On Thu, 18 July 2002, "David W. Fenton" wrote
>
> In any event, I think that having the entire alphanumeric keyboard
> available to you is quite enough metatools.
Sez you, who is currently laboring in the Fin97 dark ages unable even to access
(as I recall) all the numerics. The comment reflec
On 18.07.2002 18:19 Uhr, David W. Fenton wrote
> That's the tip of the iceberg, Johannes, and why I was having some
> difficulty understanding Robert's whole point in the first place.
>
> There is no hidden goldmine of unused keystroke combinations lurking in
> ASCII, waiting to be exploited for
On 18.07.2002 18:19 Uhr, David W. Fenton wrote
> You're left with using multiple shift keys and checking scan codes and
> shift masks (because there's no ASCII mapping for those multiple shift
> key combinations), and translating the whole thing for various
> international keyboard maps. Johannes
On 17 Jul 2002, at 18:50, Robert Patterson wrote:
> On Wed, 17 July 2002, "David W. Fenton" wrote
>
> > Ctrl-a has an ASCII code? What exactly is its ASCII code?
>
> I refuse to bore the list with further discussion of ascii codes. My
> recollection is that all the ctrl-letter combos have well-
On 18 Jul 2002, at 13:37, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> On 18.07.2002 12:35 Uhr, David H. Bailey wrote
>
> > That's fine for ctrl-A, but he did also ask for the ascii codes for
> > ctrl-a, which ISN'T defined. And it seems that ctrl-a is already
> > system-defined so as not to be useable for indivi
On 18 Jul 2002, at 0:13, Philip Aker wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 17, 2002, at 06:33 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>
> > Please, give me a reference somewhere on the web for the ASCII
> > codes for Ctrl-a->z and Ctrl-A->Z. Ctrl-0->9 is optional.
>
> > And I mean *ASCII* codes, not ANSI or keyboar
On my Win98 system, opening the window you suggest, everytime I enter
ctrl-[letter] I get a warning ding from the computer and nothing
happens. I can't use the letter keys with ANY altering key. As a
matter of fact, FinWin on my system won't allow the use of keystrokes to
navigate around thi
> On 18.07.2002 12:35 Uhr, David H. Bailey wrote
>
> > That's fine for ctrl-A, but he did also ask for the ascii codes for
> > ctrl-a,
There is no diff. betw. ctrl-a and ctrl-A, any more than there is a diff betw.
shift-a and shift-A.
Ctrl-a (on any computer system I've ever tried it on) maps t
On 18.07.2002 12:35 Uhr, David H. Bailey wrote
> That's fine for ctrl-A, but he did also ask for the ascii codes for
> ctrl-a, which ISN'T defined. And it seems that ctrl-a is already
> system-defined so as not to be useable for individual program use -- on
> Windows machines it means "select al
That's fine for ctrl-A, but he did also ask for the ascii codes for
ctrl-a, which ISN'T defined. And it seems that ctrl-a is already
system-defined so as not to be useable for individual program use -- on
Windows machines it means "select all."
Philip Aker wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 17, 200
On Wednesday, July 17, 2002, at 06:33 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
> Please, give me a reference somewhere on the web for the ASCII
> codes for Ctrl-a->z and Ctrl-A->Z. Ctrl-0->9 is optional.
> And I mean *ASCII* codes, not ANSI or keyboard scan codes.
Hello David,
Try:
http://www.cs.tut.fi/
On 17 Jul 2002, at 13:33, Robert Patterson wrote:
> On Wed, 17 July 2002, "David W. Fenton" wrote
>
> > If it's actually the ASCII code, then it wouldn't be possible.
>
> Eh? 'A' and 'a' and ctrl-a all have different, well-defined ascii codes between
> 0 and 127. This is computer text 101. No n
On Wed, 17 July 2002, "David W. Fenton" wrote
> If it's actually the ASCII code, then it wouldn't be possible.
Eh? 'A' and 'a' and ctrl-a all have different, well-defined ascii codes between
0 and 127. This is computer text 101. No need to track shift states.
The option and alt combinations are
13 matches
Mail list logo
