2011/8/11 guilherme.bradasch
>
> The firewall isn't enabled: it's a development machine, and SuperServer
> worked flawlessly in Snow Leopard, with Firebird 2.1.4.
>
We did not tested Firebird 2.1 under OsX Lion
Firebird 2.5.0 superserver had a problem
(http://paulbeachsblog.blogspot.com/2011/07/f
2011/8/16 W O :
> We dont' want (neither need) to use some Linux program, just the basic for
> to save and accessing the databases.
save and accessing are two different things
for accessing, you need Firebird under Linux
to save not
today linux Distro that are Firebird "friendly" (I mean Firebird
2011/8/16 Lester Caine
> A number of applications use firebird as their database, so it's a little
> difficult to speculate.
yes
> Do you have a 'firebird' directory in /etc or
> alternatively in /usr/lib(64) ...
not under MacOsX ;)
under MacOsx you have to look at :
/Library/Frameworks/Firebird.
2011/9/8 Fulvio Senore
> My copy of Ubuntu (10.04) has a client only firebird package.
> I think that it should install what you need.
hum under Debian and Ubuntu I guess that you are talking about this
package : libfbclient2
it is only the lib, it will not install isql
Under Debian and Ubuntu I
2011/9/11 trskopo
>
> I have installed Firebird in CentOS 5.4.
how ?
Classic or SuperServer ?
is Firebird service or Xinetd running ?
2011/9/21 johnbmoore
> Anyone have luck on this one..
>
use Firebird 2.5.1
http://www.ibphoenix.com/download/firebird/prerelease
Firebird 2.1.4 was built and tested under MacOsx 10.6 not 10.7
MacOsx 10.7 was released on July 20, 2011
Firebird 2.1.4 was released on Mar 15, 2011
2011/9/20 majstor
> Does anybody know an ideal tool for transfering data from Firebird database
> ver 2.1.x UNICODE_FSS to 2.5 UTF8, I'll try a lot of free or demo tools but
> same error with malware string are there. I just don't know how to solve this
> problem...
did you tried fbclone ?
http
2011/10/19 Rick Debay
> I'm running Debian 6.0 (squeeze) which has a package for FB 2.5.0. FB
> 2.5.1, is only available for Debian sid (unstable).
> Is there any way to get FB 2.5.1 for a production system using Debian
> package management? Or must I install it using the packages from
> Firebird?
2011/10/21 ruuddenbekker
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone give me tips/hints on how to crosscompile
> an ARM version of Firebird ( necessary env vars to set, pass CROSS_COMPILE,
> TARGET, etc )?
for what I know, Firebird don't support crosscompilation
(may be the 3 branch, but not sure, have to ask to the de
2011/10/21 Rick Debay
> > may be post a request of update in the Debian tracker
> The Debian packager responded to me on Wednesday:
>
> > Is 2.5.1 final going to be packages for squeeze?
> Maybe, if somebody comes to making a backport
>
should not be so hard
building package is part of the Sys adm
2011/11/21 greg_runnels
> Any ideas!?
remove firebird (see here
:http://paulbeachsblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/firebird-and-macosx-uninstalls.html
)
reboot
install Firebird
reboot
usually it is ok
2011/11/23 Lester Caine
>
>
>
> grip_2ls wrote:
> > Thanks for that, in which case the output is the following:
> >
> > /dev/cciss/c0d0p1 536G 135G 402G 26% /
> >
> > so not on the ntfs but the xfs partition. So I don't think that we can
> > blame ntfs in this instance.
> >
> > xfs ok for Firebir
2011/11/28 greg_runnels
> Yes, I tried the 32bit version. It hangs when I close the connection to the
> database. And locks out any other attempt to make a connection. I don't seem
> to have the problem with the 64bit version, but I can't seem to find a good
> admin tool for the Mac OSX 64bit v
2011/11/28 greg_runnels
>
> Does anyone have a good suggestion for an admin tool on the Mac? I recently
> upgraded to the 64-bit version of Firebird 2.5.1, and FlameRobin doesn't work
> with it.
>
if you want to use Firebird 64 bit (wich is the good choice under
MacOsX 10.7) with Flamerobin, or
2011/11/29 johnryh
> Using Firebird 2.5.1 on Lion 10.7.2 on a 4 core machine I attach to 2
> separate databases on the same machine in quick succession via localhost.
> Firebird always opens the first database with no problems but often hangs
> opening the second database. The only way out is t
johnryh [2011-11-29 09:29] :
> Any ideas?
what Firebird kind are you using ? Classic, SuperClassic, Superserver ?
may be you use trace/audit with SuperClassic or SuperServer ?
nipper232003 [2011-12-12 21:22] :
> I have also installed firebird 2.1.4 using the rpm from the EPL site. It
> installs with all its dependencies but how do I invoke this to run/install?
Sorry, I don't understand
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/yum/sn-managing-packages.html
> Where should
Formalejo, Richard [2011-12-14 01:07] :
> Is there a third party program need to install on my server in order to
> do this?
look at http://www.ibphoenix.com/products/software/ibreplicator
Delia Qin [2011-12-27 03:56] :
> After I copied fbembed.dll to the same folder with the program's.
fbembed.dll on MacOsx
it is a Windows dll
see :
http://paulbeachsblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/where-is-libfbclientdylib-on-macosx.html
trskopo [2011-12-27 05:39] :
> I have installed CentOS 6.2 64 bit on Intel dual core 1.8 GHz, but failed to
> installed firebird 2.5.1 for Linux AMD64.
>
> Error message was incompatible hardware.
??
from where and how did you get such message ?
what did you did ?
under CentOS 6.2 use EPEL repo
Ismael L. Donis Garcia [2011-12-27 13:55] :
> I have had never no type of problem. The one that is not recommended is the
> raid 10.
why are you saying that ?
it performs well with Firebird and more generally with rdbms
RAID 1+0
Two disc pairs are mirrored and the resulting mirrors are combined
trskopo [2011-12-28 03:31] :
>
>
>> from where and how did you get such message ?
>> what did you did ?
>>
>> under CentOS 6.2 use EPEL repository, you have Firebird packages inside
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ
>
su -c 'rpm -Uvh
http://downl
ddeham [2012-01-06 00:09] :
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to setup a GoPDM server on a Buffalo Linkstation HD-H250LAN
> running FreeLink Linux (Debian 4.0, etch). Specifically, it's
> freelink_mipsel-hdhlan-060810 downloaded from here:
> http://buffalo.nas-central.org/wiki/FreeLink
if it is Debian, then
Vander Clock Stephane [2012-01-31 16:30] :
> now with this strategy i don't remenbered, but did i need to keep the
> index
> CREATE INDEX HASH_X1_Y1_IDX ON HASH (X1_Y1);
> CREATE INDEX HASH_X1_Y2_IDX ON HASH (X1_Y2);
> CREATE INDEX HASH_X1_Y3_IDX ON HASH (X1_Y3);
> CREATE INDEX HASH_X1_Y4_IDX ON H
wang960 [2012-02-03 02:53] :
> Hi,
>
> Got three questions:
>
> 1) Is it safe to access a 1.5 fdb from a 2.5 firebird client?
yes
> 2) seems to me, if you want to have fb client in OS X, you have to install
> the server, is there a package that simply installs the client?
yes
> reason for this
wang960 [2012-02-03 12:09] :
> Thanks for the reply, that answers most of the questions I asked. now, for
> the firebird client for OS X, doing it "by hand", any tips for me to explore
> this direction?
I think that you you need fbintl, Firebird, libib_util.dylib,
libicudata.dylib, libicui18n.dy
wang960 [2012-02-03 17:36] :
> hi,
>
> using this to install firebird:
>
> yum install firebird-classic.x86_64
>
> it works in centos 6.2. now where is the ibase.h? i need that to compile some
> other modules.
as usual in packages :
yum install firebird-devel
hrefofficemanager [2012-02-16 21:00] :
> Hi, This is regarding a new clean install of CentOS 6.2, 64-bit.
>
> As root, I ran these 2 commands, without errors:
>
> rpm -Uvh
>
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/6/i386/epel-release-6-5.noarch.rpm
>
> yum install firebird firebird-superserver
hrefofficemanager [2012-02-18 22:06] :
> The following URL has notes about what DID WORK and in the end, it was very
> simple:
>
> http://needs-be.blogspot.com/2012/02/installing-firebird-25-64-bit-on-centos.html
>
just two points about your notes :
- instead of creating /var/firebirddata
you
Gugui [2012-03-01 21:36] :
> yep, i saw that,
> but i want to work with Firebird Classic version
>
and ?
what is the problem ?
Firebird Classic is available in EPEL repository
yum install firebird firebird-classic
or use the tar.gz
cniggeler [2012-03-05 18:30] :
> Hi,
>>
> 4. Since we support Linux and most flavors of Unix as well: what are
> the plans for an equivalent engine outside of Windows? I'm thinking
> here of avoiding issues with installing a daemon on those platforms
> (user may not have root privilege) and runn
nathanelrick [2012-03-07 13:33] :
> if you understand something . moving the page size from 8 to 16 reduce by
> 10 the speed of the 2 first query, but still 10x more slower than the last
> variante
obviously there are less data pages to read for the third table
see gsat -d result for these t
nathanelrick [2012-03-08 08:59] :
> I agree, what will be good is to have something like a "hotline" support
> service ... if someone have some offer i will be happy to receive it
IBPhoenix provide this
http://www.ibphoenix.com/services
Nando [2012-03-14 14:00] :
> I'm migrating to a new 64 bits Linux CentOS 5.7 server but I can´t compile
> the firebird sql freeUDFlibC-0.8. It seems the code is very old and has some
> kind of trouble with 64 bit pointers.
>
> Do some one know if there is any update for this library for 64 bits
Nick Upson [2012-03-26 14:42] :
> I have been unable to locate an epel 2.5.1, or indeed any epel rpm above
> 2.1.4.
>
EPEL 5 -> Firebird 2.1.4
EPEL 6 -> Firebird 2.5.1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/firebird?_csrf_token=78f5f5e9f1daca747407cf54a20c35cee6eeef55
Firebird 2.5 don
philippe makowski [2012-03-26 15:04] :
> Nick Upson [2012-03-26 14:42] :
>
>> I have been unable to locate an epel 2.5.1, or indeed any epel rpm above
>> 2.1.4.
>>
> EPEL 5 -> Firebird 2.1.4
> EPEL 6 -> Firebird 2.5.1
>
> https://admin.fedoraproje
mpp12310 [2012-03-27 17:04] :
> Hi,
>
> I am running FB 2.1.4 on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS server.
>
> From the server command prompt, I am able to login to GSEC, attached to my
> database. When I issue the following GSEC command I get an error:
>
> gsec> CREATE ROLE SDB_ADMIN (with or without ;)
>
>
Nick Upson [2012-03-27 17:31] :
> does that mean firebird 2.5 cannot build under Centos 5 or just that it
> will not be supplied
it will be not supplied
> but I could build it myself
out of the box, Centos 5 don't have good version of tools to build
Firebird 2.5
so may be you can build it, but
philippe makowski [2012-03-27 18:01] :
> Nick Upson [2012-03-27 17:31] :
>> does that mean firebird 2.5 cannot build under Centos 5 or just that it
>> will not be supplied
> it will be not supplied
>
>> but I could build it myself
> out of the box, Centos 5 don&#
aalliana [2012-05-07 15:17] :
> Is it safe to just disable the barriers bit or should I use ext 3 filesystem?
from http://kernel.org/doc/Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt :
When comparing versus ext3,
note that ext4 enables write barriers by default, while ext3 does
not enable write barr
Nick Upson [2012-08-08 14:21] :
> Hi,
>
> please does anyone know if there is going to be an epel 2.1.5 rpm build and
> if so when it might happen.
>
for EPEL5, I will try to find time for it before next week
philippe makowski [2012-08-08 20:38] :
> Nick Upson [2012-08-08 14:21] :
>> Hi,
>>
>> please does anyone know if there is going to be an epel 2.1.5 rpm build and
>> if so when it might happen.
>>
> for EPEL5, I will try to find time for it b
André Knappstein [2012-11-06 12:44] :
> That's a welcome thread and I would like to jump it, because I have
> the sameinterest/question. I don't want to spam the support
> list, so please, what's the best place to ask for available (paid)
> services around Firebird/Linux combinat
fo...@ymail.com [2012-12-30 04:40] :
> I published the following report on http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/:
> http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4022
>
> But I do not referred to the answer, which is:
> That's result of running gbak in embedded mode from root.
>
> I appreciate support, c
sargei_tartar [2013-01-12 16:17] :
>
> I'm trying to install firebird under Linux on a machine where I don't have
> root access, but install.sh fails with the error "You need to be 'root' user
> to do this change." How can this be done?
>
short answer, you can't
Firebird full install need to
Just in case, reboot. It often help under MacOsX.
you should have after :
$ ps aux | grep fb
root99059 0,0 0,0 2477544540 ?? S11:43
0:00.00 /Library/Frameworks/Firebird.framework/Resources/bin/fbguard
-daemon -forever
root99060 0,0 0,0 2485856 5088
mateuszloskot [2013-02-15 13:53] :
> Hi,
>
> I need to install and configure Firebird to build and
> test my C++ project on the continous integration service
> at https://travis-ci.org/
> The system is based on Linux (Debian).
>
> Unlike for MySQL or PostgreSQL, travis-ci.org does not provide
>
Le 19/02/13 08:41, ml600f a écrit :
> Maybe Firebird 3.0 does better optimizations.
>
I'm not sure
range queries are not very efficient under Firebird, may be we need
another kind of indices instead of B-Tree for that, such as R-Tree, or
bi directionnal indices, but it would need a lot of work an
piraju1379 [2013-03-14 23:17] :
> I'm installing Firebird Super Server
> version 2.5.2 on Linux Ubuntu.
>
> 1. Install by apt-get
> or
> 2. Download the file FirebirdSS-2.5.2.26539-0.i686.tar.gz
> and install by ./install.sh
>
> Which option do you recommend?
> Which option most used in business
dome_giuliano [2013-06-01 14:35] :
> directadmin as controlepanel
you mean that ? http://www.directadmin.com/
you need to have the php driver installed
under Centos it is as simple as :
yum install php-firebird
when you have epel repository enabled
but I don't know if your directadmin controlep
dome_giuliano [2013-06-01 14:35] :
> directadmin as controlepanel
you mean that ? http://www.directadmin.com/
you need to have the php driver installed
under Centos it is as simple as :
yum install php-firebird
when you have epel repository enabled
but I don't know if your directadmin controlep
dome_giuliano [2013-06-01 19:20] :
> Thank you for your response.
> I do have epel repository.
>
> With that command I get this message:
> * epel: mirror.nl.leaseweb.net
> 77 [ackages excluded due to repository priority protections
> Setting up Install Process
> No package php-firebird available
dome_giuliano [2013-06-01 20:07] :
> Hi Philippe,
>
> Thank you for bearing with me.
> I tried php-interbase, and the same error message appears.
>
> Can I supply additional information, which would help solving this?
>
That's a Centos Epel support question, not Firebird one
because the package
Le 10/07/13 16:13, John vd Waeter a écrit :
> So I tried:
> - get a 32 bit libfbclient.so from another 32 bit machine.
> - put it in /lib/i386-linux-gnu
> - made a reference in /etc/ld.so.conf.d
> - run ldconfig
>
bad idea
> But the ibconnection in freepascal still cannot find it.
> Maybe this is
Le 10/07/13 16:13, John vd Waeter a écrit :
> So I tried:
> - get a 32 bit libfbclient.so from another 32 bit machine.
> - put it in /lib/i386-linux-gnu
> - made a reference in /etc/ld.so.conf.d
> - run ldconfig
>
bad idea
> But the ibconnection in freepascal still cannot find it.
> Maybe this is
Le 06/08/13 13:12, Nick Upson a écrit :
> firebird 2.1.5 classic, yesterday, one of my systems suddenly produced
> this message 17 times in the same second.
two links :
http://www.ibphoenix.com/resources/documents/general/doc_50
http://pmakowski.ibphoenix.fr/post/2009/03/05/From-the-support-list
liviuslivius [2013-08-07 09:43] :
> Hi,
>
> i have question about row_number window function
> what it numerate records processed or records in retrieval order?
>
> i have query where result is like this
>
> Dense_rank Rank Row_Number
> 1 1 2
> 1 1 4
> 1 1 3
> 1 1 1
> ..
>
> should i
liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [2013-08-08 22:24] :
> Hi,
>
> I know how to do select with this, but i ask how should row_number work
> without specify order by in over clause. It numerate records in some internal
> order or it should numerate it in retrival order.
> You do select an without order
James Calfee [2013-08-13 20:59] :
> The platform is Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike).
that's very old, too old for Firebird 2.5
Frank Schlottmann-Gödde [2013-08-16 14:24] :
> Probably you will get more answers for Python related questions at
>
> firebird-pyt...@yahoogroups.com
>
and you have full examples in the doc and under test
Le 18/11/2013 15:37, Paul Beach a écrit :
> Has he installed a copy of Firebird for MacOSX?
>
he said yes
but I have no problem to build it
https://gist.github.com/pmakowski/7560078
Le 21/11/2013 00:58, Jerome Bossert a écrit :
> if i do a kill pid, it release the space, but i want to understand the issue
> and fix it in a proper way.
don't delete files when they are in use, that's all
Le 26/11/2013 07:37, ggoo...@yahoo.com a écrit :
> I am trying to access a firebird 1.5.3 database remotely from python using
> pyfirebirdsql. (access from Ubuntu precise 64 bit to Firebird running on
> Windows)
>
> I can connect to the database locally using a username/password with a
> de
Le 15/04/14 08:40, mieke janson a écrit :
> Good morning,
I've been using firebird for many years now on windows-systems. Now a
client
> asks me to install firebird on synology DS713 NAS . Is that possible? Is is
> easy? If I google I get contradicting results...
>
Since synology DS713+ is a Int
Le 01/10/2017 à 18:26, Allan Jardine allan.jard...@sprymedia.co.uk
[firebird-support] a écrit :
>
> I'm running into a problem installing Firebird on Fedora 26.
>
Please use the Fedora package
yum install firebird
and if really you need 3.0.2, under f26, ask for an update to Fedora
, or move to
Le 04/04/2019 à 08:35, b...@tbwb.nl [firebird-support] a écrit :
> I am using CentOS 7, and installed firebird with
>
> yum install firebird
>
Sorry, it is broken, and I don't know how to fix it :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636177
but Firebird 3 is ok
https://copr.fedorainf
Le 06/04/2019 à 14:51, Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl
[firebird-support] a écrit :
> On 4-4-2019 11:50, Philippe Makowski pmakow...@ibphoenix.fr
> [firebird-support] wrote:
>> Sorry, it is broken, and I don't know how to fix it :
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b
Are you using EPEL package ?
or Firebird project binaries ?
There is a compilation issue in Epel package since 2.5.8, and nobody
understand exactly what
fbintl from 2.5.7 package is ok
cf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636177
and http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-5925
but
you want to have firebird started at each boot, as root :
for SuperServer :
systemctl enable firebird-superserver.service
--
Philippe Makowski
http://www.ibphoeni
Le 11/05/2020 à 21:26, Hugo Eyng hugoe...@msn.com [firebird-support] a
écrit :
> Hello Mr. Makowski,
>
> About:
>
> "According to Fedora packaging rules, firebird service is not started
> automatically. You need to start it, as root :
> systemctl start firebird-superserver.service
> If you wa
Le 08/09/14 11:06, map...@gmail.com [firebird-support] a écrit :
>
> EPEL 7 left the beta stage so you can install Firebird 2.5.3 packages for
> Centos/RHEL 7
> sudo yum install
> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/x86_64/e/epel-release-7-1.noarch.rpm
> yum –enablerepo=epel install fire
Le 16/09/14 18:21, duque.herna...@yahoo.com [firebird-support] a écrit :
> Hi to all
>
>
> I've just installed Firebird 2.5 SuperClassic on a new Linux CentOS 7
> box. I tested local connections and are working fine. SELinux is
> disabled and firewall service is down.
>
>
> But when I try to connec
Le 14/11/14 21:04, 'William, David' david.will...@espn.com
[firebird-support] a écrit :
> The installation process runs ok. But whenever I try to start the
> server
Firebird should start at every boot
some informations :
http://paulbeachsblog.blogspot.fr/2008/03/where-is-libfbclientdylib-on-mac
Le 27/11/14 20:49, ash...@softwareshack.co.za [firebird-support] a écrit :
> I'm experiencing trouble when trying to install FB 2.5.3 on Centos 7 (64)
> Complains that it conflicts with file from package
> filesystem-3.2-18.el7.x86_64
>
Use Epel repository https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/F
Le 12/05/15 00:45, 'David E. Wheeler' da...@justatheory.com
[firebird-support] a écrit :
> What do I need to tweak to get it so that I can connect and create a
> database? The hosts file includes “localhost” as a name for 127.0.0.1, for
> what that’s worth, so I doubt it’s a host name issue.
>
75 matches
Mail list logo
