Honestly, I'd not recommend this at all.
Go get a cheap laser printer. A brother or something. I have a brother
1440 that is over two years old that I must have done about 20,000 pages
with, and it is a tank. The price is under $200 now. And I think it's on
it's 4th toner now?
An inkjet like th
On Jun 15, 2004, at 10:08 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Honestly, I'd not recommend this at all.
I'm no expert, but I concur.
In my encounters with HP All-in-Ones (used with a Mac), I've found them
awkward and erratic. My mother bought one and she hated it so much
that after about a week she returne
On 16.06.2004 7:08 Uhr, Eric Dannewitz wrote
> Honestly, I'd not recommend this at all.
>
> Go get a cheap laser printer. A brother or something. I have a brother
> 1440 that is over two years old that I must have done about 20,000 pages
> with, and it is a tank. The price is under $200 now. And
I agree as well. My experience with all-in-ones is that they embody the
phrase "Jack of All Trades, master of none." I used to have a gig with a
church, creating bulletins and newsletters and the HP all-in-one was nothing
but a problem.
If you're looking for recreational value, they're fine. My p
On 16 Jun 2004 at 0:03, Mark D Lew wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2004, at 10:08 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>
> > Honestly, I'd not recommend this at all.
>
> I'm no expert, but I concur.
>
> In my encounters with HP All-in-Ones (used with a Mac), I've found
> them awkward and erratic. My mother bought on
I've had an HP Gx85i for about 3 years now, and I love it. The only thing
it has not been good at is scanning -- it appears to have host driver bugs
associated with USB and Windows that they sporadically try to fix with
updates. As a printer, fax, and copier, it's been perfect.
Yeah, it eats ink.
At 08:57 AM 6/16/04 -0700, Bob Colwell wrote:
>Yeah, it eats ink. And those cartridges are expensive. Did you notice that
>17% of HP's bottom line last quarter came directly from ink cartridge sales?
Do you all refill your inkjet cartridges? I keep two carts, one new and one
refilled. The third-pa
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
While I am sure all this is correct concerning the HP All-in-ones I don't
think one can damn inkjets altogether.
I have a Canon i865, and the ink costs are probably lower than the toner
costs of my HP Laserjet, especially if I buy third party ink cartridges,
which are รข 2.50
Bob Colwell wrote:
I've had an HP Gx85i for about 3 years now, and I love it. The only thing
it has not been good at is scanning -- it appears to have host driver bugs
associated with USB and Windows that they sporadically try to fix with
updates. As a printer, fax, and copier, it's been perfect.
Y
On 16.06.2004 19:14 Uhr, Eric Dannewitz wrote
> I'd disagree about the 600x1200 printing. I have a 1200x1200 Lexmark
> printer, and a Brother 1440. I love the Lexmark's printing, as it seems
> "thicker" and it's postscript seems to give a little better output of
> slurs. However, the Brother laser
10 matches
Mail list logo
