Hello Coda,
There seems to be a problem with:
Options / Document options / Music Spacing / Manual Positioning.
The choices 'Ignore' and 'Incorporate do not seem to work as they used to.
In situations in which Finale misspaces seconds in different layers (e.g.
when accidentals are involved) and
I frequently work with 11 X 17 scores. If I am using scroll view I set the
two monitors horizontally so I can see the maximum number of measures. In
page view I set the monitors (virtually) at the vertical and I can view an
entire page at 100%. I use a trackball with acceleration which means that
I heartily agree to having a Multi-Monitor setup... I'm using an Nvidia
MX440 and 2 17 Monitors. I have an article on my website regarding this
if interested. :)
http://hale.dyndns.org/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=19mode=o
rder=0thold=0
Jim Hale
---
'The OS Tells The PC What To Do With
When I played 4'33 last year, I did an internet search on the piece
and found all sorts of stuff. There's an interesting article by
Larry J. Solomon at http://www.azstarnet.com/~solo/4min33se.htm
Here's a short quote from it:
Liberties are sometimes taken with the music, from performing it as
The thing as
a whole still doesn't want to retrograde, though I was able to
reverse many individual staves. It seems to me that the ones that
won't reverse are those which I used as sources for Mass-Mover copies
(NB: not mirrors) to other staves. Any further suggestions?
to wh. Dennis:
By the way, operate all this on a copy of the score, and then paste the
retrograde in place. That way you won't have to destroy your *real* score
all its smart shapes.
Dennis
I'm doing the reverse of that. I saved an Ur-copy of my score as
backup, then in my active version copied the existing
Happy Christmas, listsibs.
Wandering though my local music emporium this morning, I chanced upon a
MIDI keyboard controller, with a compass of about two octaves. Since I
am contemplating loading Finale onto a (windows based) laptop to take
along to libraries when I consult volumes of music that
Robert Patterson wrote:
I actually have three monitors, and I use all of them.
This thread has really caught my attention!! I assume all of you are
using Windows? (Several years ago I had a dual monitor Mac, which was
very nice ...) I received a WindowsXP personal edition upgrade for
Weldon Whipple wrote:
I assume all of you are using Windows?
No, MacOS9.
I don't know if WindowsXP can handle more than 2 monitors. I use
multiple video cards on my Mac. I guess WinXP could do the same, but
I've not tried it.
On Win, you may run into some issues on the Finale side, because
Hi, all.
It sounds like the small MIDI controller I have -- USB connected, 2 octaves, and able to input into Finale 2003. Neat setup, doesn't take up a lot of storage space (an issue in my small home) and makes inputting into Finale much faster. (Did you run into an Oxygen 8, by chance?
At 11:30 AM 12/28/02 -0700, Weldon Whipple wrote:
I guess I really don't need a lot of details, just a confirmation that
of which OS you use (I have a vague recollection of Windows XP
supporting multiple monitors).
Win98SE on up supports multiple monitors. My Matrox G450 AGP dual-head
supports
11 matches
Mail list logo
