In a message dated 12/30/03 9:46:12 PM, JohnBlane writes:
<< In a message dated 12/30/03 7:02:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Thanks Aaron, but it leaves me wondering why the basic Finale doesn't do
these things.
And while I am totally in awe of folks like Tobias and Robert Patterson who
At 1:03 PM +1100 12/30/03, helgesen wrote:
Situation- 1st and 2nd flute parts, lots of unison and some complex divisi.
Therefore done as
seperate parts, flute 1 and flute 2.
Explode music does the divisi fine, but only puts unison line in top part. I
Have looked at dialogue box carefully, but can f
At 8:13 PM -0600 12/30/03, Randolph Peters wrote:
Well, you can wait for MakeMusic to add features and fix bugs which
may never happen, or you can get a very responsive turnaround with
Robert and Tobias. I've emailed them both about small bugs in their
plugins in the past and have gotten fixes s
At 10:06 PM 12/30/2003, David H. Bailey wrote:
>They did NOT, however, lower the price of Finale to compensate for us
>having to spend extra to get those features which should be part of the
>program, now, did they?
As my earlier post indicated, I have mixed feelings about this. I don't
think the
So what's your point? Don't buy these plugins because that takes
pressure off the company?
Not very pragmatic from where I'm sitting. I don't see why we can't
have it both ways -- give MakeMusic feedback and strong complaints
when necessary, AND use plugins that do the job better. If Finale
st
Which removed a huge financial burden and crush of user-complaints.
Ain't it great when a developer off-loads development tasks and then
makes us glad?!?
Reminds me a lot of Tom Sawyer and that danged picket fence!
They did NOT, however, lower the price of Finale to compensate for us
having to
At 11:44 AM +1100 12/31/03, helgesen wrote:
Thanks Aaron, but it leaves me wondering why the basic Finale doesn't do
these things.
And while I am totally in awe of folks like Tobias and Robert Patterson who
create these brilliant plug ins, why should they need to?- obviously because
of deficiency i
Finale has admitted there is a problem with this. They don't appear to
be in any haste to try to remedy it (I hope this isn't a sign they are
going to let Finale go down the tubes) and they suggest using human
playback rather than executable shapes.
You can't create new shapes and save them, e
> From: "helgesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [...] obviously because of deficiency in the basic Finale program.[...]
Hopefully you meant *a* deficiency. A broad blanket of deficiency isn't
warranted over this in my view. But that being said, I agree that it's a
deficiency in that feature. I have run
At 07:44 PM 12/30/2003, helgesen wrote:
>Thanks Aaron, but it leaves me wondering why the basic Finale doesn't do
>these things.
>And while I am totally in awe of folks like Tobias and Robert Patterson who
>create these brilliant plug ins, why should they need to?- obviously because
>of deficiency
Thanks Aaron, but it leaves me wondering why the basic Finale doesn't do
these things.
And while I am totally in awe of folks like Tobias and Robert Patterson who
create these brilliant plug ins, why should they need to?- obviously because
of deficiency in the basic Finale program.
And while I do n
At 01:02 AM 12/30/2003, helgesen wrote:
>Yeah, looks good- but from whence does one get TG and at what cost!
>The link given certainly seems to be what I'm after, but there's no
>'download here' button.
Just look at the main site -- www.tgtools.com
Licenses cost between $50 and $100, depending on
Dear Keith,
I wish I had bought TGTools since appeared. Always I had had the same
problem that you describe. All is solved with TGTools.
The link is http://www.tgtools.com/index-en.htm
Price I think is 99 bucks, a bargain considering what saves...
Saludos, Javier (right in the antipodes)
> Yeah
13 matches
Mail list logo
