[Fink-devel] New package: Mednafen (1876940)

Hello, I've recently built a Fink package out of Mednafen which is a pretty good command-line based emulator for many game consoles, such as Gameboy (Color), Gameboy Advance, NES, Sega Mastersystem, PC-Engine and some more. As far as I can see the package complies with the Fink standards and I ch

Re: [Fink-devel] new package help: kodos

Feel free to take it. That's the whole idea of my info file dumping zone :) I 2nd Dan's comments about it needing help. I think this is both used by other programs (which one I can't remember... or am I imagining things) and is an app too. This reminds me that I need to fix up epydoc. Doh! -k

Re: [Fink-devel] new package help: kodos

On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:47:22AM -0600, Robert T Wyatt wrote: > Daniel E. Macks wrote: > >> Robert T Wyatt wrote: > >>> I've gotten to here so far: > >>> http://reg066.reg.utexas.edu/fink/kodos-py.info > >> > >> Here's the remaining error: > >> > >> Error: File in a language-versioned package is

Re: [Fink-devel] new package help: kodos

Daniel E. Macks wrote: >> Robert T Wyatt wrote: >>> I've gotten to here so far: >>> http://reg066.reg.utexas.edu/fink/kodos-py.info >> >> Here's the remaining error: >> >> Error: File in a language-versioned package is neither versioned nor in >> a versioned directory. >> Offending file:

Re: [Fink-devel] new package help: kodos

Robert T Wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Robert T Wyatt wrote: >> Hi Kurt, >> >> It's helping me. :-) Do you mind if I take it and run with it? It now >> builds and installs but doesn't validate because it's installing stuff >> in /usr/share/ but your work has helped me understand how to deal

Re: [Fink-devel] new package help: kodos

Robert T Wyatt wrote: > Hi Kurt, > > It's helping me. :-) Do you mind if I take it and run with it? It now > builds and installs but doesn't validate because it's installing stuff > in /usr/share/ but your work has helped me understand how to deal with > the INFO2 and the -py split-off. > > I'

Re: [Fink-devel] new package help: kodos

Hi Kurt, It's helping me. :-) Do you mind if I take it and run with it? It now builds and installs but doesn't validate because it's installing stuff in /usr/share/ but your work has helped me understand how to deal with the INFO2 and the -py split-off. I've gotten to here so far: http://reg06

Re: [Fink-devel] new package help: kodos

ge: 8 Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:30:46 -0600 From: Robert T Wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] new package help: kodos To: fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; char

Re: [Fink-devel] new package help: kodos

Martin Costabel wrote: > Robert T Wyatt wrote: > [] >> Can't exec "./configure": No such file or directory at >> /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm line 584, line 1. [see below] > > This thing is a python module. No configure or make involved. > You want to have a look at other "*-py" packages to se

Re: [Fink-devel] new package help: kodos

Robert T Wyatt wrote: [] > Can't exec "./configure": No such file or directory at > /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm line 584, line 1. [see below] This thing is a python module. No configure or make involved. You want to have a look at other "*-py" packages to see how they are compiled. Hint: If

Re: [Fink-devel] new package help: kodos

Alexander Hansen wrote: > I'd recommend holding off on putting it on the tracker until it > actually at least builds on -your- system. :-) My preference for the > tracker is for packages to build successfully under "fink -m > --build-as-nobody (re)build", because that reduces the iterations on > t

Re: [Fink-devel] new package help: kodos

On 12/30/06, Robert T Wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to build a fink package from the kodos project at > SourceForge. I'm sure I've already made some mistakes in the info file, > but it validates. However I get ye Olde make error: > > make: *** No targets specified and no makefile fo

[Fink-devel] new package help: kodos

I'm trying to build a fink package from the kodos project at SourceForge. I'm sure I've already made some mistakes in the info file, but it validates. However I get ye Olde make error: make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. ### execution of make failed, exit code 2 This is

Re: [Fink-devel] New package bluefish-unstable

Hello baba,Le 15 févr. 2006 à 02:36, BABA Yoshihiko a écrit :Michèle 2006/2/11, Michèle Garoche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: As there is a chill in Fink trees, I've put  there:new info file for bluefish-unstable: bluefish-unstable.info (shoul

Re: [Fink-devel] New package bluefish-unstable

Michèle 2006/2/11, Michèle Garoche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: As there is a chill in Fink trees, I've put  there:new info file for bluefish-unstable: bluefish-unstable.info (should be revision 1.1 on the site)It is the future of bluefish. I

[Fink-devel] New package bluefish-unstable

As there is a chill in Fink trees, I've put there: new info file for bluefish-unstable: bluefish-unstable.info (should be revision 1.1 on the site) It is the future of bluefish. If you want to influence or participate in its

[Fink-devel] new package - need feedback

OK I just uploaded a new package libetpan into the tracker. This is intended to provide IMAP4 support to sylpheed-claws which I have working locally but won't upload until libetpan makes it into CVS to avoid claws beating it to it (the current version uploaded is marked as a preview and has no

[Fink-devel] new "package issue" page on Wiki

Until we get a friendly bug tracker working, I've set up a page on the wiki at http://wiki.opendarwin.org/index.php/Fink:Package_issues and will put a page on the FAQ pointing to this. That way users don't have to try to wade through the SF tracker system to find out about problems with p

Re: [Fink-devel] New Package: PNGwriter 0.5.0

Paul, (B (BOn 2004.12.25, at 14:05, individual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (B (B>A long time ago, I wondered about adding my project, PNGwriter, to the (B>list of Fink packages. Alexander Hansen suggested I have a go at the (B>packaging myself. I finally got around to it today. (B> (B>I

[Fink-devel] New Package: PNGwriter 0.5.0

Hi, A long time ago, I wondered about adding my project, PNGwriter, to the list of Fink packages. Alexander Hansen suggested I have a go at the packaging myself. I finally got around to it today. I submitted a package request tracker, and then decided to have a go at it myself. I then submit

Re: [Fink-devel] New package for PyX 0.7.1

It going to become a nightmare!! :-( Ok, I've just posted on the package tracker a new version that should fix everything (symlink trick adopted). I've installed Fink teTeX and tested against it: it works!! Anyway, I thinks it would be better to warn the Fink teTeX maintainer about this problem

Re: [Fink-devel] New package for PyX 0.7.1

Andrea Riciputi wrote: Hi, I've just submitted to the Package Tracker the new info and patch files for the new version of PyX (0.7.1). It doesn't need the tipa.sty LaTeX package anymore, so it should work

[Fink-devel] New package for PyX 0.7.1

Hi, I've just submitted to the Package Tracker the new info and patch files for the new version of PyX (0.7.1). It doesn't need the tipa.sty LaTeX package anymore, so it should work even with Fink's teTeX.

Re: [Fink-devel] New package: pgp4pine

David R. Morrison writes: > If you sign up for a sourceforge account and are logged in to sourceforge > when you access that page, it will look different: there will be a button > which allows you to submit something new. Ah, cool. Okay, will do -- and I'll resubmit the pgp4pine package there; s

Re: [Fink-devel] New package: pgp4pine

Hoss, If you sign up for a sourceforge account and are logged in to sourceforge when you access that page, it will look different: there will be a button which allows you to submit something new. I agree that our instructions need improvement. -- Dave

Re: [Fink-devel] New package: pgp4pine

Alexander K. Hansen writes: >> One small gripe: could you folks please try to make it easier for >> people outside the project to make contributions? [...] The homepage link >> titled "Submit a new Fink package" simply leads to the SourceForge package >> request tracker -- which doesn't seem to pr

Re: [Fink-devel] New package: pgp4pine

"David H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > > > The homepage link titled "Submit a new Fink package" simply > >> leads to the SourceForge package request tracker -- which doesn't seem > >> to provide any obvious method for actually *submitting* a new package. > >> > >>

Re: [Fink-devel] New package: pgp4pine

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Alexander K. Hansen wrote: The homepage link titled "Submit a new Fink package" simply leads to the SourceForge package request tracker -- which doesn't seem to provide any obvious method for actually *submitting* a new package. Thanks again, -

Re: [Fink-devel] New package: pgp4pine

On Apr 2, 2004, at 1:20 PM, Hoss Firooznia wrote: Hello Fink developers, First, a big thank you for all your hard work. As a longtime BSD person who's recently started working on an OS X box, Fink has been a tremendous help. I've included a shell archive of a proposed Fink package of pgp4pine, a

[Fink-devel] New package: pgp4pine

Hello Fink developers, First, a big thank you for all your hard work. As a longtime BSD person who's recently started working on an OS X box, Fink has been a tremendous help. I've included a shell archive of a proposed Fink package of pgp4pine, a small program that allows quick signing/{en,de}cry

Re: [Fink-devel] new package - gnome include problems

On Feb 5, 2004, at 7:31 PM, Kevin Horton wrote: I am trying to get fplan to compile with the X11 interface so I can create a fink package for it. http://www.ibiblio.org/fplan/ I added the CLI variant to fink awhile ago, but I am stumped by the X11 option. I have created a test .info and .patc

[Fink-devel] new package - gnome include problems

I am trying to get fplan to compile with the X11 interface so I can create a fink package for it. http://www.ibiblio.org/fplan/ I added the CLI variant to fink awhile ago, but I am stumped by the X11 option. I have created a test .info and .patch file, based on what worked with the CLI versio

Re: [Fink-devel] new package

On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Koen Vervloesem wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a long-time Fink user, but I don't know how I have to commit a new > package. I have made an info and a patch file for the network tool > hping and I have included them here. What's the next thing I have to > do? I'm interested in committin

[Fink-devel] new package

Koen Vervloesem -- "Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?" hping.info Description: Binary data hping.patch Description: Binary data

[Fink-devel] new package

Hi, I'm a long-time Fink user, but I don't know how I have to commit a new package. I have made an info and a patch file for the network tool hping and I have included them here. What's the next thing I have to do? I'm interested in committing more Fink packages. Regards, Koen Vervloesem -- "

Re: [Fink-devel] New package: apg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Darian, On Sunday, November 2, 2003, at 07:27 PM, Darian Lanx wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Wouldn't it be useful to include a PGP Key id in this field. email addresses are somewhat transient whereas PGP/GPG keys are no

[Fink-devel] New package: apg

Hello, Please find attached the info and patch file for a program named Automated Password Generator (apg), see http://www.adel.nursat.kz/apg/. I'm not completely sure if I chose the right license. An expert should perhaps have a look on it. During packaging another question concerning the Main

Re: [Fink-devel] new package - error during make

On Sunday, August 31, 2003, at 08:30 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote: Hi, I am working on a new package (kguitar) and run into the error below. Configuration passed and then pretty soon the error comes: FYI, this was caused by an error in the package and has bee corrected by the developers. - Ko

[Fink-devel] new package - error during make

Hi, I am working on a new package (kguitar) and run into the error below. Configuration passed and then pretty soon the error comes: - [snip] Good - your configure finished. Start make now make cd . && /bin/sh /sw/src/kguitar-0.4.9-1/kguitar-0.4.9/admin/missing --run autoheader touch .

[Fink-devel] new package: python-cjkcodecs

python-cjkcodecs: Python Unicode Codecs for Chinese, Japanese and Korean encodings. The cjkcodecs package provides Unicode codecs that make Python aware of CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean) encodings such as EUC-JP, ISO-2022-KR, BIG5 and GB18030. By using this package, their characters c

[Fink-devel] new package: python-cdb

Can someone look into checking this in? I submitted it a month ago and haven't received a response yet. See http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=736117&group_id=17203&atid=414256 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etn

[Fink-devel] new package

Hi all, I'm willing to add a new package to fink : mpb. mpb is a scientific software aimed at calculating band gaps for photonic crystal material. Compiling mpb on Mac OS X requires some hackery, that's why I think adding it to fink's packages might be beneficial to other people. mpb relies on

[Fink-devel] new package: rlwrap 0.15

Here's my first attempt at a package, please comment. --- /dev/null 2003-03-21 19:49:30.0 -0800 +++ rlwrap-0.15-1.info 2003-03-21 19:43:35.0 -0800 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +Package: rlwrap +Version: 0.15 +Revision: 1 +Source: http://utopia.knoware.nl/~hlub/uck/%n/%n-%v.tgz +Source-MD5:

Re: [Fink-devel] new package manager release

Sure, Max, I realize you are busy, and I'm not trying to make more work for you! I've revised my patch for the cctools virtual package, so I hope that this can also be included in the next release. -- Dave --- This sf.net email is sponsored

Re: [Fink-devel] new package manager release

At 15:29 Uhr -0500 15.02.2003, David R. Morrison wrote: There have been no updates to the Fink package manager for two weeks, other then Ben Hines' adding 10.2.4 as a recognized OS X version this morning. Max said he wanted to do more things before the next package manager release, but I would pr

[Fink-devel] new package manager release

There have been no updates to the Fink package manager for two weeks, other then Ben Hines' adding 10.2.4 as a recognized OS X version this morning. Max said he wanted to do more things before the next package manager release, but I would prefer not to wait forever. I propose that a few people te

[Fink-devel] new package category

I propose the creation of a new package category "libs/obsolete". This will be the place that we put a package "libfoo-shlibs" which we are only keeping around for backward compatibility, for folks that have something compiled against the old library. The headers and the key /sw/lib/libfoo.dylib

Re: [Fink-devel] New Package, what to do?

On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 05:46 PM, Patrick Sodré wrote: Hi, I know I'll probably get redirected somewhere but here it goes. I have a package that is ready to be inserted into fink. Where should I send the .info and patch files? BTW, it is called pdnsd and it is a proxy DNS ser

[Fink-devel] New Package, what to do?

Hi, I know I'll probably get redirected somewhere but here it goes. I have a package that is ready to be inserted into fink. Where should I send the .info and patch files? BTW, it is called pdnsd and it is a proxy DNS server for VERY small networks and dial-up connections. Regards, Patrick

Re: [Fink-devel] New package: bow

On Sunday, January 20, 2002, at 09:06 AM, Ken Williams wrote: > Since it's a new package and not an update of an existing one (and I'm > a new package maintainer) I wasn't sure whether submitting it to the > tracker was enough, or whether I should post an announcement to the > list. So I did

[Fink-devel] New package: bow

Hi, I've submitted a new package, 'bow', for consideration. It's currently at http://sf.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=505980&group_id=17203&atid=414256 . Since it's a new package and not an update of an existing one (and I'm a new package maintainer) I wasn't sure whether submitting it to the