Re: Evaluation questions

1999-08-17 Thread Mike May, Registrar NFHR
This message is from: Mike May, Registrar NFHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 10:39 PM 8/16/99 -0400, you wrote: This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello Mike, everyone, Mike, the email I received gave me the impression due to the wording approval was denied. If this is not the case, This is

Re: Evaluation questions

1999-08-16 Thread Heithingi
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello Mike, everyone, Mike, the email I received gave me the impression due to the wording approval was denied. If this is not the case, then please resubmit our request for the September meeting. If approved, we will then discuss with the members

Re: Evaluation questions

1999-08-16 Thread Mike May, Registrar NFHR
This message is from: Mike May, Registrar NFHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 02:39 PM 8/13/99 -0400, you wrote: This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello Mike, everyone, As was suggested, we applied for approval to hold an eval, but were not given approval for two reasons. One is the simple fact

Re: Evaluation questions

1999-08-13 Thread B. Hendricks
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 13, 1999 6:39 PM Subject: Re: Evaluation questions This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello Mike, everyone, Steve, by the way, I think an evaluation in that area is a great idea! Would certainly cover those states which are very far from

Re: Evaluation questions

1999-08-13 Thread Mike May, Registrar NFHR
This message is from: Mike May, Registrar NFHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 02:39 PM 8/13/99 -0400, you wrote: Hello Mike, everyone, I will answer the rest of your post on Monday. I am getting ready to leave for the weekend right now. But I did find what the VT Evaluation fees were. Here they are:

Re: Evaluation questions

1999-08-13 Thread Heithingi
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello Mike, everyone, Steve, by the way, I think an evaluation in that area is a great idea! Would certainly cover those states which are very far from other possible evaluations. I feel the need to seriously address some issues brought up on this

Re: Evaluation questions

1999-08-12 Thread Mike May, Registrar NFHR
This message is from: Mike May, Registrar NFHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 12:38 AM 8/12/99 -0400, you wrote: This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello list! I am not attempting to stir the pot, but I must admit I am very confused concerning the NFHR evaluation process. I am hoping you all can

Evaluation questions

1999-08-11 Thread Heithingi
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello list! I am not attempting to stir the pot, but I must admit I am very confused concerning the NFHR evaluation process. I am hoping you all can enlighten me a bit. :) All of us seem to wish more evaluations. We all seem to understand the need

Re: Evaluation questions

1998-12-03 Thread Mike May, Registrar NFHR
This message is from: Mike May, Registrar NFHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 10:18 AM 12/3/98 +, you wrote: This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anton Voorhoeve wrote: Mike May told me that the 22 Fjords evaluated by Bob van Bon at our camp in May this year is not acceptable to the NFHR

Re: Evaluation questions

1998-12-03 Thread wcoli
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anton Voorhoeve wrote: Mike May told me that the 22 Fjords evaluated by Bob van Bon at our camp in May this year is not acceptable to the NFHR because (1)the evaluation was not sanctioned by the NFHR (I didn't know much about it then) and (2) the

Re: Evaluation questions

1998-12-02 Thread Anton Voorhoeve
This message is from: Anton Voorhoeve [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike May told me that the 22 Fjords evaluated by Bob van Bon at our camp in May this year is not acceptable to the NFHR because (1)the evaluation was not sanctioned by the NFHR (I didn't know much about it then) and (2) the evaluation took

Re: Re: Evaluation questions

1998-12-02 Thread Mike May, Registrar NFHR
This message is from: Mike May, Registrar NFHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 08:22 AM 12/2/98 -0800, you wrote: I've been following the yelling and screaming (if I may) that has been going on of late over Evaluations - how to do them, who should judge, are they important, etc., etc.It seems to me

Re: Re: Evaluation questions

1998-12-02 Thread jean gayle
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (jean gayle) This message is from: Mary Thurman [EMAIL PROTECTED] - There are a number of imported and US and Canadian bred horses that have gone through European Evaluations and have been awarded ster,model, prestatie etc., status as well as

Re: Evaluation questions

1998-12-02 Thread Lori Albrough
This message is from: Lori Albrough [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mary Thurman wrote: I've been following the yelling and screaming (if I may) that has been going on of late over Evaluations - how to do them, who should judge, are they important, etc., etc.It seems to me that if Evaluations are as

Re: Re: Evaluation questions

1998-12-02 Thread Mary Thurman
This message is from: Mary Thurman [EMAIL PROTECTED] - There are a number of imported and US and Canadian bred horses that have gone through European Evaluations and have been awarded ster,model, prestatie etc., status as well as those who have participated in American Evaluations.

Re: Re: Evaluation questions

1998-12-02 Thread Mike May
This message is from: Mike May [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 08:24 AM 12/2/98 -0500, you wrote: This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are a number of imported and US and Canadian bred horses that have gone through European Evaluations and have been awarded ster,model, prestatie etc., status as

Re: Re: Evaluation questions

1998-12-02 Thread Reinbowend
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are a number of imported and US and Canadian bred horses that have gone through European Evaluations and have been awarded ster,model, prestatie etc., status as well as those who have participated in American Evaluations. These horses shouldn't be

Re: Evaluation questions

1998-12-01 Thread Mike May, Registrar NFHR
This message is from: Mike May, Registrar NFHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 09:37 AM 12/1/98 -0600, you wrote: This message is from: Jon A. Ofjord [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello to all on the list: With all the discussion lately with regards to evaluations, etc. I have some questions that maybe some of you