In an attempt to undercomplicate things...
You can upload your photos somewhere and hit either this list,
design-t...@lists.fedoraproject.org, or the talk page [1] with your
link. Photos we're interested in using will then be uploaded to
http://fedorapeople.org/groups/designteam/Projects/Picture%2
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 01:30:30AM -0500, Ian Weller wrote:
> Exciting news from Máirín Duffy on fedora-art-list with the "design team
> reboot": the new design team has shared space on people1. I'm thinking
> since 90% of people who have submitted images have asked me to upload
> them, I'd like
Exciting news from Máirín Duffy on fedora-art-list with the "design team
reboot": the new design team has shared space on people1. I'm thinking
since 90% of people who have submitted images have asked me to upload
them, I'd like for people to send them through me and I'll get them
uploaded to th
On 04/17/2009 02:34 AM, Ian Weller wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 05:36:15PM +0200, Max Spevack wrote:
Why don't we start laying stuff out with good photos that we have now,
and simply add to it after Berlin? We don't have to put everything on
hold just because FUDCon Berlin will show us some n
On 04/16/2009 06:36 PM, Max Spevack wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Nicu Buculei wrote:
We can postpone the book for two months
Why don't we start laying stuff out with good photos that we have now,
and simply add to it after Berlin? We don't have to put everything on
hold just because FUDCon Ber
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 05:36:15PM +0200, Max Spevack wrote:
> Why don't we start laying stuff out with good photos that we have now,
> and simply add to it after Berlin? We don't have to put everything on
> hold just because FUDCon Berlin will show us some new pictures, right?
>
As far as I'm
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Nicu Buculei wrote:
We can postpone the book for two months
Why don't we start laying stuff out with good photos that we have now,
and simply add to it after Berlin? We don't have to put everything on
hold just because FUDCon Berlin will show us some new pictures, right
On 04/15/2009 11:38 PM, Ian Weller wrote:
Yes. If you still have pictures, please take the time to upload them or
contact somebody about them. Other than that, we'll be waiting for a
huge influx of pictures from FUDCon Berlin.
We can postpone the book for two months and wait for the Berlin FUDC
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 04:09:41PM +0200, Max Spevack wrote:
> In summary, we need to separate CONTENT CREATION and DISTRIBUTION into
> two separate tasks.
>
> CONTENT CREATION
>
>
> We need to read over their file creation guide as well as their cover
> template generator, and
In summary, we need to separate CONTENT CREATION and DISTRIBUTION into
two separate tasks.
CONTENT CREATION
We need to read over their file creation guide as well as their cover
template generator, and their color cover/interior
suggestions/guidelines. The sales guy basicall
(First off I want to thank everybody for helping the process to opening
up image submissions go smoothly :) We have a couple of entries on the
submission talk page that people would like to see if there is interest
for those photos in the book. Go make comments on the talk page:
https://fedorapro
Ian Weller wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:03:26PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
I take it I can use digital editing to put the fedora branding in the
picture? I might not be able to get a sticker to stay on a dog harness
very well.
I personally frown on doctoring Fedora logos into photos but
Ewan Luca wrote:
Nicu's photos can be seen at
http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/photos/fudcon2008brno/
I wanted to see the reactions before following with URLs and criteria fr
selection, but that's the one.
I think the pictures can be arranged as a feature on the book. See at:
http://issu
Ian Weller wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:25:14PM -0400, Andrew Jamison wrote:
I want to go to the zoo and see if they will let me take a picture of a
Penguin with a fedora sweater on it
^
To repeat the clanging bells of Paul... mixed marketing fail!
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:25:14PM -0400, Andrew Jamison wrote:
> I want to go to the zoo and see if they will let me take a picture of a
> Penguin with a fedora sweater on it
^
To repeat the clanging bells of Paul... mixed marketing fail!
--
Ian Weller
GnuPG finge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Fun with animals = endless possibilities :)
> http://forum.canardpc.com/showpost.php?p=1913396&postcount=142
>
> Steven
>
I want to go to the zoo and see if they will let me take a picture of a
Penguin with a fedora sweater on it
-BEGIN PGP S
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 01:46:44PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Paul W. Frields
> >> wrote:
> >> > Argh, mixed marketing fail!
> >>
> >
> Nicu's photos can be seen at
> http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/photos/fudcon2008brno/
>
I think the pictures can be arranged as a feature on the book. See at:
http://issuu.com/borchi24/docs/pictures_br2008
Ewan Luca
www.opencurse.blogspot.com
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-l
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 13:46 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Paul W. Frields
> >> wrote:
> >> > Argh, mixed marketing fail!
> >>
> >> A red
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Paul W. Frields
>> wrote:
>> > Argh, mixed marketing fail!
>>
>> A red knitted cap?
>
> Make it blue and you have a deal. ;-)
You people,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 05:02:06PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Paul W. Frields
> > wrote:
> > > Argh, mixed marketing fail!
> >
> > A red knitted cap?
>
> Make it blue and you have a deal. ;-
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > Argh, mixed marketing fail!
>
> A red knitted cap?
Make it blue and you have a deal. ;-)
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Argh, mixed marketing fail!
A red knitted cap?
-jef
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:34:53PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> > Most stickers are going to look small on a sleigh. I would go with
> > a 11x17 printout in a plastic cover. That will make sure you have
> > a good viewable section
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Most stickers are going to look small on a sleigh. I would go with a
> 11x17 printout in a plastic cover. That will make sure you have a good
> viewable section and not too smudgeable.
I was going to put it on a dog..and do a narrow
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Ian Weller wrote:
>> I personally frown on doctoring Fedora logos into photos but maybe
>> that's something we should discuss on this list.
>
>
> I just want to be clear as to the rules. Hence why I brought
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Ian Weller wrote:
> I personally frown on doctoring Fedora logos into photos but maybe
> that's something we should discuss on this list.
I just want to be clear as to the rules. Hence why I brought it up.
I could try to slap a Fedora sticker on a dog harness b
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 07:43:12PM +0200, Ewan Luca wrote:
> >
> >
> > So I could use the help from someone having the will and a bit of time to
> > take a critical look in a gallery and give an opinion about what that devil
> > is saying, maybe we can salvage something for the book.
> >
> >
> Nicu
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:03:26PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> Man... i have to get that picture of a Fedora branded sleddog out in
> front leading a team out on a trail. I'll have to see if I can
> arrange that image.
>
> I take it I can use digital editing to put the fedora branding in the
> p
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Ian Weller wrote:
> Submissions for the Fedora Picture Book are now open!
>
> You can look at the instructions for submitting photos here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Submitting_images_for_the_picture_book
>
> Thanks to everyone who has mad
>
>
> So I could use the help from someone having the will and a bit of time to
> take a critical look in a gallery and give an opinion about what that devil
> is saying, maybe we can salvage something for the book.
>
>
Nicu, can you post a link to those photos?
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing li
Ian Weller wrote:
Submissions for the Fedora Picture Book are now open!
You can look at the instructions for submitting photos here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Submitting_images_for_the_picture_book
Thanks to everyone who has made this possible so far!
I have a large number of photos
Submissions for the Fedora Picture Book are now open!
You can look at the instructions for submitting photos here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Submitting_images_for_the_picture_book
Thanks to everyone who has made this possible so far!
--
Ian Weller http://ianweller.org
Looks good to me. I would say lets get the ball rolling. Let us know
when to spam planet...
Jack
Ian Weller wrote:
I think we've got a pretty good procedure down. It's available at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Submitting_images_for_the_picture_book
Max helped me out yesterday by making a
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Ian Weller wrote:
I'd like to know by tomorrow about this time whether or not we should
open it up. Unless I get a good reason for a -1, I'll go ahead and add
the "now accepting submissions" banner to the fp.o rotation (woo we
get to compete with F11 beta) and we'll flood
I think we've got a pretty good procedure down. It's available at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Submitting_images_for_the_picture_book
Max helped me out yesterday by making a simpler procedure (i.e., we look
at a flickr photo set or something) and I cleared up a few things.
I'd like to know by
pg.html
> but such a rule would effectively bare our something similar.
>
IMO photos should focus on a few people. Large group photos would need
everyone to sign the form, I think. So if you did get a photo of
everybody at Brno for the picture book, you'll need everyone to sign a
form.
I'm "helping" by staying as far away as possible and letting those with
artistic skills carry the ball, so to speak. But I did want to put in one
vote for N1, which looks great (well, they all look good, but this one
especially).
Thanks Mairin and everyone else.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:31 AM,
Il giorno mar, 03/03/2009 alle 22.44 -0600, Ian Weller ha scritto:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:41:43PM -0800, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> > Let the games begin! :) My concept for the theme of the book here is a
> > guide on how to be Fedora. There would be 4 chapters, freedom, friends,
> > features, f
Ian Weller wrote:
I need people like Nicu to look over the current uploading instructions
and see if they contain all the necessary details. Please don't upload
photos yet, though.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Submitting_images_for_the_picture_book
Let me digress a bit: I am not sure if I u
3, 2009 4:41:43 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Picture Book Mockup
http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/collateral/picturebook/mocks/friendsmockup.png
(SVG in same directory)
Let the games begin! :) My concept for the theme of the book here is a guide on
how to be Fedora. There would be
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:41:43PM -0800, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Let the games begin! :) My concept for the theme of the book here is a guide
> on how to be Fedora. There would be 4 chapters, freedom, friends, features,
> first. The photos for each chapter will have the model's perspective on the
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:13:53PM -0600, Ian Weller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:40:51PM +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> > Sure, we should start accepting images ASAP (I think we now are waiting
> > for Ian to come with uploading instructions). I was trying just to not
> > get overboard wi
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:40:51PM +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Sure, we should start accepting images ASAP (I think we now are waiting
> for Ian to come with uploading instructions). I was trying just to not
> get overboard with legalese (we already waited 2 months for the Release
> Forms).
Jack Aboutboul wrote:
Nicu,
Whatever, none of this applies to you, I don't think. Either way, we are
going to go ahead and set something up so people can start uploading
pictures and just continue from there...
Sure, we should start accepting images ASAP (I think we now are waiting
for Ian
Nicu,
Whatever, none of this applies to you, I don't think. Either way, we are
going to go ahead and set something up so people can start uploading
pictures and just continue from there...
Jack
Nicu Buculei wrote:
Michael Naughton wrote:
Nicu:
Frankly, companies usually use clauses like t
Hi Nicu:
This is a great point. I may be coming at this from a very lawyerly
perspective. I hope you will forgive me.
Typically, when I am looking at a document for a entity whose position I
am supporting I try to think of ways of how that entity might get into
legal trouble. In this situ
Michael Naughton wrote:
Nicu:
Frankly, companies usually use clauses like this to dissuade individuals
from suing them. Effectively, by signing the document the company and
individual agree to the location of any possible lawsuit and what type
of law that is to be applied. In the United Sta
Nicu:
Frankly, companies usually use clauses like this to dissuade individuals
from suing them. Effectively, by signing the document the company and
individual agree to the location of any possible lawsuit and what type
of law that is to be applied. In the United States each state has its
o
Michael Naughton wrote:
I'm coming into this a bit late, but I couldn't help but wonder if there
was any discussion with Red Hat legal concerning inserting a choice of
law and choice of forum clause in the Model and Contribution release.
By adding these clauses, the signee would agree to litig
agreement, and it is now bounded to
the
Fedora Picture Book only.
Please let me know if there are any additional concerns, Red Hat is
more
than willing to work with our needs here.
Thanks for shepherding this along, Spot.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://
paul.friel
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:11:05AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> Nicu Buculei wrote:
> > Also, I would like a (as official as possible) statement about how the
> > form can be sent: is OK if I receive it faxed by the model, sign it as a
> > photographer and then fax to Red Hat? but
> > printing
Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Some people expressed the concern about people under 18 years, it
> appears we have some such contributors. For them the form should have
> also a place where the legal guardian will sign.
I'll ask about this. The age restriction was added because contracts
signed by individ
d%20Contribution%20Release%20rev1.pdf
>
> It is no longer an "exclusive" agreement, and it is now bounded to the
> Fedora Picture Book only.
>
> Please let me know if there are any additional concerns, Red Hat is more
> than willing to work with our needs here.
Thank
ement, and it is now bounded to the
Fedora Picture Book only.
Thanks a lot for the modification, in the past we wanted to use people
photos for the website too, but have not pursued it due to lack of
release forms. However, the test still says "for the Fedora Picture
Book", which *is*
d%20Contribution%20Release%20rev1.pdf
>
> It is no longer an "exclusive" agreement, and it is now bounded to the
> Fedora Picture Book only.
>
> Please let me know if there are any additional concerns, Red Hat is more
> than willing to work with our needs here.
>
alid points. Red Hat Legal was able to quickly turn
around a new version of this document for us, please look at:
http://spot.fedorapeople.org/Model%20and%20Contribution%20Release%20rev1.pdf
It is no longer an "exclusive" agreement, and it is now bounded to the
Fedora Picture Bo
I agree with Chuck.
Although I was easily able to sign the model release I received at
FudCon because it was releasing the image I gave, the Red Hat lawyers
seem to want perpetual license to use all aspects of my likeness for
marketing purposes, and MIT, my employer will not permit that.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 01:32:42PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> Okay, here is the release form:
> http://spot.fedorapeople.org/Model%20and%20Contribution%20Release.pdf
>
> Questions? Comments?
It feels too much like giving away my rights perpetually. Also, why
does this have to be an "excl
On 2009-02-20 at 23:25:56 -0500, Ian Weller wrote:
> stabus report/slight rant time now -- it looks long but please read :)
>
> 1) Blocking on release forms. I'm assured RH Legal is working on it. In
>the meantime if you're willing to take photos of people and have
>their contact informat
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 09:38:34AM +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Ian Weller wrote:
>>
>> If anybody has any mockups they wanna go for, please submit
>> them. Or any ideas at all for page design. I'm all ears :D
>
> Start with the final decision about page size and also get a decision
> about black
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:05:25PM -0500, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
> So back in my undergraduate days, I did *exactly this job* for NCSU
> periodicals. I produced the John Donne Journal
> (http://english.chass.ncsu.edu/jdj/) for a number of years.
>
> We used Pagemaker for layout. Can I pres
t.
===
Let's start by drawing a line in the sand of the Meeting on Tuesday March
10th. Where do we want the picture book to be by then?
Let's assume the book is 100 pages. I'd suggest that we have a list that
describes every single page in the format given above, from
a line in the sand of the Meeting on Tuesday
March 10th. Where do we want the picture book to be by then?
Let's assume the book is 100 pages. I'd suggest that we have a list
that describes every single page in the format given above, from the
front cover to the back cover.
===
No way
Nicu Buculei wrote:
Ian Weller wrote:
If anybody has any mockups they wanna go for, please submit
them. Or any ideas at all for page design. I'm all ears :D
Start with the final decision about page size and also get a decision
about black and white versus full color.
It has to be full color
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 05:08:55PM -0600, Ian Weller wrote:
> I've got a roadmap in my head somewhere without any dates on it. From
> what I've learned in the past few months on this list, here's what I
> envision, in some sort of vague order:
>
> * Approve mockup of page designs
> * Compile image
Ian Weller wrote:
If anybody has any mockups they wanna go for, please submit
them. Or any ideas at all for page design. I'm all ears :D
Start with the final decision about page size and also get a decision
about black and white versus full color.
No way in hell we're getting this done by
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 04:32:50PM +0100, Max Spevack wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Ian Weller wrote:
>
>> 1) Blocking on release forms. I'm assured RH Legal is working on it.
>> In the meantime if you're willing to take photos of people and have
>> their contact information so you can hunt th
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Ian Weller wrote:
1) Blocking on release forms. I'm assured RH Legal is working on it.
In the meantime if you're willing to take photos of people and have
their contact information so you can hunt them down with a New and
Improved Release Form then there's no reason st
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 07:00:20PM -0500, Jack Aboutboul wrote:
> Ian Weller wrote:
>> I have been told that we must wait on release forms from RH Legal before
>> we upload pictures to the wiki. The temporary release forms we got from
>> spot for FUDCon were for that specific FUDCon only -- also wh
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 07:00:20PM -0500, Jack Aboutboul wrote:
> Ian Weller wrote:
>> I have been told that we must wait on release forms from RH Legal before
>> we upload pictures to the wiki. The temporary release forms we got from
>> spot for FUDCon were for that specific FUDCon only -- also wh
Ian Weller wrote:
I have been told that we must wait on release forms from RH Legal before
we upload pictures to the wiki. The temporary release forms we got from
spot for FUDCon were for that specific FUDCon only -- also what I've
been told.
Max or anyone else,
Can anyone confirm and/or den
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:53:13AM +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Ian Weller wrote:
>> stabus report/slight rant time now -- it looks long but please read :)
>>
>> 1) Blocking on release forms. I'm assured RH Legal is working on it. In
>>the meantime if you're willing to take photos of people and
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:25:56PM -0600, Ian Weller wrote:
> stabus report/slight rant time now -- it looks long but please read :)
>
> 1) Blocking on release forms. I'm assured RH Legal is working on it. In
>the meantime if you're willing to take photos of people and have
>their contact
c) please reply to this message or to
me personally.
CommArch is happy to provide the initial funding. I think the first
estimate was under $3k, if I remember correctly? I'm trying to finalize
my team's Q1 budget in the next week, and I'd like to earmark funds for
the picture
Ian Weller wrote:
stabus report/slight rant time now -- it looks long but please read :)
1) Blocking on release forms. I'm assured RH Legal is working on it. In
the meantime if you're willing to take photos of people and have
their contact information so you can hunt them down with a New a
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 09:47:00AM +, Keiran Smith wrote:
> I have an Image of my Guitar Headstock. The headstock has the Fedora Logo on
> it. Would it be ok to submit that.
>
I don't see why not, once we start accepting uploads.
--
Ian Weller http://ianweller.org
GnuPG fin
I have an Image of my Guitar Headstock. The headstock has the Fedora Logo on
it. Would it be ok to submit that.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Felix Kaechele wrote:
> On Sat Feb 21 2009 05:25:56 GMT+0100 (CET) Ian Weller wrote:
>
>> 6) Does anybody know what we do to convert bitmap images to C
On Sat Feb 21 2009 05:25:56 GMT+0100 (CET) Ian Weller wrote:
6) Does anybody know what we do to convert bitmap images to CMYK with
free software?
Ever tried Cinepaint? Here's a Tutorial:
http://www.behrmann.name/cms/cinepaint/bildbearbeitung/cinepaint_ccorrection.html
HTH,
Felix
--
Fedor
stabus report/slight rant time now -- it looks long but please read :)
1) Blocking on release forms. I'm assured RH Legal is working on it. In
the meantime if you're willing to take photos of people and have
their contact information so you can hunt them down with a New and
Improved Relea
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 03:14:50PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> On 2009-02-06 at 23:45:29 -0500, Ian Weller wrote:
> > All I know is that we're waiting on RH Legal to write up an acceptable
> > release form that can be used for this project (something more broad
> > than the release forms use
t we allow him to chase this down. But he
>>> should communicate the status to you if you're minding the Picture
>>> Book project from the high level.
>>>
>>>
>> So let it be written, so let it be done
>>
> All I know is that we're waiting
status to you if you're minding the Picture
>> Book project from the high level.
>>
>>
> So let it be written, so let it be done
>
All I know is that we're waiting on RH Legal to write up an acceptable
release form that can be used for this project (som
Paul W. Frields wrote:
Since Spot is the primary contact point for legal, i.e. the "Fedora
Legal" coordinator, why don't we allow him to chase this down. But he
should communicate the status to you if you're minding the Picture
Book project from the high level.
So let i
was unsuccessful the past two
>>> days. Either way, I would like to say that I now have the ball on
>>> this and will make sure it gets done ASAP.
>>>
>>
>> Cool. Spot is at FOSDEM right now. Based on how things go at shows,
>> I bet he'
Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 12:39:47PM -0500, Jack Aboutboul wrote:
Nicu Buculei wrote:
David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack wrote:
Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on
something
from Red Hat
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 12:39:47PM -0500, Jack Aboutboul wrote:
> Nicu Buculei wrote:
>> David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack wrote:
>> Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on
>> something
>> from Red Hat Legal.
>>
>> What
I tried to get in contact with spot and was unsuccessful the past two
days. Either way, I would like to say that I now have the ball on this
and will make sure it gets done ASAP.
Thanks,
Jack
Nicu Buculei wrote:
David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack wrote:
Nicu co
David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack wrote:
Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on something
from Red Hat Legal.
What exactly are we blocking on?
Per this message it's spot:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2009-January/ms
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
>
> Hmm, looking here:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing/Tasks
>
> I don't see that reflected. Who's got the ball?
>
> --g
>
> (p.s. I just removed my name from the "Four Foundations" music video. Would
> be fun, but not high on
Hmm, looking here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing/Tasks
I don't see that reflected. Who's got the ball?
--g
(p.s. I just removed my name from the "Four Foundations" music video.
Would be fun, but not high on my priority list right now.)
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan i
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Max Spevack wrote:
> Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on something from
> Red Hat Legal.
>
> What exactly are we blocking on?
>
> --Max
>
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/
Nicu commented on my blog that there has been a long wait on something
from Red Hat Legal.
What exactly are we blocking on?
--Max
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Those are indeed beautiful portraits, but I think we want to send a
> different message, using not only people faces but also saying "fedora",
> "freedom", "friends", etc., like those:
I think at the end of the day, you'll find that you'll w
wonderer wrote:
I actually get a flickr stream from a friend of me and I thought it
maybe give some people lets say a little idea how it can feel to have
such photos for a picture book.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/vowe/tags/faceslotusphere/
I find these pictures VERY good and can also imagine
Ian Weller wrote:
How do we upload RAWs to the wiki though? I'm not sure if we can or
can't as of yet. I'd need a list of possible file extensions before that
can be enabled.
Just like any other type of files our wiki don't know how to deal with,
for example SVG, thus the usefulness of a JPEG
Hy there,
I actually get a flickr stream from a friend of me and I thought it
maybe give some people lets say a little idea how it can feel to have
such photos for a picture book.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/vowe/tags/faceslotusphere/
I find these pictures VERY good and can also imagine how
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:37:00AM +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Nicu Buculei wrote:
>>
>> This is why is probably better to upload to the wiki a JPEG preview and
>> only if the photo is selected for the book provide the RAW original (if
>> available).
>
> I sketched this flowchart about how I see
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:52:50PM -0800, Doug Berry wrote:
> Hey, I've been out of touch for the last week and trying to
> catch up. One thing I would like to suggest is that someone,
> either Max or Ian W, go to the LSI web site and register us
> as an official client.
>
> LSI has exact standard
--- On Mon, 1/19/09, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> The most important requirement from a technical point of
> view is to have the images big enough, so depending on the
> paper size we may want to resuest something like at least 4
> or 5 Megapixels (multiply the page size in inches with 300
> DPI and we
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
