Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla plug-ins

2003-01-22 Thread Kow K
The best way to go is contact package maintainer. I think it's Masanori Sekino ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), but you'd better check it out by "fink info mozilla". Cheers, Kow P.S., I agree that the Fink version of Mozilla runs faster than Carbonized one. This good. Payoff is that Fink's is still 1.1 a

[Fink-users] Mozilla plug-ins

2003-01-22 Thread Greg Hamilton
Hi, posted something along these lines recently and had no response. Thought I'd try again. I installed Mozilla using fink and I'm running it using Apple's X11. This is much faster than the Carbonised OSX build of Mozilla, but it installs without any plug-ins and I don't know how to fix the pro

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla plug-ins

2002-05-31 Thread Roman Poeschl
Jean-François Mertens wrote: > It is "unstable/crypto" that must be added. > > JFMertens > > > On Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 08:36 , Chris Devers wrote: > >> Roman Poeschl wrote: >> >>> Now a stupid question, how can one update from unstable (e.g. to >>> 0.9.9 or to your version) >>> I have ad

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla plug-ins

2002-05-31 Thread Roman Poeschl
Hi there, Yes, after sometime of desperate search I have figured this out as well. Since approximately 1 1/2 mozilla 1.0rc3-1 and it's related libriaries are compiling. So, I keep fingers crossed. Anyway thanks for help and patience to the three of you. It's amazing to see how quick and nearly

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla plug-ins

2002-05-31 Thread Jean-François Mertens
It is "unstable/crypto" that must be added. JFMertens On Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 08:36 , Chris Devers wrote: > Roman Poeschl wrote: >> Now a stupid question, how can one update from unstable (e.g. to 0.9.9 >> or to your version) >> I have added 'unstable/main' to /etc/sw/fink.conf and di

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla plug-ins

2002-05-30 Thread Alexander Hansen
If stable is before unstable, it may wind up taking priority. Here's my own Trees: line for reference: Trees: local/main unstable/main unstable/crypto stable/main stable/crypto Since I'm willing to commit to using unstable for everything that works for me. However, you may want to take a more

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla plug-ins

2002-05-30 Thread Roman Poeschl
Alexander Hansen wrote: >My recollection is that the PSM was put in place at version 0.9.9 . I >have used mozilla to visit secured sites since that version, with no >problems (I'm running 1.0rc3 now). I installed from source, using the >unstable tree for everything. 0.9.8 is still the latest v

Re: [Fink-users] mozilla plug-ins

2002-05-30 Thread Alexander Hansen
My recollection is that the PSM was put in place at version 0.9.9 . I have used mozilla to visit secured sites since that version, with no problems (I'm running 1.0rc3 now). I installed from source, using the unstable tree for everything. 0.9.8 is still the latest version one can get from sourc

[Fink-users] mozilla plug-ins

2002-05-30 Thread Roman Poeschl
Dear fink-experts, a few weeks ago I asked a question concerning mozilla plug-ins, e.g. how to obtain a PSM to visit secured pages (i.e. starting with https). I will pose my question in another way. Are you able to visit secured pages by using mozilla, and if yes which version do you use and

[Fink-users] mozilla plug-ins

2002-05-21 Thread Roman Poeschl
Sorry, the previous mail was corrupted. Well, here we go once more ... Dear fink-users, This question is maybe a bit off topic. I have installed mozilla version 0.9.8 via 'apt-get install mozilla' . In order to view encrypted web-pages I need a PSM plug-in. From the mozilla web pages I hav