Hiro,
In Finale 2006, you should no longer be using the keyswitching
expressions. You should let HP handle GPO keyswitches.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 30 Jul 2005, at 11:31 PM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
Just to play with it, I followed Wizard to create a test file for GPO
On 30 Jul 2005, at 6:16 PM, John Hughes wrote:
I can only surmise that for some reason the problem remains with me.
Although, for the life of me I can't see any alterative (that works)
to the way I have things set up at the moment.
Well, how *do* you have things set up at the moment?
MIDI
A number of people have been disappointed (or even outraged) and the
reality of GPO with this release. It is a hack job that is not
integrated in any stretch of that word. For people who are willing to
spend hours fiddling with their equipment in order to make the most
realistic rendering of
On 30 Jul 2005, at 6:34 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 30 Jul 2005 at 13:56, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 30 Jul 2005, at 12:02 PM, Andrew Levin wrote:
One other marginally related question: I read here (or Jari's
review, or the Finale web site -- sorry that I can't remember) that
GPO outpu
David W. Fenton / 2005/07/30 / 05:54 PM wrote:
>I would much rather see HP opened up so that one could tune the
>parameters that are behind the scenes, rather than seeing black-box
>enhancements specific to one set of samples.
I totally agree with this. More and more I feel NI wants to elimina
Eric Dannewitz / 2005/07/30 / 11:52 PM wrote:
>Otherwise why didn't Finale 2005 or 2004 have it? And then, why can't I
>select, um, say Battery, or Sonik Synth in Finale?
Just to be clear on this,
I believe Battery does have its stand-alone version (I run Battery on
Win2K instead of Mac because
Eric Dannewitz / 2005/07/30 / 11:52 PM wrote:
>So explain then why we didn't have AU support in Digital Performer from
>the get go. Or Protools.
The reason why anything other than Logic had AU support before Jaguar
was because there was no finalized AU spec Apple published. Apple
finally got A
Woohoo, no delays on dragging smart shapes. Wow, I do that...rarely.
I use mass mover all the time. Highlighting, copying, transposing, add
articulations. This lag is a big deal.
Fiskum, Steve wrote:
Eric,
You are not alone. There are some lagging problems in this release. I
have tested
A-NO-NE Music wrote:
Well, Finale sends MIDI to Vi (virtual instrument), which format can be
AU, VST, MAS, RTAS, etc, etc. You seems to be mixing two different
protocols. MIDI is MIDI. Finale HP uses CC1 MIDI message when GPO is
selected, while it is not a standard (why can't it be the standa
Just to play with it, I followed Wizard to create a test file for GPO.
Now I want to compare the output with my other samplers by disabling GPO.
The stoopid key switch note on messages won't go away. Not only that,
they seems to be rapidly repeating themselves so I get huge rattling
noise from
Eric Dannewitz / 2005/07/29 / 06:46 PM wrote:
>Its an Audio Unit. Go look it up on Apple.com. It's not the same thing
>as MIDI.
Well, Finale sends MIDI to Vi (virtual instrument), which format can be
AU, VST, MAS, RTAS, etc, etc. You seems to be mixing two different
protocols. MIDI is MIDI. F
Title: RE: [Finale] Mac Finale 2006 Performance
Eric,
You are not alone. There are some lagging problems in this release. I have tested a few machines along with my 6 month old laptop a 17", 1.5 Ghz, 2GB Ram, with max. Video card at 128MB, and upgraded to a speeder hard drive. I get the same
On 31 Jul 2005 at 1:38, Simon Troup wrote:
> > 1. I think it's a mistake to provide that improvement by tying
> > Finale to a particular technology, one that requires Finale to know
> > the insides of the technology chosen, instead of treating it like a
> > black box with an interface like every e
Stephen Peters / 2005/07/29 / 01:38 PM wrote:
>From descriptions by
>others, it sounded like the install of Finale worked fine in that
>case.
I just found what this means.
If user used OSX migration assistant to copy Finale from Panther to
Tiger, there will be no offensive directory copied to ap
There is certainly something to what you say. Several years ago I gave
my daughter my PC I got in 1997 with a Turtle Beach Pinnacle card. That
card had some great sounds - really fine piano, some very good wws,
etc. The next several years were a real step backward, and I never
understood why
> 1. I think it's a mistake to provide that improvement by tying Finale
> to a particular technology, one that requires Finale to know the
> insides of the technology chosen, instead of treating it like a black
> box with an interface like every equivalent technology.
Like MIDI you mean, we hav
One is a Mac Mini. And the other is a Quicksilver 2002 with a Geforce 3
graphics card. I think the Mac Mini supports core graphics.
Simon Troup wrote:
I see the lag big time on my 933 G4, and a little on my Mini Mac. I
have yet to try the PC version. Both Macs are maxed out with ram, and
runni
> I'll bet Gary Garritan is smiling like the Cheshire Cat over that bit
> of marketing. He gets a bunch of us to buy GPO for a cut rate, and
> we're all thinking we're getting this great bargain. Then, a month
> later, MakeMusic announces that GPO is rolled into the next upgrade
> of Finale. Wel
> Indeed. I seriously think this update blows. I don't see any speed
> improvements, in fact, I see a lot of things that seem slower, like
> highlighting stuff using Mass Mover.
I've got speed parity or improvement.
Simon Troup
Digital Music Art
___
> I see the lag big time on my 933 G4, and a little on my Mini Mac. I
> have yet to try the PC version. Both Macs are maxed out with ram, and
> running 10.4.2
Maybe you're not getting the benefit from CoreGraphics? What graphics card do
you have?
Simon Troup
Digital Music Art
__
No to be rude, but I really don't care about MusicXML. I'm dealing with
MIDI files. The way most professional sequencers (Digital
Performer/Protools/Logic) can shuttle things back and forth. I don't see
studio's MusicXML to get stuff out of Digital Performer into Sibelius or
Finale.
All Final
> > This has been said elsewhere, but just to be clear: You can get 64
> > instruments. You can instantiate 8 Kontakt players, and each player
> > can have 8 instruments. That makes 64.
>
> If your computer can handle all 8 instances of the Kontakt player.
True, but you're going to run into this
Thank you!
David W. Fenton wrote:
I think you're missing the point.
The problems Eric was having with MIDI import have *nothing* to do
with notational elements that cannot be included in MIDI files. They
have everything to do with Finale's obtuse transcription of MIDI data
into notation.
Perhaps it is just a Mac only thing. I seriously get a noticible lag
when I highlight one bar, hold down the shift key, and highlight another
bar.
This didn't happen in 2005.
dhbailey wrote:
On my PC I don't notice any such lag.
___
Finale mail
Sent! I am amazed at the low quality of this release. Seriously.
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Yes, I have noticed. Please make sure you send your complaints to
Macsupport immediately.
Johannes
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu
On 30 Jul 2005 at 16:44, Michael Good wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> > Where is the guess work in MIDI files?
>
> If MIDI was good enough for music notation, there would have been no
> need to invent MusicXML. We invented MusicXML because there was no
> adequate way to transfer music notation between app
Hi Eric,
> Where is the guess work in MIDI files?
If MIDI was good enough for music notation, there would have been no
need to invent MusicXML. We invented MusicXML because there was no
adequate way to transfer music notation between applications.
MIDI's inadequacy for music notation is hardly c
On 30 Jul 2005 at 16:24, Lon Price wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2005, at 2:44 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>
> > If you're going to use a different file for playback, why not just
> > save your printable score as MIDI then use a sequencer to tweak
> > playback? Why use Finale at all for creating a playback
I just finished setting up a symphonic score with 40 instruments, using
Finale with the full version of GPO. I have each percussion instrument set
to a different channel. Eg, Snare: 67; tamtam = 68, etc. They play back
beautifully.
BTW, I didn't bother with midi assignments. I left all of them po
David,
HALLELUJAH! At least someone understands what I am getting at.
Many thanks for the kind suggestions you put forth in your previous email.
Constructive help is so much nicer than sniping. I shall now go forth and
put them into practice.
In my own defence, I would like to explain that
At 06:40 PM 07/30/2005, dhbailey wrote:
>Which brings up the question as to why the Ambience Reverb doesn't give
>us Room Sizes to choose from, at least on the Windows side of things?
>Is that something to be expected in the maintenance release as well?
Yes, according to Winsupport.
Aaron.
On Jul 30, 2005, at 2:44 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:If you're going to use a different file for playback, why not just save your printable score as MIDI then use a sequencer to tweak playback? Why use Finale at all for creating a playback file if you're going to fork your playback from the printe
At 06:11 PM 07/30/2005, dhbailey wrote:
>Better a product which doesn't work as it should but is shipped when
>promised than a product which excels but may be late.
Hogwash.
Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailma
Got it,
Thanks,
Dean
On Jul 30, 2005, at 3:46 PM, dhbailey wrote:
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Darcy:
Where is the setting for Ambiance Reverb? I've missed it somehow.
Under Midi, click on Native Instruments VST Setup. There is a
checkbox at the bottom called Ambiance Reverb. There is an e
I stand corrected.
Ron
Ronald J Brown
PO Box 138
Newboro ON K0G 1P0
(613) 272-3181
http://www.RonaldJBrown.com
-Original Message-
From: Darcy James Argue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 30, 2005 2:09 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] GPO instrument loading
On 30 Jul 20
Yes, I have noticed. Please make sure you send your complaints to
Macsupport immediately.
Johannes
Eric Dannewitz schrieb:
Has anyone noticed that Finale 2006 seems slower on a lot of things than
2005 was. For example, if I highlight a bar, then hold shift, then go to
another bar, there is a
Yes, I could ... not a problem. It's just that when inputting in
soundfont, via Hyperscribe, it's easier to deal with a percussive
sound, which I haven't been able to get yet. If I understand your
question correctly.
Thanks,
Dean
On Jul 30, 2005, at 3:46 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 30
On Jul 30, 2005, at 2:44 PM, dhbailey wrote:n the past, even when there hasn't been much of great import touted in the upgrades, I have found each one I have purchased (every one since I started using version 3.5) to have had significant numbers of small improvements all through the program. I hav
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Has anyone noticed that Finale 2006 seems slower on a lot of things than
2005 was. For example, if I highlight a bar, then hold shift, then go to
another bar, there is a lag. I didn't have that with Finale 2005.
I see the lag big time on my 933 G4, and a little on my Min
Just to have a break from GPO issues, here's something a little odd I just
noticed.
I have a passage with 16th-note 6-tuples in some parts, 8th-note triplets in
others, and various mixed duple and other rhythms in others. In the "tuple"
rhythms, the tuple number is on the beam side, with no brack
That really sucks. I have an active subscription to SmartMusic (as the
schools around here use it in their music program).
Too bad they don't have a standalone player.
dhbailey wrote:
They've apparently changed this because when I try to play my own
music, entered into Finale and saved as
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Darcy:
Where is the setting for Ambiance Reverb? I've missed it somehow.
Under Midi, click on Native Instruments VST Setup. There is a checkbox
at the bottom called Ambiance Reverb. There is an edit button next to
it. Click the EDIT button and you can then chang
Indeed. I seriously think this update blows. I don't see any speed
improvements, in fact, I see a lot of things that seem slower, like
highlighting stuff using Mass Mover.
dhbailey wrote:
Timetables, Aaron, timetables. Deadlines doth make compromisers of us
all.
Better a product which doe
On 30 Jul 2005 at 15:27, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
> I thought so myself, and it is on channel 10, but still the piano
> sounds. Now, interestingly enough, when I tried Hyperscrive in GPO,
> the countoff and click sound was automatically a percussion sound
> (kind of like a triangle, I think). Hmm
Has anyone noticed that Finale 2006 seems slower on a lot of things than
2005 was. For example, if I highlight a bar, then hold shift, then go to
another bar, there is a lag. I didn't have that with Finale 2005.
I see the lag big time on my 933 G4, and a little on my Mini Mac. I have
yet to tr
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Of course you'd like it to work with MusicXML. Isn't that YOUR company?
Where is the guess work in MIDI files? Example, I can do something in
Digital Performer, load it into Logic, and it looks the same. Triplets
come out as triplets. Etc. But I load the same file into F
Darcy James Argue wrote:
John, they are exactly the same instruments you heard on the Finale
website. If the "unpleasant coloration" was absent there, then you
ought not to have anything to complain about. Have you tried the sounds
*in context* (i.e., in an ensemble), with HP and Ambience
On 30 Jul 2005 at 13:56, Darcy James Argue wrote:
> On 30 Jul 2005, at 12:02 PM, Andrew Levin wrote:
[]
> > One other marginally related question: I read here (or Jari's
> > review, or the Finale web site -- sorry that I can't remember) that
> > GPO output is only for the sound that comes out of
Thanks,
Dean
On Jul 30, 2005, at 2:00 PM, Simon Troup wrote:
Where is the setting for Ambiance Reverb? I've missed it somehow.
MIDI > Native Instruments AU SetUp > Ambience Reverb > Edit
It's at the bottom of the dialog box.
Simon Troup
Digital Music Art
_
I thought so myself, and it is on channel 10, but still the piano
sounds. Now, interestingly enough, when I tried Hyperscrive in GPO,
the countoff and click sound was automatically a percussion sound (kind
of like a triangle, I think).
H ..
Dean
On Jul 30, 2005, at 3:08 PM, dhbailey wrot
On 30 Jul 2005 at 13:10, Phil Daley wrote:
> At 05:56 PM 7/29/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
>
> >Well, you won't encounter the problems unless you persist in using
> >your optical drives like removable disks, i.e., the way you could in
> >all previous versions of Windows.
> >
> >Here's the scenari
John Hughes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Darcy James Argue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale2006 and GPO
On 30 Jul 2005, at 12:27 PM, John Hughes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Darcy James Argue" <[EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: "Darcy James Argue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale2006 and GPO
On 30 Jul 2005, at 3:02 PM, John Hughes wrote:
The trumpet, for a start, sounds absolutely nothing like a trumpet. I am
a trumpet
On 30 Jul 2005 at 8:40, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
> On 30/07/05, dhbailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am still waiting to be shown why GPO/Kontakt playback is superior.
> > A kind member of this list has offered to work on a file of mine to
> > show me how to get improved playback via GPO. I
Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 11:46 AM 07/30/2005, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> You can get a max of 8
>instruments with the GPO version that comes with Finale 2006?
This has been said elsewhere, but just to be clear: You can get 64
instruments. You can instantiate 8 Kontakt players, and each player ca
Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 02:11 PM 07/30/2005, Darcy James Argue wrote:
>Save as Audio for GPO is not hooked up yet.
Well, that's really stupid. I would assume that most people who are
using GPO want it to produce demo CDs for others, not just for their own
in-house enjoyment.
I know there a
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Ok ... just installed 2006 w/out any problems I can detect. Messed
around with a couple of instruments in GPO (Eng. Hrn. and Cl.) in a
little duet I wrote. I think the quality of the sounds and human
playback are excellent, as promised. However, when I added a coupl
Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 30 Jul 2005, at 6:56 AM, dhbailey wrote:
I have an enormous problem with the fact that the majority of my
upgrade dollars have gone to something which is problematic to use at
best (now we have to prepare THREE files -- one for printing, one for
playback via GPO
On 30 Jul 2005 at 7:37, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
> At 06:56 AM 7/30/05 -0400, dhbailey wrote:
> >I'll go further and say that I think MakeMusic has made a huge
> >mistake in including any such playback device.
>
> I agree with you.
>
> The production of 'human playback' Midi was worthwhile, b
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Ha! Welcome to Smartmusic. Please leave your credit card with MakeMusic.
I think you can get around actually buying a subscription. Or you used
to. You just won't be able to access the library of smart music.
Perhaps they changed this
They've apparently chang
dennis c. wrote:
dhbailey wrote:
In any event, the plug-ins for mid-measure repeats work fine, the
automatic adjustment of measure numbers when deleting a measure is
very nice, but hardly worth the $100 upgrade fee.
One wonders why you were in such a hurry to spend these 100 bucks. After
On 30 Jul 2005 at 6:56, dhbailey wrote:
> now
> we have to prepare THREE files -- one for printing, one for playback
> via GPO and another playback file to share with others who don't have
> machines powerful enough to use GPO.
I don't quite understand why you need a file for playback that is
d
> Where is the setting for Ambiance Reverb? I've missed it somehow.
MIDI > Native Instruments AU SetUp > Ambience Reverb > Edit
It's at the bottom of the dialog box.
Simon Troup
Digital Music Art
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.s
> Where is the guess work in MIDI files? Example, I can do something in
> Digital Performer, load it into Logic, and it looks the same.
> Triplets come out as triplets. Etc. But I load the same file into
> Finale, and the triplet comes out wrong.
Hi eric
I'm intrigued, if you have a moment send m
Darcy:
Where is the setting for Ambiance Reverb? I've missed it somehow.
Dean
On Jul 30, 2005, at 12:14 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 30 Jul 2005, at 3:02 PM, John Hughes wrote:
The trumpet, for a start, sounds absolutely nothing like a trumpet.
I am a trumpet player and the sound I hea
My Dear Listfriends,
As one who (wisely?) sprang for GPO prior to MakeMusic's (MM) 2006
announcement, I would like to add my two cents to what I've read so far.
1. GPO is a lovely set of sounds with really terrible documentation. I
know how the percussion works now, I simply cannot imagine how t
In case anyone missed it, you CAN get 128 MIDI channels in the AU/VST
option if you use the full Kontakt 2 software. (This is a doubling of
what is available with the regular Finale install.) This software is
expensive and probably isn't worth it since the amount of RAM and
processor speed need
Of course you'd like it to work with MusicXML. Isn't that YOUR company?
Where is the guess work in MIDI files? Example, I can do something in
Digital Performer, load it into Logic, and it looks the same. Triplets
come out as triplets. Etc. But I load the same file into Finale, and the
triplet
I like the English horn and Oboe in GPO. They soun
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Everyone's always biased towards their own instrument. Johannes has
said that the solo violins sound nothing like solo violins. I'm sure
oboe players would say the same of the oboe patch, etc. Again, GPO is
a rough
On 30 Jul 2005, at 3:02 PM, John Hughes wrote:
The trumpet, for a start, sounds absolutely nothing like a trumpet. I
am a trumpet player and the sound I hear really offends me.
Everyone's always biased towards their own instrument. Johannes has
said that the solo violins sound nothing like
I agree, but for whatever reason, it didn't make the cut for the
initial release, and was put off for maintenance. I guess there just
wasn't enough time. I'm sure they're working hard on that feature as
we speak.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 30 Jul 2005, at 2:58 PM, Aaro
- Original Message -
From: "Darcy James Argue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale2006 and GPO
On 30 Jul 2005, at 12:27 PM, John Hughes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Darcy James Argue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mine
At 02:11 PM 07/30/2005, Darcy James Argue wrote:
>Save as Audio for GPO is not hooked up yet.
Well, that's really stupid. I would assume that most people who are
using GPO want it to produce demo CDs for others, not just for their
own in-house enjoyment.
I know there are workarounds and ways
At 12:34 PM 07/30/2005, Simon Troup wrote:
>It looks like I should be able to address 8 banks of 16 instruments,
>but I can't figure out how to access, for example, the second tier of
>the the first bank (9 to 16).
You can't. For whatever reason, and whatever limitation, you can only
access the
At 11:46 AM 07/30/2005, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> You can get a max of 8
>instruments with the GPO version that comes with Finale 2006?
This has been said elsewhere, but just to be clear: You can get 64
instruments. You can instantiate 8 Kontakt players, and each player
can have 8 instruments. Th
Ok ... just installed 2006 w/out any problems I can detect. Messed
around with a couple of instruments in GPO (Eng. Hrn. and Cl.) in a
little duet I wrote. I think the quality of the sounds and human
playback are excellent, as promised. However, when I added a couple of
more instruments, as
Disappointing: yes. Surprising:
no.
But thanks very much
for the info, Darcy --
Best,
Les
Les MarsdenFounding Music Director and Conductor, The Mariposa
Symphony OrchestraMusic and Mariposa? Ah, Paradise!!!
http://arts-mariposa.org/symphony.htmlhttp://www.sierratel.com/mcf/
Details here:
http://tinyurl.com/d4wrm
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
On 30 Jul 2005, at 12:11 PM, Mariposa Symphony Orchestra wrote:
Can anyone tell me if saving as an audio file (in '06) offers the
choice of softsynth HP GPO playback - MY choice? Or is it a
default over which I'd have no control?
Save as Audio for GPO is not hooked up yet. Yes, that's e
On 30 Jul 2005, at 1:26 PM, ronan wrote:
In the Kontakt player, in the box underneath the CPO Usage box is a
happy
face? cat? (it's so small I can't make out what it's suppose to be.)
Click
that and you can assign an input channel to the instrument you have
selected. So, yes, you can have Fina
On 30 Jul 2005, at 11:40 AM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On 30/07/05, dhbailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am still waiting to be shown why GPO/Kontakt playback is superior.
A
kind member of this list has offered to work on a file of mine to show
me how to get improved playback via GPO. I am eage
On 30 Jul 2005, at 12:34 PM, Simon Troup wrote:
You can get a max of 8 instruments with the GPO version that comes
with Finale 2006? So, if you happen to do an arrangement that has
more than 8 instruments, you are out of luck in using GPO. You'd have
to use the soundfonts or Midi.
I seem to be
On 30 Jul 2005, at 11:46 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
You can get a max of 8 instruments with the GPO version that comes
with Finale 2006?
No. Max 64 channels (and many are keyswitching, so no need to use up
separate channels for arco violins and pizz violins.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 30 Jul 2005, at 6:22 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Having to define expressions specifically to work with GPO playback
seems to me to be defeating to the purpose of being able to share
files with other Finale users.
Once again, you do NOT have to define expressions specifically to work
with GPO pla
On 30 Jul 2005, at 12:02 PM, Andrew Levin wrote:
What is the best way to start a new project in Finale?
Setup Wizard.
*There are times when I know I'll need GPO, so I'll start up with the
GPO wizard
There is no "GPO Wizard." There is an option in the Setup Wizard to
use GPO Finale Editio
On 30 Jul 2005, at 6:56 AM, dhbailey wrote:
I have an enormous problem with the fact that the majority of my
upgrade dollars have gone to something which is problematic to use at
best (now we have to prepare THREE files -- one for printing, one for
playback via GPO and another playback file to
On 30 Jul 2005, at 6:45 AM, dhbailey wrote:
If Finale really wants to impress us, they should have shared some
demo files which would have said (through example not just marketing
brochure double-speak) "THIS is how fantastic your files can sound!"
I agree, it would have been nice if Coda had
Stephen Peters / 2005/07/29 / 01:38 PM wrote:
>But this is a matter of testing *other* applications to make
>sure that they still worked after the procedure, which I strongly
>doubt is part of their test suite.
Address Book is a part of OSX, which is not "other" application in this
context. Loo
On 30 Jul 2005, at 7:06 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Tyler Turner wrote:
Hi Craig,
Darcy mentioned it, but I just want to make sure you
caught it. For new compositions that you create with
the setup wizard, you don't have to do any GPO setup.
It's automatically done (and that's a major part of
the inte
On 30 Jul 2005, at 12:27 PM, John Hughes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Darcy James Argue"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mine sound just awful. I bought Fin2006 purely on the promise that I
could at last hear my work sound something like real. But I'm afraid
I was very disappointed. The s
I read in another site that “Save as
Audio” will be in a maintenance release.
Ron
Ronald J Brown
PO Box
138
Newboro ON K0G 1P0
(613) 272-3181
http://www.RonaldJBrown.com
From: Mariposa
Symphony Orchestra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 30, 2005 12:12 PM
To
In the Kontakt player, in the box underneath the CPO Usage box is a happy
face? cat? (it's so small I can't make out what it's suppose to be.) Click
that and you can assign an input channel to the instrument you have
selected. So, yes, you can have Finale write to Channels 9-16, the have your
secon
At 05:56 PM 7/29/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
>Well, you won't encounter the problems unless you persist in using
>your optical drives like removable disks, i.e., the way you could in
>all previous versions of Windows.
>
>Here's the scenario that reveals the problems:
>
>Use commandline XCOPY
No, you can load up to 64 instruments at a time. There are 8 instances of
the Kontakt player that can be loaded under Midi set up.
Ron
Ronald J Brown
PO Box 138
Newboro ON K0G 1P0
(613) 272-3181
http://www.RonaldJBrown.com
-Original Message-
From: dhbailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sen
The sound of full GPO compared to Finale/GPO is 100% better. Finale used
"generic" sounding instruments, while in Garritan's GPO you get instruments
with character. Frankly, I can't tell the difference between Softsynths and
the Finale/GPO instruments, but I don't have the best of hearing.
Ron
Ro
DAVID, YOU'RE A PRINCE.
Your suggestion worked. I can't tell you how much I appreciate your
willingness to help fellow Finale strugglers. It must happen so often to
members on the list who sometimes reach the point of desperation, when a
shining light reaches out to them from another member an
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> Totally agree. I really think the GPO thing is fluff. I'd rather see
> Finale get better at importing Midi files. I hate when a Midi that
I've
> done in Digital Performer does not come across correctly in Finale. It
> happens all the time. It's frustrating, and wastes ti
Thanks.
Dean
On Jul 30, 2005, at 12:29 AM, Tyler Turner wrote:
--- "Dean M. Estabrook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good explanation Tyler ... now, how do you feel
about the GPO sounds?
Are they as good as the samples provided on the MM
site, or not? And
if not, what gives? Also, I've just r
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Which is totally an oversight by MakeMusic. I don't know about VST
(don't really use it), but I use GPO (full version) with Digital
Performer, and I can easily have my cake (Audio Units) and eat it
too (and Midi).
It doesn't make sense that you can't mix it. You can get
> You can get a max of 8 instruments with the GPO version that comes
> with Finale 2006? So, if you happen to do an arrangement that has
> more than 8 instruments, you are out of luck in using GPO. You'd have
> to use the soundfonts or Midi.
I seem to be able to address 8 banks or 8 instruments (6
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
