FWIW... I tried out iKey, and I found almost no difference between it
and QuicKeys X2 when running OSX 10.2.8.
Of course, I'm biased since I already bought QKX2.
--
Brad Beyenhof
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mar 11, 2004, at 12:24 AM, Neal Schermerhorn wrote:
As simple as that. I swear I read through the whole manual for this.
I found it by searching the chord tool pdf for enharmonic
Best Regards,
Steve Gibons
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Brad,
Your system is probably a lot faster than mine. I'm on Panther, too --
don't know if that makes a difference.
Stuff like just picking which application you want to create a menu
shortcut in in QuicKeys is *interminably* slow on my machine (542 MHz
G4 upgrade card). And QuicKeys
Hi all,
Has anyone had any success getting this to work? 12x18 is not
officially supported by this printer -- the official max is 12x17. You
are also required to program the bypass tray size on the printer
itself, so that's the largest paper size it will accept -- 12x17.
However, the
On 11.03.2004 21:15 Uhr, Darcy James Argue wrote
One thing that I haven't tried yet, but that ought to work, would be to
print the left-side pages of a 9x12 2-up, then turn the printer around
and print the right-side pages.
Interesting concept... (Do you also turn your house to change a
Hi all:
I have an old file (MacFin97) that has a parenthesis on almost every
accidental. How can I get rid of them all at once?
I never use them.
Thanks:
Bob Florence
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
Has anyone else noticed that part extraction under WinFin2004b takes
noticeably longer than under previous versions? I didn't do any extraction
under 2004 or 2004a, so I'm comparing it here to 2003 and previous. I'm
extracting parts from a 400 measure work, and it seems that the first
Hurray! Today Finale 2004 finally arrived. Great program, lots of new
things to try out.
But: after I've finished my current project though.
So I opened one of the files I'm currently working on, tried to run JW
Space Systems, which I depend heavily on for this project, and Finale
went into a
On Thursday, March 11, 2004, at 03:34 PM, Barbara Touburg wrote:
Hurray! Today Finale 2004 finally arrived. Great program, lots of new
things to try out.
But: after I've finished my current project though.
So I opened one of the files I'm currently working on, tried to run JW
Space Systems,
At 06:34 PM 3/11/2004, Barbara Touburg wrote:
So I opened one of the files I'm currently working on, tried to run JW
Space Systems, which I depend heavily on for this project, and Finale
went into a loop.
Oh, that's really bad news. I'd already been bracing myself for working
without Forza,
On 11 Mar 2004, at 05:31 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 11.03.2004 21:15 Uhr, Darcy James Argue wrote
One thing that I haven't tried yet, but that ought to work, would be
to
print the left-side pages of a 9x12 2-up, then turn the printer around
and print the right-side pages.
Interesting
Hi Bob,
I don't think there *is* a way, actually. I had the same problem with
the Cautionary Accidentals plugin putting parentheses on accidentals
even when I told it not to, and I couldn't find any way of getting rid
of them other than doing it all by hand.
You could try using the Canonic
I would assume Jari's been really busy. I did email him, encouraging
him to update his plugins for FinMac2004 and mentioning that I think
lots of us would gladly pay for them if he decides he needs to start
charging for the plugin set. Perhaps if he's abandoned them, he would
be willing to
On Thursday, March 11, 2004, at 04:11 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
In the meanwhile, when Fin2004 for OS 9 is finally released, we ought
to be able to open Fin2004 files in Classic and run the existing JW
plugins -- right?
I doubt it. I have tried to run Carbonized programs from Classic, but
But the JW plugins *aren't* Carbonized. There is no problem running
any of the JW plugins in Classic mode for Finale 2002 or 2003.
Presumably, when Finale 2004 for OS 9 is released, we will be able to
run it in Classic and the non-Carbonized plugins will run just fine.
Or did you mean you
I don't have my Mac in front of me (I can't remember if this option exists on the mac
without looking it up), but can you check Ignore Margins for N-up Printing In the
print dialog?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Darcy James Argue
Sent:
On 11 Mar 2004, at 10:14 PM, Fisher, Allen wrote:
I don't have my Mac in front of me (I can't remember if this option
exists on the mac without looking it up), but can you check Ignore
Margins for N-up Printing In the print dialog?
Hi Allen,
Yes you can. But it doesn't make any difference.
I haven't tried it yet. I was waiting to see if you had success.
BF
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Darcy James Argue
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Finale] 12x18 printing on Ricoh AP2610
Hi
On 12.03.2004 1:11 Uhr, Darcy James Argue wrote
I would assume Jari's been really busy. I did email him, encouraging
him to update his plugins for FinMac2004 and mentioning that I think
lots of us would gladly pay for them if he decides he needs to start
charging for the plugin set. Perhaps
Yes, I have noticed this, too.
Liudas
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Sherber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 12:58 AM
Subject: [Finale] WinFin2004b part extraction slowness
Hi all,
Has anyone else noticed that part extraction under WinFin2004b
On 12 Mar 2004, at 02:32 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
I doubt it. For two reasons: I don't think carbonized apps even open in
classic, at least some don't
We've been over this already. I expect that when Finale 2004 for OS 9
is released, it will be as a separate application from Finale 2004 for
21 matches
Mail list logo
