To the creative and collective wisdom of the list:
I am putting together a piece that will need specialty noteheads for vocalists.
They will be creating "effects" (a la the honda commercial, but not anywhere
near as sophisticated or complex). Mostly, I want to notate that certain words
be inhal
In a message dated 8/6/2008 7:35:54 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Or can I still use my serial number to buy future Finale upgrades?
You can.
--David Lawrence
**
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits
in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
I have purchased the Sibelius crossgrade. I'm about to send the original
Finale CD with a form that comes with Sibelius, in which Finale's serial
number is asked for, in order to register Sibelius and unlock it. Does
that mean I will no longer be a Finale registered user? Or can I still use
my seri
Hi,
I have purchased the Sibelius crossgrade. I'm about to send the original
Finale CD with a form that comes with Sibelius, in which Finale's serial
number is asked for, in order to register Sibelius and unlock it. Does
that mean I will no longer be a Finale registered user? Or can I still use
my
If you can point me to one, I'd be delighted. I've searched high and low to
no avail. Closest I found was an old program called 'aleatory music
composer' or something to that effect, which forced you to listen to the
midi data before you could export it, and only exported midi, so you
couldn't do
Probably not, but there are plenty of freeware midi things that can do that
for you.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Adam Golding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would the new finalescript features allow anything like generating random
> music for sight-reading practice? I'm thinking random pitches
Would the new finalescript features allow anything like generating random
music for sight-reading practice? I'm thinking random pitches/rhythms with
random enharmonics, including double sharps/flats, and random clef, key, and
time signatures changes.
___
Definitely go to Garritan's website. If they're anything like most
audio co's I've worked with, they'll have either a list of known good
configurations, what they test on, or recommended systems (in addition
to minimum systems)
I'd also cruise Gary's forums to see if there's any issues with
Hi Craig,
Assuming the AMD dual-cores are comparable to the Intel Core 2 Duos,
you should be fine. However, I have 2 GB RAM and wish I had 3 GB for
GPO/JABB. (I never seem to have the cash to buy another stick.)
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 6 Aug 2008, at 4:3
I have a dual core AMD 2.6 GHz with 2GB. That ought to exceed their
recommendations by a wide margin.
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Well, if your system is slow, then getting GPO and JABB will probably not be
the wisest thing to do. Sample players really tax the system, and you need a
LOT of RAM as
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Well, if your system is slow, then getting GPO and JABB will probably not be
the wisest thing to do. Sample players really tax the system, and you need a
LOT of RAM as well. I'd go over to Garritan.com and check out the computer
specs they recommend to run the products.
A
Well, if your system is slow, then getting GPO and JABB will probably not be
the wisest thing to do. Sample players really tax the system, and you need a
LOT of RAM as well. I'd go over to Garritan.com and check out the computer
specs they recommend to run the products.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:2
I have been thinking about buying the full GPO and JABB libraries. As I
understand it, that means I would be relying on the Kontact player. Is
that correct? Dos that mean my system would slow down considerably?
Allen Fisher wrote:
This has a lot to do with the Aria Player. It's much more e
On Aug 6, 2008, at 9:25 AM, Allen Fisher wrote:
This has a lot to do with the Aria Player. It's much more efficient
than Kontakt Player.
Hi Allen,
But things I have loaded with Kontakt - full GPO sounds, also seem to
load more quickly. Am I imagining this?
Chuck
On Aug 6, 2008, a
This has a lot to do with the Aria Player. It's much more efficient
than Kontakt Player.
On Aug 6, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Chuck Israels wrote:
And I wonder if this is only a subjective experience, but I am
finding some things that seem faster. Large ensembles of GPO and
JABB instruments load
I have been following the discussion of the limitation on the number
of staff lists, and though it doesn't have much effect on the kind of
work I do, I can understand why this could present unnecessary (or not
- depending on programming issues beyond my expertise) difficulties
for others.
I know. This is a problem. I have been complaining about this since
Fin2007.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 6 Aug 2008, at 5:15 AM, Brian Williams wrote:
I finally found where you change the hidden object shading percentage
(Program Options: View), but no matter how much
--- Christopher Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Might be regional, or it might be a classical thing.
> I hear "desk" in
> the orchestras around here all the time, though not
> exclusively.
>
I played in both orchestras (Toronto) & band
(Montreal) when I was in high school, and it was
alw
Christopher Smith wrote:
I just tested this. While a redraw shows items beneath (but not staff
lines!) in 2008, the object is still completely opaque in 2009. This
behaviour appears to have been changed, to the detriment of the program,
I think.
[snip]
This may be a case of a bug which had
On Aug 5, 2008, at 11:42 PM, John Howell wrote:
At 11:22 PM -0400 8/5/08, John Howell wrote:
5. 'div. par pupitre'
"divide by stand"
Interesting that two other listers translated this as "divide by
desk." I have never referred to a music stand as anything but a
"stand," never as a "
I just tested this. While a redraw shows items beneath (but not staff
lines!) in 2008, the object is still completely opaque in 2009. This
behaviour appears to have been changed, to the detriment of the
program, I think.
Christopher
On Aug 6, 2008, at 8:53 AM, Don Hart wrote:
I don't hav
On Aug 6, 2008, at 4:55 AM, Brian Williams wrote:
It seems obvious that the "old school" way of using multiple staff
lists was
far easier and more elegant in situations like this. I can't
imagine how
*anyone* could, in good conscience, defend MakeMusic's arbitrary and
Sibelius-like decisio
I don't have 2009 yet, but tried this in 2006 to see if things have changed.
Hidden objects are transparent for notes but are not transparent for staff,
time sig., etc. I did notice that after I moved the object on screen it
then blocked the view of the notes it was placed over, but that was easil
There is another serious problem with using the Show On Score Only/Parts
Only options outside the context of a staff list. That is that the
expression and its handle completely vanish in the view where it is not
to appear.
For assignments that are part of a staff list, this is not a problem.
Brian Williams wrote:
So the only other work-around is to manually edit the individual assignments
for each and every single expression, as this cannot be done en masse by
drag-selecting a group of expressions and selecting "Edit Assignment" from
the context menu.
Yes, this is a serious probl
Christopher Smith wrote:
> I am addressing the ghost problem first. You can set the shading of the
> ghosts so that they are very, very faint; just enough so that you can see
> them to identify them. Also, drag them off the BOTTOM of the page, not the
> side, so they don't show on other pages.
I finally found where you change the hidden object shading percentage
(Program Options: View), but no matter how much you lighten the shading, it
still does not make hidden objects transparent - which means that they will
still completely obscure everything they are on top of.
Try this: create an
27 matches
Mail list logo
