You already have them, check your email. Like I said, this is old news.
On Oct 16, 2006, at 4:20 PM, new.morning wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> It's what's already been discussed New Mourn: it's also a Conroe
>> processor which is supposed
On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As an example a 2.16 GHZ T2600 dual core Macbook laptop ran Windows Media Encoder at a score of 280, an HP Pavillion 2.16 GHZ T2600 dual core scores with a DESKTOP (with
On Oct 16, 2006, at 2:21 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 16, 2006, at 1:28 PM, new.morning wrote:.  The Falcon Northwest Mach V runs Intel's long-awaited Core 2 processor (formerly known as Conroe). It's the new desktop pe
On Oct 16, 2006, at 1:28 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 16, 2006, at 12:45 PM, new.morning wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote: That doesn't expalin the di
On Oct 16, 2006, at 12:09 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote: great. I would like to see tests on a range of software though. That doesn't explain the discrepencey of a 4 core Mac pro only
On Oct 16, 2006, at 12:45 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote: That doesn't expalin the discrepencey of a 4 core Mac pro only equaling performance of a Dell two core PC -- FROM the article yo
On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As an example a 2.16 GHZ T2600 dual core Macbook laptop ran Windows Media Encoder at a score of 280, an HP Pavillion 2.16 GHZ T2600 dual core scores with a DESKTOP (with prob
On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote:great. I would like to see tests on a range of software though. That doesn't expalin the discrepencey of a 4 core Mac pro only equaling performance of a Dell two core PC -- FROM the article you sent. You do realize that the Mac Pro is TWO dual core
On Oct 16, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Alex Stanley wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A couple of things, first of all, this is NOT emulation. With emulation there is no contest, as emulation is VERY slow. I have no interest in dual booting, but I'm very curiou
On Oct 16, 2006, at 12:12 AM, new.morning wrote:I don't know. Can it? If so that would be great. It's already been done (Vista has been run on Intel Macs). Boot Camp will need to be updated however for support from it.
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
On Oct 16, 2006, at 8:05 AM, Vaj wrote:A couple of things, first of all, this is NOT emulation. With emulation there is no contest, as emulation is VERY slow. Secondly, in the June edition of Macworld, they test equivalent PC systems running XP Pro with Macs of the same config booted for XP
On Oct 15, 2006, at 10:35 PM, new.morning wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 15, 2006, at 9:15 PM, new.morning wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> OK, thanks. The mac pro is less expensive than a similar Dell.
>>> Surprising, I want to study it more
On Oct 15, 2006, at 9:15 PM, new.morning wrote:OK, thanks. The mac pro is less expensive than a similar Dell. Surprising, I want to study it more. But still, in the benchmarks, other aticle, a two core gateway killed the four core Mac running windows apps. Still not a contest yet.I've not seen th
On Oct 15, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Vaj wrote:On Oct 15, 2006, at 7:43 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning wrote:Perhaps I am misreading the benchmarks, but it appears that the dualcore gateway
On Oct 15, 2006, at 7:43 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning wrote: Perhaps I am misreading the benchmarks, but it appears that the dual core gateway is killing the quad core apple r
On Oct 15, 2006, at 6:46 PM, Vaj wrote:(Note the price listed on this PC mag review is over twice the actual price)Oops, didn't realize the model reviewed was with 4 gigs of RAM and a honkin' video card...
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://group
On Oct 15, 2006, at 5:59 PM, new.morning wrote:But the new Apple Quad (not sure of maketing name) 2 dual core intel procs on a dual slot motherboard sounds intersting. Seen any benchmarks on that. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2014446,00.asp(Note the price listed on this PC mag review is o
Vaj wrote:
>
> On Oct 15, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
>
>> Vaj wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 15, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
>>>
--- Vaj wrote:
>
> That's not to ignore that there are numerous features I like in XP
> that I'd also like to see transferred on OS X.
>>
jyouells2000 wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> new.morning wrote:
>>
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000"
>>>
> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
jyouells2000 wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> jyouells2000 wrote:
>>
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning wrote:
>>>
>>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000"
> wrote:
>
On Oct 15, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Bhairitu wrote:Vaj wrote: On Oct 15, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote: --- Vaj wrote: That's not to ignore that there are numerous features I like in XP that I'd also like to see transferred on OS X. Same here. In the end, though, I guess I dislike Windows
jyouells2000 wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" wrote:
>>
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfri
jyouells2000 wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" wrote:
>>
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfri
Vaj wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2006, at 10:55 PM, Alex Stanley wrote:
>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will
>>> have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to
>>> 300 bucks and m
jim_flanegin wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000"
>>
> wrote:
>
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
>>>
> wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoog
Vaj wrote:
>
> On Oct 15, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
>
>> --- Vaj wrote:
>>>
>>> That's not to ignore that there are numerous features I like in XP
>>> that I'd also like to see transferred on OS X.
>>
>> Same here. In the end, though, I guess I dislike
>> Windows because it's butt-ug
new.morning wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>>
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "auth
Alex Stanley wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will
>> have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to
>> 300 bucks and many are just tired of the Spyware issues and so
>>
On Oct 15, 2006, at 1:48 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] The nice thing about that is that even a low-end PC will be able to render video, multi-track music files and 3D raytraced animation quite quickly compared to today. The ave
On Oct 15, 2006, at 1:16 PM, sparaig wrote:The eye candy of MacOS X works best with more RAM also, but appears to degrade gracefully if you don't have it. Yeah, but a gig will do IME.
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Fa
On Oct 15, 2006, at 12:59 PM, sparaig wrote:Burroughs B3500 with 640 kilodidgits of core memory. Before that, it was an IBM 360 at school, I think... Yep, remember it well, the ole IBM 360. That's what I learned to program on.
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
O
TurquoiseB wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>>
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
>>> wrote:
>>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "A
On Oct 14, 2006, at 10:55 PM, Alex Stanley wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to 300 bucks and many are just tired of the Spyware
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Vista (was Re: Fwd: A PROGRESS REPORT)
on 10/15/06 2:09 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , "jim_flanegin
On Oct 15, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:--- Vaj wrote: That's not to ignore that there are numerous features I like in XP that I'd also like to see transferred on OS X. Same here. In the end, though, I guess I dislike Windows because it's butt-ugly, and I like Apple because it's
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Vista (was Re: Fwd: A PROGRESS REPORT)
on 10/14/06 11:11 PM, curtisdeltablues at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sold my soul (if I had one) to Bill a long time ago. Now that PC
has great audio and video, I'll never know the joys of the Mac in this
life. I c
On Oct 14, 2006, at 9:33 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 14, 2006, at 8:37 PM, sparaig wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: [...] and the Windows Sidebar, where it bests Apple, Google and everyone in user-interfa
On Oct 14, 2006, at 8:37 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] and the Windows Sidebar, where it bests Apple, Google and everyone in user-interface design), I'm not familiar with what is meant by "Windows side-bar". Claiming that they b
On Oct 14, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Rick Archer wrote:on 10/14/06 11:36 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Oct 14, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Vaj wrote:That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to 300 bucks and many are just
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Vista (was Re: Fwd: A PROGRESS REPORT)
on 10/14/06 11:36 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 14, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Vaj wrote:
That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay clo
On Oct 14, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Vaj wrote:That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to 300 bucks and many are just tired of the Spyware issues and so on which will surely follow Vista. It's said to be a fairly diffe
That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to 300 bucks and many are just tired of the Spyware issues and so on which will surely follow Vista. It's said to be a fairly different UI that many hardcore Wintel people
42 matches
Mail list logo
