The whole point of Cognitive Radio is very simple: it's a radio
that can program itself.
A corollary of that point is: it's a radio that can and will adapt
*by itself* to functioning in response to situations and
requirements that *you don't and can't in principle know yet*.
So a cognitive radio
At 08:31 AM 1/4/2007, Lyle Johnson wrote:
> > ... It makes no sense to run anything but Linux on
> > the embedded controllers and then have them be a server.
>
>Um, I respectfully disagree. It may make no sense to run Vista / XP /
>Windows-flavor-of-the-era on an embedded controller, but if, for
>
> On 1/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> There is no reason why you could not have the Linux box interfaced to
> a physical front panel so everything outside the box looks like a
> conventional radio. Booting from Flash is not problem for Linux so
> you could do without
Lyle Johnson wrote:
>> ... It makes no sense to run anything but Linux on the embedded
>> controllers and then have them be a server.
>
> Um, I respectfully disagree. It may make no sense to run Vista / XP /
> Windows-flavor-of-the-era on an embedded controller, but if, for
> example, one want
Lyle --
What you're saying makes sense for a (basically) fixed product. It
leaves no room for enhancements in the Cognitive Radio area, which
*do* require the resources of a more general computer. What we're
dealing with is much more a coprocessor than a peripheral of any sort.
The high falutin'
On 1/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ... It makes no sense to run anything but Linux on
> >> the embedded controllers and then have them be a server.
> >
> > Um, I respectfully disagree. It may make no sense to run Vista / XP /
> > Windows-flavor-of-the-era on an embedded c
>> ... It makes no sense to run anything but Linux on
>> the embedded controllers and then have them be a server.
>
> Um, I respectfully disagree. It may make no sense to run Vista / XP /
> Windows-flavor-of-the-era on an embedded controller, but if, for
> example, one wants to embed a DSP inside
When, where, and how soon can I buy several of these?? :-)
Duane
N9DG
--- Philip Covington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In the end I want a small form factor Linux box running the
> SDR core
> and interfacing to the hardware. I want to be able to
> connect ANY SDR
> GUI box (in Windows/Linu
> ... It makes no sense to run anything but Linux on
> the embedded controllers and then have them be a server.
Um, I respectfully disagree. It may make no sense to run Vista / XP /
Windows-flavor-of-the-era on an embedded controller, but if, for
example, one wants to embed a DSP inside an SD
On 1/4/07, Bob McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Philip Covington wrote:
> > On 1/3/07, Bob McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> After we have the radio running either stand alone with a Linux box in
> >> it (or in the case of SDR-1000, by it) we can then work out the delivery
> >> of au
Philip Covington wrote:
> On 1/3/07, Bob McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> After we have the radio running either stand alone with a Linux box in
>> it (or in the case of SDR-1000, by it) we can then work out the delivery
>> of audio across the room, across town, across the planet. It will
On 1/3/07, Bob McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After we have the radio running either stand alone with a Linux box in
> it (or in the case of SDR-1000, by it) we can then work out the delivery
> of audio across the room, across town, across the planet. It will
> simply be a different connec
. hmm
73,
Fred
- Original Message -
From: "Bob McGwier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Flex Radio Reflector" ;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:38 AM
Subject: [Flexradio] (A peek behing the curtain) was Re: vSound update from
Phil C. - Window
> IGNORE THAT MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN.
>
[big snip]
This sure sounds a lot like what I was asking for. Linux is perhaps
overkill, but if it delivers the goods for a reasonable price, I guess I'm
OK with that.
Given that, give it to me travel hardened (in terms of connectors and so
on) with petty
IGNORE THAT MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN.
User space drivers, behind Vista layers and layers of bulk and
protection of digital media rights, is possible. It is just awful so
why would we do it? I have a strong opinion. It is my strongest
possible opinion that for the future, Flex should build s
15 matches
Mail list logo
