whole Foods has a supply of my bodily fluids!?
Share struggles to get her foot out of her mouth, fails:
Not Rita, Silly Judy, Whole Foods!
On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 9:22 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
You believe Rita has a supply of my bodily fluids!?
Yes, Share, I know you were trying very hard there to make a joke. I was making
fun of the attempts, you see.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:
Judy, it's called joking. Remember, IT'S ONLY A CHAT ROOM!
OK, if you say it was a joke I'll go along with it. Does one have to find
something funny for it to be a joke? It just sounds silly to me, no wit, no
creativity and
Well, I couldn't figure out my question either. Let me rephrase: Share, do
you agree that Judy *did* include qualifiers, including the one you
specifically mention (sounds like) in the section of said post below that I
have copied to this one?
Share, this is a yes/no question. I won't
It grows on trees, too! Thanks!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Emily, I empathize with Share --
For example, let's take that first sentence: What, exactly, do you mean, by,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrWMBB7DdXo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrWMBB7DdXo
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:
Ah ha ha ha ha ha. My kid thinks I am crazy as a loon, given all this
laughing at my computer screen. Yes, Doctor, you have me figured out.
1. Marijuana could be the best-selling legal drug. Ever.
'5 Jaw-Dropping Facts About Legal Marijuana'
http://www.fool.com/jaw-dropping-facts-about-legal-marijuana
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/11/30/5-jaw-dropping-facts-about-legal-marijuana.aspx
On 12/2/2013 8:33 AM,
Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't
have as much time as usual to read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used
qualifiers in the example she gave.
What I mainly remember is how she initially responded and how she continues to
write to and about
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:
Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't
have as much time as usual to read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used
qualifiers in the example she gave.
What I mainly remember is how she
Share tries her hardest to create confusion:
Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't
have as much time as usual to
read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used qualifiers in the example
she gave.
No, I gave no example, Share. Rather, I
An effective Truth Serum for you and a few others here should handle it nicely,
thank you.
Share cracked:
Richard, maybe Rita could find a nice supplement for what ails Ms. Stein (-:
Considering how the poles of opinion on FFL are so divergent, it would inspire
more trust if 1) there was a truth serum that could actually work, and 2) we
all took it. By excluding yourself and some others, suspicion will not be
alleviated. Now to take care the the most divergent pole, all we
Thank you, Emily. Love U2.
Emily wrote:
I am a huge fan of Judy's and I like her very much. I enjoy reading all of
her posts and I like what she contributes. I see someone who is fair-minded,
honest, authentic, courageous, rational - who has a sense of humor, who can
discuss almost
Even without going into whether or not the TM mantras are the names of
the Hindu gods, why on earth would Judy then call me a liar and then
deny that she posted this statement:
...the TM mantras are *not* the names of the Hindu gods. The Hindu gods
have perfectly good names of their own.
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard
seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
Even without going into whether or not the TM mantras are the names of the
Hindu gods, why on
Deny everythng; blame others; be cynical.
On 12/2/2013 8:32 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.*
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
Let me rephrase that: almost everyone on the planet except you knows
that the TM mantras are the names of the Hindu gods. Wink.
For our practice, we select only the suitable mantras of personal Gods.
Such mantras fetch to us the grace of personal Gods and make us happier
in every walk of
OK, Share, let's see if you can both listen and reply to this post, which is
about some unfinished business from yesterday that we need to deal with.
In a post to Barry, you wrote:
Judy first ran her number on me on Sept 9, 2012.
As I've already noted, this is not true. We had
Barry, of course, is actually encouraging a pissing contest by advising Share
to refrain from acknowledging reality. (Although goodness knows, she doesn't
need any help doing that.)
And good grief, I've let lie far more than I've ever taken up on this forum,
as Barry well knows.
I'm not
You may remember it differently, Share, but as you know I just now corrected
your false memory by actually quoting the posts you were misremembering. And
just think, everyone can read what you said and what I said, so nobody is going
to fall for your remember it differently excuse. Instead,
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:
Ah. Demonstrating once again that she can't let *anything* lie, and feels
compelled to start it back up again and try to turn it into one of her endless
tarbaby arguments, Judy challenges Share to a pissing contest. Might I remind
Authfriend's modus operandi: A falsis principiis proficisci. (Marcus Tullius
Cicero)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:
Judy, we remember it differently. That's all there is to it imo.
I read this and, just as an experiment, I thought about what I would write if
I were you (but really me) in this situation. Here is what, to the best of my
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote:
Authfriend's modus operandi: A falsis principiis proficisci. (Marcus Tullius
Cicero)
And you're the guy in Unity?
That's a great idea, Ann! Why don't we all write as if we are someone else --
then we can show how much wiser and better we are in every respect than the
individual we are impersonating!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In
Thank you, Ann. I would accept an I misremembered admission from Share if she
made it crystal clear she was acknowledging that her memory had been wrong, and
then apologized for those mistakes having put me in a bad light.
But We remember it differently doesn't fly. No matter how hard she
You know, Feste, Share just loved it when you said a few days back that you
hadn't been happy with her attack on Ann. She told you so herself; remember?
Today you have a chance to give Share an even bigger thrill by making it clear
you don't approve of the way she's trying to wiggle out of
Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly what you
think they ought to say. You seem to demand it as a kind of self-validation:
you are right and everyone must acknowledge how right you are and how wrong
your dishonest opponents are. They are disreputable human
As demonstrated on this forum, at least, Share's makeup prevents her from
taking personal accountability for her words or actions. This isn't a
criticism, it is simply a fact based on hundreds of examples she has provided
in black and white. To ask her to do that is a waste of time. It has
Feste sputtered:
Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly what
you think they ought to say.
You seem to demand it as a kind of self-validation: you are right and
everyone must acknowledge how
right you are and how wrong your dishonest opponents are.
Isn't that incredible? Looks like Share's defenders had the shit scared out of
them by my post documenting her untruthfulness. There's no possible rebuttal,
and they can't admit even that she misremembered, so they're frantically
standing on their heads and wiggling their ears trying to save
This example is what I mean by accountability and it is done objectively.
Not that hard and it works to keep lines of communication between two people
open, imho.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@...
Just speaking for myself, I sure am glad we have Judy around to remind
us of our ethical duties on this discussion group. What would we do
without her? Go figure.
The rudeness, the arrogance, the insulting manner of my approach was to
deliver perhaps enough of a shock to make her utter
Correction: To ask her to do that is a waste of my time currently. Maybe
later.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:
As demonstrated on this forum, at least, Share's makeup prevents her from
taking personal accountability for her words or actions. This isn't a
Barry, that is by far the craziest thing you've said in a long time. It really
is crazy; do you believe what you write?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
feste37 wrote:
Oh, auth, you
giggle
Poor Barry.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
feste37 wrote:
Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly
what you think they ought to say. You seem
Conversation between Share and Emily:
Share: It's raining in Iowa.
Emily: Share, is it raining in Fairfield?
Share: Emily, I heard it on the news today that it's raining.
Emily: Share, is it raining outside your door?
Share: Emily, the Farmer's Almanac says that it will be raining this
You misunderstand. I meant that Ann is not involved in the situation, not you.
By kind of nuts, I mean your relentless obsession with small, unimportant
details, your inability to let go of anything in the way that a normal person
would. Quite frankly, you often sound like a patient in a
O.K. Share, let's try one more time. Re: What's unfortunate is that Emily
used to wrote some interesting posts...
Share: What posts of mine did you used to find interesting?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:
Jeez! Now Emily has gone bonkers too!
On
Good lord, somebody get her some Valium before she goes completely off the
rails.
I don't have a bandwagon, and if I did, Emily would be about the last to get
on it. She runs her own show, always has.
See, Share is using Barry's incredibly cowardly tactic. She's so hard up it
isn't
So Emily, tell us why you are on FFL and have no background in TM? I
would think you'd feel like a fish out of water.
On 12/01/2013 12:45 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
O.K. Share, let's try one more time. Re: What's unfortunate is that
Emily used to wrote some interesting posts...
Er, Share, she's parodying you (and Barry). And very aptly, too. Can you laugh
at yourself? No, of course not. Neither can Barry.
Share upchucks:
Jeez! Now Emily has gone bonkers too!
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 2:33 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote:
Conversation between
I am glad you enjoyed those Share. Curtis has been gone a long time now
though, although I am curious about what he thinks of Robbie Robertson. Here
is a second question for you: How to you remember the posts that Judy wrote
differently than she wrote them? No, this is not a setup. I am
You know, I've been asking myself this and I have an answer. I'll get back to
you later as I have no more time today to write it out.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote:
So Emily, tell us why you are on FFL and have no background in TM? I would
think you'd feel
Emily, if you'll forgive me, I can't figure out what this question means; I
wouldn't blame Share if she couldn't either:
Emily wrote:
Here is a second question for you: How to you remember the posts that Judy
wrote differently than she
wrote them? No, this is not a setup. I am
Yep Bhari2, that has become my question also.
So Emily, since you never learned TM, why are you here on this forum?
Is this your little gossip parlor?
Maybe instead this is this your prayer hut. So which deity do you pray to
anyway? Yhvh? Jesus? Christos Pantocrator? Is it a He, a She
Empty, been noticing Alex Jones using phrases like absolute
enlightenment these days?
On 12/01/2013 02:58 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yep Bhari2, that has become my question also.
So Emily, since you never learned TM, why are you here on this forum?
Is this your little gossip parlor?
You know, you guys, it's not as if Emily has never given us an account of why
she's here. She has done so, in some detail, in her early posts and in
subsequent updates. That you don't remember or never read them is not something
for which you can blame her.
Having learned TM is not a
After searching Absolute Enlightenment on the Inforwars site, not much came
up other than the usual paranoia. Seems more of a diatribe type phrase used
against the enlightened elites who rule over us - their cattle.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote:
Empty, been
I addressed Emily rather than you.
Perhaps you believe you now speak for her and can now answer questions posed to
her. However, I am interested in Emily's response. I have faith that she is
capable of responding directly with some intelligence - unencombered by your
personal likes and
You don't listen to his podcasts? He used the absolute enlightenment
phrase on his show today (which is still running into overdrive at the
moment). You can download the podcasts on the site.
On 12/01/2013 03:41 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote:
After searching Absolute Enlightenment on the
I'm not asking this to make her feel unwelcome. I'm not going to bother
to search and she just replied she's been wondering that herself.
Hardly anyone else has ever stuck around very long who didn't practice
TM. Most of those have been drive by.
Significant contributions are not what chat
empty bill wrote:
I addressed Emily rather than you.
Yes, and...?
Perhaps you believe you now speak for her and can now answer questions posed
to her.
Did I even remotely suggest such a thing, or did you make it up?
However, I am interested in Emily's response. I have faith
Yeah, it was emptybill's demands that were unkind. But Emily has been on FFL
for two or three years, never made any secret of not being a TMer. It was just
quite odd that all of a sudden you both jumped on her wanting to know what she
was doing here.
As far as what chat groups are about is
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:
For example, Emily, you used to have some interesting exchanges with Curtis, I
think about music.
Amazing what a simple comma placement can accomplish.
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 2:45 PM, emilymaenot@...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
feste37 wrote:
Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly
what you think they ought to say. You seem to demand it as a kind
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
wrote:
I am glad you enjoyed those Share. Curtis has been gone a long time
now though, although I am curious about what he thinks of Robbie
Robertson.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote:
Yep Bhari2, that has become my question also.
So Emily, since you never learned TM, why are you here on this forum?
Is this your little gossip parlor?
Maybe instead this is this your prayer hut. So which deity do you pray
Oh, I'd forgotten about this one.
Barry ordered:
STOP be a codependent in all of this. YOU can stop it all by just
cutting them out of your life.
Ann commented:
Says Barry in an attempt to fan the flames. Oh, how fun is this Barry? Just
up your particular alley. You are such a
I think this forum would be a much duller place without Emily's contributions.
I may take issue with some of those contributions, but I think what she posts
is a damn sight more interesting than most of the fare here.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote:
Yep
Good point, Ann. People that post here anonymously are not real people,
in the sense that they have any real attributes - it could be and
probably is, just all made up avatars or personas. In that they have an
advantage over the informants who use their real names. Lot's of people
have hidden
Emily, I empathize with Share --
For example, let's take that first sentence: What, exactly, do you mean, by,
Share, is it raining in Fairfield??? I'm not tracking this, either...its a
little out there, frankly. Do you mean actual rain, like rain-rain, composed of
water, wet, droplets, and
Steve and I have something in common; we are both blessed with having
children/teens in the house. It is important that we stay sane and grounded in
*reality.* I think this may be easier for Steve than it is for me, but I'm
just guessing.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Ah ha ha ha ha ha. My kid thinks I am crazy as a loon, given all this laughing
at my computer screen. Yes, Doctor, you have me figured out. I was pulling a
fast one on Share, but I am sure that she will exercise those traits that Feste
mentionedacceptance, forgiveness, letting goand
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Emily, I empathize with Share --
For example, let's take that first sentence: What, exactly, do you mean, by,
Share, is it raining in Fairfield??? I'm not tracking this, either...its a
little out there, frankly. Do
Well, I hope this is okay to say, but I think it may make it easier to have
onsite two parent input. Right now the 20 year old is listing somewhat in his
junior year. (I delivered a ping pong table down to him today. After we set
it up, he beat me in an overtime game.)
But he's got some
Junior year is tough; I've got a junior also. It's decision time - maybe.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote:
Well, I hope this is okay to say, but I think it may make it easier to have
onsite two parent input. Right now the 20 year old is listing somewhat in his
68 matches
Mail list logo
