Le 25/02/03 19:28, "Bob Florence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
I think it may have to do with group optimizing in Fin2003. Be sure that the
group attributes settings are setting to let Finale optimize it as you wish.
Eric Dussault
> I am working on a piano part. I want to optimize the whole part
Other than entering all the staff names as expressions, your answer is
the only one I can think of.
It isn't that big a deal, since the empty staves will all be optimized
away and you'll still be left with a 4-staff score.
Lee Dengler wrote:
I am using Windows 2003. I am engraving a piece rig
On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 07:44 PM, Richard Yates wrote:
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Perhaps an easier solution would be to simply erase Stem and Beam
alterations from the Mass Edit menu.
Tried it. Does not seem to do anything.
Really? That's odd, because I use this all the time. Beam Move
At 4:28 PM -0800 2/25/03, Bob Florence wrote:
I am working on a piano part. I want to optimize the whole part. This
has never been a problem but now it won't work. I checked to make sure
that nothing was hidden and that there were no staff styles being used.
No luck.
I am using Mac Finale 2003a. Wh
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
>> What's the advantage over just clearing the beam an stem alterations
>> using mass mover?
This option in the MassEdit menu does not seem to work for this problem.
Richard
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mai
Darcy James Argue wrote:
>> Perhaps an easier solution would be to simply erase Stem and Beam
>> alterations from the Mass Edit menu.
Tried it. Does not seem to do anything.
Richard
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman
At 07:28 PM 2/25/2003, Bob Florence wrote:
>I am working on a piano part. I want to optimize the whole part. This
>has never been a problem but now it won't work.
What isn't working?
Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.ed
Bob, everytime you post on the Finale forum here, I get an attached
document "bobflo.vcf" on my desktop. Is is possible to turn that off?
RockyRoad
--
David Stonestreet - Coming to you from Sydney Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Fleeing from the Cylon tyranny, the last Battlestar, Galactica,
leads
I am working on a piano part. I want to optimize the whole part. This
has never been a problem but now it won't work. I checked to make sure
that nothing was hidden and that there were no staff styles being used.
No luck.
I am using Mac Finale 2003a. What have I missed?
Thanks in advance:
Bob Flo
You can do what you want either with group names or with staff styles. Assuming you
predominately have separate staves, you might do it as follows
Set your staff names to
Full: "Soprano" Abbr: "S."
Full: "Alto" Abbr: "A."
Full: "Tenor" Abbr: "T."
Full: "Bass" Abbr: "B."
Create two staff styles.
I am using Windows 2003. I am engraving a piece right now that is
presenting a problem I've never faced before. On the first two pages I am
scoring the vocal parts (SATB) in open score. On the first system of the
piece I want the full staff name for SOPRANO, ALTO, TENOR & BASS. On the
next seve
On 25.02.2003 21:06 Uhr, David H. Bailey wrote
> You can't open Finale2003 files in 97, so you couldn't use 2003 for your
> note-entry work and then use 97 for other work. Unless the
> cut-and-paste thing works between versions. I'm not even sure that you
> could have both versions open and cut
You can't open Finale2003 files in 97, so you couldn't use 2003 for your
note-entry work and then use 97 for other work. Unless the
cut-and-paste thing works between versions. I'm not even sure that you
could have both versions open and cut and paste from 2003 into 97 --
perhaps somebody who
On 25.02.2003 17:12 Uhr, Rick & Kathy Neiman wrote
> Both programs can exist on the same disk. I had 98 and 2k1d on the same hard
> disk with Win98SE without problems. Make sure you store (install) each in
> separate folders, i.e. Fin 97 in a Folder entitled "Finale 97" and 2k3 in
> "Finale 2003
On 25.02.2003 16:28 Uhr, Cecil Rigby wrote
> Hi all--
>
> I appreciate the suggestions and comments received on my XP OS/Finale 97c
> compatibility issue. The latest poster (David Bailey) suggests I simply
> upgrade to 2003 on the XP and have 97c resident. This is certainly less
> work than creat
On 24 Feb 2003 at 18:25, Cecil Rigby wrote:
> does this mean I could perhaps delete the Finmid32. dll and use the
> Finmid16.dll instead? This would be most excellent. Tell me it's so!!
Nope, that won't accomplish anything.
Both DLLs are used by the 32-bit WinFin97, but the problem with NT-
base
On 25 Feb 2003 at 10:28, Cecil Rigby wrote:
> For inquiring minds, if this were my personal choice I'd have upgraded a
> long time ago, but one very active client insists on using the older
> version.
Then charge this customer a premium for the costs you incur in order
to continue to support Win
Both programs can exist on the same disk. I had 98 and 2k1d on the
same hard disk with Win98SE without problems. Make sure you store
(install) each in separate folders, i.e. Fin 97 in a Folder entitled
"Finale 97" and 2k3 in "Finale 2003". I never
had the occasion to have both open at the same
On 25.02.2003 15:43 Uhr, Richard Yates wrote
> I was going to post this as a question, but then found a solution. I had not
> used this feature before and perhaps others would like to hear of it:
>
> I had a score on which I had run the indispensable Patterson Beams plugin
> and then made further
Hi all--
I appreciate the suggestions and comments received on my XP OS/Finale 97c
compatibility issue. The latest poster (David Bailey) suggests I simply
upgrade to 2003 on the XP and have 97c resident. This is certainly less
work than creating a new partition. brilliant!
I'm guessing
On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 09:43 AM, Richard Yates wrote:
I was going to post this as a question, but then found a solution. I
had not
used this feature before and perhaps others would like to hear of it:
I had a score on which I had run the indispensable Patterson Beams
plugin
and then
On 25 Feb 2003, Richard Yates wrote:
>
> I ... needed to reverse all of the [beam]
> adjustments. I found that in the MassEdit
> menu, Copy
An alternative method is to use my Mass Copy plugin. Select the area where you want to
remove the adjustments, open Mass Copy, select the items you want to
I was going to post this as a question, but then found a solution. I had not
used this feature before and perhaps others would like to hear of it:
I had a score on which I had run the indispensable Patterson Beams plugin
and then made further beam adjustments. I then had to use this score for
anot
Actually, my advice would be to avoid all that rigmarole and simply
upgrade to Finale2003! You can still keep Finale97c on your machine,
but if you upgrade, you should be able to use the new version to play
your files.
Cecil Rigby wrote:
Well, ain't that a kicker...
So, then,
24 matches
Mail list logo
