My vote is for flute, mezzo, piano- it just seems *right* to me.
your mileage may vary!
As to range, a good mezzo can go from g-g# below mid C up to around an A or
Bb above C'. Again, YMMV.
Cecil Rigby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Taris L Flashpaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Finale] Sc
Hi all:
Looking to tap the collective wisdom on a matter of score order for a
chamber work that I'm currently undertaking. The orchestration calls for
flute, piano and mezzo-soprano. The Setup wiz would put it in that order,
but my mind is telling me that it should be
Flute
Mezzo-Soprano
Piano
This would be helpful to me (and others) with regard to the multiple
conversions that Finale files are often submitted to (pdf, ps, gif,
resizing, etc). Sometimes a small change in staff size puts the line
thickness below a threshold at which a line shoes clearly in another format.
Andrew's suggest
David W. Fenton wrote:
...
Marius Flothius
...
professor Marius Flothuis
(like float house)
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Le 04/09/03 17:39, "Robert Patterson Finale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit:
> Several years ago, when Randy Stokes was still a regular contributor to this
> list, he floated the idea of fixed-width lines. I've wanted this for years for
> exactly the same reasons Andrew does. At the time the idea was
Several years ago, when Randy Stokes was still a regular contributor to this list, he
floated the idea of fixed-width lines. I've wanted this for years for exactly the same
reasons Andrew does. At the time the idea was roundly derided as a waste of time by
almost all other list members.
Oh well
I realize that this is an awkward time in Finale's development cycle
to be making a feature request, but I need to do this while it is on
my mind.
In a recent exchange on the Finale online mailing list, the issue of
small staff sizes (for pocket scores, large orchestras, etc.) came
up. One t
Johannes wrote:
> > However, I don't really see Bärenreiter as a publisher that only has
> > one font or look. I don't think they are particularly fixed in their
> > look. There isn't really any particular font they stick with.
to which David responded
> Indeed. Bärenreiter has had multiple loo
On 4 Sep 2003 at 9:19, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> However, I don't really see Bärenreiter as a publisher that only has
> one font or look. I don't think they are particularly fixed in their
> look. There isn't really any particular font they stick with.
Indeed. Bärenreiter has had multiple looks e
That won't put cautionary key and time signatures at the end of any
measure - will just force them to show at the start of a measure.
The only way I know to do what Andrew is asking is to insert the slim
empty measure just to hold the requisite time/key signatures.
Dan Rupert wrote:
Hi Andre
> From: Andrew Stiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> OK, how do I (in FinMac 2K2) put a cautionary key and time change
> into a measure when the following measure does not in fact change
> time or key? This comes up because a first ending requires these
> cautions (the measure to wh. it jumps has the ne
Andrew Stiller Writes:
OK, how do I (in FinMac 2K2) put a cautionary key and time change
into a measure when the following measure does not in fact change
time or key? This comes up because a first ending requires these
cautions (the measure to wh. it jumps has the new key and time), but
the 2
Hi Andrew:
I can't remember specifically but I think this works in 2K2:
Measure attributes\key signature, & select 'always show' from the
drop down list.
On Behalf Of Andrew Stiller
Subject: [Finale] repeats
OK, how do I (in FinMac 2K2) put a cautionary key and time change
into a me
OK, how do I (in FinMac 2K2) put a cautionary key and time change
into a measure when the following measure does not in fact change
time or key? This comes up because a first ending requires these
cautions (the measure to wh. it jumps has the new key and time), but
the 2nd ending is unaffected.
Title: Re: [Finale] Finale 2003 Win
At 11:20 AM +0200 9/04/03, mnoia wrote:
Question:
I've switched from 2002 to 2003 and find the same
problem in
transposition tool:
why after
having set a transposition option (let's say Bb add two sharps) I see
the score at the same pitch?
In the
manual I can o
Under the Options menu, UNcheck the Display in Concert Pitch setting.
mnoia wrote:
Question: I've switched from 2002 to 2003 and find the same
problem in transposition tool:
why after having set a transposition option (let's say Bb add two
sharps) I see the score at the same pitch?
In the manu
Question: I've switched from 2002 to 2003 and find
the same
problem in transposition tool:
why after having set a transposition option (let's
say Bb add two sharps) I see the score at the same pitch?
In the manual I can only read "while you're woking
on the score, you can see it both in trans
Hi,
Who says that 'a blues in D' always means a mixolydian blues?
Did you ever hear/play an archaic blues, a bird blues, a 'minor blues',
coltrane blues or a blues from the contemporary jazz players?
If it's a minor blues I would use the normal minor key signature (mr.
P.C.-like).
If it's a bird
On 04.09.2003 0:19 Uhr, Mario Aschauer wrote
> Dear fellow listers,
>
> I have liked Bärenreiter's music-output for a very long time. It has
> always inspired my own work. I know they use "Score" for their
> engraving, but I wonder what font they might use - is it on of the
> standard-fonts and i
19 matches
Mail list logo
