Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base fail (Sanjay Connare)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes I did, and it still does not list 4.2.1.1-4. After again running fink-selfupdate, fink update-all, fink index. I still get the following results for xfree86-base. [] xfree86-base 4.2.1.1-3 XFree86 libraries, utilities, clients Ah, you don't have t

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base fail (Sanjay Connare)

Yes I did, and it still does not list 4.2.1.1-4. After again running fink-selfupdate, fink update-all, fink index. I still get the following results for xfree86-base.  xforms-bin   1.0-3    GUI toolkit based on Xlib xforms-shlibs    1.0-3    GUI toolkit based on Xlib

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base fail (Sanjay Connare)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I ran fink selfupdate, and it updated some core packages and then I ran "fink update-all" and then when I did a "fink list" the xfree86-base was still listed as 4.2.1.1-3. Are you sure this isn't the xfree86-base-threaded package? This one is indeed at 4.2.1.1-3. I

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base fail (Sanjay Connare)

On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 03:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 1/11/03 21:34:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The current version of xfree86-base is 4.2.1.1-4. So, you'll need to update fink with "fink selfupdate" or "fink selfupdate-cvs" if you're accessing CVS tree. I r

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base fail (Sanjay Connare)

In a message dated 1/11/03 21:34:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The current version of xfree86-base is 4.2.1.1-4. So, you'll need to update fink with "fink selfupdate" or "fink selfupdate-cvs" if you're accessing CVS tree. I ran fink selfupdate, and it updated some core packages and then I ran

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base fail (Sanjay Connare)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [] mv /sw/src/root-xfree86-base-4.2.1.1-3/Applications /sw/src/root-xfree86-rootless-4.2.1.1-3/ mv: rename /sw/src/root-xfree86-base-4.2.1.1-3/Applications to /sw/src/root-xfree86-rootless-4.2.1.1-3//Applications: No such file or directory This has been seen before. It

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base fail (Sanjay Connare)

The current version of xfree86-base is 4.2.1.1-4. So, you'll need to update fink with "fink selfupdate" or "fink selfupdate-cvs" if you're accessing CVS tree. If you want to Apple's X11, follow instructions on Fink web page carefully. In particular, you need to install BOTH Users AND SKD packages.

[Fink-users] xfree86-base fail (Sanjay Connare)

Hello, I recently tried installing the xfree86-base with fink, this was before apple released their x11 server.   % fink install xfree86-base sudo /sw/bin/fink  install xfree86-base Password: Information about 874 packages read in 2 seconds. pkg xfree86-base  version ### pkg xfree86-base 

[Fink-users] xfree86-base-threaded

Fink tells me that libxine needs updating. There are dependencies on xfree86-base-threaded, xfree86-base-threaded-shlibs, xfree86-rootless-threaded, and xfree86-rootless-threaded-shlibs, none of which I currently have installed; instead, I have the placeholder package system-xfree86 4.2-1, stan

[Fink-users] xfree86 base

Andrew Hartung writes: > How long should I allow for the unpacking of xfree86-base? > > > Preparing to replace xfree86-base-shlibs 4.2.0.1-3 (using > > .../xfree86-base-shlibs_4.2.0.1-3_darwin-powerpc.deb) ... > > Unpacking replacement xfree86-base-shlibs ... > > Preparing to replace xfree8

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86 base

No worries: if others see the same behavior, they can refer to this thread. I wonder if this could be related to the new splitoff configuration: I built the packages yesterday, but haven't installed them as of yet. On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 13:02, Andrew Hartung wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 30

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86 base

On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 11:39 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: It may take a while--it's a pretty big package that is getting uncompressed and files moved. It finally finished, took around an hour. I don't remember it taking this long before, but it has been a while since I had compil

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86 base

It may take a while--it's a pretty big package that is getting uncompressed and files moved. On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 12:05, Andrew Hartung wrote: > How long should I allow for the unpacking of xfree86-base? > > > Preparing to replace xfree86-base-shlibs 4.2.0.1-3 (using > > .../xfree86-base-shlibs

[Fink-users] xfree86 base

How long should I allow for the unpacking of xfree86-base? Preparing to replace xfree86-base-shlibs 4.2.0.1-3 (using .../xfree86-base-shlibs_4.2.0.1-3_darwin-powerpc.deb) ... Unpacking replacement xfree86-base-shlibs ... Preparing to replace xfree86-base 4.2.0.1-2 (using .../xfree86-base_4.2.0.

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base

Martin Sarajervi wrote: > * Martin Costabel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > >Martin Sarajervi wrote: > >[] > > > >>You have an existing X11 installation in /usr/X11R6 and /etc/X11. > >>This package refuses to overwrite these. Remove them, then tell Fink to > >>install xfree86-base again. (The pack

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base

* Martin Costabel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Martin Sarajervi wrote: > [] > >You have an existing X11 installation in /usr/X11R6 and /etc/X11. > >This package refuses to overwrite these. Remove them, then tell Fink to > >install xfree86-base again. (The package won't be recompiled.) If you > >wa

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base

Martin Sarajervi wrote: [] > You have an existing X11 installation in /usr/X11R6 and /etc/X11. > This package refuses to overwrite these. Remove them, then tell Fink to > install xfree86-base again. (The package won't be recompiled.) If you > want > to keep your X11 installation, install system-xf

[Fink-users] xfree86-base

I have a problem when trying to install xfree86-base. Unpacking xfree86-base (from .../xfree86-base_4.2.0-12_darwin-powerpc.deb) ... You have an existing X11 installation in /usr/X11R6 and /etc/X11. This package refuses to overwrite these. Remove them, then tell Fink to install xfree86-base agai

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base-threaded

On mardi, sep 17, 2002, at 10:01 Europe/Paris, Ashley Yakeley wrote: > Thanks, it works. Now I discover xfree86-base-threaded won't install: > mv: rename > /usr/local/finksw/src/root-xfree86-base-threaded-4.2.0.1-2/usr/local/ > finksw > /../Applications to > /usr/local/finksw/src/root-xfree86-roo

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base-threaded

On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 04:01 , Ashley Yakeley wrote: > At 2002-09-16 20:22, Alexander Strange wrote: > >> Won't work. Follow the instructions on >> http://fink.sourceforge.net/news/jag-bootstrap.php > > Thanks, it works. Now I discover xfree86-base-threaded won't install: ... > /us

[Fink-users] xfree86-base

At 2002-09-17 01:01, I wrote: >Thanks, it works. Now I discover xfree86-base-threaded won't install: xfree86-base has the same problem: rm -rf /usr/local/finksw/src/root-xfree86-rootless-4.2.0.1-2 mkdir -p /usr/local/finksw/src/root-xfree86-rootless-4.2.0.1-2/usr/local/finksw mkdir -p /usr/loc

[Fink-users] xfree86-base-threaded

At 2002-09-16 20:22, Alexander Strange wrote: >Won't work. Follow the instructions on >http://fink.sourceforge.net/news/jag-bootstrap.php Thanks, it works. Now I discover xfree86-base-threaded won't install: rm -rf /usr/local/finksw/src/root-xfree86-rootless-threaded-4.2.0.1-2 mkdir -p /usr/l

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base compile problem

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, John Melby wrote: > /usr/bin/make ...and what does a "ls -la /usr/bin/make" give? I get (roughly) % ls -la `which make` lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7 Jun 29 12:26 /usr/bin/make -> gnumake % ls -la `which gnumake` -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 184648 Mar 20 16:41 /usr/bin/gnu

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base compile problem

What version of the dev tools? ('cc -v') What OS version? ('sw_vers') What version of make? ('make -v') What Fink version? ('fink --version') Cheers, Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: phone: (+49) 6151-494890

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base compile problem

/usr/bin/make On Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 02:31 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 03:23 PM, John Melby wrote: > >> I am on an HFS+ partition. > > > What does 'which make' say? === John Melby Emeritus Professor of Music University of Illinois at Urban

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base compile problem

On Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 03:23 PM, John Melby wrote: > I am on an HFS+ partition. What does 'which make' say? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Stuff, things, and much much more. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base compile problem

I am on an HFS+ partition. On Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 02:11 PM, Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To: John Melby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base compile problem > > If you are on a UFS filesystem t

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base compile problem

If you are on a UFS filesystem the XFree86 build won't work - you have to build it on a HFS+ partition or install the binary package. -Jeff On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, John Melby wrote: > I seem to remember that this problem was dealt with in a thread several > months ago, but I don't have the informat

[Fink-users] xfree86-base compile problem

I seem to remember that this problem was dealt with in a thread several months ago, but I don't have the information where I can easily get at it. I'm trying to install xfree86-base with fink, and I consistently get the following error: __ making imake with BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS= in config/i

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base-4.2.0-2 and libgl

sudo dpkg --remove --force-depends xfree86-base xfree86-server xfree86 xfree86-rootless ; fink install xfree86-base xfree86-server; On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 09:05 PM, Liam mac Lynne wrote: > Fink won't remove xfree86-base. Complains about X11 not being installed > (argh!) —— Alexander Str

[Fink-users] xfree86-base-4.2.0-2 and libgl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I can't get xfree86-base-4.2.0-2 to install; I'm running OS X 10.1.2, Dec. dev tools, fink -version : Package manager version: 0.9.7 Distribution version: 0.3.2a.cvs which I updated about an hour ago (6pm EST) from CVS. This is my error msg; if

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base not conflicting properly?

I'm testing it right now... [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >the base and server packages are now updated in CVS. I cannot test since >I don't have the rootless package installed, so pls let me know if it does >or does not fix the problem. ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., Ju

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base not conflicting properly?

the base and server packages are now updated in CVS. I cannot test since I don't have the rootless package installed, so pls let me know if it does or does not fix the problem. -Jeff On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Max Horn wrote: > At 8:25 Uhr -0500 24.01.2002, Benjamin Reed wrote: > >Late last night I

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base not conflicting properly?

At 8:25 Uhr -0500 24.01.2002, Benjamin Reed wrote: >Late last night I did a `fink selfupdate-cvs` and `fink update-all` >and it looks like the xfree86 upgrade didn't work properly. I >ended up with this: > > Preparing to replace xfree86-base 4.1.0-9 (using >.../xfree86-base_4.2.0-1_darwin-powe

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base not conflicting properly?

I had this issue and had to remove xmms and qt to remove -rootless. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Preparing to replace xfree86-base 4.1.0-9 (using >.../xfree86-base_4.2.0-1_darwin-powerpc.deb) ... > Unpacking replacement xfree86-base ... > dpkg: error processing >/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binar

Fwd: [Fink-users] xfree86-base not conflicting properly?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Forgot the "Reply-all". Doh. Begin forwarded message: > From: Liam mac Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu Jan 24, 2002 10:00:48 US/Eastern > To: Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Fink-u

[Fink-users] xfree86-base not conflicting properly?

Late last night I did a `fink selfupdate-cvs` and `fink update-all` and it looks like the xfree86 upgrade didn't work properly. I ended up with this: Preparing to replace xfree86-base 4.1.0-9 (using .../xfree86-base_4.2.0-1_darwin-powerpc.deb) ... Unpacking replacement xfree86-base ... dp