Re: [Flexradio] UNSUPPORTED... WHY BOTHER?

2009-08-07 Thread MILLER, Tom
I have installed Flex radio on three computers. The first two were older slower computers and I did not do much to deal with issues to help with running Flex at 192 with both receivers going. I did by a nice Dual Core box which suits the Flex just fine, without doing anything. However my

Re: [Flexradio] UNSUPPORTED... WHY BOTHER?

2009-08-07 Thread Dave Gomberg
At 05:49 AM 8/7/2009, MILLER, Tom wrote: It is really cool now to know that those carriers that sweep the band are the ionospheric scanners that determine that MUF. I can click follow them up in frequency and see that they turn off when passing the WWV frequencies. I wonder why the

[Flexradio] UNSUPPORTED... WHY BOTHER?

2009-08-06 Thread Joe Rodriguez
Dear Mr Systems Administrator List Manager, For the last year and a half I've struggled with the thought of purchasing a Flex radio. But the problem is WINDOWS... and I've have had the good sense to convert to Apple OS X and the computer problems have been reduced by over 95%. Bootcamp

Re: [Flexradio] UNSUPPORTED... WHY BOTHER?

2009-08-06 Thread Gerald Youngblood
, 2009 12:25 PM To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: [Flexradio] UNSUPPORTED... WHY BOTHER? Dear Mr Systems Administrator List Manager, For the last year and a half I've struggled with the thought of purchasing a Flex radio. But the problem is WINDOWS... and I've have had the good sense

Re: [Flexradio] UNSUPPORTED... WHY BOTHER?

2009-08-06 Thread Robert Jefferis
...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Joe Rodriguez Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:25 PM To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: [Flexradio] UNSUPPORTED... WHY BOTHER? Dear Mr Systems Administrator List Manager, For the last year and a half I've struggled