Hi
I am trying to install 'ethereal'. i keep getting an erro message relating to
gtk+2. I had previously installed The Gimp with no problems. I have updated Fink
and move my other version of teh Gimp to trash with no success . Can someone
help as I get the following error message:
The following
Dapo wrote:
[]
dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.1.dylib
Referenced from: /sw/bin/gtk-query-immodules-2.0
Reason: image not found
What do you get from
ls -l /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.*.dylib
? You should see something like
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 14000 Jun 28
Still doesn't seem to be getting through with the new patches for the
10.3 branch... :-(
***
The following package will be rebuilt:
ethereal
dpkg-deb -b /sw/src/fink.build/root-fink-buildlock-ethereal-0.99.0-11
/sw/src/fink.build
dpkg-deb: building package
On Apr 27, 2006, at 10:51 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 04:06:00PM -0400, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
I'm still hoping for
fixes to libgnome* and libbono* to come down the line soon too.
I don't remember seeing a report of those lib problems.
I recently re-sent an error I
Looks like Ethereal's still not working on the 10.3 branch? :-(
*
The following package will be rebuilt:
ethereal
dpkg-deb -b /sw/src/fink.build/root-fink-buildlock-ethereal-0.99.0-11
/sw/src/fink.build
dpkg-deb: building package `fink-buildlock-ethereal-0.99.0-11' in
On 4/27/06, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like Ethereal's still not working on the 10.3 branch? :-(
*
The following package will be rebuilt:
ethereal
dpkg-deb -b /sw/src/fink.build/root-fink-buildlock-ethereal-0.99.0-11
/sw/src/fink.build
dpkg-deb: building package
On Apr 27, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 4/27/06, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like Ethereal's still not working on the 10.3 branch? :-(
*
The following package will be rebuilt:
ethereal
dpkg-deb -b
Here's the update output:
*
rsync -az -q rsync://master.us.finkmirrors.net/finkinfo//TIMESTAMP
/sw/fink/TIMESTAMP.tmp
I will now run the rsync command to retrieve the latest package
descriptions.
rsync -rtz --delete-after --delete -q --include='10.3/'
--include='10.3/stable/'
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Looks like Ethereal's still not working on the 10.3 branch? :-(
I don't know what happened; I was sure to have copied that patch file
over from 10.4 to 10.3, but apparently it is not there. I'll try again.
Maybe this time I am not dreaming and it will stick.
Have a
On Apr 27, 2006, at 1:37 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Looks like Ethereal's still not working on the 10.3 branch? :-(
I don't know what happened; I was sure to have copied that patch file
over from 10.4 to 10.3, but apparently it is not there. I'll try
again.
Maybe
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 04:06:00PM -0400, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
I'm still hoping for
fixes to libgnome* and libbono* to come down the line soon too.
I don't remember seeing a report of those lib problems.
dan
--
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks
Is the latest Ethereal update broken? (0.99.0-11) I'm having errors at
the phase where it patches the source...
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated
On 26/4/06 18:38, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Is the latest Ethereal update broken? (0.99.0-11) I'm having errors at
the phase where it patches the source...
I installed 0.10.14-11 from unstable without any problems a couple of
days ago.
Mike.
This message has been scanned for viruses by
On 4/26/06, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the latest Ethereal update broken? (0.99.0-11) I'm having errors at
the phase where it patches the source...
0.99.0-1011 (PowerPC on 10.4 tree) worked fine for me:
...
patch -p1 /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/net/ethereal.patch
On Apr 26, 2006, at 1:46 PM, Mike Zanker wrote:
On 26/4/06 18:38, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Is the latest Ethereal update broken? (0.99.0-11) I'm having errors
at
the phase where it patches the source...
I installed 0.10.14-11 from unstable without any problems a couple of
days ago.
I
On Apr 26, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 4/26/06, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the latest Ethereal update broken? (0.99.0-11) I'm having errors
at
the phase where it patches the source...
0.99.0-1011 (PowerPC on 10.4 tree) worked fine for me:
...
patch
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:55:43PM -0400, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Apr 26, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 4/26/06, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the latest Ethereal update broken? (0.99.0-11) I'm having errors
at
the phase where it patches the
On 26/4/06 18:50, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
I had that version, I think, and Fink Commander told me it was outdated
by 0.99.0. I'll have to look and see.
Ah, yes, just done a selfupdate and got the new one. It has patched OK
for me and is now building. This is on a G4 mini running 10.4.6.
On Apr 26, 2006, at 2:23 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Confirmed broken on 10.3 (also ethereal-ssl), not broken on
10.4(intel).
Um...NUTS! :-(
Hopefully fixes will come down the pipeline soon. I'm still hoping for
fixes to libgnome* and libbono* to come down the line soon too.
-Bart
Works for me on two machines (1.25GHz PowerBook G4, 800MHz iMac G4).
version: ethereal-ssl-0.99.0-11
OS: 10.4.6
libtool: Apple Computer, Inc. version cctools-590.23.2
gcc: gcc version 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5250)
2006/4/26, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Apr 26, 2006, at
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Apr 26, 2006, at 2:23 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Confirmed broken on 10.3 (also ethereal-ssl), not broken on 10.4(intel).
Um...NUTS! :-(
Hopefully fixes will come down the pipeline soon. I'm still hoping for
fixes to libgnome* and libbono* to come down the line
On Apr 26, 2006, at 6:20 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On Apr 26, 2006, at 2:23 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Confirmed broken on 10.3 (also ethereal-ssl), not broken on
10.4(intel).
Um...NUTS! :-(
Hopefully fixes will come down the pipeline soon. I'm still hoping
for fixes
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
[]
Is there a way to measure how maintained the various ports are?
Whether they're active/inactive, number of open bug reports, etc...?
The best source for this kind of information are the cvs logs, normally
accessible from the cvs browser link on the Fink home
Hi,
I used ethereal for years, but I had to install OS X (Panther) again,
so I had to install ethereal again, too.
Installation (both binary and from source) works fine but no ethereal
is in /sw/bin ... just tethereal
FinkCommander says it is outdated...
has anybody a hint?
thanks
Jan
On 3/24/06, Jan Winter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I used ethereal for years, but I had to install OS X (Panther) again,
so I had to install ethereal again, too.
Installation (both binary and from source) works fine but no ethereal
is in /sw/bin ... just tethereal
FinkCommander says it is
On Feb 19, 2006, at 1:02 AM, stephen joseph butler wrote:
2006/2/19, Juan Courcoul [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
latest source offering for Panther: 0.10.12. Unfortunately, especially
in comparison to the previous releases, this one turned out to be a
real snail. Startup takes over three minutes, and
On 20/2/06 08:20, Juan Courcoul wrote:
What should I try next?
Have you tried running
sudo update_prebinding -files /sw/bin/*
sudo update_prebinding -files /sw/lib/*
This solved it on 10.3.9 for me.
Regards,
Mike.
This message has been scanned for viruses by MailController -
Ah, thanks, that did the trick, but only by doing the prebinding on the
/sw/lib directory first, to get the libraries done, and then on the bin
directory. Even though Steven Butler's suggestion (run
/sw/var/lib/fink/prebound/update- package-prebinding.pl ethereal-ssl) still
fails afterwards,
On 20/2/06 19:28, John Courcoul wrote:
Ah, thanks, that did the trick, but only by doing the prebinding on the
/sw/lib directory first, to get the libraries done, and then on the bin
directory. Even though Steven Butler's suggestion (run
/sw/var/lib/fink/prebound/update-
A short while ago, I upgraded my Fink-based Ethereal sniffer to the
latest source offering for Panther: 0.10.12. Unfortunately, especially
in comparison to the previous releases, this one turned out to be a
real snail. Startup takes over three minutes, and starting a packet
capture takes even
2006/2/19, Juan Courcoul [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A short while ago, I upgraded my Fink-based Ethereal sniffer to thelatest source offering for Panther: 0.10.12. Unfortunately, especiallyin comparison to the previous releases, this one turned out to be areal snail. Startup takes over three minutes, and
Fixed in CVS.
Max
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
I have just upgraded to 10.4.4. I did a fink selfupdate then did an update-all
with no problems till it got to ethereal. It went through the whole auto-config
procedure and stopped at the net-snmp library and quit with the following
message, anyone else having these problems with 10.4.4?
Can't
On 1/11/06, Alex W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just upgraded to 10.4.4. I did a fink selfupdate then did an update-all
with no problems till it got to ethereal. It went through the whole
auto-config
procedure and stopped at the net-snmp library and quit with the following
message, anyone
I recently wiped out my /sw directory and made a fresh install of fink.
The only package I've tried to install so far is ethereal, and
something's wrong. If I do a binary install, it appears to work fine,
and it installs all the dependent packages and libraries, but there's
no ethereal
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 09:06:00PM -0800, Matt Snyder wrote:
I recently wiped out my /sw directory and made a fresh install of fink.
The only package I've tried to install so far is ethereal, and
something's wrong. If I do a binary install, it appears to work fine,
and it installs all the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I searched the mailing list archives and couldn't find anything
regarding this problem.
the packages 'ethereal' and 'ethereal-ssl' don't seem to actually
- -contain- the ethereal binary. They've got tethereal... but no ethereal.
This is using
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Corey Halpin wrote:
I searched the mailing list archives and couldn't find anything
regarding this problem.
the packages 'ethereal' and 'ethereal-ssl' don't seem to actually
- -contain- the ethereal binary. They've got tethereal... but no ethereal.
This is using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Devers wrote:
Really?
calvin:~$ fink list ethereal-ssl
Information about 3941 packages read in 3 seconds.
i ethereal-ssl 0.10.6-11Powerful network protocol analyzer
(with ...
calvin:~$ ls -la /sw/bin/*ether*
- -rwxr-xr-x1 root
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Corey Halpin wrote:
Chris Devers wrote:
Really?
calvin:~$ dpkg -L ethereal-ssl | grep bin
/sw/bin
/sw/bin/capinfo
/sw/bin/dftest
/sw/bin/editcap
/sw/bin/idl2eth
/sw/bin/mergecap
/sw/bin/tethereal
/sw/bin/text2pcap
On Sep 1, 2004, at 7:30 PM, Timothy Reaves wrote:
Ethereal is in the list of packages over at the sf site; why does
fink not see it when I run fink install?
Does it show up if you run fink list ethereal? If not, then try
running fink selfupdate
--
Alexander Hansen
Fink Documentarian
[Day
Ethereal is in the list of packages over at the sf site; why does fink
not see it when I run fink install?
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA
I have installed fink and ethereal but ethereal won't run. I get the following error message:
dyld: ethereal can't open library /sw/lib/libdl.0.dylib.
/sw/lib contains no libdl* files and I don't find any libdl in finkcommander. All packages are binary, I have not built anything.
My setup
On Mar 19, 2004, at 1:16 PM, Lon Canaday wrote:
I have installed fink and used finkcommander to install ethereal but
ethereal won't run. I get the following error message:
dyld: ethereal can't open library /sw/lib/libdl.0.dylib.
/sw/lib contains no libdl* files and I don't find any libdl
On Mar 11, 2004, at 12:30 PM, Noah Silverman wrote:
Fink Install ethereal completed without any errors.
I start up Apple's X11 Application and type
sudo /sw/bin/ethereal
And get all the same errors as before.
Could this be an environmental issue? Something to do with the
environment in X11?
On Mar 11, 2004, at 1:01 AM, Noah Silverman wrote:
Hi!
I am running the latest version of OS 10.3 (panther).
I just installed the most recent version of fink.
I used dselect to install ethereal. It sucessfully installed a bunch
of depancies and then ethereal.
I do the following:
1) Start
Thanks,
I'm not sure what you mean by install from source.
If I just download the ethereal source from ethereal.com, it fails to
install due to a ton of dependancy errors. That is why I tried the
Fink route.
I work in Linux all day, so I'm fairly comfortable with how these
things work,
Interesting.
I always thought that dselect was the only way to go. In general, is
it better to use fink install for the packages that I want?
On Mar 11, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
I mean that you should use the Fink source distribution, e.g. via
fink install ethereal.
The
I mean that you should use the Fink source distribution, e.g. via fink
install ethereal.
The Fink source distribution does all of the patching and configuration
automatically.
On Mar 11, 2004, at 11:57 AM, Noah Silverman wrote:
Thanks,
I'm not sure what you mean by install from source.
If I
For newer packages, frequently.
For bleeding edge unstable packages (which frequently are stable
versions for Linux), absolutely.
On Mar 11, 2004, at 12:07 PM, Noah Silverman wrote:
Interesting.
I always thought that dselect was the only way to go. In general, is
it better to use fink
Didn't work.
Fink Install ethereal completed without any errors.
I start up Apple's X11 Application and type
sudo /sw/bin/ethereal
And get all the same errors as before.
Could this be an environmental issue? Something to do with the
environment in X11?
On Mar 11, 2004, at 9:03 AM,
I had the same problem.
Unfortunately, I had to completely remove my /sw directory and start
over.
Once i reinstalled fink, run fink selfupdate, then try reinstalling
ethereal again. I think there is some other package installed that
messed up the gtk settings. All i know is starting over
I got it to work!
I deleted the /sw directory completely and then re-installed fink from
source. I then installed ethereal-ssl and all its dependancies from
source.
Thanks,
-N
On Mar 11, 2004, at 8:59 PM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Mar 11, 2004, at 12:30 PM, Noah Silverman wrote:
Fink
Hi!
I am running the latest version of OS 10.3 (panther).
I just installed the most recent version of fink.
I used dselect to install ethereal. It sucessfully installed a bunch
of depancies and then ethereal.
I do the following:
1) Start up Apples X11 software. (the executable that comes
I installed ethereal and I have a powerbook an airport extreme and a
PC. When I start capturing packets it catches TCP packets from my Mac,
but when it comes to the PC it catches everything except TCP. I don't
know if the router is stopping me or what. I tried turning of my
firewall, but still
Daniel wrote:
I installed ethereal and I have a powerbook an airport extreme and a PC.
When I start capturing packets it catches TCP packets from my Mac, but
when it comes to the PC it catches everything except TCP. I don't know
if the router is stopping me or what. I tried turning of my
I installed ethereal (9.14-1) and I get an error about all these
plugins have no version symbol, but ethereal still starts up.
10.3.2
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and
Greetings. Earlier Finks had packages for building Ethereal without X
(called ethereal-nox, if I remember correctly). The current version
doesn't seem to have that. I really don't want to pollute my system
with all the xfree86 kruft given that I only want tethereal.
Can I use Fink to get just
They must have been really early, then--the package database doesn't
show such a thing as of version 0.4.1 of the distribution (i.e. OS
10.1.x).
You might be able to make one up yourself by modifying the package's
.info file appropriately.
--
Alexander Hansen
Levitated Dipole Experiment
At 5:12 PM -0500 1/23/04, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
They must have been really early, then--the package database doesn't
show such a thing as of version 0.4.1 of the distribution (i.e. OS
10.1.x).
Err, I think you're right. Now that I think of it, the last time I
did this, I went from the
Sounds good.
Actually the modifications to the .info file would be to put the
arguments to ./configure on the ConfigureParams: line of the .info
file. One would probably want to copy the .info file over to the local
tree and possibly rename it.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Levitated Dipole
Hi,
I was using ethereal with no problem, and i don't know if it was after
a fink selfupdate and fink update-all, i have now :
Gtk-WARNING **: gtk_arg_type_new(): argument class in
GtkCTree::spacing is not in the `GtkObject' ancestry
Gtk-WARNING **: gtk_arg_type_new(): argument class in
According to http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/ethereal the
currentunstable version of Ethereal for OS 10.2 is:
current-10.2-gcc3.3: 0.9.16-1
So, to update my version from 0.9.14 to 0.9.16 I did the usual:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/net]: sudo
Shawn Protsman wrote:
According to http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/ethereal the
current unstable version of Ethereal for OS 10.2 is:
current-10.2-gcc3.3: 0.9.16-1
So, to update my version from 0.9.14 to 0.9.16 I did the usual:
[EMAIL
/LDX
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn Protsman
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 10:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fink-users] Ethereal 0.9.15 or 0.9.16?
According to http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/ethereal
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 12:00, Martin Costabel wrote:
Shawn Protsman wrote:
According to http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/ethereal the
current unstable version of Ethereal for OS 10.2 is:
current-10.2-gcc3.3: 0.9.16-1
So, to update my version from 0.9.14 to 0.9.16 I did
I have installed Fink and Fink Commander and now tried to install the
ethereal package by ctrl+clik on ethereal and then going to binary and
installnow after it d/l the packages this is the error message I
received? I am new to this and I read the beginners guide but I didn¹t see
any info...
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fink-users] Ethereal Install Problem
I have installed Fink and Fink Commander and now tried to install the
ethereal package by ctrl+clik on ethereal and then going to binary and
installnow after it d/l the packages this is the error message I
received? I am new
. Hansen
Subject: Re: [Fink-users] Ethereal Install Problem
This is what my path is in commander:
/bin: /sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin
And termain:
[Matthew-Mac1:~] morowe% printenv PATH
/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/X11R6/bin
What should
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
The Fink Commander PATH should also start with
/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:
It looks like Fink Commander put in spaces instead of /sw at the
beginning. The script did do its job, because the PATH is correct as shown
in the Terminal--there may be something subtle going on that
Hi, all,
I've got ethereal installed on two 10.2.3 systems, and the binaries are
bit-for-bit identical. If I run the binary on one system, it works; on
the other, it fails, claiming
dyld: /usr/local/bin/ethereal version mismatch for library:
/usr/lib/libz.1.dylib (compatibility version of
Justin Walker wrote:
Hi, all,
I've got ethereal installed on two 10.2.3 systems, and the binaries are
bit-for-bit identical. If I run the binary on one system, it works; on
the other, it fails, claiming
dyld: /usr/local/bin/ethereal version mismatch for library:
/usr/lib/libz.1.dylib
Certainly. The reason for the division is to comply with US export
restrictions on encryption, or at least that's what I think.
Ethereal-ssl works beautifully for me since a long time.
On tisdag, sep 24, 2002, at 04:56 Europe/Stockholm, David L. Moneypenny
wrote:
That was one of the
What is the difference between ethereal and ethereal-ssl? I
know what SSL is, but how is it pertinent in this context (I can
think of several possibilities)? I am unable to find any discussion
of this question on the net--hell, I can't even find anything on the
Fink or SourceForge web
On Monday, September 23, 2002, at 10:34 PM, David L. Moneypenny wrote:
What is the difference between ethereal and ethereal-ssl? I know what
SSL is, but how is it pertinent in this context (I can think of
several possibilities)? I am unable to find any discussion of this
question
That was one of the possibilities I had in mind, and of
course now comes the follow-up question. If I load ethereal-ssl
rather than ethereal, will I be unable to analyze non-ssl encrypted
traffic?
You said:
On Monday, September 23, 2002, at 10:34 PM, David L. Moneypenny wrote:
I'm getting the following error when trying to capture packets on my TI-800
with 500MB ram:
*** malloc[330]: error: Can't allocate region
mach_port_type() failed (ipc/rcv) msg too large
task_get_bootstrap_port() failed (ipc/rcv) msg too large
This typically happens after capturing web-traffic,
On Monday, June 24, 2002, at 04:35 AM, Harald Schweder wrote:
I'm getting the following error when trying to capture packets on my
TI-800
with 500MB ram:
*** malloc[330]: error: Can't allocate region
mach_port_type() failed (ipc/rcv) msg too large
task_get_bootstrap_port() failed
It is doing it even with April tools.
On Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 04:31 PM, Stan Sanderson wrote:
(copy of message sent to Carsten Max)
Carsten
I had the same result when attempting to install either ethereal-ssl
0.9.4-2 or ethereal 0.9.4-2. I posted my effort to the fink-beginners
It happily builds away, until it hits an @ sign when compiling .libs/etherealS.c
Line 1972 of this file reads like this:
{@PROGRAM@, (lt_ptr) 0},
Not very good for a C program :-)
Actually, the first line of ethereal.nm looks like this:
: @PROGRAM@
which may be the origin of this. I
(copy of message sent to Carsten Max)
Carsten
I had the same result when attempting to install either ethereal-ssl
0.9.4-2 or ethereal 0.9.4-2. I posted my effort to the fink-beginners
list and informed the maintainer, Max Horn. I'm also obsessive about
updates but using the Dec 2001
Trying to update ethereal-ssl, I get the following error:
***
checking whether to use UCD SNMP/NET-SNMP library if available... yes
checking for ucd-snmp/snmp.h... yes
checking for ucd-snmp/version.h... yes
checking for sprint_realloc_objid in -lsnmp... no
checking for
On 28/5/02 9:57 PM, Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to update ethereal-ssl, I get the following error:
***
checking whether to use UCD SNMP/NET-SNMP library if available... yes
checking for ucd-snmp/snmp.h... yes
checking for ucd-snmp/version.h... yes
memory.
From: Oscar Erlandsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fink users [EMAIL PROTECTED], Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fink-users] Ethereal crashes, malloc error
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 17:13:50 +0200
I've noticed my ethereal crashing quite often with this error (mostly when
the number
I've noticed my ethereal crashing quite often with this error (mostly when
the number of packets sniffed is quite large):
*** malloc[13470]: error: Can't allocate region
mach_port_type() failed (ipc/rcv) msg too large
task_get_bootstrap_port() failed (ipc/mig) wrong reply message ID
[1]
I have recently downloaded the ethereal package (and accompanying
libpcap). Everything seemed to go to plan however when trying to run it
I get the following error:
dyld: ethereal can't open library: /sw/lib/libcrypto.0.9.6.dylib (No
such file or directory, errno = 2)
I have done a find for
Hello,
I'm not sure if I should submit this as a fink bug or an ethereal bug.
I'm thinking ethereal b/c I don't think it's a package/install issue, but
hey - I could be wrong! I suppose it's possible that there's a bug in the
dependencies, rather than ethereal...
I'm running the latest ethereal
87 matches
Mail list logo
