On 2010-01-03 17:11:55 +, Martin Costabel said:
Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
On 10.6/32bit: Builds but doesn't install
Unpacking sbcl (from .../sbcl_1.0.34-1_darwin-i386.deb) ...
### execution of /sw32/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 6
/sw32/bin/dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by
Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
main/archives.c:tarobject() uses a static buffer to store a filename
during installation. Wanna guess the size of fnamebuf[]? Try bumping
it to something much larger. Latest dpkg upstream still has this
same hardcoded size.
This may even be legal, seeing that
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:39:45AM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote:
Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
main/archives.c:tarobject() uses a static buffer to store a filename
during installation. Wanna guess the size of fnamebuf[]? Try bumping
it to something much larger. Latest dpkg upstream still has this
Jesse Alama wrote:
[]
I just committed an updated SBCL (version 1.0.34) to my experimental
repository:
http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fink/experimental/jessealama/
Can you please give this a try? I didn't do anything new apart from bumping
the version, but perhaps this will
Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
On 10.6/32bit: Builds but doesn't install
Unpacking sbcl (from .../sbcl_1.0.34-1_darwin-i386.deb) ...
### execution of /sw32/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 6
/sw32/bin/dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Updating the list of locally
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:11:55PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
On 10.6/32bit: Builds but doesn't install
Unpacking sbcl (from .../sbcl_1.0.34-1_darwin-i386.deb) ...
### execution of /sw32/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 6
/sw32/bin/dpkg-deb: subprocess
Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
This looks like dpkg is not able to handle files with a file name longer
than 256 characters. On the other hand, I don't understand why this bug
only shows up on 10.6/32bit and not on 10.6/64bit nor on 10.5/32bit.
Also doesn't seem to choke on 10.4/ppc. Wonder if
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:09:09PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote:
Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
This looks like dpkg is not able to handle files with a file name longer
than 256 characters. On the other hand, I don't understand why this bug
only shows up on 10.6/32bit and not on 10.6/64bit nor
That's odd. As far as I can tell Martin Costabel's instructions should
have made dpkg forget about sbcl altogether.
Could you possibly post your /sw/var/lib/dpkg/status file to some Web
or FTP server so that we are able to get it? If that's not possible,
send it to my e-mail address (do not
Dr. Wolfram Schroers wrote:
Martin,
I have followed the instructions and removed the entries from
/sw/var/lib/dpkg/status. There were no files with sbcl in their names in the
/sw/var/lib/dpkg/info subdirectory. Finally, I ran fink scanpackages and
sudo apt-get update.
When trying to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/1/10 11:05 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Dr. Wolfram Schroers wrote:
Martin,
I have followed the instructions and removed the entries from
/sw/var/lib/dpkg/status. There were no files with sbcl in their names in the
/sw/var/lib/dpkg/info
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
I was told that the package functioned on 10.6/64-bit. I didn't have
time actually to verify that on a clean 10.6 system at that time, but
verified that it works on 10.5; I applied an update to maxima concurrently.
There is something weird going on: I have two build
Martin Costabel wrote:
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
I was told that the package functioned on 10.6/64-bit. I didn't have
time actually to verify that on a clean 10.6 system at that time, but
verified that it works on 10.5; I applied an update to maxima concurrently.
There is something weird
Dr. Wolfram Schroers wrote:
[]
Error message from sudo apt-get remove sbcl:
[]
/sw/bin/dpkg: error processing sbcl (--remove):
Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should
reinstall it before attempting a removal.
In such a situation, I found that the only solution is to
Martin,
I have followed the instructions and removed the entries from
/sw/var/lib/dpkg/status. There were no files with sbcl in their names in the
/sw/var/lib/dpkg/info subdirectory. Finally, I ran fink scanpackages and
sudo apt-get update.
When trying to install sbcl again, I got an error
Hi,
Unfortunately, this didn't solve the problem.
I have deleted the source files, the deb files and rebuilt sbcl from the latest
source on the mirror. Neither fink nor apt-get allow me to install nor remove
sbcl.
Error message from sudo apt-get remove sbcl:
Reading Package Lists... Done
Hi,
When trying to install the package sbcl, I run into the following installer
error. The compilation was fine, but the installation fails. Afterwards, I also
get error messages about the 'missing file list'. The file, /sw/bin/sbcl
exists, however, although Fink does not list the package in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/29/09 5:05 AM, Wolfram Schroers wrote:
Hi,
When trying to install the package sbcl, I run into the following installer
error. The compilation was fine, but the installation fails. Afterwards, I
also get error messages about the 'missing
18 matches
Mail list logo
