Latest Vuescan shows lot of improvements in colorspace Adobe RGB.and MAC OS
9.
Test negative 100 ISO Fuji (test target including Mac Beth+ gray scale
resolution test and much more. Test object build and used by Photodo
Magazine )
Colors now rely good in color space Adobe RGB
Yellow much bett
Try going into the control panel > “Scanners
& Cameras” > Properties > Events > uncheck the box for “Disable
Device Events.”
That worked for me.
Doug Wise
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Steve Woo
Steve Woolfenden wrote
> I just downloaded a trial version of vuescan and
> cant get it to work - presumably it should work
> without uninstalling nikonscan ?
Your presumption is correct. I have had Nikonscan (various versions) and
Vuescan (lots of versions) living happily together under Win 95
Make sure you have your scanner on BEFORE you start vuescan, it does a scsi bus scan
on startup.
alan
>> I just downloaded a trial version of vuescan and cant get it to work -
>> presumably it should work without uninstalling nikonscan ?
>> Thanks
>> Steve
>Steve Woolfenden wrote
>
>> I just downloaded a trial version of vuescan and
>> cant get it to work - presumably it should work
>> without uninstalling nikonscan ?
>
>Your presumption is correct. I have had Nikonscan (various versions) and
>Vuescan (lots of versions) living happily together unde
Do not have both scanner drivers running simultaneously.
Bob Wright
- Original Message -
From: Peter Marquis-Kyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan
> Steve Woolfenden wrote
>
>
Funny, I'm on Windows 98SE with an Adaptec SCSI adapter..
It is the 2902E, and I forced windows to use the actual 2902E family drivers vs. the
7800 family it wants too. I had trouble getting the scanners recognized with the 7800
drivers, almost never trouble (except epson twain) on the 2902E d
Both Nikon Scan and Vuescan work happily on the same
machine. However, Vuescan will not run in parallel with NS. When I invoke
VS with NS minimized, I am advised to exit it first, no need to
uninstall. No big problem. Just clarifying the issue. Hersch
At 07:47 PM 08/21/2001, you wrote:
Steve Woolf
In a message dated 1/8/2001 5:15:41 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> How does the "Clean" option work in Vuescan with the Minolta Scan Dual II,
> HP S20 and other scanners without Digital ICE.
Unfortunately, the Clean option just doesn't work very well without
the infrared channel of the Min
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Unfortunately, the Clean option just doesn't work very well without
> the infrared channel of the Minolta Scan Elite, Nikon LS-30 and
> Nikon LS-2000. I hope to improve this, but it's hard to clean
> dust spots without an infrared channel without also losing image d
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Berk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:35 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Vuescan
> Hey Ed-
> I just got the Kodak RFS 3600, and was interested in giving Vuescan a
try,
> but I went to the website and was hoping to
Sadly to say, it is not supported yet for this scanner. I am still willing
to loan mine, Ed? ;)
Spencer Stone
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rick Berk
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 8:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners:
Besides you can get a free trial period from Ed and see it first hand.
Gordon
>
> > but I went to the website and was hoping to see some screen shots or
> > something... any chance you could add some?
>
> you don't need screenshots,
I'm not sure the Kodak RFS3600 is supported by Vuescan - check the archives,
something in the back of my memory rings.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Arthur Entlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 6:16 AM
Subject
Rick Berk wrote:
> Hey Ed-
> I just got the Kodak RFS 3600, and was interested in giving Vuescan a try,
> but I went to the website and was hoping to see some screen shots or
> something... any chance you could add some? I'd just like to know what I can
> expect... Also, does anyone have any ex
> > > but I went to the website and was hoping to see some screen shots or
> > > something... any chance you could add some?
>
I think it would improve the html manual if it included screen shots of both
the menus and the tabbed regions. Somehow having a picture to look at
clarifies things for m
Art wrote:
> Rick Berk wrote:
>
> > Hey Ed-
> > was interested in giving Vuescan a try,
> > I'd just like to know what I can expect... > > Rick
>
> Rick,
>
>...download the full program free of charge and not only see screen
> shots, but play with it and see how it works. The only difference
>
Bob Armstrong wrote:
> Art wrote:
>> Rick,
>>
>> ...download the full program free of charge and not only see screen
>> shots, but play with it and see how it works. The only difference
>> between the version you are getting, and the one for $40, is that for
>> $40 you get a serial number th
t: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Berk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:35 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Vuescan
> Hey Ed-
> I just got the Kodak RFS 3600, and was interested in giving V
n Behalf Of Jules
>Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 3:38 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Rick Berk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday
In a message dated 3/12/2001 3:45:17 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Would someone in London PLEASE get Ed a Kodak RFS 3600 to play with?
Someone in Hawaii loaned me one, and I should get it this week.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
>Either Ed has stopped announcing new releases of Vuescan or not all the mail
>is getting through. Visited his site today and found that version 7.03 is
>now available.
>
>Dale
He may not be announcing new releases on the list. In other correspondence he wrote a
few days ago "I'm not on this [f
>He may not be announcing new releases on the list. In other correspondence
>he wrote a few days ago "I'm not on this [filmscanner] mailing list any
>more - too many off-topic postings."
>
>--
>Bob Shomler
>http://www.shomler.com/gallery.htm
If it is true that Ed Hamrick is no longer on the li
Bob wrote:
>He may not be announcing new releases on the list. In other correspondence
>he wrote a few days ago "I'm not on this [filmscanner] mailing list any
>more - too many off-topic postings."
Bummer. That means he has missed all the postings asking for the grain
removal and cleaning to be
> He may not be announcing new releases on the list. In other
correspondence he wrote a few days ago "I'm not on this [filmscanner]
mailing list any more - too many off-topic postings."
>
> --
> Bob Shomler
Darn, our lose.
Dale
>>He may not be announcing new releases on the list. In other correspondence
>>he wrote a few days ago "I'm not on this [filmscanner] mailing list any
>>more - too many off-topic postings."
>
>Bummer. That means he has missed all the postings asking for the grain
>removal and cleaning to be sepa
>Bob wrote:
> >He may not be announcing new releases on the list. In other
>correspondence
> >he wrote a few days ago "I'm not on this [filmscanner] mailing list any
> >more - too many off-topic postings."
>
>Bummer. That means he has missed all the postings asking for the grain
>removal and cl
I have taken my asbestos suit out, had it dry cleaned, and refitted:
Bob Shomler wrote:
>> Either Ed has stopped announcing new releases of Vuescan or not all
the mail
>> is getting through. Visited his site today and found that version
7.03 is
>> now available.
>>
>> Dale
well said Art. I have noticed that Ed is still frequenting news groups,
which hold much more noise than filmscanners. Anyway, nobody is forced to
read all the traffic, if you don't like any particular OT, just skip it.
You're right, we had both (the group and Ed) benefit from discussions. BTW,
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Bob Shomler wrote:
> It may be necessary to send bug reports and other vuescan requests
> direct to Ed.
Well, isn't that where they should be sent in the first place? Why would
they be sent here? I agree totally with what Art just wrote. It would be
totally different thing i
Art
How do you know Ed has abandoned the list, have I missed something?
--
Regards
Richard
//
| @ @ --->>> Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C _) )
--- '
__ /
At 21:15 20-03-01 -0800, you wrote:
>I find that very interesting, if accurate. Especially after he
>encouraged the flood of this exact group with literally hundreds, if not
>thousands, of messages regarding his Vuescan product. He was very
>willing to use this group to advance his product sales
i agree about ed. on top of that he is almost rude if you are not good with
software and e-mail him personally with questions. vuescan is a difficult
programs with daily updates and i wish i had gotten silverfast. joanna
> At 21:15 20-03-01 -0800, you wrote:
>
> >I find that very interesting, if accurate. Especially after he
> >encouraged the flood of this exact group with literally hundreds, if not
> >thousands, of messages regarding his Vuescan product. He was very
> >willing to use this group to advance his p
t: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan
> i agree about ed. on top of that he is almost rude if you are not good
with
> software and e-mail him personally with questions. vuescan is a difficult
> programs with daily updates and i wish i had gotten silverfast. joanna
>
I propose that we return to using this forum for filmscanners and stop
flaming people.
| i agree about ed. on top of that he is almost rude if you are not good
with
| software and e-mail him personally with questions. vuescan is a difficult
| programs with daily updates and i wish i had gotten si
> I propose that we return to using this forum for filmscanners and stop
> flaming people.
>
> | i agree about ed. on top of that he is almost rude if you are not good
> with
> | software and e-mail him personally with questions. vuescan is a
> difficult
> | programs with daily updates and i wish
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:32:29 EST ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> vuescan is a difficult
> programs with daily updates and i wish i had gotten silverfast. joanna
Er... I think you should try Silverfast first, if you are bothered by
'difficult' :-)
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:17:56 +0200 (EET) =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hugo_G=E4vert?=
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I agree totally with what Art just wrote. It would be
> totally different thing if did offer the software free to us. He is, after
> all making a good money from the product.
>
> But I also ho
At 05:40 22/03/2001 -0800, you wrote:
> What Ed needs
>is someone to write his documentation and to screen his email. But, this
>would probably require raising the price of VueScan and eventually becoming
>just like most other software developers. Which do you want? I would
>rather Ed consecra
>don't you reckon, Vuescan lacks of good tutorial, help file, manual?
Particularly, if Ed changes nomenclature used. I recommend you go to web
site of Windows Picture and see an example of a good tutorial.
Ed's addressed this on Filmscanners, and made an open offer to anyone who
wants to try to
> >don't you reckon, Vuescan lacks of good tutorial, help
file, manual?
Speaking as a former Help author, I think Vuescan's Help is
very good for a program that has evolved so rapidly. The way
it's structured at the moment lends itself to quick & easy
amendment of individual topics, without a maj
Hi Roman,
Do you have the URL of the Windows Picture web site you
mentioned?
Thanks,
Eli
-Original Message-
From: Roman Kielich(r) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 1:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Vuescan
At 05:40
At 11:07 23/03/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>Hi Roman,
> Do you have the URL of the Windows Picture web site you
>mentioned?
> Thanks,
> Eli
www.dl-c.com
Robert wrote:
>I do not know what I am doing wrong, but I downloaded Vuescan and tried to
use it. God is it long winded
and it screws up my PC. First it takes an age showing busy, then another age
processing mask. etc.
> For scanning at the moment Microteks Scanwizard is far more useable on
my
> At present I am having a big problem getting accurate colours in a scan of a
> negative in the latest 7.0.19 .
>
> Has anyone else had colour balance problems like the above? Thanks.
>
> Colin Maddock
>
>
>
Hi again Colin
For what its worth I'm reposting my findings on the subject u
Rob writes ...
> "Walter Bushell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is it necessary to rescan with infrared every time, IOW, when
doing
> > multiple scans of the same film is it necessary to do an IR scan
every
> > time?
>
> If you want to have the cleaning features in Vuescan work, you need
> the I
In a message dated 6/3/2001 10:55:46 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Unlike Nikons, doesn't this scanner insist the IR channel scan
> separately from the RGB scan ... ie, a 2nd pass. I thought the
> original post was stating, if he wanted 16x RGB passes, it also
> scanned the IR 16x. The
I don't mean to question your authority on this, since I don't own a
2740 and you probably have worked with one, however, I am trying to
understand the mechanism of this situation.
I understand that dICE works by doing a comparison of the infrared image
and the "visible" image and does some so
In a message dated 6/4/2001 10:38:06 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm guessing, but I would be surprised that the infrared light
> scan would have very much noise artifacting in it.
The exact same CCD and A/D converter is used to scan the
image in infrared and visible light. The only d
Hi Ed,
Again, not to be argumentative, but, I do understand it is the same CCD.
That isn't the issue. We know that, for instance, typically the blue
scan is noisier than the green or red, right?
I have no idea what type of response the infrared sensitivity of the CCD
is, but I'm (guessing) tha
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001 05:11:56 EDT, you wrote:
>The exact same CCD and A/D converter is used to scan the
>image in infrared and visible light. The only difference between
>the two scan passes is which lamp is turned on.
I've just purchased an LS-2000 and am clambering up the learning
curve. My w
In a message dated 6/5/2001 11:11:38 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I noticed a deep scratch in one of my negs, so I turned on Light Clean
> in the Filter tab and scanned from Disk again.
>
> The scratch disappeared.
Yes, this is what should happen.
> So I suppose my question is: if C
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 02:29:20 EDT, you wrote:
>This is controlled by the "Device|Bits per pixel" setting. If you can
>with it set to "64 bit RGBI" (the default), there will be an infrared
>channel in the raw scan file.
Great, thanks: that answered my question perfectly.
Unfortunately, I don't think there's a better way. The best thing is to play with all
the settings, doing repeated previews from memory, until you get an understanding of
how the system works and what all the choices do. Frankly, I've been using it for a
couple of years now, and I just got co
Surely you can get a full working demo at:
www.hamrick.com
Well it does leave criss crosses on the scan till you buy it for a measly
$40.00
Ira
Ira Beckoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Marvin Demuth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2
Hi
I am also new to scanning and Vuescan.
I used the "help" given with Vuescan software as documentation.
These help files are very informative compared to what Minolta help gives.
But there will be some issues un-addressed and this list has helped in
clearing such issues.
Please, let me kno
I think the "bits and pieces" you are picking up are primarily fine-tuning
suggestions. Perhaps the easiest way to start is to just leave it at the
default settings except the Color tab where you can select your film type,
the Files Tab where you may wish to select the default folder for saving
On Wed, 06 Jun 2001 08:00:21
Marvin Demuth wrote:
>I am picking up "bits and pieces" of information on getting started with
>VueScan from reading the messages and the help file information.
>Surely there is more efficient way to be introduced to VueScan.
>Can anyone refer me to other VueScan i
In a message dated 6/5/2001 5:28:40 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Can you perhaps post an example of what the infrared scan looks like of
> a typical image?
You can do this yourself by setting "Files|TIFF file type" to "16 bit
Infrared".
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
At 02:27 PM 6/6/01, Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. wrote:
>Perhaps the easiest way to start is to just leave it at the
>default settings except the Color tab where you can select your film type,
>the Files Tab where you may wish to select the default folder for saving the
>scan, and the default viewer on t
Well, I could if I had a scanner which did IR scans, but I don't ;-)
Could someone please send me an IR scan of an image (slide or neg, just
tell me which it is) to look at? I'd like to see what IR "sees"
Perhaps that might help me to better understand this whole process.
Art
[EMAIL PROTECT
I recently having similar problem but the dark scans were printing
reasonably OK - it turned out that Adobe Gamma was not loading during start
up. Try locating the gamma loader it should be here:
C:\Program Files\Common Files\Adobe\Calibration\Adobe Gamma Loader.exe
If your screen lightens up th
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Norman Unsworth wrote:
> For Tony Sleep -
>
> I really appreciated your workflow description, especially the part about
> trying to use Vuescan settings that will capture all data on the slide /
> negative. It's easy enough to lower the white point to ensure no clipping at
s not an *easy* program. :-)
Best regards--LRA
>From: Raphael Bustin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan Settings
>Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:36:12 -0400 (EDT)
>
>
>
>On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Norm
AFAIK the gamma setting will not decrease shadow clipping but will merely
shift the curve over. The "Auto black point" checkbox and the Black point %
setting on the Color tab would deal with that, and if necessary perhaps
multiple passes to soak out the shadow information (but heed the Help File
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:36:12 -0400 (EDT) Raphael Bustin
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Gamma adjustments, by definition, don't
> affect white point or black point --
> only the stuff in between.
>
> I'm sure even Vuescan has a a way to set
> both of these -- if not, I'd trash it.
It has - th
My 7.1.3 has a seperate control for Image Brightness and Gamma. Image brightness will
affect the blacks of the image, Gamma not so much.
I often leave Black to .01 or so which results in the black edge of negs or slide
masks going close to 0, I almost always go with Maximum and do any cropping
Doing successive previews, I recently found I couldn't revert to the
"start over" point. How does one do this?
Dave
> My 7.1.3 has a seperate control for Image Brightness and Gamma.
Image brightness will affect the blacks of the image, Gamma not so
much.
>
> I often leave Black to .01 or so
File-Default Options
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Dave King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan Settings
| Doing successive previews, I recently found I couldn't revert
Thanks Maris. I tried that, but it didn't seem to work in one case.
I'll give it another shot.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vue
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Greenbank
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 12:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan Settings
>
>
> I recently having similar problem but the dar
> I can even live without a
> histogram.
I'm shocked that 1) Viewscan doesn't have a histogram, and 2) that you can
live without it!
I get around all of these problems by not using these features in VueScan:
- I never have used the crop box. Probably a carryover from when the Mac
version did not have it.
- Tried to use folders once. Now I just leave the images in VueScan's
folder and manually move them afterwards.
- I always
on 7/19/01 5:45 PM, Austin Franklin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I can even live without a
>> histogram.
>
> I'm shocked that 1) Viewscan doesn't have a histogram, and 2) that you can
> live without it!
Vuescan, Austin. Vuescan. Repeat after me. V-U-E-S-C-A-N
as for the histogram I set black
At 05:45 PM 7/19/01 -0400, Austin wrote:
[someone else:}
>> I can even live without a
>> histogram.
[Austin:]
>I'm shocked that 1) Viewscan doesn't have a histogram, and 2) that you can
>live without it!
Ayup. I still wonder why Vuescan is so revered by so many.
Earlier versions didn't even h
he preview. Or am
I missing something?
Alex Pardi
-Original Message-
From: Austin Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: giovedì 19 luglio 2001 23.46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Vuescan gripes
> I can even live without a
> histogram.
I'm shocked that 1)
>Me too. Having a LS-30 I badly need Vuescan as it's the only way to extract
>10 bits rather than 8, and it's really a waste of time having to make a real
>scan to check if the exposure is correct (no clipping at the high and low
>ends), rather than simply looking at the histogram after the previe
In a message dated 7/20/2001 9:50:04 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> Me too. Having a LS-30 I badly need Vuescan as it's the only way to extract
> 10 bits rather than 8, and it's really a waste of time having to make a
real
> scan to check if the exposure is correct (no clipping at the hi
In a message dated 7/20/2001 10:23:26 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Because I frequently use the 16x multisample option and
> always scan in 16-bit mode, this means I sometimes spend as much as an hour
> on each image, which is a major PITA. Still, the results I get from it,
> despite t
exact version
of Vuescan I'm using (I'm in the office, now), but I downloaded it less than
a month ago.
Thanks, Alex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: venerdì 20 luglio 2001 17.42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuesc
In a message dated 7/20/2001 12:25:52 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> Actually this is what I experienced: B&W film (TMax 100 or 400, don't
> remember), auto-exposure, defaults settings: the histogram of the raw file
> had almost nothing in the lower half. I rescanned with manual exposure
>All other things can be re-done by pressing the "Scan mem."
>button, making it unnecessary to _ever_ scan the same piece
>of film twice.
Including manual exposure adjustments and/or a long exposure pass? With my
shots from Lower Antelope Canyon, I find I get slightly better results by
tweaking
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone ever seen a case where the "Device|Auto exposure"
> option doesn't work optimally?
Yes, but only on images which were generally hopelessly underexposed.
Autoexposure often fails on night photos. It works very well on normal
daylight exposures. To be fair,
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:42:22 EDT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The clipping of the cropped file is controlled by the
> "Color|White point (%)" and "Color|Black point (%)"
> options. Is there a problem with one of these options?
Not IME, but it would be nice if you could explicitly set a figure
I
think so. Go directly to hamrick.com, do not past go
:-)
I use
an LS-40 and am very happy with Vuescan.
Occasionally, I will do comparisons between NS3 and Vuescan.
Vuescan always is the winner.
Marc
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]O
Steve,
You
may want to check out http://www.scantips.com
Marc
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve
WoolfendenSent: Monday, July 23, 2001 5:27 PMTo:
FILMSCANNERSSubject: filmscanners: Vuescan
question
I'm a little ap
Download it and try it out - it's a small program and doesn't alter your
registry if that is a concern, and it won't affect or bother your Nikonscan3
TWAIN.
Many including myself use it because the interfact, though not 'fancy' is
straightforward and very easily provides results better than Nikon
I am one of those who has not found the problems that others report with
Nikonscan; I have found it to do what it should do, quickly and with great
control. I bought Vuescan after reading how much better it was, but have
not found it to be either better or worse, just different and much more
I prefer to
> fine-tune color, contrast and everything else in post-scan processing in
> Photopaint or Photoshop or PSP or whatever your favorite program is.
Thanks Maris - is their any benefit to be had by doing things this way as
opposed to doing it up-front? Other than , I suppose , when scan
At 12:51 24-07-01 +1000, Julian Robinson wrote:
>I am one of those who has not found the problems that others report with
>Nikonscan; I have found it to do what it should do, quickly and with great
>control.
In general I agree with that and especially appreciate the control that NS
gives me. T
Message -
From: "Steve Woolfenden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:12 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan question
| I prefer to
| > fine-tune color, contrast and everything else in post-scan processing in
| > Photopaint or
Thanks Marc , didnt know you were here too! I'll
check this out.
Steve
Steve,
You
may want to check out http://www.scantips.com
Marc
Julian Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:51 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Vuescan question
> I am one of those who has not found the problems that others report
with
> Nikonscan; I have found it to do what it should do, quickly an
At 12:51 PM 7/24/01 +1000, Julian wrote:
>Last time I tried Vuescan's IR dust removal I found it didn't work as well
>for me as ICE, but this may have improved since then, or at least I should
>say it definitely has improved going by what I have read here.
>
>The bottom line for me is that I ha
Thanks for the alternative view Julian! I suppose I really should try both
and see - ultimately I suspect that I might go for the easiest option in the
shortterm as I'm also trying to find my way round Photoshop and a new
printer all at the same time !
Steve
> I am one of those who has not found
I've used Vuescan to scan line-art on the Epson 1200U Photo, and to scan
film and negatives at it's full 1200 dpi and have never had a problem.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Stan McQueen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 12:20 PM
Subject: film
At 11:20 AM 7/26/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>I installed my new Epson 1640SU last night and started scanning with
>Vuescan. It seemed to work great with negatives and transparencies. Then
>my wife needed me to scan some line drawings for her. Since I hadn't
>installed the Epson software yet, I deci
Have you set the Crop and Buffer such that you are sure VueScan is
looking at actual picture content (and not frame edges or sprocket
holes) for setting the white and black points? If it sees a sprocket
hole or an opaque frame edge that really messes things up! The picture
will be quite flat (low
I meant to mean the sand is supposed to be more yellow than gray. I had to drop the
gamma down below one to get some shadow in the 60 to 80 range of the water on the
sand. It doesn't quite help enough for the skin of my son in the sun, which is coming
into 220 for the red component, which is
1 - 100 of 1056 matches
Mail list logo
