Jim,
The amateur radio service is NOT an emergency communications service
according to the FCC regulations? I beg to differ! The very first section
of Part 97, the Basis and Purpose of the amateur service clearly states
that the amateur radio service has emergency communications as one of its
Antennas and rotors are some of the dumbest peripherals I know. I2C could at
least smartin them up a little. My point was to wring all the power out of the
bus that is available and not just settle for the trivial subset.
I like Frank's idea for a miles per ERP approach to contesting.
73
Speaking of humility, please read the following from another reflector.
Get'er done.
73 Ross K9COX
Please join me in congratulating Phil on the first Mono port of the
SDRMAX-II GUI *and* QS1RServer to Linux (Ubuntu 8.04 2.6.24.20-rt kernel).
These two achievements are among the 11
Quoting Ray, K9DUR [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Mon 28 Jul 2008 04:25:33 AM PDT:
Jim,
The amateur radio service is NOT an emergency communications service
according to the FCC regulations? I beg to differ! The very first section
of Part 97, the Basis and Purpose of the amateur service clearly
McGwier
Cc: Tim Ellison (W4TME); [EMAIL PROTECTED]; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New Model from FlexRadio?
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Bob McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank and I differ. The ultimate capabilities are profoundly revolutionary,
as revolutionary
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:49 AM, Lee A Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I like Frank's idea for a miles per ERP approach to contesting.
Not my idea by a long shot. It's been batted around in V/U/SHF for a long
time, evidently. Zack Lau W1VT is the one who's done the most extensive
thinking on
On Jul 28, 2008, at 4:49 AM, Lee A Crocker wrote:
Antennas and rotors are some of the dumbest peripherals I know. I2C
could at least smartin them up a little. My point was to wring all
the power out of the bus that is available and not just settle for
the trivial subset.
I agree --
*That* is impressive!
John
PS -- I went to the Round the Horne Revisited stage show a few years
ago. Another great British radio show.
Alan NV8A said the following on 07/26/2008 10:20 PM:
Probably I can do you one better: I attended one of their recording
sessions back in the 1950s.
Systems Administrator
W4TME
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Petrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tim Ellison (W4TME) [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New Model from FlexRadio
(W4TME) [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New Model from FlexRadio?
Impressive, can you point me to some description of what VR code
is? I
have the SDR-1000.
Thanks, Dennis, k0eoo
Hummm
GBG = gotta be good ?
GBG = God Bless Gerald ?
GBG = Greatness Beyond Grandure ?
GBG = Great Big Gadget ?
GBG = Grand Boundless Gates ?
GBG = Golden Brass Goblets ?
.
.
.
de ken n9vv
GBG - initials for a set of words still secret to me, but not hard to
figure out
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Robert Dennison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A thinking SDR should be fascinating...
The word cognitive is kind of misleading. By convention, a Cognitive Radio
is one which, without operator intervention, will reconfigure itself based
on its current signal
power all-band SO2R assisted.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Brickle
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 2:16 PM
To: Robert Dennison
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New Model from FlexRadio?
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008
Geralds Baby Girl?
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Ken N9VV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hummm
GBG = gotta be good ?
GBG = God Bless Gerald ?
GBG = Greatness Beyond Grandure ?
GBG = Great Big Gadget ?
GBG = Grand Boundless Gates ?
GBG = Golden Brass Goblets ?
.
.
.
de ken n9vv
GBG -
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...sit around on the beach with your friends in Aruba steaming oysters and
drinking cold ones by the fire for 24 hours...
Actually this is a pretty good opportunity to illustrate the difference
between the limited
The Contest SDR will have far more capability. The whole gig about contesting
is probability and maximizing efficiencies and there now exist monte carlo
engines that can run thousands of simulations and develop a distribution of
forward looking likely scenarios, and can do a risk benefit
Hey Frank,
Like your thoughts...
I've been in a few sports (like fencing) where automation basically
ruined what was a very interesting activity. Your thoughts could well
prevent that from happening in Ham radio contesting!!Stick with it!
73's
Rob
AB7CF
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:57:59
Message -
From: Frank Brickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Dennison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New Model from FlexRadio?
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Robert Dennison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been
Why a subcarrier? just make it the contest exchange
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Lee A Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Why a subcarrier? just make it the contest exchange
Two reasons:
(1) So it can be decoded automatically by a simple demod, rather than (say)
an open-speaker-set voice transcription, by a program sucking in all
available
PROTECTED]; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New Model from FlexRadio?
Tim is exactly right. And anyway, we're out of the closet in admitting that
the highly-esteemed new architecture is really just some old
architecture applied to a mildly novel problem. Calling the prototype VR
Quoting Lee A Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Sun 27 Jul 2008
12:59:11 PM PDT:
This is why flexwire is so much more than just a bus to run some
relays, and why it will be important to be able to distribute
functionality across a network. Flexwire is a master-slave/
master-master 2
Quoting Lee Mushel [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Sun 27 Jul 2008
03:32:01 PM PDT:
I just got up from my nap to see the cognitive contesting business and I
will admit that something that complex offers more than a few interesting
aspects but you've not considered the *missing link*! I see precious
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Bob McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank and I differ. The ultimate capabilities are profoundly revolutionary,
as revolutionary an impact on radio as say CW Skimmer is having on CW
contesting/operating. That said, the opening salvos will be functional,
not
New Radio? Please step up and speak into the microphone, sir. :-)
Frank, AB2KT said-
Sooner than you might think. We are moving very fast now towards an
earlier
exposure of alpha code for the new radio than we'd previously announced
(Dayton next).
Kirb - VE6IV
]
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 12:22 PM
Subject: [Flexradio] New Model from FlexRadio?
New Radio? Please step up and speak into the microphone, sir. :-)
Frank, AB2KT said-
Sooner than you might think. We are moving very fast now towards an
earlier
exposure of alpha
to
make RF out of.
- Tim
-
FRS Internet Systems Administrator
W4TME
- Original Message -
From: Kirb Nesbitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 12:22 PM
Subject: [Flexradio] New Model from FlexRadio?
New Radio? Please step up
: [Flexradio] New Model from FlexRadio?
No new physical radio, per se. When you match the new VR code with the
FLEX-5000 and the SDR-1000, you will have new software defined radios that
are going to be very different from what you have today with PowerSDR 1.x.
That is what was promised to have running
-radio.biz
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New Model from FlexRadio?
Impressive, can you point me to some description of what VR code is? I
have the SDR-1000.
Thanks, Dennis, k0eoo
- Original Message -
From: Tim Ellison (W4TME) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
: Re: [Flexradio] New Model from FlexRadio?
Tim is exactly right. And anyway, we're out of the closet in admitting
that
the highly-esteemed new architecture is really just some old
architecture applied to a mildly novel problem. Calling the prototype VR
the new radio might be just a sliver less
Brickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tim Ellison (W4TME) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New Model from FlexRadio?
Tim is exactly right. And anyway, we're out of the closet in admitting
that
the highly
@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New Model from FlexRadio?
Tim is exactly right. And anyway, we're out of the closet in admitting
that
the highly-esteemed new architecture is really just some old
architecture applied to a mildly novel
K9WRU
- Original Message -
From: Frank Brickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tim Ellison (W4TME) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New Model from FlexRadio?
Tim is exactly right. And anyway
-radio.biz
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New Model from FlexRadio?
Impressive, can you point me to some description of what VR code
is? I
have the SDR-1000.
Thanks, Dennis, k0eoo
- Original Message -
From: Tim Ellison (W4TME) [EMAIL
34 matches
Mail list logo
