On 1/3/07, Bob McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
After we have the radio running either stand alone with a Linux box in
it (or in the case of SDR-1000, by it) we can then work out the delivery
of audio across the room, across town, across the planet. It will
simply be a different
Philip Covington wrote:
On 1/3/07, Bob McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
After we have the radio running either stand alone with a Linux box in
it (or in the case of SDR-1000, by it) we can then work out the delivery
of audio across the room, across town, across the planet. It will
On 1/4/07, Bob McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philip Covington wrote:
On 1/3/07, Bob McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
After we have the radio running either stand alone with a Linux box in
it (or in the case of SDR-1000, by it) we can then work out the delivery
of audio across
... It makes no sense to run anything but Linux on
the embedded controllers and then have them be a server.
Um, I respectfully disagree. It may make no sense to run Vista / XP /
Windows-flavor-of-the-era on an embedded controller, but if, for
example, one wants to embed a DSP inside an
When, where, and how soon can I buy several of these?? :-)
Duane
N9DG
--- Philip Covington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the end I want a small form factor Linux box running the
SDR core
and interfacing to the hardware. I want to be able to
connect ANY SDR
GUI box (in Windows/Linux/OSX)
On 1/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... It makes no sense to run anything but Linux on
the embedded controllers and then have them be a server.
Um, I respectfully disagree. It may make no sense to run Vista / XP /
Windows-flavor-of-the-era on an embedded controller,
Lyle --
What you're saying makes sense for a (basically) fixed product. It
leaves no room for enhancements in the Cognitive Radio area, which
*do* require the resources of a more general computer. What we're
dealing with is much more a coprocessor than a peripheral of any sort.
The high falutin'
Lyle Johnson wrote:
... It makes no sense to run anything but Linux on the embedded
controllers and then have them be a server.
Um, I respectfully disagree. It may make no sense to run Vista / XP /
Windows-flavor-of-the-era on an embedded controller, but if, for
example, one wants to
On 1/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
There is no reason why you could not have the Linux box interfaced to
a physical front panel so everything outside the box looks like a
conventional radio. Booting from Flash is not problem for Linux so
you could do without the
At 08:31 AM 1/4/2007, Lyle Johnson wrote:
... It makes no sense to run anything but Linux on
the embedded controllers and then have them be a server.
Um, I respectfully disagree. It may make no sense to run Vista / XP /
Windows-flavor-of-the-era on an embedded controller, but if, for
The whole point of Cognitive Radio is very simple: it's a radio
that can program itself.
A corollary of that point is: it's a radio that can and will adapt
*by itself* to functioning in response to situations and
requirements that *you don't and can't in principle know yet*.
So a cognitive radio
IGNORE THAT MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN.
[big snip]
This sure sounds a lot like what I was asking for. Linux is perhaps
overkill, but if it delivers the goods for a reasonable price, I guess I'm
OK with that.
Given that, give it to me travel hardened (in terms of connectors and so
on) with petty
NICELY PUT BOB!
I think that makes the most sense, amongst the myriad of possibilities there
are out there.
I guess that probably means a major re-assembly kit For those of us that
cannot afford another radio. :-)
I don't know how that fits in with HPSDR efforts though... hmm
73,
Fred
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
