Dear Joseph,
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:49 AM, joe.bren...@bluewin.ch <
joe.bren...@bluewin.ch> wrote:
> Dear Plamen,
>
> Welcome to the group (from a member).
>
> Your project is most interesting, but your questionnaire is daunting! Would
> you accept partial answers that I and others might make
Dear colleagues,
we are looking for your contributions to our 3 events in August 2011:
http://www.inbiosa.eu/en/Workshops-And-Conferences.html
The submission deadlines were extended.
I look forward to meeting you in San Jose, Paris or Stirling!
Kind regards,
___ ___ ___
Dr. Plamen L
Dear colleagues,
we are looking for your contributions to our 3 events in August 2011:
http://www.inbiosa.eu/en/Workshops-And-Conferences.html
The submission deadlines were extended. I look forward to meeting you in San
Jose, Paris and/or Stirling!
Kind regards,
___ ___ ___
Dr. Plamen L
hat do you think?
I invite the ones who are interested in this to let me know.
Thank you for your attention,
Best wishes!
Plamen
___ ___ ___
Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov
landline: +49.30.38.10.11.25
fax/ums: +49.30.48.49.88.26.4
mobile: +49.15.22.89.02.26.4
email: pla...@sime
/www.GeneralInformationTheory.com
>
> Regards,
> Boris Sunik
>
> ___
> fis mailing list
> fis@listas.unizar.es
> https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
>
> ___
&
sion base about information and computation in biological
context.
Best wishes,
Plamen
___ ___ ___
Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov
landline: +49.30.38.10.11.25
fax/ums: +49.30.48.49.88.26.4
mobile: +44.12.23.96.85.69
email: pla...@simeio.org
URL: www.simeio.org
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 a
biological information & computation, to be chaired by inbiosa parties.
> Does it look a good idea? best wishes
>
> ---Pedro
>
> Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov escribió:
>
> Thank you, Bruno, John, Walter, Pedro, Gordana & FIS,
>
> I could not agree more with the said a
> fis mailing list
> fis@listas.unizar.es
> https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
>
>
>
> ___
> fis mailing list
> fis@listas.unizar.es
> https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fi
s/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> -
>
> Pedro C. Marijuán
>
>
> Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
>
> Instituto Aragonés de Ciencia
mer (
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/progress-in-biophysics-and-molecular-biology/recent-articles/
)
Best wishes,
___ ___ ___
Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov
landline: +49.30.38.10.11.25
fax/ums: +49.30.48.49.88.26.4
mobile: +49.17.43.56.41.75
email: pla...@simeio.org
URL: www.
es
>> http://sites.google.com/site/**pedrocmarijuan/<http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/>
>> --**---
>>
>>
>> *
>>
>> Berkeley
-10: 0415834333; ISBN-13: 978-0415834339.
[8] ———. 1964. “Eye and Mind.” In *The Primacy of Perception*, edited by
James M. Edie, 159–90. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
ISBN-10: 0810101645; ISBN-13: 978-0810101647.
++++++++++++++
Kind regards,
/special-theme-issue-on-integral-biomathics-life-sciences-mat/
Please pay attention to the new Note for Authors.
We look forward to your interesting contributions.
With best wishes,
__ ___ ___
Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov
landline: +49.30.38.10.11.25
fax/ums: +49.30.48.49.88.26.4
mobile
Dear colleagues,
I think that this discussion about phenomenology, or better said
"phenomenological philosophy", is essential, but may go in the wrong
direction. As for the common grounds that Loet addressed in his note, I
assume that some of us are continuing the path of Varela’s naturalisation
o
can be downloaded
here
<http://www.simeio.org/pages/details/papers/presentations/JPBM_SI_IB_119_3_TOC.pdf>
.
I wish you a peaceful and successful New Year 2016!
Plamen L. Simeonov
__ ___ ___
Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov
mobile: +49.17.37.81.63.37
landline: +49.30.83.21.20.70
fax/ums: +49.30.4
Dear All,
I have some good news for you. Elsevier allowed us to disseminate *the link
to all articles* of the 2015 JPBMB special issue for *free promotional
access* in our social community networks that will be available for 6
months *until July 19th 2016*. Please feel free to distribute this link
best.
Plamen
__ ___ ___
Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov
<http://lnkd.in/aqn39k>
2015 JPBMB Special Issue on Integral Biomathics: Life Sciences, Mathematics
and Phenomenological Philosophy
<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal
@All: Enjoy your discussion.
Best regards
Plamen
__ ___ ___
Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov
mobile: +49.17.37.81.63.37
URLs: www.simeio.org / LinkedIn <http://lnkd.in/aqn39k>
___
Fis mailing list
Fis@listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cg
Dear Jerry, Maxine, Marcus and All,
I will come back later on discussing this interesting issue because, I have
a major project deadline by tomorrow.
But let me just give you this link to educate you on what Phenomenological
Philosophy is really about:
http://ibiomath.org/on-phenomenological-philo
Dear Maxine and Colleagues,
thank you for your responses and agile responses in the second week of the
schedule.
I wish to announce that we are about closing the session on Maxine's theme
soon and move to the next presenter, Louis H. Kauffman with the following
annotations as follows.
Dear Jerry and Colleagues,
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Jerry LR Chandler
wrote:
>
> Dear Plamen, List
>
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 12:40 AM, Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov <
> plamen.l.simeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Jerry, Maxine, Marcus and All,
>
> I wil
Dear Lou, Pedro and Colleagues,
I think that Pedro made an interesting comment suggesting an extension of
Lou’s original model that another sort of recursion can be injected from
the outside world in terms of multiple nested loops of action. That the
species (r)evolution was accelerated and “har
uld be happy to talk
> about that. When I do it is at the level of human observer and our mutual
> abilities to distinguish, agree and disagree.
>
I see. This is the level of the scientist.
This should be doable. Self-referential microbes are out of question for
the moment.
Thanks!
Plam
Thank you, Lou.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Louis H Kauffman wrote:
> Dear Plamen,
> I will make comments in the text.
> Best,
> Lou
>
> On Mar 9, 2016, at 7:21 AM, Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov <
> plamen.l.simeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Lou,
>
> thank
Dear Lou, Pedro and Colleagues,
I have another somewhat provoking question about the "constructive" role of
topology in morphogenesis. What do you think about the somewhat artistic,
but scientifically VERY controversial theory about the origin and
development of life forms based on physical forces
these patterns work in a complex
> system. An artistic approach can be very fruitful.
> Best,
> Lou
>
> On Mar 16, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov <
> plamen.l.simeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Lou, Pedro and Colleagues,
>
> I have another somewh
)
Best,
Plamen
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov <
plamen.l.simeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Lou,
>
> This sounds really motivating! Thank you for your positive response. So,
> this approach can be actually used to prove biological hypotheses like
recombination, and we can explore this by using rope models and the
> abstract apparatus of corresponding topological models. Something similar
> might be possible for developmental biology.
>
> On Mar 17, 2016, at 2:45 AM, Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov <
> plamen.l.simeo...@gmail.com> w
Dear Lou, Pedro and All,
I am going to present a few opportunistic ideas related to what was said
before in this session. Coming back to Pivar’s speculative
mechano-topological model of life excluding genetics I wish to turn your
attention to another author with a similar idea but on a sound mat
he origin of life generally
> while keeping Howard Pattee's thinking in mind, I have been struck by the
> notion that the origin of life (that is: WITH the genetic system) was the
> origin of mechanism in the universe. Before that coding system, everything
> was mass action.
s directly in the belief in the existence of
> form and this form is a living form that we interact with and we are. How
> these notions are related to QM probably does await the emergence of a
> deeper QM.
>
> On Mar 29, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov <
> plamen.l.
apply to more
> complex phenomena.A more extended paper by myself and Joel Isaacson will be
> available soon.Best,Lou Kauffman*
>
> On Mar 30, 2016, at 7:18 AM, Pedro C. Marijuan
> wrote:
>
> Sorry but the dancing time is over... maybe tomorrow or on Friday Lou
> coul
formulation and interpretation of this "jewel of physics".
>> Rukhsan
>> Thank you very much
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:45 PM, wrote:
>>
>> > Send Fis mailing list submissions to
>> > fis@listas.unizar.es
>> >
>> > To
@listas.unizar.es
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> fis-ow...@listas.unizar.es
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Fis digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today&#
Dear Alex and FIS,
what I can only say as (now) qualified non-expert in QT is that points 1-13
embrace a period in scientific research of really great minds (I did not
see Feynman”s name in the list, but he is certainly meant under “others") a
little bit more than 100 years. Please excuse my doubt
Dear Maxine, Lou, Pedro, Loet, John, Soeren and Colleagues,
first of all I wish to thank Maxine for providing a bit different
perspective upon the overall subject of the discussion theme, namely
phenomenology or better said “phenomenological philosophy” (since
“phenomenology” has acquired differen
Sciences, Mathematics
and Phenomenological Philosophy
<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00796107/119/3>
(note: free access to all articles until July 19th, 2016)
Of course, you are welcome to read all papers there.
Best wishes,
Plamen
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Dr. Pl
Dear Pedro, Alex and Colleagues,
thank you for this introduction of the next round on physics and
phenomenology with Alex' challenging theory. I’d like to share with you a
curious blog by Phillip Ball which a friend dropped me earlier this
morning:
http://nautil.us/issue/35/boundaries/why-physics-
Dear Colleagues,
My contribution will finalize the discussion on phenomenology in the
domains of biology, mathematics, cyber/biosemiotics and physics by the
previous speakers (Maxine, Lou, Sœren and Alex) with a “challenging topic”
in *3φ integrative medicine*. *You may wish to skip the small fo
other problems in the communication.
Best,
Plamen
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov <
plamen.l.simeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
>
>
> My contribution will finalize the discussio
gt; The deep info problems are taken as already solved and articulated
> synthesis are undertaken as mere agglutinations. Maybe the problem is too
> deeply complex, and medicine is as always too messy.
>
The question we could try to answer here is: can we do something to
disentangle the s
013).
> In conclusione, sapendo che sono stato molto schematico e frammentario, il
> pensare economico, più che il pensiero economico, fa diventare la
> fenomenologia più brillante, pregnante e cognitiva. La libertà economica,
> infatti, è condizione della libertà di pensiero ed illumina
symptom on which adiagnosis can be made.
>
>
>
>
>
> John Collier
>
> Professor Emeritus and Senior Research Associate
>
> University of KwaZulu-Natal
>
> http://web.ncf.ca/collier
>
>
>
> *From:* Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] *
Dear Colleagues,
I’d like to share a possible sensation as of today if true:
http://phys.org/news/2016-05-complex-life-billion-years-earlier.html
What would this mean in terms of our discussion about life and medicine?
Best.
Plamen
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov
This is an interesting question, Karl. Without giving a full account, I
think there can be said the following.
It is usually not the (chemical) nature of a substrate or the availability
of an external source that makes it a poison, but its ratio.
Small amounts are harmless, larger amounts are dange
about the operation and
interaction of whole body systems, I think.
Best,
Plamen
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov <
plamen.l.simeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is an interesting question, Karl. Without giving a full account, I
> think there can be said the
/pipermail/fis/2016-May/000955.html.
It is called "*[Fis] _ Towards a 3φ integrative medicine*" and began on
Saturday, May 14th.
Best wuishes,
Plamen
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov <
plamen.l.simeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
about trying to come back again to criticality and try to trace jointly
at least one complete possible investigative path to the puzzle of illness
and recovery for one of the 3 examples I mentioned earlier in kind of a 3φ
or 4φ (or even "powers of φ”) "recombinant solution” from the standpo
theories that would reshape the world as no knowledge ever
before. We appear to be a little bit lost and helpless with playing “Bits &
Bolts" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuUxLplR_TI) in our era.
Best,
Plamen
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov <
plamen.l.simeo.
://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1210/1210.0048.pdf.
I look forward to your opinion, in particular those of Alex, Lou and Maxine
(with respect to making the turn towards phenomenology).
With best wishes for a fruitful week,
Plamen
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov <
plamen.l.si
Dear Pedro and Colleagues,
I think what we should keep in mind is that cancer cure is just one of the
possible incarnations of the recently popular topic of self-organised
criticality addressed in Alex’ earlier session. It is not incidental that I
came back to put attention on it, even if the “pro
Dear Bob,
thank you for your response. What you said in the core - heterogeneity -
resonated with the first suggested example I began this session with: the
puzzle of registering the heterogeneity of cancer, both in the
molecular-biological and histological level, both in space and time. It
appear
Dear Pedro, Francesco, Bob, Joe and All,
we are approaching the end of this session (10.6) and I am going to make
some concluding remarks on it. This does not excludes the chance for
submitting contributions until the end, but we have to follow our plan.
Your thoughts expanded significantly the s
Dear All,
we are indeed approaching the end of this series of sessions on life
science, phenomenology and mathematics. Your note sent 2 weeks ago with the
reference to your new book did not remain unnoticed, Francesco. Therefore I
will try to respond to it and make some final comments on what we h
http://www.inbiosa.eu>
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov <
plamen.l.simeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> we are indeed approaching the end of this series of sessions on life
> science, phenomenology and mathem
Dear All,
I would like to disseminate this lecture given by Brian Josephson at the
2016 Lindau Nobel Laureates Meeting on June 29t:
http://sms.cam.ac.uk/media/2277379
Best wishes,
Plamen
___ ___ ___
Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov
mobile: +49.17.37.81.63.37
landline: +49.30.83.21.20.70
email
Dear Louis, Pedro and FISers,
I have been knowing Otto for about a litle less than 10 years now.
What I have learned from him is that he has a very subtle sense of humor
and wisdom.
What I conclude about this issue with CERN's LHC is that he wishes nothing
more/less than an a priori theoretical pr
Well, these are only citations. What if all of them are wrong?
What if the data that were measured are incorrect?
We have had this many times in human history. Titanik was considered
unsinkable.
Bismark too. But both went down to the seaground.
Where is the mathematical proof or the computer simula
> Math is not the ultimate arbiter. But if we didn't have this empirical
> background it would have been a good reason to seek out empirical
> counter-examples before running our own test. Of course this sort of
> caution was not heeded when we tested nuclear weapons.
>
> — Terry
I know him: his name is God, the meta-observer + meta-actor at the same
time.
Correct, Bruno?
;-)
best,
Plamen
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Loet Leydesdorff
wrote:
> Dear Pedro, Koichiro, and colleagues,
>
> At the level of ob
atural evolution, or (even more specific) the natural selection.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Emanuel.
>
>
>
> --------
>
> *From:* Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] *On Behalf Of *Dr.
> Plamen L. Simeonov
> *Sent:* Friday, March 02, 2018 11:36 AM
> *To:* Loet Leydesdorff
>
Dea FISes,
with respect to this big data and machine learning cults today, which I
consider as somewhat useful fragments of a much bigger paradigm but not the
non-plus-ultra tendency in science, let me ask you a bit different question:
What do you think about the other more interesting phenomenon
l these tools to empower and perpetuate human
mind activities like those in this forum. Therefore, I wish to ask you if
you would eventually support a future experiment for creating a "human mind
capital" currency based on the trustfulness of the idea transactions in
this forum. I think we c
t; artificial intelleigence, artifficial catastrophe & complexity theory, and
> so on. Let us wait and see. Welcome in the extent to which it really
> responds to unanswered questions. And let us be aware of the technocratic
> lore it seems to drag.
>
> This was my second cent for the
64 matches
Mail list logo
