This has been ongoing for about four years now !!
Maybe Next Year --- ???
Thank God this is just a Hobby
Bruce
On Sun, 10 May 2009 12:03:01 -0400, you wrote:
Geez, guys... Why is it that any time anybody raises just a little
negative criticism they get jumped on? Give Barry a break.
Hi Bruce
But look at all the improvements we have gotten in that 4 year period!
The software hasn't stood still at all and seems to be going into
only-dreamed-upon territory with the work that Bob and Eric are doing.
Plus the introduction of new radios which you may think does not
directly affect
I thank everyone for their criticism, positive comments, negative
comments, etc. on the new architecture thread that were aimed in my
direction. I cannot speak for Flex, since I don't work for them or have
a financial interest in Flex, but I have a couple of comments.
I read all of the
Bob has put in thousands of hours into the development of this software. In
fact the reason you have such a nice radio to use is in no small part because
it came out of the brain of N4HY. I did not find his response in the least
offensive.
Before one complains one migh ask precisely how
The question is whether you want something now or something that we
know works. Its kinda like the people who complain when flights are
delayed due to weather: do you really want to fly in a plane that the
pilot doesn't want to fly?
As with all new architectures (I am sure its your
Geez, guys... Why is it that any time anybody raises just a little
negative criticism they get jumped on? Give Barry a break.
Barry, and all of us, bought a radio an integral part of which is the
software that runs on a host PC. That software is pretty good, but it's
far from perfect. I think
upgrades. I would
not want them to go bankrupt. That would make absolutely no sense.
Happy Mothers Day!!
Edwin Marzan AB2VW
From: rbee...@hotmail.com
To: edwin_mar...@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] New architecture SVN Alpha code?
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 05:49:44 +
Ed What
level components are talking to one another.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Barry Jablonski
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 10:43 PM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] New architecture
Hi Bob,
It's both obvious and seems prudent to me (I've been in the
engineering business for more than 30 years now) that you don't
release alpha code to the general public for the reasons you have
implied. It's also both obvious and seems prudent that you
you don't put forth false promises
of line.
Edwin Marzan AB2VW
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 23:33:13 -0400
From: bjablon...@att.net
To: rwmcgw...@gmail.com; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] New architecture SVN Alpha code?
Hi Bob,
It's both obvious and seems prudent to me (I've been in the
engineering business
With Dayton '09 approaching -- any word on the new architecture. Or,
is it still in the clouds?
Barry
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives:
Can anyone point me to where the new architecture alpha code (SVN)
resides? I'd like to start testing it.
Barry
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Barry Jablonski
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 10:43 PM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] New architecture SVN Alpha code?
Can anyone point me to where the new architecture alpha
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 6:46 PM
To: Roland Etienne; Bob Cowdery
Cc: Reflector Flex-Radio
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New architecture questions
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Roland Etienne
Sent: Tuesday
.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
] On Behalf Of Lux, James P
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 6:46 PM
To: Roland Etienne; Bob Cowdery
Cc: Reflector Flex-Radio
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New architecture
With all those bits and pieces of information on the new architecture
I am wondering what it actually looks like... Anywhere any info
available? Some early diagrams?
I would assume it meets the following requirements / wishes:
* Separate radio driver process, connectable from several
, January 06, 2009 10:23 AM
To: Lux, James P; Bob Tracy
Cc: Reflector Flex-Radio
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New architecture questions
With all those bits and pieces of information on the new architecture
I am wondering what it actually looks like... Anywhere any info
available? Some early diagrams
to minute. Wish I had more to offer.
73,
Bob K5KDN
-Original Message-
From: Frank Goenninger [mailto:f...@me.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 10:23 AM
To: Lux, James P; Bob Tracy
Cc: Reflector Flex-Radio
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New architecture questions
With all those
]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 10:23 AM
To: Lux, James P; Bob Tracy
Cc: Reflector Flex-Radio
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New architecture questions
With all those bits and pieces of information on the new architecture
I am wondering what it actually looks like... Anywhere any info
available? Some
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Roland Etienne
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 12:31 PM
To: Bob Cowdery
Cc: Reflector Flex-Radio
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New architecture questions
Frank, AB2KT
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Lux, James P
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 6:46 PM
To: Roland Etienne; Bob Cowdery
Cc: Reflector Flex-Radio
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] New architecture questions
-Original Message
With the dttsp VR kernel humming along nicely, etc., the question arises of how
will it be integrated into a new PowerSDR? More interestingly, what toolchain
are you thinking will be used for the new PowerSDR? I assume you're not
sticking with VS2003, nor are you going to abandon Windows as a
...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz]on Behalf Of Lux, James P
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 6:57 PM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] New architecture questions
With the dttsp VR kernel humming along nicely, etc., the question arises of
how
On 1/5/09 7:00 PM, Bob Tracy btr...@anvilcom.com wrote:
Jim,
I am using Eclipse with the Erlang (ErlIDE) and Google Web Tools (GWT)
plug-ins to develop an experimental GUI. I have an Erlang VR kernel (not as
sophisticated as Frank's, but functional) that I use to test communications
Subject: [Flexradio] New architecture lands
And WITHOUT a thud:
Eric Wachsmann, KE5DTO, has been succesffully moving the C# hardware
control
out of PowerSDR for the Flex 5000 and has successfully done the first
steps
of interop and is successfully sending and acting on commands using
And WITHOUT a thud:
Eric Wachsmann, KE5DTO, has been succesffully moving the C# hardware control
out of PowerSDR for the Flex 5000 and has successfully done the first steps
of interop and is successfully sending and acting on commands using Erlang
to manage the remotable service and a gen_tcp
Hello,
Beeing a late SDR-1000 customer (late 2006) I feel a little left alone.
Why is this?
Yes I know the software has gone through a big enhancement during this time,
but I was really looking forward to the version witch had separate user
interface, skin possibility. Version 2.0, later ..New
Stig,
If you are using the 10.4 console look at the updates that has happened
to the PowerSDR, and if you have been using the SVN versions you have
seen the updates to the PowerSDR that are coming out later this
week. The current console is basically what has been used by industry
for
Hello Stig,
First let me clarify that there have been many improvements to PowerSDR(TM)
that have benefited both the SDR-1000 and the FLEX-5000. FLEX-5000
development has directly improved SDR-1000 features and performance. I have
covered this in past emails to the reflector. Further, there
29 matches
Mail list logo
