RE: [Finale] time signature question

2006-12-11 Thread Nancy L Schoen
Behalf > Of Derek Kane > Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 3:31 PM > To: finale@shsu.edu > Subject: [Finale] time signature question > > Greetings, > > > > Just a quick question here, I am working with a symphonic score, and I > want > one staff to be in 12/8

Re: [Finale] time signature question

2006-12-08 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 04:30 PM 12/8/2006, Derek Kane wrote: >Just a quick question here, I am working with a symphonic score, and I want >one staff to be in 12/8 and the rest to be in 4/4 (or common time). Later >in the piece I want one staff to be in 4/4 while all the others are in 12/8. >Any suggestions? Sure.

[Finale] time signature question

2006-12-08 Thread Derek Kane
Greetings, Just a quick question here, I am working with a symphonic score, and I want one staff to be in 12/8 and the rest to be in 4/4 (or common time). Later in the piece I want one staff to be in 4/4 while all the others are in 12/8. Any suggestions? Thanks for all your help. Derek

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-22 Thread David W. Fenton
On 22 Jan 2006 at 11:43, Eric Dannewitz wrote: > You did read the manual? Oh yeah, just didn't see anything under > OCTAVE, or doubling. I don't need to pour salt in your wounds anymore. > I know it hurts. And it's not a filthy lie, unlike most of the posts > you do here. It is a blatant lie and

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-22 Thread Eric Dannewitz
You did read the manual? Oh yeah, just didn't see anything under OCTAVE, or doubling. I don't need to pour salt in your wounds anymore. I know it hurts. And it's not a filthy lie, unlike most of the posts you do here. However, you are coming across as a "know it all". Just stop it. Stop insult

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-22 Thread David W. Fenton
On 21 Jan 2006 at 19:42, Eric Dannewitz wrote: > Keep in mind, this is the guy who didn't take time to RTFM That's a filthy lie. I clearly stated several times that really *did* read the manual, but I wasn't successful in finding the part having the needed explanation. And you probably know

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Keep in mind, this is the guy who didn't take time to RTFM sotake it with a grain of salt.. dhbailey wrote: David W. Fenton wrote: [snip]> My original reply, which I edited, used the term "idiotic." How kind of you. I feel ever so much better now. ___

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread dhbailey
David W. Fenton wrote: [snip]> My original reply, which I edited, used the term "idiotic." How kind of you. I feel ever so much better now. -- David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailma

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread David W. Fenton
On 21 Jan 2006 at 17:07, dhbailey wrote: > David W. Fenton wrote: > > On 21 Jan 2006 at 6:21, dhbailey wrote: > > > >>If you're just placing the two meters beside each other at the start > >>of the work, how will anybody know when a measure is supposed to get > >>the 3/4 feeling instead of hemiol

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Eric Dannewitz
Exactly. After all, he's ALWAYS right. Who care what he thinks anyways? I think alternating 3/4 to 6/8 is just fine, especially if it is some sort of jazz piece where the 6/8 is played in a different feel. In fact, I know I have played something that alternated like this fairly recently. Maybe

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread dhbailey
David W. Fenton wrote: On 21 Jan 2006 at 6:21, dhbailey wrote: If you're just placing the two meters beside each other at the start of the work, how will anybody know when a measure is supposed to get the 3/4 feeling instead of hemiolas in 6/8? From my point of view this is not a very smart

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On 1/21/06, Owain Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brad Beyenhof wrote: >> On 1/21/06, Owain Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> David W. Fenton wrote: On 21 Jan 2006 at 9:19, Brad Beyenhof wrote: > Yes, I'll admit that that was a silly example, since it can easily be > adapted to

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Owain Sutton
Brad Beyenhof wrote: On 1/21/06, Owain Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David W. Fenton wrote: On 21 Jan 2006 at 9:19, Brad Beyenhof wrote: Yes, I'll admit that that was a silly example, since it can easily be adapted to make either signature clear. What about a dotted half? This is a ludi

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On 1/21/06, Owain Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David W. Fenton wrote: >> On 21 Jan 2006 at 9:19, Brad Beyenhof wrote: >>> Yes, I'll admit that that was a silly example, since it can easily be >>> adapted to make either signature clear. What about a dotted half? >> >> This is a ludicrous ques

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Éric Dussault
Le 06-01-21 à 16:05, John Howell a écrit :And another question:  When one does change time signatures, is it proper always to use a double bar line, or never to use a double bar line?  I've always used it, but I'm not sure why.  Of course I use double bar lines at structural points as well, just to

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread John Howell
At 8:42 PM + 1/21/06, Owain Sutton wrote: David W. Fenton wrote: On 21 Jan 2006 at 9:19, Brad Beyenhof wrote: Yes, I'll admit that that was a silly example, since it can easily be adapted to make either signature clear. What about a dotted half? I've stayed out of this particular food-f

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Owain Sutton
David W. Fenton wrote: On 21 Jan 2006 at 9:19, Brad Beyenhof wrote: Yes, I'll admit that that was a silly example, since it can easily be adapted to make either signature clear. What about a dotted half? This is a ludicrous question, seems to me, because there's no way whatsoever for a pe

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Don Hart
I'm using "show as" and handling the beaming etc. manually. The adjustments are straight forward and hardly noticeable for this piece. Don on 1/21/06 12:25 PM, Brad Beyenhof at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 1/21/06, dhbailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Am I misunderstanding the process?

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Don Hart
This post provided a nice little nudge for me to explore the positioning of expressions further than I had previously. I guess those of you who are more serious about engraving are already on top of things, but those who aren't should really check this out. I didn't realize that the Measure Posit

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread David W. Fenton
On 21 Jan 2006 at 9:19, Brad Beyenhof wrote: > On 1/21/06, Christopher Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 21, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Brad Beyenhof wrote: > >> Yes, but > what if there are no beams (a half note and a quarter note, >> for > example)? > > How would your example be performed diff

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread David W. Fenton
On 21 Jan 2006 at 8:22, Brad Beyenhof wrote: > Yes, but what if there are no beams (a half note and a quarter note, > for example)? . . . Well, I don't know how someone could play that without it sounding like it's in 3/4 not 6/8, but if you really wanted them to try, you'd notate it as dotted

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread David W. Fenton
On 21 Jan 2006 at 6:21, dhbailey wrote: > If you're just placing the two meters beside each other at the start > of the work, how will anybody know when a measure is supposed to get > the 3/4 feeling instead of hemiolas in 6/8? >From my point of view this is not a very smart question. Hundreds of

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Don Hart
I think that's where I originally saw this sort of thing. - Don on 1/21/06 5:41 AM, Michael Cook at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't know what Don's piece looks like, but to take a well-known > example: "I like to be in America" is notated this way, with 6/8(3/4) > as time signature at the beg

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Don Hart
This is an answer to David's question but it gets into a few of the other ideas that have been brought up since. I was a little slow getting around to the list today (it's Saturday after all!). A recurring rhythmic figure in the piece is: q e q e / q q q - one measure clearly 6/8 and one 3/4.

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Éric Dussault
Le 06-01-21 à 11:22, Brad Beyenhof a écrit :Yes, but what if there are no beams (a half note and a quarter note, for example)?  in 6/8,  a half plus a quarter note should be written as a dotted quarter tied to an eight note plus a quarter. This make it clear for the reader that he is in 6/8. Really

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On 1/21/06, dhbailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I misunderstanding the process? Is there really a way to enter the > two different meters and have Finale automatically switch beaming > between alternating measures? Seems I was misremembering with the alternation thing. In any case, giving t

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread dhbailey
Christopher Smith wrote: On Jan 21, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Brad Beyenhof wrote: On 1/21/06, Éric Dussault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le 06-01-21 à 06:21, dhbailey a écrit : If you're just placing the two meters beside each other at the start of the work, how will anybody know when a measure is

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 21.01.2006 Brad Beyenhof wrote: Yes, I'll admit that that was a silly example, since it can easily be adapted to make either signature clear. What about a dotted half? In what way would a dotted half be performed differently in 6/8 and 3/4? Reminds me of Gerald Hoffnung (the GP in 3/4, whi

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On 1/21/06, Christopher Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 21, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Brad Beyenhof wrote: > >> Yes, but what if there are no beams (a half note and a quarter note, >> for example)? > > How would your example be performed differently in 6/8 or 3/4? > > However, the notation of it

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Christopher Smith
On Jan 21, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Brad Beyenhof wrote: On 1/21/06, Éric Dussault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le 06-01-21 à 06:21, dhbailey a écrit : If you're just placing the two meters beside each other at the start of the work, how will anybody know when a measure is supposed to get the 3/4 fe

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Carolyn Bremer
> Yes, but what if there are no beams (a half note and a quarter note, > for example)? Also, Finale might make it difficult to ensure correct > beaming, since it will alternate its default beaming between 6/8 and > 3/4 in each subsequent measure. That's what "adding" timesigs together > is supposed

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On 1/21/06, Éric Dussault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le 06-01-21 à 06:21, dhbailey a écrit : > >> If you're just placing the two meters beside each other at >> the start of the work, how will anybody know when a measure >> is supposed to get the 3/4 feeling instead of hemiolas in 6/8? >> >> With

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Éric Dussault
Le 06-01-21 à 06:21, dhbailey a écrit :If you're just placing the two meters beside each other at the start of the work, how will anybody know when a measure is supposed to get the 3/4 feeling instead of hemiolas in 6/8? With both meters allowing 6 8th notes (or 3 quarter notes) it may not be imme

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Michael Cook
I don't know what Don's piece looks like, but to take a well-known example: "I like to be in America" is notated this way, with 6/8(3/4) as time signature at the beginning, and I don't think there's any doubt how to play or conduct this piece. Michael Cook On 21 Jan 2006, at 12:21, dhbailey w

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread dhbailey
Don Hart wrote: Thank you to Johannes, Robert and Eric for the help on this. There is one thing I discovered which seems to alleviate the need for TGTools in this situation. I kept the 3/4 part of the signature in the Time Signature tool and replaced the plus sign with an *option* space. This

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-21 Thread Don Hart
Thank you to Johannes, Robert and Eric for the help on this. There is one thing I discovered which seems to alleviate the need for TGTools in this situation. I kept the 3/4 part of the signature in the Time Signature tool and replaced the plus sign with an *option* space. This gave me enough spa

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-20 Thread Éric Dussault
Le 06-01-20 à 16:36, Don Hart a écrit :I can get a beautiful 6/8 *plus* 3/4 using the composite option in "use different time signature for display", but haven't found a way to get rid of the plus sign or add the parentheses (within the realm of the time signature). To remove the plus sign, go to d

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-20 Thread Robert Patterson
Don Hart wrote: I want the time signature to be 6/8 and to have 3/4 show immediately after in parentheses. Doing it with expressions is quite painless starting in Fin04, esp. with the help of TGTools to make the space at the beginning of the bar. I don't know of a better way. I would actu

Re: [Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-20 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 20.01.2006 Don Hart wrote: I can get a beautiful 6/8 *plus* 3/4 using the composite option in "use different time signature for display", but haven't found a way to get rid of the plus sign or add the parentheses (within the realm of the time signature). I don't know about the paranthesis,

[Finale] Time signature question

2006-01-20 Thread Don Hart
I think this has been discussed before but I can't remember if there's a way to do it or not. The piece I'm working on alternates freely between 6/8 and 3/4 (probably conducted in one, with a dotted quarter = 90 bpm). Instead of cluttering the page with many, many time signatures, I want the time

Re: [Finale] time signature question

2004-11-07 Thread Stan Lord
Surely you intend that the crotchets in the 2/4 time will be dotted crotchet length of the crotchets in 3/4 time? I can't figure how you have different numbers of bars at the end. I just set up a SATB system and with staff tool set S and A to independent time sigs, selected 3 bars on these staves

Re: [Finale] time signature question

2004-11-06 Thread dhbailey
Lawrence David Eden wrote: Greetings Listers, I am try to transcribe the Zither Carol and I don't know how to make a few things happen. Here are my questions: Soprano and alto must use an independant time signature at various times during the music. The carol is written in 3/4 time, but the sopran

Re: [Finale] time signature question

2004-11-06 Thread John Poole [Finale Discussion]
Lawrence David Eden wrote: Greetings Listers, I am try to transcribe the Zither Carol and I don't know how to make a few things happen. Here are my questions: Soprano and alto must use an independant time signature at various times during the music. The carol is written in 3/4 time, but the sopran

[Finale] time signature question

2004-11-06 Thread Lawrence David Eden
Greetings Listers, I am try to transcribe the Zither Carol and I don't know how to make a few things happen. Here are my questions: Soprano and alto must use an independant time signature at various times during the music. The carol is written in 3/4 time, but the soprano and alto are in 2/4.