OK Eddie, after yours mail the combo N1MM-FLDIGI deserve an extensive
check at all. It may be that I tried it too early with N1MM. The combo,
so N1MM, is the key. I think I have got the sense of yours mail. FLDIGI
stand alone doesn't sound to me, i tried it several times and no way to
have it w
I always read, listen to other comments, make notes and then try the ideas.
When I find a combo that works for me I stick with it regardless of the
naysayers...so good for you and enjoy your set up !!! I believe your
approach is very good and worth attention.
Ted, WB2LOU
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 1
Hi all. I completely disagree with the comments against FLdigi. and it is
based on recent experience running HUGE pileups on RTTY and PSK31 from
3D2A.using my Flex5000A with PSDR2
By setting the DIGL and DIGU filters with CUSTOMISED bandpasses. using
1000Hz as the CF for PSK31 with 50Hz bandwith,
nt: Friday, April 22, 2011 6:49 PM
To: iw1...@googlemail.com
Cc: Tim Ellison; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] MMTTY vs FLDIGI
Have times changed? :-) When I asked about native digital modes last year the
response was it was decided early on that the existing digimode software wa
Have times changed? :-) When I asked about native digital modes last year the
response was it was decided early on that the existing digimode software was so
good and plentiful that vac was the way.
On Apr 22, 2011, at 6:06 PM, iw1ayd wrote:
> OK Tim, just for the matter, it wasn't and it i
OK Tim, just for the matter, it wasn't and it isn't in my intention to
be against the FLEX AFSK at all. But as you rightly wrote inside
POWERSDR(TM) it could be made better and easy to use all around.
I am really tied to FLEX with AFSK, no regrets. I would like write a lot
more about TPF, nois
Thanks for your well thought out presentation and opinion...very much needed
by many.
Ted, WB2LOU
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:04 PM, iw1ayd wrote:
> Hello to all.
> With the biggest respect to the experiences and the personal opinion of
> everybody I would suggest to use MMTTY. Its internal filt
to:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of iw1ayd
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 3:05 PM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] MMTTY vs FLDIGI
Hello to all.
With the biggest respect to the experiences and the personal opinion of
everybody I would suggest to use MMTTY. Its internal
Hello to all.
With the biggest respect to the experiences and the personal opinion of
everybody I would suggest to use MMTTY. Its internal filters are far
superior to the those inside FLDIGI. That's all, IMHO. All but not
enough for sure. Just to say more about my personal experiences and
view
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Michael Ruttenberg
wrote:
> Let's not forget that MMTTY integrates with other loggers like N1MM too.
>
But so does fldigi. You just use DDutil as a router for CAT commands thus
allowing fldigi and N1MM to have access to the CAT data stream to/from the
radio.
--
Let's not forget that MMTTY integrates with other loggers like N1MM too.
MMvari gies you PSK as well as RTTY.
Mike
G7TWC
On 22 sApr 2011, at 10:18, "Eddie DeYoung" wrote:
> Why 'upgrade' to MMTTY?
>
> FLDIGI is far superior, so IMHO migrating to MMTTY is a step downward.
>
> I used MMTTY f
Why 'upgrade' to MMTTY?
FLDIGI is far superior, so IMHO migrating to MMTTY is a step downward.
I used MMTTY from its beginning.and last year made the switch to FLDIGI.
It was like swapping my Ford sedan for a Ford Mustang!!
Start and STAY with FLdigi.just remember to download and install the dr
12 matches
Mail list logo
