Has Sibelius again shown MM how to do their job?
I speak of the information on accessing RAM and optimizing one's machine for
doing so.
MM must get on the bandwagon and give us this info.
BTW, I didn't know our MAC friends with Snow Leopard were dead in the water
with Sib6.
Henry Howey
Profe
(BTW, Henry, your Reply-To is always set to fin...@lists.shsu.edu,
which is invalid for those of us emailing from outside SHSU)
On 30 Oct 2009 at 13:15, Howey, Henry wrote:
> Has Sibelius again shown MM how to do their job?
>
> I speak of the information on accessing RAM and optimizing one's ma
http://www.sibelius.com/products/sibelius/6/6_1_features.html
Sibelius 6.1 new features
Existing Sibelius 6 user? Update for free now »
Windows 7 and Snow Leopard compatible
Write beautiful scores on the world’s newest, fastest operating
systems.
On Oct 30, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Howey, Henry w
I just played around a little with Sib 6.1, and I must say that the
slurs are really good. They are everything Engraver slurs should have
been, but aren't. I haven't tested them in depth. Willl they work well
for system ends?
Johannes
___
Finale mail
Am 30.10.2009 um 20:05 schrieb Johannes Gebauer:
They are everything Engraver slurs should have been, but aren't.
Hmm?
Gerhard
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
What are you talking about?
On Oct 30, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Howey, Henry wrote:
Has Sibelius again shown MM how to do their job?
I speak of the information on accessing RAM and optimizing one's
machine for doing so.
MM must get on the bandwagon and give us this info.
Allen Fisher
Founder
i think he's talking about Sibelius 6.1 being able to use up to 4 gigs
of ram in windows 7.
--- send out and aboot on my iPhone ---
On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:12 PM, Allen Fisher
wrote:
What are you talking about?
On Oct 30, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Howey, Henry wrote:
Has Sibelius again shown
On 30 Oct 2009 at 21:27, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> i think he's talking about Sibelius 6.1 being able to use up to 4 gigs
> of ram in windows 7.
How is this helpful? Finale is, and always has been, one of the most
RAM-efficient applications I have ever run. And the files are quite
small, too, r
Loading up a full orchestra or wind band score with full garritan
sounds?
--- send out and aboot on my iPhone ---
On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:44 PM, "David W. Fenton"
wrote:
How is this helpful? Finale is, and always has been, one of the most
RAM-efficient applications I have ever run. And t
On 30 Oct 2009 at 21:52, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:44 PM, "David W. Fenton"
> wrote:
>
> > How is this helpful? Finale is, and always has been, one of the most
> > RAM-efficient applications I have ever run. And the files are quite
> > small, too, relatively speaking.
> >
>
Well, makemusic does as much. Remember the finale release where they
touted having the copyright sign as a new feature? Finale 2006 or
something?
I believe that is what Henry was referring to. The memory thing in
6.1. I couldn't come up with anything else from Sibelius.com that
would fit
On 30 Oct 2009 at 22:46, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> Well, makemusic does as much. Remember the finale release where they
> touted having the copyright sign as a new feature? Finale 2006 or
> something?
Certainly (that's why I said it should be buried as a bullet point),
but I was reacting to He
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Loading up a full orchestra or wind band score with full garritan sounds?
Isn't Garritan or any VST loaded as an external process in Windows?
mvh/
Jari W.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman
On 31.10.2009 David W. Fenton wrote:
Sibelius needs to do this sooner than Finale because of their slower
release cycle.
Now that's an interpretation I cannot follow. Although Sibelius has had
a slower main release cycle, as far as I remember they were much quicker
in fixing and updating for
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 30 Oct 2009 at 21:27, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
i think he's talking about Sibelius 6.1 being able to use up to 4 gigs
of ram in windows 7.
How is this helpful? Finale is, and always has been, one of the most
RAM-efficient applications I have ever run. And the files ar
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Loading up a full orchestra or wind band score with full garritan sounds?
Is that Sibelius's fault or GPO's fault? For those of us
who use soundfonts or external midi devices for playback,
there's no need for such huge amounts of RAM. For people
who insist on using s
On 31 Oct 2009 at 9:34, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> On 31.10.2009 David W. Fenton wrote:
> > Sibelius needs to do this sooner than Finale because of their slower
> > release cycle.
>
> Now that's an interpretation I cannot follow. Although Sibelius has had
> a slower main release cycle, as far as
On 31 Oct 2009 at 6:34, dhbailey wrote:
> Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> > Loading up a full orchestra or wind band score with full garritan sounds?
>
> Is that Sibelius's fault or GPO's fault?
Or the Aria player (or whichever player your version of Finale uses
for GPO sounds)?
And that raises the qu
On Sat Oct 31, at SaturdayOct 31 4:06 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
(you didn't know I had three hands, heh? Well,
I have only two nipples...),
Too
Much
Information!
8-P
Christopher
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mail
On 31.10.2009 David W. Fenton wrote:
> On 31.10.2009 David W. Fenton wrote:
> > Sibelius needs to do this sooner than Finale because of their slower
> > release cycle.
>
> Now that's an interpretation I cannot follow. Although Sibelius has had
> a slower main release cycle, as far as I remembe
On 1 Nov 2009 at 0:04, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> On 31.10.2009 David W. Fenton wrote:
> >> > On 31.10.2009 David W. Fenton wrote:
> >>> > > Sibelius needs to do this sooner than Finale because of their slower
> >>> > > release cycle.
> >> >
> >> > Now that's an interpretation I cannot follow. Al
On 01.11.2009 David W. Fenton wrote:
Sibelius releases every 2-3 years, Finale every year. That is pretty
clearly a slower release cycle, and that if each company waited until
their next release to adapt to this Win7 feature, Finale would manage
it next year, and Sibelius not for another 2 year
On 1 Nov 2009 at 8:19, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
> I specifically said that while the main release cycle is slower they
> usually have several maintenance releases. 6.1 is a maintenance. They
> are _quicker_ with maintenances than Finale ever tried to be.
>
> They are quicker if you take all rele
23 matches
Mail list logo
