I just commited a YASim patch to fix the approach lift problem I
mentioned this morning. The 747, in particular, behaves much more
sanely on approach. (But remember the fuel load! The model now
starts at only 50% tanks, but that's still quite heavy for an
approach).
The patch requires new airc
> Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Try being lighter on the controls, and try a set of rudder pedals if
> > you haven't already. I honestly haven't had any serious difficulties
> > maneuvering the plane.
> >
>
> hard to have that kind of a setup at work :-( "almost unflyable" was
> a
Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >
> > Here's the code from simgear/sky/cloud.cxx:
> >
> > void SGCloudLayer::draw() {
> > if (layer_type != SG_CLOUD_CLEAR)
> > ssgCullAndDraw( layer_root );
> > }
> >
>
> Can't test this now,
A J wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> Is there any flight gear source code for visual c++ 6.0
>
> if there exist please send me its address
>
FlightGear supports MSVC6. Workspace and project files are included in
the source. Visit the FlightGear web page at http://www.flightgear.org/
for download instr
On Sun, 19 May 2002 22:27:35 -0700,
"C. Hotchkiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Alex Perry wrote:
>
> > > I definitely agree. It's a violation of almost every netiquette
> > > rule, that is concerned to virus-like behaviour or bandwith
> > > respect of othe
Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Try being lighter on the controls, and try a set of rudder pedals if
> you haven't already. I honestly haven't had any serious difficulties
> maneuvering the plane.
>
hard to have that kind of a setup at work :-( "almost unflyable" was
an unfair descripti
Alex Romosan wrote:
> Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Remaining outstanding YASim bugs are (people should shout if I've
> > forgotten something):
>
> i don't know if this a bug or if that's how the modeling is supposed
> to work but the a4 is almost unflyable. when i use the controls the
Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Jim Wilson -- Monday 20 May 2002 19:59:
> > Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > Solution failed to converge after 1 iterations
> >
> > You might want to report the bug you are seeing in another thread or directly
> > to Andy. I'm sure
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
> As we discussed in the list, line endings don't depends on the platform
> where the server or the client is run.
>
> But the patch is imcomplete :
>
> The help command is OK but the dump command still send only LF as line
> endings. In fact, my patch missed that poin
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Jim Wilson writes:
>
> > CVS as of last night.
>
> SimGear CVS as well?
Uggh...no. And I was so sure I hadn't seen any updates to simgear in the last
couple days. :-) Just checked and there was that one patch to sky.cxx.
> > Yes. It looks like a
Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Remaining outstanding YASim bugs are (people should shout if I've
> forgotten something):
>
i don't know if this a bug or if that's how the modeling is supposed
to work but the a4 is almost unflyable. when i use the controls the
plane gets into these weir
Jim Wilson writes:
> CVS as of last night.
SimGear CVS as well?
> Yes. It looks like a big huge medium or dark grey polygon
> z-fighting with the terrain at 0 elev. Sounds odd...but I guess it
> must be drawing something.
Here's the code from simgear/sky/cloud.cxx:
void SGCloudLayer::
* Andy Ross -- Monday 20 May 2002 21:29:
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > YASim SOLUTION FAILURE:
> > Solution failed to converge after 1 iterations
> >
> > That's now the case since a few weeks. The c310 works, though. (CVS
> > HEAD)
>
> This is a YASim bug. Honestly, I wasn't aware that the
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> Err ... I'd say it doesn't run because there seems to be some nasty
> bug in Yasim or its 747 data. I =do= have a 747 model installed, and
> this is what I get before fgfs aborts:
>
> YASim solution results:
> Iterations: 10002
> Drag Coefficient: 13.1075
>
Actually, what we have had was not an Easter egg, but a surprise
improvement that might someday be the norm. Program Easter eggs are
supposed to be hidden and activated by an arcane sequence of operator
inputs. So, what should we consider adding into the program to be our
first official egg, a par
* Jim Wilson -- Monday 20 May 2002 19:59:
> Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Solution failed to converge after 1 iterations
>
> You might want to report the bug you are seeing in another thread or directly
> to Andy. I'm sure he put that error message in the program so folks wou
Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Jim Wilson -- Monday 20 May 2002 19:20:
> > If I'm not mistaken the last release does not run if
> > you type in --aircraft=747-yasim because a model that doesn't exist is spec'd
> > in the "-set.xml" file.
>
> Err ... I'd say it doesn't run because t
* Jim Wilson -- Monday 20 May 2002 19:20:
> If I'm not mistaken the last release does not run if
> you type in --aircraft=747-yasim because a model that doesn't exist is spec'd
> in the "-set.xml" file.
Err ... I'd say it doesn't run because there seems to be some nasty
bug in Yasim or its 747 da
David Megginson writes:
> Curtis L. Olson writes:
>
> > I think the suggestion was that if the 3d model specified is not
> > found, we should revert to some simple default, like the glider (and
> > probably display a warning message.)
>
> That's simply a matter of catching the exception in th
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> David Megginson writes:
> > Norman Vine writes:
> >
> > > So the way I read it the glider is no-more
> >
> > It's still there, but it's not used by the C172.
>
> I think the suggestion was that if the 3d model specified is not
> found, we should
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Jim Wilson writes:
>
> > One note is that on the layers 2, 3, and 4 that have no elevation defined,
> > there is some z-fighting going on with the runways on my Voodoo3 if the
> > airport runway is at or close to sea level. And the (sea level) wat
Curtis L. Olson writes:
> I think the suggestion was that if the 3d model specified is not
> found, we should revert to some simple default, like the glider (and
> probably display a warning message.)
That's simply a matter of catching the exception in the model manager
and substituting the g
David Megginson writes:
> Norman Vine writes:
>
> > So the way I read it the glider is no-more
>
> It's still there, but it's not used by the C172.
I think the suggestion was that if the 3d model specified is not
found, we should revert to some simple default, like the glider (and
probably di
Norman Vine writes:
> So the way I read it the glider is no-more
It's still there, but it's not used by the C172.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PRO
Jim Wilson writes:
> One note is that on the layers 2, 3, and 4 that have no elevation defined,
> there is some z-fighting going on with the runways on my Voodoo3 if the
> airport runway is at or close to sea level. And the (sea level) water is a
> greyish color.
This shouldn't happen -- i
Tony Peden writes:
> Curt, David: I humbly request that such patches not be accepted in
> the future.
I've been away for the weekend, so I don't actually know what
happened, except that some music played on a certain date. I had not
been aware of the Easter egg.
> I really think that grabbi
Frederic Bouvier writes:
> > should eventually be handled some other way. The following types are
> > available (these are all that SimGear supports):
> >
> > 1. clear
> > 2. mostly-sunny
> > 3. mostly-cloudy
> > 4. overcast
> > 5. cirrus
> >
> Why not using the METAR terminology :
Compiling FGSD CVS got some errors on linux gcc2.96
here are the fixes
runways.cpp: 85 line :change to SGPath path =(SGPath)__fgRoot
688: _popup->add( "&Center", FL_ALT + 'c', FGSD_MainWindow::center_cb,
this );
change to _popup->add( "&Center", FL_ALT + 'c',
&FGSD_MainWindow::center_cb, thi
As we discussed in the list, line endings don't depends on the platform
where the server or the client is run.
But the patch is imcomplete :
The help command is OK but the dump command still send only LF as line
endings. In fact, my patch missed that point too. writeProperties is
used to dump a
FYI
I run RH 7.3, plib cvs, simgear cvs, fgfs cvs and base cvs, and use NVidia
drivers and don't experience any of these problems. I suspect that your
solutions are not entirely necessary, maybe when you upgraded you might have
forgot that the XFree devel rpm probably sticks in a new libGL wh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 20.05.02:
> > I definitely agree. It's a violation of almost every netiquette rule,
> > that is concerned to virus-like behaviour or bandwith respect of
> > others.
>
> I disagree. Almost _every_ new Microsoft-based program checks its home
> website, sometimes for l
>I'd suggest that we not cause a fatal
>error on models that are not shipped in the base package? Or possibly,
>just don't cause a fatal error when any model fails to load.
In PLIB's UL package there is a function
bool ulFileExists ( const char *fileName ) ;
So, it could be as easy as (pseudoc
> we used to fall back to the glider model
I mentioned this problem already several weeks ago but nobody was interested
in it. Now as the subject comes up again I'd second the desire for a
fallback to the glider - as we were used to have before for very long time,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user fri
On Sun, 19 May 2002 15:34:52 -0300 (ART),
Flavio Villanustre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 19 May 2002, Alex Perry wrote:
>
> > > > Xlib: extension "GLXUnsupportedPrivateRequest" missing on
> > > > display ":0.0". GLUT: Fatal Error in fgfs: visual with ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 20 May 2002 06:38, you wrote:
> OK, ha, ha, funny, funny. Joke's over.
>
> Curt, David: I humbly request that such patches not be accepted in the
> future.
Anyone got a link to the sound file? Thanks,
David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
- Original Message -
From: "Frederic Bouvier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery editing on PPE
> btg editing is the purpose of this project, but so far, we don't begin
> work on this area. We are conce
btg editing is the purpose of this project, but so far, we don't begin
work on this area. We are concentrating on adding static object in stg
files.
All your ideas are good ideas, but they will show up in the program as
soon as there will be more contributors to the project.
We can discuss these
fdsd is coolest programm but I need to edit btg files and save it in btg
format
so maybe you can provide me with some information about status of fgsd
as I got from source you read btg file and after it you simply create
opengl triangles
but when you attempt to save btg you need to reorganize ope
38 matches
Mail list logo
