Hello,
I'm trying to beam a note as single 16th note with a beam as it would be if
extended over a rest, but it's the last note in 3/8 time with other rests
before it, and I don't want it beamed within the previous group. In the
Finale options (2003), I can just find the Extend Beams Over Rest
You want it beamed over the barline into the next measure?
Liudas
- Original Message -
From: Giovanni Andreani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Finale Groups [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 12:29 PM
Subject: [Finale] Beaming 16th Notes
Hello,
I'm trying to beam a note as
Giovanni Andreani wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to beam a note as single 16th note with a beam as it would be if
extended over a rest, but it's the last note in 3/8 time with other rests
before it, and I don't want it beamed within the previous group. In the
Finale options (2003), I can just find the
If I understand your directions correctly, you can do the following:
Simple entry;
Deselect check for extra notes;
Put the notes in the bar as required, and add an extra 16th note beside
the one you need the beaming on;
Beam those two notes with Speedy entry (and choose ignore the
Giovanni Andreani wrote:
If I understand your directions correctly, you can do the following:
Simple entry;
Deselect check for extra notes;
Put the notes in the bar as required, and add an extra 16th note beside
the one you need the beaming on;
Beam those two notes with Speedy entry (and
David W. Fenton wrote
It's rounded in the *wrong* direction -- it's concave, when it should
be convex.
At least, that's my opinion in regard to replicating the shape of the
wedge that I see in late 18th- and early 19th-century editions (which
is what I want to do).
I have seen the
On 20 Jan 2004 at 11:26, Andrew Stiller wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote
It's rounded in the *wrong* direction -- it's concave, when it
should be convex.
At least, that's my opinion in regard to replicating the shape of
the wedge that I see in late 18th- and early 19th-century
I'm editing an early 19th Century concerted choral work, and about
midway thru the piece there is a change of tempo on the 4th beat of a
measure (quarter note on beat one, quarter rest on beat two, quarter
rest of beat three with a fermata, followed by a thin double bar, then a
quarter note on
On 20.01.2004 21:59 Uhr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Is there some command in Finale Mac 3k that will allow me to do this, or
do I have to create two separate measures out of the one in 4/4 time and
then hide the time signature in the second measure of 1/4?
This is the way to do it in Finale.
The best way is to make the two measures, making a 3/4 measure and a 1/4
measure and hiding both time signatures.
You'll have to adjust your measure numbers, if you're using them.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm editing an early 19th Century concerted choral work, and about
midway thru the
Hoping someone can help me out with my current brain short-circuit...
In the middle of a piece of music, let's say there are a few bars which the
oboe can play or can leave out, at the conductor's discretion. So those
bars are marked 'ad lib.' Immediately following are bars which the oboe
must
Martin wrote:
I'm editing an early 19th Century concerted choral work, and about
midway thru the piece there is a change of tempo on the 4th beat of a
measure (quarter note on beat one, quarter rest on beat two, quarter
rest of beat three with a fermata, followed by a thin double bar, then
a
I always thought that was what obbligato meant (obligated to be played.)
A quick glance in my New Harvard Dictionary confirms it -- Obbligato is
the opposite of ad libitum.
Aaron Sherber wrote:
Hoping someone can help me out with my current brain short-circuit...
In the middle of a piece of
On Jan 20, 2004, at 12:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some command in Finale Mac 3k that will allow me to do this,
or do I have to create two separate measures out of the one in 4/4
time and then hide the time signature in the second measure of 1/4?
That's how I do it -- assuming that
Aaron Sherber wrote:
Hoping someone can help me out with my current brain short-circuit...
In the middle of a piece of music, let's say there are a few bars which
the oboe can play or can leave out, at the conductor's discretion. So
those bars are marked 'ad lib.' Immediately following are
Thinking about it ... is 'ad lib' the right term for a few bars that can be
missed out? I'm more used to seeing 'ad lib' in the context of cadenzas or
sections where the 'soloist' is in control of the tempo/interpretation.
Maybe the bars in question should be indicated with brackets and marked as
On 20.01.2004 23:37 Uhr, Noel Stoutenburg wrote
However, if measure numbers matter, and I don't need the target, I have
also used the shape designer to create a shape expression which looks
just like a double bar line, and use that, instead.
But if you are concerned about correct spacing this
While ad.lib. often means the performer is in control of tempo/in,
strictly speaking it means the section can be taken or not, at the
pleasure of the performer. At least that's how it is defined in the New
Harvard Dictionary of Music.
Michael Withers wrote:
Thinking about it ... is 'ad lib'
I've seen plenty of 'ad lib' passages where the intended result was
basically a cadenza. A dictionary is unlikely to keep up with the
interpretation of such instructions.
David H. Bailey wrote:
While ad.lib. often means the performer is in control of tempo/in,
strictly speaking it means
Below would be my choice as well. As for the objection that it can't be used
if correct spacing were an issue, I ask why. Spacing is adjustable to make
room for this, using the beat chart for one thing.
Not even the shape designer would be absolutely needed. Select the line tool
from the smart
Why not simply define a custom line starting with ad lib. Followed by - - -
- - and a down hook -| and draw that around the measures you need to be
marked.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Owain Sutton
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004
For all Windows users:
Try Fineprint (www.fineprint.com)- it's the best printing apprentice around
Wonderful bookletprinting option with preview.
Amazing options also in conjunction with pdfFactory (same company)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
At 01:50 AM 1/21/04 +0100, Jörg Peltzer wrote:
Why not simply define a custom line starting with ad lib. Followed by - - -
- - and a down hook -| and draw that around the measures you need to be
marked.
When I've needed extra barlines, I've used one of these:
1. Use them as expressions. The
On Jan 20, 2004, at 4:37 PM, Richard Huggins wrote:
Below would be my choice as well. As for the objection that it can't
be used
if correct spacing were an issue, I ask why. Spacing is adjustable to
make
room for this, using the beat chart for one thing.
For another, I should think it wouldn't
From a practical standpoint, I would suggest that the ad lib bars be
followed simply by a marking of PLAY or (play) or (always play).
Raymond Horton
Bass Trombonist
Louisville Orchestra
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Sherber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
The Oxford Companion to Music confirms David's comments re- ad libitum and
obbligato, giving examples of the 'confusion' and stating - rather smugly, I
thought- a clear case of Lucus a non lucendo. Translation please?
FWIW my solution to what to put in parts and score would be optional and
play
Hello - I was wondering if any of you have solved these problems.
I am doing a song in Eb major with chords - wanting to set it up for capo on
the 3rd fret for guitar. I am running into 2 problems. (FinWin2k4)
1. It looks like I need to go through each chord and double-click on it to
get the
27 matches
Mail list logo
