OK, Share, let's see if you can both listen and reply to this post, which is
about some unfinished business from yesterday that we need to deal with.
In a post to Barry, you wrote:
> Judy first ran her number on me on Sept 9, 2012.
As I've already noted, this is not true. We had clashe
Barry, of course, is actually encouraging a "pissing contest" by advising Share
to refrain from acknowledging reality. (Although goodness knows, she doesn't
need any help doing that.)
And good grief, I've "let lie" far more than I've ever taken up on this forum,
as Barry well knows.
I'm no
Judy, we remember it differently. That's all there is to it imo.
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 9:47 AM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Barry, of course, is actually encouraging a "pissing contest" by advising Share
to refrain from acknowledging reality. (Although goodness knows, she does
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Ah. Demonstrating once again that she can't let *anything* lie, and feels
compelled to start it back up again and try to turn it into one of her endless
tarbaby arguments, Judy challenges Share to a pissing contest. Might I remind
Share before
You know, I've been asking myself this and I have an answer. I'll get back to
you later as I have no more time today to write it out.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
So Emily, tell us why you are on FFL and have no background in TM? I would
think you'd feel like a fish out
Yep Bhari2, that has become my question also.
So Emily, since you never learned TM, why are you here on this forum?
Is this your little gossip parlor?
Maybe instead this is this your prayer hut. So which deity do you pray to
anyway? Yhvh? Jesus? Christos Pantocrator? Is it a He, a She o
After searching "Absolute Enlightenment" on the Inforwars site, not much came
up other than the usual paranoia. Seems more of a diatribe type phrase used
against the "enlightened elites" who rule over us - their cattle.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Empty, been noticing Al
Yeah, it was emptybill's demands that were unkind. But Emily has been on FFL
for two or three years, never made any secret of not being a TMer. It was just
quite odd that all of a sudden you both jumped on her wanting to know what she
was doing here.
As far as "what chat groups are about" is
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard
seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Even without going into whether or not the TM mantras are the names of the
Hindu gods, why on earth would Judy t
You may "remember it differently," Share, but as you know I just now corrected
your false memory by actually quoting the posts you were misremembering. And
just think, everyone can read what you said and what I said, so nobody is going
to fall for your "remember it differently" excuse. Instead,
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Judy, we remember it differently. That's all there is to it imo.
I read this and, just as an experiment, I thought about what I would write if
I were you (but really me) in this situation. Here is what, to the best of my
ability putting mys
You know, you guys, it's not as if Emily has never given us an account of why
she's here. She has done so, in some detail, in her early posts and in
subsequent updates. That you don't remember or never read them is not something
for which you can blame her.
Having learned TM is not a require
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Yep Bhari2, that has become my question also.
So Emily, since you never learned TM, why are you here on this forum?
Is this your little gossip parlor?
Maybe instead this is this your prayer hut. So which deity do you pray to
anyway? Yh
I think this forum would be a much duller place without Emily's contributions.
I may take issue with some of those contributions, but I think what she posts
is a damn sight more interesting than most of the fare here.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Yep Bhari2, that has b
An effective Truth Serum for you and a few others here should handle it nicely,
thank you.
Share cracked:
> Richard, maybe Rita could find a nice supplement for what ails Ms. Stein (-:
Thank you, Emily. Love U2.
Emily wrote:
I am a huge fan of Judy's and I like her very much. I enjoy reading all of
her posts and I like what she contributes. I see someone who is fair-minded,
honest, authentic, courageous, rational - who has a sense of humor, who can
discuss almost anyth
This proposed Truth Serum, Judy, surely you would insist that it contain one
your bodily fluids?!
On Monday, December 2, 2013 2:57 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
An effective Truth Serum for you and a few others here should handle it nicely,
thank you.
Share cracked:
> Richard, m
You believe Rita has a supply of my bodily fluids!?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
> This proposed Truth Serum, Judy, surely you would insist that it contain one
> your bodily
> fluids?!
On Monday, December 2, 2013 2:57 PM, "authfriend@..." wrote:
An effective Tru
Not Rita, Silly Judy, Whole Foods!
On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 9:22 AM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
You believe Rita has a supply of my bodily fluids!?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
> This proposed Truth Serum, Judy, surely you would insist that it contain one
> y
You believe Whole Foods has a supply of my bodily fluids!?
Share struggles to get her foot out of her mouth, fails:
> Not Rita, Silly Judy, Whole Foods!
On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 9:22 AM, "authfriend@..." wrote:
You believe Rita has a supply of my bodily fluids!?
---In Fair
Judy, it's called joking. Remember, IT'S ONLY A CHAT ROOM!
On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 3:49 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
You believe Whole Foods has a supply of my bodily fluids!?
Share struggles to get her foot out of her mouth, fails:
> Not Rita, Silly Judy, Whole Foods!
Yes, Share, I know you were trying very hard there to make a joke. I was making
fun of the attempts, you see.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Judy, it's called joking. Remember, IT'S ONLY A CHAT ROOM!
OK, if you say it was a joke I'll go along with it. Does one have to find
something funny for it to be a "joke"? It just sounds silly to me, no wit, no
creativity and no real humour
Authfriend's modus operandi: A falsis principiis proficisci. (Marcus Tullius
Cicero)
That's a great idea, Ann! Why don't we all write as if we are someone else --
then we can show how much wiser and better we are in every respect than the
individual we are impersonating!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Judy
Thank you, Ann. I would accept an "I misremembered" admission from Share if she
made it crystal clear she was acknowledging that her memory had been wrong, and
then apologized for those mistakes having put me in a bad light.
But "We remember it differently" doesn't fly. No matter how hard she
This example is what I mean by "accountability" and it is done objectively.
Not that hard and it works to keep lines of communication between two people
open, imho.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Judy, we remember it differ
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 wrote:
>
> Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly
what you think they ought to say. You seem to demand it as a kind of
self-validation: you are right and everyone must acknowledge how right
you are and how wrong your dis
What's unfortunate is that Emily used to wrote some interesting posts but once
she got on Judy's bandwagon she's become imo sort of repetitive.
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:22 AM, "anartax...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Authfriend's modus operandi: A falsis principiis proficisci. (Marcus Tulliu
I addressed Emily rather than you.
Perhaps you believe you now speak for her and can now answer questions posed to
her. However, I am interested in Emily's response. I have faith that she is
capable of responding directly with some intelligence - unencombered by your
personal likes and dislike
Steve and I have something in common; we are both blessed with having
children/teens in the house. It is important that we stay sane and grounded in
*reality.* I think this may be easier for Steve than it is for me, but I'm
just guessing.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
I t
Considering how the poles of opinion on FFL are so divergent, it would inspire
more trust if 1) there was a truth serum that could actually work, and 2) we
all took it. By excluding yourself and some others, suspicion will not be
alleviated. Now to take care the the most divergent pole, all we n
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Authfriend's modus operandi: A falsis principiis proficisci. (Marcus Tullius
Cicero)
And you're the guy in Unity?
You know, Feste, Share just loved it when you said a few days back that you
hadn't been happy with her attack on Ann. She told you so herself; remember?
Today you have a chance to give Share an even bigger thrill by making it clear
you don't approve of the way she's trying to wiggle out of al
Barry, that is by far the craziest thing you've said in a long time. It really
is crazy; do you believe what you write?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
feste37 wrote:
>
> Oh, auth, you want to contro
Poor Barry.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
feste37 wrote:
>
> Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly
what you think they ought to say. You seem to demand it as a ki
Conversation between Share and Emily:
Share: "It's raining in Iowa."
Emily: "Share, is it raining in Fairfield?"
Share: "Emily, I heard it on the news today that it's raining."
Emily: "Share, is it raining outside your door?"
Share: "Emily, the Farmer's Almanac says that it will be raini
Jeez! Now Emily has gone bonkers too!
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 2:33 PM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Conversation between Share and Emily:
Share: "It's raining in Iowa."
Emily: "Share, is it raining in Fairfield?"
Share: "Emily, I heard it on the news today that it's raining."
E
Good lord, somebody get her some Valium before she goes completely off the
rails.
I don't have a "bandwagon," and if I did, Emily would be about the last to get
on it. She runs her own show, always has.
See, Share is using Barry's incredibly cowardly tactic. She's so hard up it
isn't sur
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
>
> I am glad you enjoyed those Share. Curtis has been gone a long time
now though, although I am curious about what he thinks of Robbie
Robertson. Here is a second question for you: "How to you remember the
posts that Judy wrote differently than she
empty bill wrote:
> I addressed Emily rather than you.
Yes, and...?
> Perhaps you believe you now speak for her and can now answer questions posed
> to her.
Did I even remotely suggest such a thing, or did you make it up?
> However, I am interested in Emily's response. I have fait
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
feste37 wrote:
>
> Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly
what you think they ought to say. You seem to demand it as a kind of
self-val
Well, I hope this is okay to say, but I think it may make it easier to have
onsite two parent input. Right now the 20 year old is listing somewhat in his
junior year. (I delivered a ping pong table down to him today. After we set
it up, he beat me in an overtime game.)
But he's got some
Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly what you
think they ought to say. You seem to demand it as a kind of self-validation:
you are right and everyone must acknowledge how right you are and how wrong
your dishonest opponents are. They are disreputable human being
Isn't that incredible? Looks like Share's defenders had the shit scared out of
them by my post documenting her untruthfulness. There's no possible rebuttal,
and they can't admit even that she "misremembered," so they're frantically
standing on their heads and wiggling their ears trying to save h
O.K. Share, let's try one more time. Re: "What's unfortunate is that Emily
used to wrote some interesting posts..."
Share: What posts of mine did you used to find interesting?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Jeez! Now Emily has gone bonkers too!
On Sunday, December
For example, Emily, you used to have some interesting exchanges with Curtis, I
think about music.
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 2:45 PM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
O.K. Share, let's try one more time. Re: "What's unfortunate is that Emily
used to wrote some interesting posts..."
Er, Share, she's parodying you (and Barry). And very aptly, too. Can you laugh
at yourself? No, of course not. Neither can Barry.
Share upchucks:
> Jeez! Now Emily has gone bonkers too!
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 2:33 PM, "emilymaenot@..." wrote:
Conversation between Share and Em
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
wrote:
>
> I am glad you enjoyed those Share. Curtis has been gone a long time
now though, although I am curious about what he thinks of Robbie
Robertson. Here is a se
Emily, I empathize with Share --
For example, let's take that first sentence: What, exactly, do you mean, by,
"Share, is it raining in Fairfield?"?? I'm not tracking this, either...its a
little out there, frankly. Do you mean actual rain, like rain-rain, composed of
water, wet, droplets, an
Junior year is tough; I've got a junior also. It's decision time - maybe.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Well, I hope this is okay to say, but I think it may make it easier to have
onsite two parent input. Right now the 20 year old is listing somewhat in his
junior year. (I
As demonstrated on this forum, at least, Share's makeup prevents her from
taking personal accountability for her words or actions. This isn't a
criticism, it is simply a fact based on hundreds of examples she has provided
in black and white. To ask her to do that is a waste of time. It has *n
Feste sputtered:
> Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly what
> you think they ought to say.
> You seem to demand it as a kind of self-validation: you are right and
> everyone must acknowledge how
> right you are and how wrong your dishonest opponents ar
I am glad you enjoyed those Share. Curtis has been gone a long time now
though, although I am curious about what he thinks of Robbie Robertson. Here
is a second question for you: "How to you remember the posts that Judy wrote
differently than she wrote them?" No, this is not a setup. I am g
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
For example, Emily, you used to have some interesting exchanges with Curtis, I
think about music.
Amazing what a simple comma placement can accomplish.
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 2:45 PM, "emilymaenot@..." wrote:
O.K. Share, l
Oh, I'd forgotten about this one.
Barry ordered:
> STOP be a codependent in all of this. YOU can stop it all by just
cutting them out of your life.
Ann commented:
> Says Barry in an attempt to fan the flames. Oh, how fun is this Barry? Just
> up your particular alley. You are such a
Ah ha ha ha ha ha. My kid thinks I am crazy as a loon, given all this laughing
at my computer screen. Yes, Doctor, you have me figured out. I was pulling a
fast one on Share, but I am sure that she will exercise those traits that Feste
mentionedacceptance, forgiveness, letting goand le
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Emily, I empathize with Share --
For example, let's take that first sentence: What, exactly, do you mean, by,
"Share, is it raining in Fairfield?"?? I'm not tracking this, either...its a
little out there, frankly. Do you mean actual rain, l
Correction: "To ask her to do that is a waste of my time currently. Maybe
later."
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
As demonstrated on this forum, at least, Share's makeup prevents her from
taking personal accountability for her words or actions. This isn't a
criticism, it is
You misunderstand. I meant that Ann is not involved in the situation, not you.
By kind of nuts, I mean your relentless obsession with small, unimportant
details, your inability to let go of anything in the way that a normal person
would. Quite frankly, you often sound like a patient in a me
Emily, if you'll forgive me, I can't figure out what this question means; I
wouldn't blame Share if she couldn't either:
Emily wrote:
> Here is a second question for you: "How to you remember the posts that Judy
> wrote differently than she
> wrote them?" No, this is not a setup. I am
It grows on trees, too! Thanks!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Emily, I empathize with Share --
For example, let's take that first sentence: What, exactly, do you mean, by,
"Share, is it raining in Fairfield?"?? I'm not
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrWMBB7DdXo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrWMBB7DdXo
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Ah ha ha ha ha ha. My kid thinks I am crazy as a loon, given all this
laughing at my computer screen. Yes, Doctor, you have me figured out. I was
pulling a
Well, I couldn't figure out my question either. Let me rephrase: "Share, do
you agree that Judy *did* include qualifiers, including the one you
specifically mention (sounds like) in the section of said post below that I
have copied to this one?"
Share, this is a yes/no question. I won't t
Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't
have as much time as usual to read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used
qualifiers in the example she gave.
What I mainly remember is how she initially responded and how she continues to
write to and about me
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't
have as much time as usual to read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used
qualifiers in the example she gave.
What I mainly remember is how she initially respo
Share tries her hardest to create confusion:
> Emily, thanks for making it simple for me. Since I'm with my family I don't
> have as much time as usual to
> read and respond on FFL. Yes, I think Judy used qualifiers in the example
> she gave.
No, I gave no "example," Share. Rather, I
67 matches
Mail list logo