Here's toTitleCase:
String.prototype.toTitleCase = function() {
var a = this.length;
if (a == 0) return ;
var c;
var w;
var s = ;
while (--a -(-1)) {
c = this.charCodeAt(a);
w = this.charAt(a - 1);
w =
After thinking about it, I believe the eql method is fine how it is and
here's why.
If there is an object in there with the same exact properties, but it's
a different instance of the object, then I don't think it should be a
match. If it points to the same place in memory (same instance) then
Latest and greatest!
http://paste.plone.org/7317
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier
My follow up to the Array extensions is this set of String extension
methods, again, borrowed from other languages. Time for optimization!
Some methods are still in development - some pretty tricky checking. I
also need to make _parseParams a bit more robust in allowing multiple
arguments to be
Pseudocode examples of usage:
hello.capitalize() Hello
HELLO.capitalize() Hello
123ABC.capitalize() 123abc
hello.center(4) hello
hello.center(20, _) ___hello
hello.chomp() hello
hello\n.chomp() hello
hello \n there.chomp() hello \n there
I appreciate all feedback on this Array extension.
Why do the function names have underscores when camel-humped names
are
the customary syntax in ActionScript
It's how Ruby does it and I'm learning Ruby so I guess it just carried
over. I've changed them to AS formatting.
Some of the names
Thanks for pointing out the issues with sum. I think I have found a
decent solution, though I'm not certain of the performance hit.
Array.prototype.sum = function() {
var x = 0;
var a = this.length;
while (--a -(-1)) {
if (!isNaN(Number(this[a]))) {
Yes I see it. Thanks for pointing that out.
Yes, the isNaN(Number(this[a])) check will convert string numbers to
numbers and that's a great benenfit in a language where strict typing is
bogus.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your
Those are great additions. You need a duplicate_deep and a
replicate_deep, though. Right now, any obejcts stored in the array
will be
references in the new array. A _deep method would make copies of those
too, recursively caling Array.duplicate, or Object.duplicate. ;-)
I'm not sure this is
Version 3 - Keep those revisions, suggestions, comments coming!
---
// Empowered Array
// Runs a function on every item in the array
// Returns true if the function returns true for any one item
Array.prototype.any = function(block) {
var a = this.length;
Quick optimization - Pulled the if instanceof Array out of the loop:
Array.prototype.lastIndexOf = function(obj) {
var a = this.length;
if (!(this[a] instanceof Array)) {
while (--a -(-1)) {
if (this[a] == obj) return a;
Ah. Thanks! I updated the list.
Ok, I'm getting back to work on String extension, the next in the
series.
Keep the feedback coming!
-Steven
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
There must be equivalent Java functions somewhere (and ActionScript is
far more akin to Java than PHP or Ruby).
I think every and any are fine, to be honest.
But, as pointed out before, ActionScript is far more akin to Java,
where
equals is something just about every single object has.
Chris,
You rock! How about calling it PowerArray or XArray instead. :)
-Steven
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com
Ok, I'll go through and make those changes to every loop with this[a] is
referenced more than once.
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http
| Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Hill
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 2:56 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Array Empowerment
Done! :D
http://ubergeek.tv
http://paste.plone.org/7080
I've fixed some bugs, implemented flatten4, and also changed the methods
to just function() calls for easier implementation into the great mixin
class that Chris wrote. I also assigned this[a] to a variable 'e' where
this[a] is used more than once in a loop. Removing
Sweet.
The only other method that uses recursion is eql.
-Steven
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf
http://paste.plone.org/7081
Meh, silly bug with indices now that it's just functions. Removed for
now.
-s
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
Remove and delete aren't synonymous, and I think remove is much better
suited to what is happening in the function. Without looking at the
function
or reading any documentation, I would assume that a delete method
destroyed
the object, not just removed it from the array. An Array.delete
I just had a look at eql (equality) because of the recursion there and
actually I'm not sure it should be there at all. By that logic you
would have to compare the properties of objects, too, which would
raise questions about recursion depth.
You're right. Object == Object doesn't work.
DataProvider is not secretly decorating things, BUT something
somewhere
in the V2 stuff is iterating over the array object itself, and is
silently blowing up when it finds these extra functions. I've had a
similar problem when some third party code was adding a function to
object.prototype,
to reel it
in and save yourself from potential debugging issues down the road, and
make it easier if you ever intend on learning a lower level language.
:)
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your
As a relative newcomer to Actionscript, I have found the entirety of
this thread very useful. I want to thank all of you for sharing this
code, as well as providing a considerable amount of insight to those
of us lurking in the shadows.
Glad to hear it.
I was fairly surprised to see that
First off, thanks to everyone helping on this thread. I originally was
using object == typeof(this[a]). Glad to see instanceof Array was
fastest.
What I'm trying to do here is write new methods for Array (and next up
is String) that other languages have but Flash does not. Some of these
Oh, I just noticed that Mark's was fastest. But, I can't get it to work
(freezes flash) There seems to be an error in the final while loop.
It's a single = not a double ==. Is that a typo?
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your
Ok, I got Mark's to work however it does not work when turned into a
prototype and I set list = this. Why it doesn't work may be the result
of another problem, though, and I'm not sure yet what it is, but here's
the behavior.
I created a movie with 3 buttons. An new array is instantiated.
Could you post (or send me) the test script, please?
Sure, here you go.
---
function randomArray(p) {
var a = [];
for (var i = 0; i p; i++) {
if (random(2) random(5)) {
a.push(i);
} else {
Other programming languages have more comprehensive Array methods.
While some are rarely used, some are quite useful, and some are merely
shortcuts. I have included them all here in my Array Empowerment
script.
If anyone can speed any of these up, please let me know. Some of these
for loops
Thank you for your comments. Writing these methods is like creating and
solving little puzzles. Much fun!
// Remove all elements from Array
Array.prototype.clear = function() {
this.length = 0;
};
This function scares me to death.
According to the official Flash documentation
Here is the next iteration - new and improved. Again, all comments and
optimizations, including conversations about optimizations, are most
welcome!
// Array Empowerment
// Removes all elements from Array
Array.prototype.clear = function() {
this.length = 0;
};
// Invoking block once
Is there a way to make this script any faster?
Array.prototype.flatten = function(r) {
if (!r) r = [];
var l = this.length;
for (var a = 0; a l; a++) {
if (this[a].__proto__ != Array.prototype) {
r.push(this[a]);
} else {
this[a].flatten(r);
}
}
the same method, which means recursion.
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard Poulin
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 9:56 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders
I may be asking a stupid question, but did you by chance duplicate it
before it was finished loading?
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
Another issue with developing a Rails or Cake type of framework for
Flash is the rate at which Flash changes undermines the effort.
PHP, Java, Ruby - these languages get upgrades, improvements and bug
fixes over the years, but for the most part, don't change that much, and
get a lot of additional
James,
Rails and Flex work very well together. Maybe you should consider
following that career path - a Flex/Rails developer. Jesse Warden has
gone that way and loves it.
http://www.recentrambles.com/pragmatic/view/31
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
in ruby and rails) and you might be able to
apply some of the brilliance found there to your Flash development
approach.
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search
Well, Ruby on Rails is just a hype. Their are some issues with it
which
cause database corruption.
Oh really? Do tell.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
Well, Ruby on Rails is just a hype. Their are some issues with it
which cause database corruption.
Oh really? Do tell.
The reason I ask is because I don't think you can blame Rails for
something that's a programmer issue. That's like blaming Flash for bugs
in people's Flash apps.
On top
http://blogs.borland.com/fhaglund/archive/2006/07/15/25963.aspx ;-)
And yet at the end of said article
There might be easy ways get this to work in Rails but I'm a Rails
rookie and I have not found it yet. Can someone with deeper knowledge
enlighten me?
What we have here is a programmer error,
I think that says more about the average Director developer than about
Flash or Macromedia. ;-)
Heh, I was joking to make a point. I don't think anyone can claim to
know the future and label new technologies as just hype, especially
not having delved into them personally to weigh the benefits
the scrollpane inside that movieclip.
See if that works.
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Haikal Saadh
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 9:03 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re
Sure, here's the first step. Buy and read the following books:
Agile Web Development with Rails - 2nd Edition
http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/titles/rails/index.html
This will give you a solid foundation on why Rails is such an
outstanding framework.
Practices of an Agile Developer
Debugger, and with Xray.
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf
Is it open source and freely available like Xray is?
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of eric dolecki
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:00 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re
Write your own, don't use the component.
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Santhakumar K
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:25 PM
To: Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject
You need to declare your class variables before you use them:
class GameObject extends MovieClip {
var little_stars_mc:MovieClip;
var game_number:Number;
function GameObject() {
game_number = 1;
little_stars_mc.gotoAndStop(game +
And I feel happy using mProjector from Binary Noise, a wrapper written
with a Flash developer in mind from the ground up. The API is second to
none and the performance and stability is unmatched, IMO.
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
How is your movie built? Is the scrollpane component in a loaded in
swf? If so, you must have the scrollpane component in the library of
the root/loading swf. Do you have the scrollpane embedded in another
component? Do you have the scrollpane masked?
for hijacking your thread.
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Stone
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 12:41 PM
To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Eclipse Assistance
Hi,
You need to check google before you spam the list. Especially with an
off-topic post that has nothing to do with Flash.
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=206213
google search: detect windows media player in firefox
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
With such a great subject line i think it would benefit the archives
to
share your results...
Everything you need to know can be found on this thread:
http://www.northcode.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6086
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
Hi grimm,
You need to embed the italic and bold versions of the font, too.
Best bet is to stick all three in off-screen dynamic textfields
somewhere (or exported in your library).
Old school Flasher trick - works like a charm. Nice suggestion for all
these code monkeys who forget (or never
when 2 was, etc.
1
2
3
4
5
That way, Flash is only drawing 5 clips, and you're just swapping data out.
This is how MM does it. No smooth scrolling, but it's hardly noticeable, esp
considering the performance is great.
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
-Original Message-
From
Hello!
Buddy your words are out of my thought.right me
clearly
whatever you want to tell.
thnx.
I am at once nonplussed and entertained.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search
Did you try using _sans, not just imported Arial?
Is the field masked?
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of grimmwerks
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 2:40 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing
I've spent some time on google trying to find information and no luck.
I'm looking for a pointer in the right direction on how to create custom
documentation that would integrate into the Flash Help window installed
via an MXP file.
Thanks!
___
Nevermind, I found it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Sacks | BLITZ
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 6:52 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: [Flashcoders] Creating Custom Documentation MXP
I've spent some
.
-Steven
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Thomas
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 7:16 AM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: [Flashcoders] Detecting a Sound Card
Hi folks,
I
Pop-up blockers don't block pop-ups if the user clicks the link that
launches the pop-up (they're effectively opting-in).
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 8ball Developer
Sent
There are plenty of reasons why people in corporate environments run
Windows
2000 Workstation, that have nothing to do with the speed of technology
or
Moore's law (which has absolutely nothing to do with operating
systems).
There are plenty of reasons I don't work in corporate environments.
Stephen
You can see in the From it's spelled with a v. It's not like you
heard my name and spelled it with a ph. You read the word right in
front of you with a v and yet you still misspelled it. Astounding. ;)
you're misreading the information on that link.
And you're misreading the
From the Flash Help panel:
_url (MovieClip._url property)
public _url : String [read-only]
Retrieves the URL of the SWF, JPEG, GIF, or PNG file from which the
movie clip was downloaded.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription
So, you can have multiple swfs listening to a single swf, but you
cannot
have a single swf listen to multiple swfs.
The best analogy I can think of is a radio station.
A radio station can transmit its signal to all its listeners. But, the
radio station can only receive calls from one listener
it will
reconnect.
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/pipermail/flashcoders/2003-May/076262.html
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com
This thread might be of use to you:
http://my.opera.com/userjs/forums/topic.dml?id=125641
Did a google search:
http://www.google.com/search?q=open+link+in+new+tab+javascript
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders
Sorry, I meant on a single LocalConnection.
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Grden
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 2:34 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re
Wait, you and I are saying the same thing.
I can broadcast on as many channels as I want but I can't have a
LocalConnection listen to more than the channel you pass it in the
connect method.
LC = new LocalConnection():
LC.connect(channelA);
If you call
LC.connect(channelB);
It disconnects
| Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe
Maybe a scam is a harsh word
...
but you don't just forget to mention such a huge detail by accident.
I sold you a car that looks fairly new. It will get you from point A to
point B. I forgot to mention that it's not street legal and it runs on
leaded fuel.
What's the word for that?
I don't think it's a scam. I gave them a call when I was working with
them and they were amazingly helpful and polite. I think it's 3 guys
coding a component framework, and one that's not too shabby. Sure, it
doesn't work with MM's framework, but who cares? V2 is garbage
anyways.
It's not
I think that's false. There are lots of people who are interested in
using frameworks and using them completely.
We have to agree to disagree on this one.
There are always tradeoffs: adopt the framework, you give some
things up, but you get others. Depending on their needs, some people
MM did that as well, did you say scam then too ?
With the exception of the DRK series of components, MM's components came
free with Flash.
And I don't recall any MM components that caused other things to break
in your application. The components themselves were buggy and certain
components
Case in point - to use Rails, you must do things inn VERY specific
ways.
Rails is all about convention, and if you don't adhere to its
conventions,
you will be boned.
Not true. For example, one of the conventions Rails uses to make things
easier is their naming conventions, specifically,
What is not entirely clear on the website is that the XPComponents are
NOT designed to be used as standalone components in YOUR application,
but are meant to be used when you build applications using the
DEVELOPERS' EXACT framework.
We paid for the components but found out very quickly that they
test
---
Steven Sacks
Senior Flash Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: 310-551-0200 x209
Fax: 310-551-0022
BLITZ | 405 S Beverly Drive, 3rd Floor - Beverly Hills, CA 90212
www.blitzagency.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your
Hey everyone,
I recently upgraded to Windows XP SP2 and this stupid information bar
keeps me from running local html pages with swfs in them without
clicking on it, and then a subsequent pop up alert box.
I googled the web and couldn't find any way to stop this from
happeneing. The methods
Are the Ghostwire components still being developed further or added
to?
Ville
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
Sacks
| BLITZ
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 12:01
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] XPcomponents
Use a _global namespace.
On your root timeline:
_global.APP = this;
Then, in your sub-timelines/swfs
APP.ContentClip = this;
APP.Navigation = this;
etc.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the
Maybe check length 0 if there is text in the file...
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of edwin
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 4:46 PM
To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject
You're loading in a non-cached version each time right?
var myXml = new XML();
for (var a = 0; a 30; a++) {
myXml.load(path + ?x= + a);
}
BLITZ | Steven Sacks - 310-551-0200 x209
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your
AJAX is just a buzzword anyway. The methodology has been around
forever.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig
But unless I am totally wrong, AMFPHP wasn't out of beta
until recently.
And it isn't officially supported by Adobe/MM, or if it is,
it wasn't until recently. CF is.
Macromedia doesn't support free technologies that are in direct
competition with their technologies. Why would they? If you
AMFPHP is faster and easier to implement than CF Remoting, IMO.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf
Almost every hosting company has PHP already installed. I mean, if you
don't include the time it takes to get CF set up, then yeah, I guess
they're about even.
CF costs money. PHP is free.
PHP wins, at least for me. Hence, the IMO.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plus, I don't really like CF. So I guess I'm biased.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Steven Sacks | BLITZ
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:24 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Best Flash data access way
You can use the NetConnection Debugger, an amazing debugging tool that comes
with the free remoting components from Macromedia/Adobe (search the site for
'Download Flash Remoting Components'), or if you're feeling frisky, you can
grab XRay from osflash and learn that.
Breakpoints aren't really
That's how the for-in loop works, no idea why.
for in loops go backwards because they compile to reverse loops which
are MUCH faster than forward loops. For more detailed information on
this subject, check out the Flasm page.
http://flasm.sourceforge.net/#optas
Here are the fastest loops:
You get what you pay for. You earn what you ask for.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of David Brunswick
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 10:09 AM
To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] OT: Junior Developer Flash/Flex
test
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
Why don't you just load one of two swfs, each with their own includes?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Tom Lee
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:56 PM
To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
Subject: [Flashcoders] Targeting multiple player
Please move this thread somewhere else. If 'OT' appears in
the subject line, that ought to be a clue to everyone that
the thread no longer belongs on Flashcoders. Intellectual
property and business practice discussions don't really belong here.
Not to mention it has been discussed to death
Yes, objects are hashes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen
Ford
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 5:28 PM
To: flashcoders
Subject: [Flashcoders] Sort within an object
I thought all objects were associative arrays ?
Is this
Sorry. Yes to your first question. No to your second.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
Sacks | BLITZ
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 5:58 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Sort within an object
Yes
Did you try making a new Flash file and trying it in there?
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
If you give a damn about performance, just use prototype, or manually extend
every textfield in the clip with a for loop, especially if you have a bunch
of textfields on a screen (like a form).
If you want to manually extend, be pragmatic and do what I do. Name all
your textfields with TXT_ or
Developer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
Sacks
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:07 PM
To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Can't update text in rotated text field
Did you try making a new Flash file
Oh, and the reason setting orientation to landscape doesn't work is
because orientation is read-only.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
test
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
My code for printing landscape works in five different applications I have
used it in.
The author of the PrintJob class made some poor choices when coding it and
you have to code around it. Here is my method explained with comments:
function printCertificate() {
// reference to the
801 - 900 of 1049 matches
Mail list logo
