On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2007 8:09 PM, Ken Mankoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Robert T Wyatt wrote:
rm /sw/src/*
find /sw/fink/10.5/ -name "*.deb" -exec rm {} \;
>>> ... by this point fink has been crippled
>
> Did I miss somethin
On Dec 5, 2007 8:09 PM, Ken Mankoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Robert T Wyatt wrote:
> >> rm /sw/src/*
> >> find /sw/fink/10.5/ -name "*.deb" -exec rm {} \;
> >>
> > ... by this point fink has been crippled
Did I miss something? I do this all the time, all that is removed are
Gary Olson on Dec. 5, 2007 at 9:25 pm MDT wrote:
An emacs22-carbon-22.1-3002 failed at end on build during setting up
of package with chown: `games:admin': invalid user. Here is last part
of build log:
/bin/cp -r ../fixed-width-fontset.*/readme.ja /sw/src/fink.build/root-
emacs22-carbon-22.
On 2007/12/05, at 8:33 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> Try removing the buildlock package directly:
>
> fink remove fink-buildlock-seamonkey-1.1.7-1
That did the trick. Thanks.
Victor.
--
Victor Eijkhout, 512 471 5809 (w), 512 499 0504 (h)
Texas Advanced Computing Center, The University of T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Victor Eijkhout wrote:
> On 2007/12/05, at 6:26 PM, Robert T Wyatt wrote:
>
>> What do you get with:
>>
>> fink list buildlock
>>
>
> [albook:~] %% fink list buildlock Information about 6634 packages
> read in 0 seconds. p fink-buildlock
On 2007/12/05, at 6:26 PM, Robert T Wyatt wrote:
> What do you get with:
>
> fink list buildlock
>
[albook:~] %% fink list buildlock
Information about 6634 packages read in 0 seconds.
p fink-buildlock[virtual package]
*i* fink-buildlo... 2007.12.05- Package compile-time lo
Ken Mankoff wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Robert T Wyatt wrote:
>
>> Ken Mankoff wrote:
>>> So 'cleanup' won't remove large amount of source and deb files taking
>>> up space. Is there another 'offical' command to do this?
>>>
>>> Or is it safe and reasonable to do the following. Disk space is wor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ken Mankoff wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Ken Mankoff wrote:
>>> I'm running OS X 10.5 and fink 0.27.9 dist 0.8.1.cvs
>>>
>>> I'm trying to save some space, but cleanup doe
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Robert T Wyatt wrote:
> Ken Mankoff wrote:
>> So 'cleanup' won't remove large amount of source and deb files
>> taking up space. Is there another 'offical' command to do this?
>>
>> Or is it safe and reasonable to do the following. Disk space is
>> worth more than bandwidth
Ken Mankoff wrote:
> So 'cleanup' won't remove large amount of source and deb files
> taking up space. Is there another 'offical' command to do this?
>
> Or is it safe and reasonable to do the following. Disk space is
> worth more than bandwidth to me.
>
> rm /sw/src/*
> find /sw/fink/10.5/ -na
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ken Mankoff wrote:
>> I'm running OS X 10.5 and fink 0.27.9 dist 0.8.1.cvs
>>
>> I'm trying to save some space, but cleanup doesn't appear to be
>> doing much. I've checked the FAQ and the word 'clea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ken Mankoff wrote:
> I'm running OS X 10.5 and fink 0.27.9 dist 0.8.1.cvs
>
> I'm trying to save some space, but cleanup doesn't appear to be
> doing much. I've checked the FAQ and the word 'cleanup' isn't
> anywhere in it, nor do I see this addressed
Ken Mankoff wrote:
> I'm running OS X 10.5 and fink 0.27.9 dist 0.8.1.cvs
>
> I'm trying to save some space, but cleanup doesn't appear to be
> doing much. I've checked the FAQ and the word 'cleanup' isn't
> anywhere in it, nor do I see this addressed recently on the mail
> list.
try: http://wi
Victor Eijkhout wrote:
> My session crashed while doing an update-all. Now I get:
>
> Unpacking expat1 (from .../expat1_2.0.1-1_darwin-i386.deb) ...
> Setting up expat1 (2.0.1-1) ...
> Reading buildlock packages...
> Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies!
> It looks like some of the problems
On 06 Dec 2007, at 00:11, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Robert T Wyatt wrote:
> []
>> bash-3.2$ xmms
>> dlopen(/sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so, 2): Symbol not found:
>> _osx_about
>>Referenced from: /sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so
>>Expected in: flat namespace
>>
>> bash-3.2$ nm -m /sw/lib/xmms/
Robert T Wyatt wrote:
[]
> While these messages may not have been from the same binary, they can be
> generated from the same binary as I get the identical output
> (leopard/intel/MBP after today's updates):
>
> bash-3.2$ xmms
> dlopen(/sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so, 2): Symbol not found: _osx_ab
Never mind. It's now current.
Victor.
On 2007/12/05, at 4:29 PM, Victor Eijkhout wrote:
> However, I'm not sure why 3.02 is installed, while fink commander
> tells me "installed: 3.00, latest: 3.02" and marks the status as
> "outdated".
--
Victor Eijkhout, 512 471 5809 (w), 512 499 0504 (h)
Te
On 2007/12/04, at 2:59 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> You don't appear to have the most current version installed yet,
> though. That one appears actually to activate the fonts without
> making you do it manually.
Cool. That did the trick.
However, I'm not sure why 3.02 is installed, while
I'm running OS X 10.5 and fink 0.27.9 dist 0.8.1.cvs
I'm trying to save some space, but cleanup doesn't appear to be
doing much. I've checked the FAQ and the word 'cleanup' isn't
anywhere in it, nor do I see this addressed recently on the mail
list.
I type "fink cleanup" and "fink cleanup --a
My session crashed while doing an update-all. Now I get:
Unpacking expat1 (from .../expat1_2.0.1-1_darwin-i386.deb) ...
Setting up expat1 (2.0.1-1) ...
Reading buildlock packages...
Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies!
It looks like some of the problems encountered involve buildlocks for
Martin Costabel wrote:
> Sean wrote:
> []
>> nm -m /sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so|fgrep _osx_about
>>
>> with the following result:
>>
>> 1090 (__TEXT,__text) non-external _osx_about
>
> Are you sure this is the *same* libOSX.so that gave you earlier the
> error message
>
>> dlopen(/sw/lib/xm
Sean wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2007 2:19 AM, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sean wrote:
>> []
>>> nm -m /sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so|fgrep _osx_about
>>>
>>> with the following result:
>>>
>>> 1090 (__TEXT,__text) non-external _osx_about
>> Are you sure this is the *same* libOSX.so tha
On Dec 5, 2007 2:19 AM, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sean wrote:
> []
> > nm -m /sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so|fgrep _osx_about
> >
> > with the following result:
> >
> > 1090 (__TEXT,__text) non-external _osx_about
>
> Are you sure this is the *same* libOSX.so that gave you earl
Sean wrote:
[]
> nm -m /sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so|fgrep _osx_about
>
> with the following result:
>
> 1090 (__TEXT,__text) non-external _osx_about
Are you sure this is the *same* libOSX.so that gave you earlier the
error message
>
> dlopen(/sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so, 2): Symbol not
On Dec 4, 2007 9:29 PM, Jean-François Mertens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 05 Dec 2007, at 05:06, Sean wrote:
>
> > dlopen(/sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so, 2): Symbol not found: _osx_about
> > Referenced from: /sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so
> > Expected in: flat namespace
>
> Sorry _ but here
On Dec 4, 2007 9:29 PM, Jean-François Mertens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 05 Dec 2007, at 05:06, Sean wrote:
>
> > dlopen(/sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so, 2): Symbol not found: _osx_about
> > Referenced from: /sw/lib/xmms/Output/libOSX.so
> > Expected in: flat namespace
>
> Sorry _ but here
26 matches
Mail list logo
