I am stumped over something fink is doing to my
sed commands. I need to be able to execute...
sed -i -e "s|tjmp %%edx|tjmp *%%edx|g" i386.c;
inside of a sh shell patch script. However fink
seems to insist on changing the *%% to *%. This
is what an echo of ""tjmp *%%edx" shows when
executed in t
I have a problem that I know others have experienced but I have not been
able to find
a solution.
The problem is ruinning texshop with the tex and ghostscript option.
If I start tex shop using either texshop or the file (that is using the
finder),
it will not compile and complain that formats hav
Hi guys,
I just wanted to know the state of the Jaguar version of Fink. Will we have
a working fink for the release of Jag ?
Thanks,
Pejvan
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing
real-time communication
> The simplest thing to do is to simply add this as an alternative method.
> But we were just discussing on #fink a more drastic change: we could
> scrap anonymous cvs access altogether, and offer only two access
> methods, rsync or ext cvs (the latter for fink developers only).
Has CVS been scra
On January 16th, I'll be leaving Apple to pursue opportunities in
Boston. I intend to continue working with Fink and hacking on
buildfink, and Apple will be remaining involved as well. Dr. Ernie
Prabhakar, whom many of you know as the Open Source Product Manager,
will be taking over my ro
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 09:01:48PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> I am stumped over something fink is doing to my
> sed commands. I need to be able to execute...
>
> sed -i -e "s|tjmp %%edx|tjmp *%%edx|g" i386.c;
>
> inside of a sh shell patch script. However fink
> seems to insist on changing th
On 20 Nov 2007, at 03:01, Jack Howarth wrote:
> I am stumped over something fink is doing to my
> sed commands. I need to be able to execute...
>
> sed -i -e "s|tjmp %%edx|tjmp *%%edx|g" i386.c;
And on another vein than dmacks's, you shouldn't ever
use this in an info file: fink's sed or ssed
I'm finally about to cut over from 10.4 to 10.5. What will this do
to my fink install? Do I need to recompile everything? Do I need
to reinstall? Will it be relatively trivial? Transparent?
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ht
I am in the process of preparing llvm and
llvm-gcc-4.2 packaging for the new llvm 2.5
release (which finally has a usable gfortran
that passes the Polyhedron benchmarks). The
packaging uses the Xcode 3.1 linker in
/Developer/usr/bin so that the LTO is available
at -O4 in the compilers. I am als
Hi,
I recently found my newly installed fink was crashing because I have installed
some old version of libfreetype in /usr/local by iInstaller. This
makes me wondering
should fink restrict it is search path? Of couse I have deleted /usr/local and
iInstaller altogether in favor of fink. However, it
Hi,
Is there a place were we can talk about issues with fink and 10.4 ? I
have one particular package which behave strangely and I'm kind of at
lost. I don't think it's a fink issue though.
Thanks,
Yarden
---
SF.Net email is sponsored b
Hi Peter,
I'm a Fink committer and am working on getting Ruby up to date so it can support
the new popular Ruby on Rails web development platform.
One of the databases it supports is sqlite. I'm looking at it and have several
questions.
1) Are you still supporting sqlite? I haven't seen a
I think fink 0.39.0 supports OS X 10.11, but I haven’t seen any official info
to confirm this. I’d like to update from OS X 10.10 to 10.11 soon. What is
the official path to do this?
Thanks,
Kevin Horton
Ottawa, Canada
--
I use the fink tetex and ghostscript along with TeXShop--it just involves
changing the default file location in the TeXShop preferences.
Refresh my memory: texlive isn't the same as the Wierda TeX distribution,
is it? I've only used Wierda's when I did the non-fink TeX and
ghostscript. In any
At 15:34 Uhr +0200 25.07.2002, Pejvan 'battôsaï' BEIGUI wrote:
>Hi guys,
>
>I just wanted to know the state of the Jaguar version of Fink. Will we have
>a working fink for the release of Jag ?
A new fink release is planned before the Jag release. Most package
from the bindist should work on Jagua
Thx for the reply.
I've already read this somewhere else :
> Since Jaguar uses GCC 3.1, anything that use C++ will be binary
> incompatible to stuff build with GCC 2.95.
But I don't have any explanation. Can you point me to some docs please ?
Thanks,
Pejvan
On Thursday, July 25, 2002, at 04:08 PM, Pejvan 'battôsaï' BEIGUI wrote:
> I've already read this somewhere else :
>> Since Jaguar uses GCC 3.1, anything that use C++ will be binary
>> incompatible to stuff build with GCC 2.95.
>
> But I don't have any explanation. Can you point me to some docs
03 3:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fink-devel] fink and CVS?
> The simplest thing to do is to simply add this as an alternative method.
> But we were just discussing on #fink a more drastic change: we could
> scrap anonymous cvs access altogether, and offer only two access
> met
--it's having problems again. Keep trying.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Novak
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 3:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Fink-devel] fink and CVS?
>
> > T
Kaben Nanlohy said the following on 10/9/03 12:57 PM:
Or switch to the rsync update method. Download and unpack
http://fink.opendarwin.org/fink/fink-0.14.0.tar.gz,
then "cd fink-0.14.0; sudo ./inject.pl /sw",
then "fink selfupdate-rsync".
Just a note on this.
Please be advised that this method i
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> I'm finally about to cut over from 10.4 to 10.5. What will this do
> to my fink install? Do I need to recompile everything? Do I need
> to reinstall? Will it be relatively trivial? Transparent?
>
>
It's relatively straightforward, as long as you're on the 0.8.1
> "Alexander" == Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexander> If you're on 0.8.1, then do a final "fink selfupdate" with rsync or
Alexander> cvs updating under OS 10.4 to insure you're on fink-0.27.10,
Alexander> install OS 10.5, and then do "fink reinstall fink ; fink
Alexander> se
After a MAJOR version change like this, is there any benefit in recompiling all
source (i.e., pick up new libraries & optimizations, etc.), performance or
security-wise?
On Wednesday, March 26, 2008, at 01:44PM, "Randal L. Schwartz" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Alexander" == Alexander Ha
I wouldn't imagine so. One reason we use dynamic libraries is that
updates, as long as they're compatible with the prior version,
automatically get used--no rebuild needed. If they're not compatible,
then that's another matter.
Juan M. Courcoul wrote:
> After a MAJOR version change like this,
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:10:45AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> The fink maintainer mode is confused by
> libLTO.dylib because it's otool -L output shows...
>
> libLTO.dylib:
> @executable_path/../lib/libLTO.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,
> current version 2056.0.0)
> /us
Daniel,
I agree its only valid depending upon the location.
However, the point of the exercise here is to provide
the user with the option of using full LTO by bundling
a copy of llvm 2.5's libLTO.dylib with the llvm packages.
I guess we will just have to ignore the maintainer mode
errors.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Min Xu wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I recently found my newly installed fink was crashing because I have
installed
| some old version of libfreetype in /usr/local by iInstaller. This
| makes me wondering
| should fink restrict it is search path?
/usr/local is
On Aug 17, 2004, at 8:14 PM, Yarden Livnat wrote:
Hi,
Is there a place were we can talk about issues with fink and 10.4 ? I
have one particular package which behave strangely and I'm kind of at
lost. I don't think it's a fink issue though.
Thanks,
Yarden
Sorry, we don't have a place to talk abo
Daniel,
You might want to take a look at how fink currently handles Provides.
As I mentioned before, I had to create a new revision of fftw (2.1.5-6)
because the addition of "Provides: fftw" to both the fftw and fftw-mpi as
well as "Provides: fftw-shlibs" to both the fftw-shlibs and fftw-mpi-sh
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 13:35, Kevin Horton wrote:
>
> I think fink 0.39.0 supports OS X 10.11, but I haven’t seen any official info
> to confirm this. I’d like to update from OS X 10.10 to 10.11 soon. What is
> the official path to do this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin Horton
> Ottawa, Canada
Ther
Considering that Apple will likely be announcing dual quad core
systems in the near future, I wonder if fink should adopt some
policy on packaging that utilizes the extra cores. Specifically
if we should have two changes. One would be a setting in fink.conf
which would either allow fink to use a
I've been trying to bootstrap the latest Fink sources (0.27.4, 0.27.6) on my Leopard box but I keep getting the same errors:cd lib; make allgcc -g -O2 -I. -c ./getopt.c./getopt.c: In function '_getopt_internal':./getopt.c:648: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'strlen'
update-all-bash: fink: command not foundI'm lost again,-B--Message: 2Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:34:05 -0400From: Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] Fink and Latest Leopard 10.5To: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.netMessage-ID: <[E
Hi,
has anyone used fink and darwinports together? Is there any advantage of
using both? It seems to be a lot of overlapping packages between them.
And how about adding yum into the concortion?
Thanks
Maurice
---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed
On Aug 24, 2004, at 10:14 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Daniel,
You might want to take a look at how fink currently handles
Provides.
As I mentioned before, I had to create a new revision of fftw (2.1.5-6)
because the addition of "Provides: fftw" to both the fftw and fftw-mpi
as
well as "Provides:
Dave,
Could you look at the current fftw.info and grace.info in unstable
and make some suggestions? The problem that the Provides was meant to
solve was the following. If one does "fink install grace" it will
automatically install fftw. However without the Provides: fftw-shlibs
added to fftw.in
Dave,
Can you clarify this a little more? I don't quite see where the
breakage will occur if I use Provides: fftw-shlibs in the main fftw
package which contains the headers. For example, I did...
fink install gromacs (picking fftw)
fink install gromacs-mpi (which installed fftw-mpi)
Then I
I have a package for Fink that is completely CPU ignorant; how should
I mark it such in the .info file?
Also, what is the generic approach taken towards PowerPC/Intel issue,
which now gets more concrete.
I found no notion at:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/packaging/reference.php?
phpLa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Howarth wrote:
>Considering that Apple will likely be announcing dual quad core
> systems in the near future, I wonder if fink should adopt some
> policy on packaging that utilizes the extra cores. Specifically
> if we should have two changes.
>Considering that Apple will likely be announcing dual quad core
> systems in the near future, I wonder if fink should adopt some policy
> on packaging that utilizes the extra cores. Specifically if we should
> have two changes. One would be a setting in fink.conf which would
> either allow fin
David,
What I am suggesting is not quite making the packages
build as multi-procs by default by rather allow certain
very large packages (like gcc42) do so if the user
consents. Also, I'm not suggesting injecting MAKEFLAGS
into the user environment. What I was suggesting that
the user have veto
I've been doing this:
eg (from cctbx):
# Find the number of cpus:
num_cpu=$( sysctl hw.logicalcpu | awk '{print $NF}' )
# On a machine with multiple CPUs enter:
libtbx.scons -j $num_cpu .
So far no one has complained, so I am hoping it is legal...
(It doesn't ask permission.)
Bill
-
Brent Austin wrote:
> I've been trying to bootstrap the latest Fink sources (0.27.4, 0.27.6)
> on my Leopard box but I keep getting the same errors:
>
> cd lib; make all
> gcc -g -O2 -I. -c ./getopt.c
> ./getopt.c: In function '_getopt_internal':
> ./getopt.c:648: warning: incompatible implicit de
Ooops, never mind--just noticed that you're on Leopard. Can't answer
some Leopard questions on the public lists yet due to the NDA.
On 9/9/07, Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brent Austin wrote:
> > I've been trying to bootstrap the latest Fink sources (0.27.4, 0.27.6)
> > on my
On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 17:57 -0700, Brent Austin wrote:
> I've been trying to bootstrap the latest Fink sources (0.27.4, 0.27.6)
> on my Leopard box but I keep getting the same errors:
> gcc -g -O2 -I. -c ./getopt1.c
> g++ -I. -c ./getline.cc
> /usr/include/stdio.h: In function 'int __sputc(int, F
Brent,
Are you trying to bootstrap Leopard from a fink cvs pull?
You do realize that you have to use a cvs pull from fink and
not any of the release tarballs for fink. The instructions for
pull from the fink cvs are at...
http://www.finkproject.org/doc/cvsaccess/index.php
these are correct ex
Jack Howarth wrote:
> Brent,
> Are you trying to bootstrap Leopard from a fink cvs pull?
> You do realize that you have to use a cvs pull from fink and
> not any of the release tarballs for fink. The instructions for
> pull from the fink cvs are at...
>
> http://www.finkproject.org/doc/cvsacces
On Sep 11, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> Jack Howarth wrote:
>> Brent,
>> Are you trying to bootstrap Leopard from a fink cvs pull?
>> You do realize that you have to use a cvs pull from fink and
>> not any of the release tarballs for fink. The instructions for
>> pull from t
Brent Austin wrote:
> I got fink to build (and I guess install as well) install from a cvs pull.
> Only problem I have now is that none of the commands that I try do anything.
> All I get is:
>
> brent-austins-power-mac-g5:~ brentaustin$ fink selfupdate
> -bash: fink: command not found
> brent-au
I tired that too. Is there something I need to do after running ./bootstrap?
-B
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: "Alexander K. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] Fink and Latest Leopard 10.5
Date:
omething blocking that operation.
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> From: "Alexander K. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] Fink and Latest Leopard 10.5
> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 200
CC: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] Fink and Latest Leopard 10.5
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:46:36 -0400
Brent Austin wrote:
> I tired that too. Is there something I need to do after running ./bootstrap?
> -B
>
>
Try running "/sw/bin/pathsetup.sh" (as
you may have to edit your
shell startup script (.profile, .bash_profile, or whatever you're using)
manually and insert that command there, if the pathsetup script isn't
working for you.
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> From: "Alexander K. Hansen" <[EMAIL PR
Brent Austin wrote:
> OK it workedI think?
>
> brent-austins-power-mac-g5:bin brentaustin$ ./pathsetup.sh
> 2007-09-13 06:38:07.673 osascript[23593:10b] Error loading
> /Library/QuickTime/LiveType.component/Contents/MacOS/LiveType:
> dlopen(/Library/QuickTime/LiveType.component/Contents/Mac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Maurice Ling wrote:
Hi,
has anyone used fink and darwinports together? Is there any advantage of
using both? It seems to be a lot of overlapping packages between them.
And how about adding yum into the concortion?
Mac os X Hints had a 'hint' h
Please excuse me for continuing a discussion that is several months
old, but I am still not sure about a few things.
On 1/11/06, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2006, at 10:05 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
>
> > On 1/10/06, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
On Jul 28, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
> Please excuse me for continuing a discussion that is several months
> old, but I am still not sure about a few things.
>
> On 1/11/06, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2006, at 10:05 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
>>
>
> The Package field is sbcl for both packages. You need an
> Architecture field for each one, and the names of the files should be
> sbcl-powerpc.info and sbcl-i386.info.
>
ok, thanks!
> > On a sort of related note, another common lisp implementation I
> > maintain now has a 64bit G5 specific v
On Jul 29, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
>
>> > On a sort of related note, another common lisp implementation I
>> > maintain now has a 64bit G5 specific version in addition to the
>> > original generic powerpc version. What can I do to ensure that
>> only
>> > someone with a G5 ins
On 7/29/06, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 29, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
> > This package (64bit version of openmcl) doesn't create any libraries,
> > but there is an executable and lisp heap image, both 64bit, and both
> > specific to 64bit powerpc processo
On Jan 6, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Asko Kauppi wrote:
I have a package for Fink that is completely CPU ignorant; how
should I mark it such in the .info file?
That's the default behavior; no need to mark anything.
Also, what is the generic approach taken towards PowerPC/Intel
issue, which now
On Jan 10, 2006, at 10:05 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
On 1/10/06, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Asko Kauppi wrote:
I have a package for Fink that is completely CPU ignorant; how
should I mark it such in the .info file?
That's the default behavior
At 22:32 Uhr +0100 11.02.2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> > nsmith> packages, but it's still quite a few thousand files. Does
>> > anyone know
>> > nsmith> what the default maximum number of inodes is in OS X? This is a
>> > nsmith> pretty fundamental limit on what
On Tuesday, February 12, 2002, at 12:52 , Max Horn wrote:
> At 22:32 Uhr +0100 11.02.2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> > nsmith> packages, but it's still quite a few thousand files. Does
>>> > anyone know
>>> > nsmith> what the default maximum number of inodes i
64 matches
Mail list logo
