-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Macks wrote:
|
| That's why I also mentioned adding some sort of magic number and have
| the indexer ignore any file that is newer than the level it supports.
| Maybe a "MinFinkVersion: " field as the first line?
After discussion on #fink which I
From: Darian Lanx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Martin Costabel wrote:
D. H=F6hn wrote:
I do not quite understand why. Please do not misunderstand me, I am
not
completely opposed, I just do not get why. We are good at something,
which is packaging Unix based applications.
The underlying technology is sui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 26, 2004, at 9:38 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
David R. Morrison wrote:
So you would migrate from .info files to .vinfo files, over time?
That's
quite a hack!
Seriously, if this were going to be done, then goal #1 of the hack
would be
to set up
David R. Morrison wrote:
So you would migrate from .info files to .vinfo files, over time? That's
quite a hack!
Seriously, if this were going to be done, then goal #1 of the hack would be
to set up a new, extensible, % system so that this would never need to be done
again in the future. I don't
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:38:34PM -0500, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> >So you would migrate from .info files to .vinfo files, over time? That's
> >quite a hack!
> >
> >Seriously, if this were going to be done, then goal #1 of the hack would be
> >to set up a new, extensibl
From: Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] gnome on macos x
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:25:23 -0500
> You run "gnome-session"
Here's how:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/x11/run-xfree86.php
--
+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
+ BABA Yoshihiko
+ - - - - -
So you would migrate from .info files to .vinfo files, over time? That's
quite a hack!
Seriously, if this were going to be done, then goal #1 of the hack would be
to set up a new, extensible, % system so that this would never need to be done
again in the future. I don't know what form that would
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 08:41:08PM -0500, David R. Morrison wrote:
> > So how do you feel about the .vinfo solution?
>
> Could you explain that a bit more? I didn't quite follow...
Consider foo-pm.info, which includes "Package: foo-pm%Q". This file is
not compatible with any current version of f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David R. Morrison wrote:
|>So how do you feel about the .vinfo solution?
|
|
| Could you explain that a bit more? I didn't quite follow...
Yes lets.
dmacks has added some new % expansions to fink. I assumed fink selfupdate
did the following:
1. grab
> So how do you feel about the .vinfo solution?
Could you explain that a bit more? I didn't quite follow...
-- Dave
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the b
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 02:14:00PM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Daniel Macks wrote:
> |
> | In implementing variants, I'm doing some percent expansions on Package
> | using %things that may not be known to previous fink. That means (I
> | think) that if a user selfupdates while running an older f
You run "gnome-session"
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX
On Jan 26, 2004, at 7:19 AM, Niccolò Battezzati wrote:
Hello,
I have MacOS X 10.2.8 running on my iMac. I've installed Fink (last
release) and I'm trying to use Gnome as window manager for unix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
|
| On Jan 26, 2004, at 5:52 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
|
|>> Martin Costabel wrote:
|>>
|>>> It would be better to make an Alias instead of a symlink. And put it
|>>> on the Desktop instead of /Applications. This would be less
|>>
Hello,
I have MacOS X 10.2.8 running on my iMac. I've installed Fink (last
release) and I'm trying to use Gnome as window manager for unix
applications. I installed the bundle-gnome package but I can't run it.
If I call the startx command (with -fullscreen or -rootless) it runs
XFree86.
Can yo
In my view, the main reason for doing this is that there already exists
software out there which on the one hand depends on UNIX libraries which
are (or should be) part of Fink, but on the other hand is packaged in
OS X form, as an .app bundle which uses a Cocoa interface.
Either all of the Unix l
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Martin Costabel wrote:
> > I believe we have one or two command line apps in fink which are binary.
>
> One of them is aquaterm that installs an app into /sw/Applications. I
> never liked the fact that this is a binary installation, even when you
> do "fink install". But I thi
On Jan 25, 2004, at 8:44 PM, James Gibbs wrote:
On Jan 25, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Pierre Mazoyer wrote:
## Dependencies
Depends: tcltk (>= 8.0), tcltk-dev (>= 8.0), tcltk-shlibs (>= 8.0)
Forgot to mention that versioned deps have to have a revision, like:
Depends: tcltk (>= 8.0.0-1), etc.
James
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Martin Costabel wrote:
D. Höhn wrote:
[]
I do not quite understand why. Please do not misunderstand me, I am not
completely opposed, I just do not get why. We are good at something,
which is packaging Unix based applications. There are enough
Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 26, 2004, at 5:52 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
It would be better to make an Alias instead of a symlink. And put it
on the Desktop instead of /Applications. This would be less
intrusive. During package installation, people
Ben Hines wrote:
Fine by me, as long as we stick to open source applications ONLY. The
No one ever suggested anything else.
objection about 'moving apps around' never did make sense to me, i think
a more important objection is fink losing focus.
I believe we have one or two command line apps
This sounds like a nice solution.
Keith
On Jan 26, 2004, at 5:52 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
It would be better to make an Alias instead of a symlink. And put it
on the Desktop instead of /Applications. This would be less
intrusive. During package installation, people are us
D. Höhn wrote:
[]
I do not quite understand why. Please do not misunderstand me, I am not
completely opposed, I just do not get why. We are good at something,
which is packaging Unix based applications. There are enough
This is a false opposition. There are more and more "Unix based
applications"
Martin Costabel wrote:
It would be better to make an Alias instead of a symlink. And put it on
the Desktop instead of /Applications. This would be less intrusive.
During package installation, people are used to things appearing on the
desktop.
I can imagine installing KDE and having 150 apps on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 26, 2004, at 5:32 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
David R. Morrison wrote:
My proposal is that we place .app's in /sw/Applications, and then in a
postinstall script, set up a symlink from /Applications to the actual
.app.
It would be better to mak
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 26, 2004, at 1:42 AM, D. Höhn wrote:
|>I think we will have to restart the old discussion of
/sw/Applications,
|>too. And I mean a real discussion, not the hasty erection of
religious
|>taboos as we had in the past. I would really love to see t
David R. Morrison wrote:
[]
My proposal is that we place .app's in /sw/Applications, and then in a
postinstall script, set up a symlink from /Applications to the actual .app.
It would be better to make an Alias instead of a symlink. And put it on
the Desktop instead of /Applications. This would be
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 07:39:14PM -0500, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:10:24AM +0100, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 04:39:27AM -0500, Daniel Macks wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:22:04AM +0100, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote:
> > > > On
Hi Dustin, hi TheSin
I am sorry to bother you again on this topic. I heard that you, Dustin,
are working on upgrading apache2 and php to work with bdb4.2. Still, i
haven't seen as sign on that yet since December.
Subversion yesterday released a new version, 0.37, which is probably
the last bet
Joe Corneli wrote:
gnuplot> history
warning: history command requires some form of readline support
fink list readline
Information about 2434 packages read in 2 seconds.
i readline 4.3-25 Comfortable terminal input library
i readline-shlibs4.3-25
29 matches
Mail list logo
