Re: [Fink-devel] PDB pages

Am 13.01.2007 um 23:01 schrieb Michèle Garoche: > > Le 13 janv. 2007 à 15:12, Max Horn a écrit : [...] >> 2) Would somebody mind if I changed the PDB package page (i.e. >> package.php) to put the description inside a field? This way, >> descriptions that use formatting (like

Re: [Fink-devel] PDB pages

Le 13 janv. 2007 à 15:12, Max Horn a écrit :Hi,some questions/things:1) I just noticed that yields an empty  page. Couldn't this be made to redirect to  pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/> ?2) Would somebody mind if I changed the PDB package page (i.e.  package.php) to put the d

Re: [Fink-devel] Python 2.5 error

I had a think about it the speed issues and fink installed CcpNmr. Assuming you weer using the same python version of CcpNmr (ccpnmr- py25), the speed issue could be down to having your .py files not byte-compiled. This is often the case because the fink directory is only root enabled. Once y

Re: [Fink-devel] PDB pages

FYI, I added an prototype of browse.php to CVS, you can try it out here: It's still very rough, ugly, missing features, etc., but maybe somebody is interested in helping with it -- I won't work any more on it for today, so feel free to add the miss

Re: [Fink-devel] multilib builds

On Jan 13, 2007, at 10:57 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > > As to the general problem, on the one hand I see no major reason > not to allow > %lib w/o the Type field; on the other hand I prefer general mechanisms > _ like allowing conditionals _ to very specialised ones ... > The %lib mecha

Re: [Fink-devel] multilib builds

On 13 Jan 2007, at 16:57, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > 1) everything in the ppc64 or x86_64 subdirectory of /sw/lib/gcc4.2/ > lib should go in the -shlibs splitoff. "everything" = *.*.dylib , of course.. JF - Take Surveys

Re: [Fink-devel] multilib builds

On 13 Jan 2007, at 17:30, Jack Howarth wrote: > JF > The fat libgcc files are as expected... Of course. Was just correcting an inaccuracy... > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 04:00:47PM +0100, Jean-François Mertens wrote: >> >> On 13 Jan 2007, at 14:59, Jack Howarth wrote: >> >>> Dave, >>> The anal

Re: [Fink-devel] multilib builds

On 13 Jan 2007, at 14:59, Jack Howarth wrote: >We really do want to move the libraries currently in > /sw/lib/gcc4.2/lib/ppc64 from the gcc42 package to the > gcc42-shlibs package. Otherwise anything built with -m64 > will break when we need to create a gcc43 package later > since the gcc4X p

Re: [Fink-devel] multilib builds

On 13 Jan 2007, at 14:59, Jack Howarth wrote: > Dave, >The analysis of gcc42 is incorrect. There are no fat binaries > created but rather an explicit 64-bit subdirectory. A small correction: at least I am getting 3 fat libraries /sw/lib/ gcc4.2/lib/libgcc_s.*.dylib Jean-Francois -

Re: [Fink-devel] PDB pages

On 1/13/07, Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > some questions/things: > > 1) I just noticed that yields an empty > page. Couldn't this be made to redirect to pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/> ? > > > 2) Would somebody mind if I changed the PDB package page (i.e. >

[Fink-devel] PDB pages

Hi, some questions/things: 1) I just noticed that yields an empty page. Couldn't this be made to redirect to ? 2) Would somebody mind if I changed the PDB package page (i.e. package.php) to put the description inside a field? This way, descriptions that use

Re: [Fink-devel] multilib builds

Dave, One other note. While both Apple's and FSF's gcc both have ppc64 and x86_64 subdirectories, I would note that Apple's compiler uses lipo to create fat shared libs but FSF gcc doesn't. One reason for this may be that the FSF gcc is intended to be used with MacOS X as far back as 10.3.9. In

Re: [Fink-devel] multilib builds

Dave, The analysis of gcc42 is incorrect. There are no fat binaries created but rather an explicit 64-bit subdirectory. So we have for example... /sw/lib/gcc4.2/lib/libgfortran.2.0.0.dylib currently in the gcc42-shlibs package and... /sw/lib/gcc4.2/lib/ppc64/libgfortran.2.dylib in the gcc42

Re: [Fink-devel] multilib builds

On Jan 12, 2007, at 8:20 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 1/12/07, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>I'm still unclear how we can leverage the architecture Shlibs >> field for the multilib build of the gcc42 package. The standard >> multilib installation for gcc is to have the shared

Re: [Fink-devel] multilib builds

On Jan 12, 2007, at 6:53 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >I'm still unclear how we can leverage the architecture Shlibs > field for the multilib build of the gcc42 package. The standard > multilib installation for gcc is to have the shared libs installed > for the default architecture (32-bit for Dar