On 17.03.2004 1:51 Uhr, David W. Fenton wrote
> Well, you've got to have something in the blank notation layer that
> is going to take up a lot of space, like the written-out notes for a
> trill. That's where I'm getting all the problems, with ornaments for
> playback.
David,
do you really need
Hi all,
The point is that for Finale there's only one barline: the one to the
right.
Only the first measure in a system has a 'left' barline also. I think
this may be the cause of some confusion.
Klaas de Jong.
Op 16-mrt-04 om 21:04 heeft John Howell het volgende geschreven:
At 11:23 AM +1100 3
On 16 Mar 2004, at 05:10 PM, Phil Daley wrote:
At 3/16/2004 01:57 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
>You never zoom past 100%?
Why would I? Everything is readable at that point.
As David said, fine-tuning of positioning of *anything* in Finale --
slurs, lyrics, articulations, expressions, etc. --
At 09:19 PM 3/16/2004, Harold Owen wrote:
>I've found that it's helpful to create new articulations for cross-staff
>notes. In the Articulation dialog box use "Duplicate" then "Edit" and set
>manual positioning. Then the new articulations will stay put.
This is true, but it shouldn't be necessary.
At 7:51 PM -0500 3/16/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 16 Mar 2004 at 19:36, Rich Caldwell wrote:
I'm not sure why you used a blank notation staff style in the first
place (maybe there weren't as many layer options in '97 or I'm missing
a purpose for it here), . . .
There wasn't a spacing problem
Title: Re: [Finale] Cross staff notes and
artics
Aaron Sherber writes:
Hi all,
WinFin2004b
I have a piano staff with notes entered in the treble staff and some
of them dragged down to the bass staff. I find I am unable to get
articulations positioned correctly on the cross-staff notes -- even
On 16 Mar 2004 at 20:32, Williams, Jim wrote:
> Pardon me; I've come into the middle of this. Have you considered...
>
> Options=>Document Options=>Layers=>"This layer affects music spacing"
> for the "offending" layer should be UNCHECKED. Is it?
If that worked on a measure-by-measure basis, tha
Pardon me; I've come into the middle of this. Have you considered...
Options=>Document Options=>Layers=>"This layer affects music spacing" for the
"offending" layer should be UNCHECKED. Is it?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: David W. Fenton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:15 PM 3/16/2004, Richard Huggins wrote:
>When you say "even when I drag them" do you mean the articulations or the
>notes? Are you entering the articulations when the notes are in their
>original staff (before using cross staff)?
I mean dragging the articulations, and it doesn't matter if I e
I can't speak to version 4 stuff, but it works pretty well for me in 2k2.
When you say "even when I drag them" do you mean the articulations or the
notes? Are you entering the articulations when the notes are in their
original staff (before using cross staff)?
In case it helps if working on the ar
On 16 Mar 2004 at 19:36, Rich Caldwell wrote:
> I'm not sure why you used a blank notation staff style in the first
> place (maybe there weren't as many layer options in '97 or I'm missing
> a purpose for it here), . . .
There wasn't a spacing problem in WinFin97.
> . . . but even by using your
David,
I'm not sure why you used a blank notation staff style in the first
place (maybe there weren't as many layer options in '97 or I'm
missing a purpose for it here), but even by using your method I
couldn't duplicate the problem (MacFin2k4). However, I have a
suggestion that might work if
On 16 Mar 2004 at 17:17, Phil Daley wrote:
> my 22 inch monitor
This might have something to do with your preference for not
maximizing. I had no idea we were dealing with someone using a
monitor of a size that is so far out of the ordinary.
--
David W. Fentonhttp://ww
On 16 Mar 2004 at 17:10, Phil Daley wrote:
> At 3/16/2004 01:57 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
>
> >You never zoom past 100%?
>
> Why would I? Everything is readable at that point.
Don't you ever do any find positioning? I believe that Coda has told
us that to get absolutely accurate positioni
Hi all,
WinFin2004b
I have a piano staff with notes entered in the treble staff and some of
them dragged down to the bass staff. I find I am unable to get
articulations positioned correctly on the cross-staff notes -- even when I
drag them to where I want them, they bounce to some completely d
Barbara Touburg wrote (re: Jari):
Thanks for gossipping. I assume the child is born by now? Couldn't we
send him our congratulations and ask him to return to the list and/or to
his plugins?
Yes, a daughter (in early October). I haven't heard from Jari in a while, but why not write him at [EMAI
At 3/16/2004 01:57 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
>You never zoom past 100%?
Why would I? Everything is readable at that point.
>Again, I have a feeling you might be in the minority.
I don't think I ever said I wasn't.
>> I can't image what possible purpose there would be in maximizing a
>> scr
At 3/16/2004 02:06 PM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
>In applications I use often, I kill as many icons as I can & replace them
>with abbreviated text, and make the remaining icons as small as I can. I
>want every pixel to be workspace, not borders & designs & trinkets &
>widgets & other droppings o
I've never bothered with staff styles meself and, you are moving swiftly
beyond my FinMAC 2002 system 9 knowledge, so I can't much help you here.
You can hear I'm even having trouble getting that out. I must say I have
noticed allot of non-solvable problems cropping up where none existed afor
On 16 Mar 2004 at 13:31, Mark D Lew wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2004, at 10:33 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>
> > I posted yesterday about my problems with spacing when using blank
> > notation, and have received no answers.
> >
> > Does no one really have no ideas or suggestions?
>
> I explored the quest
Erg, they why spend all this time on these little frill things.
Something like this would make my life a LOT easier.
John Howell wrote:
At 3:10 PM -0500 3/15/04, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Eric,
The two are not mutually exclusive. I believe some linkage between
score and parts is event
At 3:10 PM -0500 3/15/04, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Eric,
The two are not mutually exclusive. I believe some linkage between
score and parts is eventually coming, but I'm pretty sure it's a
difficult problem to solve and is probably several years off, still.
In the meanwhile, tabs would at leas
I sometimes manage to get myself out of this by fiddling around.
Last night it happened, and I think I remember what I did:
Click on the Finder to leave Finale. Then choose Finale in the dock
to force it to the front, and immediately after (or while) doing that
press the ESC key.
That cancell
I agree with those who say that starting a single-staff system with a barline is
incorrect. But Finale can do it either way. It's in the barline options in doc
options, but I don't remember the exact verbiage. Basically the option tells Finale
whether to draw the left line on single-staff system
Title: Re: [Finale] Cross Staff Accidental
Question
Rob Deemer writes:
Finalefolk,
I have a friend who has an interesting dilemma. He's got a piano part
which has
cross-staffing galore and he's having problems with accidentals being
hidden or forced
out where he'd rather them not be. For exampl
At 11:23 AM +1100 3/14/04, Rocky Road wrote:
I have a single treble clef stave and and each line starts open
ended. I have gone into the measure attributes and chosen "normal"
for the left barline, but it doesn't show.
How can I get each stave to start with a barline on the left (to the
left of
At 2:06 PM -0500 3/16/04, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
If I could have a screen the size of my desk, it
still wouldn't be enough. Every application is always maximized if it
allows that (and these "designy" applications with fixed borders -- arrgh!).
Yeah! I hear ya!
I
want every pixel to be work
I can hardly believe it!
The latest update to OS X (10.3.3) fixes USB printing for the Ricoh
AP2610!
No more cumbersome plugging and unplugging the USB cable between print
jobs! Everything works the way it's supposed to work!
(And to think I was *this* close to spending over $300 on the wirel
On 16 Mar 2004 at 14:10, gj.berg wrote:
> David W. Fenton wrote:
>
> >I just upgraded an older file (I think it began life as 3.52, was
> >converted to WinFin97, now into WinFin2K3), and I'm having fits with
> >the spacing for any measure with blank notation in layer 1 and notes
> >in layer 4 (th
One suggestion is turn on active layer only - go to 4 then do spacing
jerry
David W. Fenton wrote:
I just upgraded an older file (I think it began life as 3.52, was
converted to WinFin97, now into WinFin2K3), and I'm having fits with
the spacing for any measure with blank notation in layer 1 a
At 01:49 PM 3/16/04 -0500, Phil Daley wrote:
>I can't imagine needing to see more than a whole page at once, in 100% page
>view, that would take up about a half a screen.
>I can't image what possible purpose there would be in maximizing a scroll
>view. Whole width, obviously, but maximized would
You possibly already know that to *Finale* all those notes are in the same
stave. That's why it is not repeating the accidental. I think he'll have to
use the asterisk key on each occurance to get the accidental to appear. I
can't find any way to alter Finale's behaviour as regards repeating
accide
On 16 Mar 2004, at 01:49 PM, Phil Daley wrote:
I can't imagine needing to see more than a whole page at once, in 100%
page view, that would take up about a half a screen.
[boggle]
You never zoom past 100%?
Again, I have a feeling you might be in the minority.
I can't image what possible purpos
At 3/16/2004 01:35 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
>On 16 Mar 2004, at 12:53 PM, Phil Daley wrote:
>
>> "Maximizing" an application is a totally different process, something
>> I would never ever do. It would then take up the whole screen. I
>> cannot ever imagine a circumstance when this would be
On 16 Mar 2004, at 12:53 PM, Phil Daley wrote:
"Maximizing" an application is a totally different process, something
I would never ever do. It would then take up the whole screen. I
cannot ever imagine a circumstance when this would be something I
would want to do.
You cannot *imagine*? You
I posted yesterday about my problems with spacing when using blank
notation, and have received no answers.
Does no one really have no ideas or suggestions?
Or have I done something to deserve being shunned? :)
--
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton
On 16 Mar 2004 at 12:53, Phil Daley wrote:
> At 3/16/2004 12:37 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
>
> >Yes, but in Finale, the Zoom ("maximize") button is effectively the
> >same as the Maximize button in Windows. In MacFinale, clicking the
> >Zoom button *always* causes the top left corner of the
Thanks Brad, but fortunately a reboot straightened it all out. I really
need to clean up my computer, I think - shiver.
Brad Beyenhof wrote:
Barbara:
I have found that you have to include at least part of the staff when
applying the articulations this way. For instance, if your notes are
on
Finalefolk,
I have a friend who has an interesting dilemma. He's got a piano part which has
cross-staffing galore and he's having problems with accidentals being hidden or forced
out where he'd rather them not be. For example, he'll have an Eb on beat one in the top
staff, then a similar note on b
At 3/16/2004 12:37 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
>Yes, but in Finale, the Zoom ("maximize") button is effectively the
>same as the Maximize button in Windows. In MacFinale, clicking the
>Zoom button *always* causes the top left corner of the window to align
>itself to the top left corner of the sc
On Tuesday, March 16, 2004, at 09:39 AM, Barbara Touburg wrote:
Maybe it's my configuration again, but in the Articulations tool,
pressing a metatool key and dragging over notes does not apply
articulations!
Barbara:
I have found that you have to include at least part of the staff when
applyi
Title: Re: [Finale] Feature request: stack windows instead of tiling
Mac users already know this, but for clarification I would point out that in pre-OSX, using Option-Click on the zoom button (otherwise called maxmimizing) does, in fact, cause the window to open to the full height and width of
On 16 Mar 2004, at 05:59 AM, Dennis W. Manasco wrote:
At 3:43 pm -0500 3/15/04, Phil Daley wrote:
In a Windows app, it is not possible to have cascaded windows and
maximized windows at the same time.
As soon as you maximize one cascaded window, all the rest are
automatically maximized, too.
Maybe it's my configuration again, but in the Articulations tool,
pressing a metatool key and dragging over notes does not apply
articulations!
Barbara
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Dear Harold,
Please send me your Finale 2004 Tutorial files for Windows.
Thank you,
Byron DeFries
Albuquerque, NMHarold Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Wisdom,In System 10.3 for Mac, when you save a Finale file as a PDF file, it uses Preview, and the file will open in Preview. Those usin
Thanks for gossipping. I assume the child is born by now? Couldn't we
send him our congratulations and ask him to return to the list and/or to
his plugins?
Barbara
Chuck Israels wrote:
Jari gossip. I was in Gothenberg in the Fall and had the good fortune
of spending a nice leisurely breakfast
At 3:43 pm -0500 3/15/04, Phil Daley wrote:
In a Windows app, it is not possible to have cascaded windows and
maximized windows at the same time.
As soon as you maximize one cascaded window, all the rest are
automatically maximized, too.
Aside Brad's comments, there is a subtle cultural diffe
47 matches
Mail list logo
