Hi!
I use Vuescan with my Minolta Dimage Scan Multi. I'm very satisfied with
Vuescan. Still, I have some questions:
It seems to me that I get the best results with:
Media type: Image
Color balance: Neutral
I feel that White balance tends to a little yellowish highlights.
If I set Media type
Hi Rob,
I'm one of those users that try it straight out of the box. If it doesn't
work then I check the settings and try again. I haven't kept up on all the
releases, but I have downloaded them religiously. This is the first time
the default settings wouldn't open in ACDSee. But then I haven't
I just got a new LS 4000. It works fine with Nikon Scan 3.1, but I really
want to use VS (prior experience with Polaroid SS4000). The Nikon doesn't
show up as a device, only "disk" in the popup.
Mac G4/450
OS 9.1
Help!
Gilbert
>Ken asked: The Vuescan Fuji neg options don't include one for Superia 400, which
>I've shot a lot of. Any idea which of the existing ones match it the
>best?
I worked through them all and the closest to what seemed accurate colour was Reala
100(Japan)
Colin Maddock
ken wrote:
>Will it upgrade the existing version on my computer? Or do I DL and
>replace with same reg#?
Make a backup copy of your vuescan.ini, then install the new version. You
won't have to re-enter the registration number and you definitely don't
need a new one. Just replace the vuescan.in
Bill ,
Fantastic , the Mac OS 9.2:Photos works perfectly.
Thanks again Bill
All the Best
Eric
> Eric--
>
> Try "Mac OS 9.2:Photos"
>
> or "Mac OS 9.2/Photos"
>
>
> Note the ":" vs the "/" used to join the folder name to the hard disk name.
>
> --Bill
>
>
>
> At 3:47 PM + 1
Eric--
Try "Mac OS 9.2:Photos"
or "Mac OS 9.2/Photos"
Note the ":" vs the "/" used to join the folder name to the hard disk name.
--Bill
At 3:47 PM + 10-11-01, Eric Calderwood wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Another dumb question .
>
>What do I type into the default folder , for where the scans a
Someone recently asked if there was any discernible difference among the
low-medium-high settings with Ed's improved grain reduction filter in vuescan 7.2.3.
I thought I'd try some small comparisons from a negative scan, a small crop of sky and
snow from a near-end-of daylight scene -- sky bei
novembre 2001 08.15
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: VueScan and highlight/shadow pixel
> clipping--wh y? (SS4000)
>
>
> Stan. I see the same with Vuescan and the Microtek 4000T
> scanner. Don't know
> why. Leif.
>
> >
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan clipping & flat images
The following is taken from VueScan's help file. It seems to me that B&W
points of 0% should leave all of the pixels in the scan. (Having said that,
when looking at a histogram, it does seem that som
That vuescan text (below) states that the black point determination uses the histogram
of each color -- three histograms. Might the combination of color balance / neutral
and black point computation result in one or two color channels with pixels below the
calculated (luminance) black point?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
> Sent: 22 November 2001 15:13
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan clipping & flat images
>
>
> The following is taken from VueSc
Maybe a dumb question (I'm tired).. :-)
Why does my image change so dramatically between white point 0.001 and
0? When tweaking white point, I find I get small useful changes down to
0.001, but if I try to go lower or to zero, the image suddenly drops VERY
dramatically in brightness/gamma.
In a message dated 11/30/2001 7:22:44 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> Why does my image change so dramatically between white point 0.001 and
> 0?
It's a bug - zero was being treated as the same as setting
"Color|Color balance" to "None". I've fixed this, and will
release it in 7.2.11.
R
Ed,
Any news on the Minolta Elite II loan?
If your comments on the Minolta Multi Pro are any indication of the Elite IIs likely
performance (after all, it has the same theoretical OD with its 16 bit output), it
should
prove a worthy competitor to the LS-40.
Conversely, the Minolta Elite II c
Julian wrote:
>I can't see any actual advantage in putting the focus point towards a
>corner rather than just near the top or bottom edge.
Because the main headache with focussing has been bowed slides which form
a kind of dome shape? A sensible average point would be halfway along a
diagonal b
At 00:05 04/12/01 +, Ian Lyons wrote - wrote:
>Mikael,
>
>
>Is there some reason why you must persist in posting attachments as part of
>your messages? I'm sure the info is useful but can it not be put somewhere
>for folk to go and look at (by chosie0 rather than have it shoved own our
>throat
In a message dated 12/5/2001 7:13:30 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Does VueScan already support the new
> Epson Perfection 2450?
Yes.
le 6/12/01 17:54, John "Salty" Stines à [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hi John
I posted the same question here a couple of weeks ago. The kodak profile for
Portra BW is not implemented yet in Vuescan, somebody suggested me to use
the "generic color negative profile", but Iwas not satisfied with it.
"DRP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To Ed: please think about updating the Kodak negatives list in Vs!
AFAIK Ed is limited by the released PhotoCD profiles from Kodak. If Kodak
haven't published the profile for Portra, then Ed wouldn't be able to
provide one.
Rob
In a message dated 12/10/2001 10:52:52 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> PLEASE can you add this. I've just noticed that when I re-input my
> settings after installing v7.3, I forgot to add the 'plus' to the file
> path. I've lost the last 3 strips worth of film scans (about 1h30m in
> scann
Thanks, Ed - I've made this mistake, too (thankfully not often) so this will help very
much.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan file overwrite warning
>In a message dated 12/10/2001 10:52:52 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>> PLEASE can you add this. I've just noticed that when I re-input my
>> settings after installing v7.3, I forgot to add the 'plus' to the file
>> path. I've lost the last 3 strips worth of film scans (about 1h30m in
-
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan file overwrite warning
> In a message dated 12/10/2001 10:52:52 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > PLEASE can you add this. I've just noticed
On 12/17/01 3:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote:
>I just released VueScan 7.3.5 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X
>and Linux.
>
> ...
>
> * Added separate color spaces for Monitor and Files
Thanks, Ed. This seems like a good interim solution, until VueScan gets
real color management
Vuescan (for windows) is putting my scan and crop tifs in the wrong
location. That is, in spite of me setting the default location for a
specific drive and directory, Vs is putting these tifs in the 'c:\vuescan'
directory. I don't know for sure, but it may be because I saved options in
the vue
shAf wrote ...
> ... So, it would seem saving an options file messes
> with the default directory location.
Is there any way to set Vuescan to ^always^ save the options file to the
Vuescan (or a specific) directory ... rather like the 'vuescan.dat' file???
I work with Vuescan my own way of co
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: Vuescan memory error
>Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 18:39:07 -0500
>
>do an exhaustive test of the memory, try Norton 2002 or download a test
>program
>suitable for Win2k.. a complete test will tak
Hi, everybody. I've lurked long enough to feel as if I know you all - but finally
need help of a what feels like a simple sort and has me stymied. I'[m running a Mac
G4 with 9.1 and just downloaded Vuescan 7.3.11 and can't seem to get it to do anything
when I make preview and scan requests.
I've made quite a few changes in 7.4, so I thought I'd make
beta versions for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X and Linux available.
The most significant change is that the preview and scan
windows are updated automatically when options are changed.
You can download from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
I just released VueScan 7.5 beta 2 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X
and Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.5 beta 2
* Fixed problem with extra preview when scanning
* Fixed problem with focus position on Nikon and Scan Multi
* Fixed problem wit
I just released VueScan 7.5 beta 4 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X
and Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.5 beta 4
* Improved infrared cleaning
* Added pixel unit to "File|Image units"
* Changed "File|Lock image size" to "File|Lock aspect rati
There seems to be a rumor at the newsgroup which
implies Ed is no longer relying on it as a "Vuescan forum". While his
wwwsite implies the forum to be a resource for "scanning techniques,
problems and workarounds", I now wonder how he wants us to report possible
"bugs" and "suggestions"?? Suc
I just released VueScan 7.5 beta 9 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X
and Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.5 beta 9
* Fixed infrared alignment on Canon FS4000 and ScanWit 2740S
* Fixed problem with Scan Dual II, HP 5300 and HP 7400
* Fixed prob
I just released VueScan 7.5 beta 11 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X
and Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.5 beta 11
* Changed auto eject to eject right after scan completes
* Increased maximum number of raw scan files to 10,000
* Reduced disp
I just released VueScan 7.5 beta 15 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X
and Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.5 beta 15
* Fixed slow scans on Mac OS 8/9
* Fixed some crashing problems
* Fixed option scrolling problem
Unless someone sends me a re
Thanks!
Ed Hamrick
Ed makes us aware:
> I just released VueScan 6.4.9 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
> ...
I wanted to play with setting the exposure and mask values as
described in the help file. My procedure was to try and pick a
normally exposed negative with "auto" settings for exposure and mask
... but a
shAf previously wrote ...
> I seemed to have fixed my previous problem with v.6.4.9 (...
> scanning a disk file and it coming up non-rotated and as a negative
> ...) by restarting Vuescan. (What changed shall remain a mystery,
but
> I hate it when that happens ...*smile*...)
> ...
I hav
Ed: I found the same with Vuescan vs. PS 5 for both slides and negatives
on my LS-30. I rescanned but with the brightness set at 1.3 for the slide
and negative rather than .7. The slide was fine, the negative was OK but
with less contrast than the slide.
Gordon
shAf wrote:
> Ed makes us awar
Try increasing the preview dpi and see if you get a closer match between
vuescan and PS.
- Original Message -
From: "Gordon Tassi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.4.x suggestio
>Try increasing the preview dpi and see if you get a closer match between
>vuescan and PS.
A few days ago Ed told this list that the Preview will rarely match the
scan. Once I found out that the Preview in Vuescan was supposed to be
different than in the other scanning software I have used it
On my scanwit, and I would speculate that other none exposure adjusting scanners as
well, the preview and the scan image are very close. Close enough to use preview mem
while adjusting color settings to get an image that is great in PS and requires very
little tweaking.
alan
>> I have bee
Henry writes ...
> A few days ago Ed told this list that the Preview will rarely match
the
> scan. Once I found out that the Preview in Vuescan was supposed to
be
> different than in the other scanning software I have used it has
made using
> Vuescan easier. ...
I've never expected the Vue
Henry,
I've been doing the same for quit some time now, but with a small
alteration:
I like the autonumbering feature if Vuescan a lot but rescanning will
not allow it if you output every file to VuePrint (or whatever...)
Instead I start with turning OFF the output file before I even do the
pr
>Then I scan the slide at the desired resolution. I test
>different settings in VueScan and each time performes an Scan Mem When
>I'm satisfied with the look within VueScan I switch it on again and do a
>last scan mem to output the file. This way I can use the fast scan mem
>to tweak VueScan to be
(Ed H?)
Or do you always work on the full image area and crop it
later? (Arguably this is an easier way to work.)
Regards,
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Alan Womack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Majordomo leben.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 4:19 PM
Sub
In a message dated 1/15/2001 7:53:27 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I've since discovered that if I do NOT click or do
> anything with vuescan while it is doing the scan process (preview
> and/or scan) that it will do the 100% scan. If I do click, or fiddle
> with tabs etc while Vuesca
Yep, and usually on maximum so I get a bit of black border.
alan
>> Or do you always work on the full image area and crop it
>> later? (Arguably this is an easier way to work.)
>> Regards,
>> Alan T
Ed writes ...
> I'd rather not go into the details of what I did, but I was careful
not
> to violate any of ASF's patents. In avoiding their patents, I was
able
> to come up with a much better way of doing infrared dust removal
> (what ASF calls ICE) and grain reduction (what ASF calls GEM).
> B
In a message dated 1/31/2001 8:32:52 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> In a response to a query, ASF implied their "ICE3" filter set was
> subject to peculiarities of specific scanners. Is this true of your
> algorithms as well?
One of the weaknesses of the ICE algorithms (and there are
sev
Ed's really come a long ways with the last few versions of VueScan. Using 6.6.1 I was
finally able to make a scan of one of the slides from the groupscan (the infamous bug
hunter hat) that had realistic grass, full detail in the hat, and good contrast.
I found settings gamma to 2.2 and brightn
I sent it yesterday, but it did not get to the list, so send it again,
and attachments in separate mail.
---
Hi, I just tried VueScan (with new Canoscan 2710), and I'm having some
problems.
1. Take a look at attached images, both saved
Here is the second image.
Slava
=
--- NOTE: EMAIL HAS CHANGED !!! -
Slava Zilberfayn| Home +1(416)7838430 | Work +1(416)5931122x2486
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]OR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADDRESS: appt 1219, 377 Ridelle ave, M6B1K2, Toronto, ON, CANADA
___
This is a VueScan request for Ed which I send him also separately by e-mail.
After the preview-scan the slide holder goes back in the Acer ScanWit
scanner, thus protecting the slides against collecting dust and against
damaging by hand.
After finishing a normal scan the slide holder stays stickin
In a message dated 2/8/2001 9:33:58 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Are you sure it works on other CCDs ?
Yes, with varying degrees of success.
> For example I used a pin and poked three different size holes in a very
dark
> Provia 400F slide. The 2 pixel hole showed no charge bleeding
Ed,
is this why some of my 35mm. negative scans look a tad 'thin'
when using VueScan and more 'gutsy' when using CanoScan?
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 11:05 AM
Su
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:05 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan long pass mode
>
> I've been saying on this mailing list for more than a year that
> overexposing the CCD
In a message dated 2/9/2001 2:05:44 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I agree, although Vuescan long pass currently seems to make some very simple
> assumptions about the CCD charge bleeding characteristics. At the very
> least it would be nice not to have Vuescan include charge bled pixels
In a message dated 2/9/2001 2:05:44 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I agree, although Vuescan long pass currently seems to make some very simple
> assumptions about the CCD charge bleeding characteristics. At the very
> least it would be nice not to have Vuescan include charge bled pixels
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan long pass mode
>
> Can you describe this more sophisticated approach? Give a bit
> of pseudocode for this algorit
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan long pass mode
> The problem is that you haven't described an algorithm
Agreed, but one has to leave something for
Hi Ed,
How does the Minolta Dimage Dual Scan II (USB version) compare with the
Canon FS2710 in terms of using overexposure scanning?
Art
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 2/8/2001 9:33:58 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>> Are you sure it works on other CCDs ?
>
>
> Yes
charge bleeding is a characteristic of CCD sensors, once the electron wells get
filled up you get these vertical smears as the charge "bleeds" into adjacent
pixels..its a hardware problem, can only be solved by limiting the exposure.
I suggest you do multipass with the Canon instead of a "long pas
>> > The examples I posted earlier provide enough
>> > information for a more sophisticated approach.
>>
>> No, they don't provide any useful information for a more
>> sophisticated approach.
>>
b> *shrug* Actually they do. That's why I selected them. But I'd rather be
b> taking pictures th
>From: "bjs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > No, they don't provide any useful information for a more
> > sophisticated approach.
> >
>
>*shrug* Actually they do. That's why I selected them.
Whether Ed Hamrick can come up with a fix for this apparent hardware problem
or not, it should be pointed out
> Also developer's point of view may be very
> different from the user's (for many reasons).
> It is a common pain we are to live with until
> we'll be writing our own VueScan's .
I noticed the , but I like to mention that Ed is doing a great job
creating and maintaning VueScan the way he does! T
- Original Message -
From: "Herm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 2:20 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan long pass mode
> charge bleeding is a characteristic of CCD sensors, once the electron
wells get
> fill
Henk, my was in no way directed to Ed !!
Certainly he is doing a great job and fully get the burden of
the support as well as he moves VueScan forward (rapidly!).
I am probably in the minority of this list because photography is my
hobby: I am a software developer, not a professional photograp
>From: "bjs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>People claiming the longpass results I'm seeing in Vuescan are the "best
>that can be done using software" simply don't know what they are talking
>about.
I thought I had read all the messages on this thread and I don't recall any
that have said that. Which o
bjs: Is it appropriate directly to give Ed the name and maker of the program
so he can possibly get it on his own see what you are talking about? He seems
quite well aware of ICE and GEM and has been able to adjust his program without
violating any proprietary and copyright requirements in that
this is multiscanning, its already available and implemented..leave Ed alone
(g)...We have a problem communicating, we keep saying the same stuff over and
over and over and over..
"bjs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a Pascal program that takes N files at arbitrary exposure levels and
>comb
- Original Message -
From: "Herm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 3:27 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan long pass mode
> this is multiscanning...
There is a fundamental difference between combining multiple ex
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:16:15 -0800 bjs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I have a Pascal program that takes N files at arbitrary exposure levels and
> combines them into one "longpass" result. It accounts for charge bleeding
> and a number of other issues. The result has none of the gross errors
> -Original Message-
> From: bjs [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 9:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan long pass mode
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Herm" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Jerry Oostrom wrote:
> Another, complex approach would be to apply scouring algorithm in the long
> exposure scan to the sections with pixels exposed to the limit (one/all
> channels). That is, if scouring algorithm can be applied that way. The
> pixels that were exposed to the limit would still
age is read N times."
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "shAf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "film scanner list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 8:22 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Vuescan: long exposure pass
| An obsvervation for a
ECTED]]On Behalf Of Joel Nisson
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 9:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: filmscanners: Vuescan vs Silverfast control
>
>
> I'm trying to decide between Vuescan and Silverfast for use with my SS4000
> scanner (Already own Silverfast, testi
Joel writes ...
> I'm trying to decide between Vuescan and Silverfast for use with my
SS4000
> scanner (Already own Silverfast, testing trial VS). My main
question at
> this point is whether there is a fundamental difference in how the
two
> programs control the scanner that allows one or the ot
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 11:41 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Vuescan vs Silverfast control
| I'm trying to decide between Vuescan and Silverfast for use with my SS4000
| scanner (Already own Silverfast, testing trial VS). My main question at
|
ct Ed here @ filmscanners.
JHH
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joel Nisson
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 12:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: filmscanners: Vuescan vs Silverfast control
>
For Ed Hamrick (most likely):
I just purchased Vuescan and have a few technical questions:
1. In the Color balance tab, what is the difference between "Neutral" and
"Auto Levels?"
2. Also in Color balance, does "White balance" assume that the lightest
object in the image is white? Can it be
n.
3.By now you've seen the answer to this from Ed Hamrich.
4.I've never really experimented with this.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Jules" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 12:03 AM
Subject: filmscanne
In a message dated 3/5/2001 5:20:57 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> When I do a final scan with the SS4000, instead of the carrier being pulled
> through continuously, now it's moving with a start-stop motion. Is that an
> expected change?
This just means it's running too slowly to keep th
: Monday, March 05, 2001 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: vuescan questions (different ones)
> 3.By now you've seen the answer to this from Ed Hamrich.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jules" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
In a message dated 3/6/2001 2:50:05 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 3. it would be really nice if the user interface somehow told you
> what options affect the raw file and which don't. is there a list?
There isn't a list. The options are in the Device tab, the
Crop tab, and in the Options
>What do people think of my putting options that affect the raw scan
>in the Device tab, and other options in other tabs? I've been asked
>several times in the past few days which options affect the raw scan,
>and this seems like a logical way to organize things.
I would like that. A good cue a
>What are the correct Vuescan "Media" tab settings for Fujicolor
>Professional 400 NPH color negative film?
>
>Vuescan: 6.7.5 (test)
>Scanner: HP Photosmart C5100A (SCSI)
>Fuji Pro 400 NPH: http://www.fujifilm.com/AF3-865E.pdf
I've long used just Vuescan's Generic Color Negative, with default wh
fine.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Berry Ives" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "filmscanner listserve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 9:08 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Vuescan effects on system?
| Does installing Vuescan have any effect on my Mac
To Ed Hamrick and other Vuescan experts,
Currently I am using only the raw file generated by Vuescan (with I
-channel) load this into PS and
apply a profile conversion to Adobe RGB with an ICC profile created for
my scanner.
This gives me the best possible color/level/gamma balance results for
sl
I just released VueScan 7.0 Beta 1. I'm not widely publicizing
this, but the Windows, Mac OS and Linux versions can
be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/files/vuesca70.exe
http://www.hamrick.com/files/vuesca70.sit
http://www.hamrick.com/files/vuesca70.tgz
What's new in version 7.0
I just released VueScan 7.0 beta 2 for Windows, Mac OS
and Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
There were 118 people on this mailing list who
downloaded VueScan 7.0 beta 1 and I got a lot
of useful feedback. If you have feedback about
beta 2, please e-mail it un
Great! I'll be looking forward to trying out whichever Vuescan version
supports the scanner.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 4:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vu
Is there a way to increment the numbering of TIFF output files from Vuescan.
Unless I am missing something, they are always saved as crop001.tif (or
something similar to that) and if a rescan again, the name is overwritten.
I would like to perform several different type of scans and have them save
Hi,
can anybody help with folllowing problem:
I used Photoshop6 as an external viewer in Vuescan. The scans have been
opened in PS without problems. Since a few days, maybe since Vuescan 7 or PS
update 6.01 , in PS the new file dialogue opens up after scanning and asks
for the filesize and mode.
> Maybe Ed or someone else has a better idea about how the Vuescan grain
> removal option could be expanded and in a practical sense work even
> better.
> If you do then please give us your input.
>
I don't know about VueScan, but I did read through US Patent 5,673,336 which
seems to be the ba
Good work, Dean.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Shough, Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 12:23 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Vuescan grain removal idea
| > Maybe Ed or someone else has a better idea ab
"Henry Richardson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> another story. I often get grain aliasing in the sky but other areas of
the
> image rarely have much of a grain aliasing problem. I'm not sure why this
> is so, but it has been my pretty consistent experience. Even stranger,
even
> other hi
I am surprised that some of the quotes I included from the ROC patent did
not generate more response. I want to comment on some portions of ROC (or
at least the patent that ROC seems to be based on).
> "The infrared scan is used to detect imperfections in the film medium
> itself. As discussed
Thanks very much Dean. That is food for thought.
Hersch
At 09:26 AM 3/21/2001 -0800, you wrote:
I am surprised that some of the quotes I
included from the ROC patent did
not generate more response. I want to comment on some portions of
ROC (or
at least the patent that ROC seems to be based on).
901 - 1000 of 1386 matches
Mail list logo
