At 06:30 AM 2/5/2007, Bill Tippett wrote:
>Mark Amos wrote:
> >The Flex-Radio, on the other hand, was pretty much unuseable when the
>transmitter & amp were running. It saw every dit from that transmitter out to
>dozens of KHz's away - spurs popping up and drowning out even S9+ stations.
>
>
Mark Amos wrote:
>The Flex-Radio, on the other hand, was pretty much unuseable when the
transmitter & amp were running. It saw every dit from that transmitter out to
dozens of KHz's away - spurs popping up and drowning out even S9+ stations.
BDR seems to be the weak point for SDR rigs.
Guy Olinger, K2AV wrote:
>With all the above as a caveat, I would be surprised if the engineers
>that designed the FA-66 ever tested it in a high RF environment. It's
>an AUDIO box, right? (Those hams are doing WHAT with it?)
>
>
>
I went to buy a new microphone today. I didn't like what was
Just wanted to say thanks for all the suggestions and answers to my contesting
question, both on and off the list. I really appreciate the value I get from
this list. I hope to be able to contribute more as time goes on.
Great radio, great group of people!
Mark
-- next part --
Larry,
I should have added in my previous post:
While the SDR-1000 will experience some overload interference from nearby
transmitters, its excellent hardware design (read "wide dynamic range")
makes it less susceptible than many other hardware boxes on the market.
73, Ray, K9DUR
__
Larry,
You are correct, any transceiver has problems when being used simultaneously
in close proximity to another. A few years ago our club had a building
project where we constructed several filters for use at Field Day. I think
we were running 8A (100W) that year with all operating stations
Mark Amos wrote:
>The Flex-Radio, on the other hand, was pretty much unuseable when the
>transmitter & amp were running. It saw every dit from that transmitter out to
>dozens of KHz's away - spurs popping up and drowning out even S9+ stations.
>I've never operated in a high RF environment before
ngineers
that designed the FA-66 ever tested it in a high RF environment. It's
an AUDIO box, right? (Those hams are doing WHAT with it?)
73, Guy.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Amos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 4:53 PM
Subject:
I'm not sure what to make of this either. I have all
3 soundcards, and the FA-66 seems more sensitive to
close RF than the other 2 cards. It seems to desense.
With the D-44 I have been able to work for example 75
SSB and and do CW DXing on 160, 80M or 40 running
>1kw, but I notice I can't do tha
I'm not sure what to make of this either. I have all
3 soundcards, and the FA-66 seems more sensitive to
close RF than the other 2 cards. It seems to desense.
With the D-44 I have been able to work for example 75
SSB and and do CW DXing on 160, 80M or 40 running
>1kw, but I notice I can't do tha
All,
I visited a contesting station this past weekend for the 160 contest. I took
the SDR-1000 and subsidiary equipment with me - not to operate, just to see how
it might work in a future contest. Also, I wanted to show it to the op that was
working the contest to show him the quality of the rec
11 matches
Mail list logo
