On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 21:02, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 19:18:26 -0600,
> "Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > They say some nice things in there too, and we need to stand up and
> > take our criticism like adults, they clearly spent
Hi,
..in http://www.dlsproductions.com/fg/ you state: "Everyone is
encouraged to send me any feedback or point out my stupid mistakes via
email."
..on your stupid mistakes: ;-)
..a: Below "2. Tutorials and Other Documents", you link to
"2. FlightGear Display Module - Initial Analysis
3. H
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 19:18:26 -0600,
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> They say some nice things in there too, and we need to stand up and
> take our criticism like adults, they clearly spent quite a bit of
> time investigating FlightGear ...
..I'll a
Just checked out the latest sources of both FlightGear and SimGear from
CVS. SimGear built fine (after configuring with
--prefix=/home/johan/install), and it installed fine as well in
/home/johan/install.
Configuring FlightGear with --with-simgear=/home/johan/install fails
however. The reason is
Curt wrote:
> Right, I don't want to be too critical ... they are certainly entitled
> to form an opinion based on their experiences. They also may be
> giving us poor marks in the area of cross-platform portability for not
> doing everything natively on every platform ... there again, that may
>
Jon Berndt writes:
> > I think we should look closely on their conclusion in their reflection:
> >
> >
> > In conclusion, the FlightGear flight simulator is a very nice flight sim
> > package that offers great features (for free), but very poor
> > extensibility with very few user-friendly too
> I think we should look closely on their conclusion in their reflection:
>
>
> In conclusion, the FlightGear flight simulator is a very nice flight sim
> package that offers great features (for free), but very poor
> extensibility with very few user-friendly tools and source code that is
> ge
Erik Hofman wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Some one must have had a great time:
> http://www.dlsproductions.com/fg/
A very interesting page!
I think we should look closely on their conclusion in their reflection:
In conclusion, the FlightGear flight simulator is a very nice flight sim
package that of
I have updated materials.dtd and materials.xml so that they (almost)
validate together using xmllint which comes with libxml:
xmllint --dtdvalid materials.dtd -noout materials.xml
The only bit that doesn't quite work is the section which is
allowed to contain arbitrary element tag names. I
Hi,
Some one must have had a great time:
http://www.dlsproductions.com/fg/
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Quoth Michael Bonar:
> Hi David. I get a Forbidden error when I try to reach that link.
Terribly sorry. The link should have been
http://www.more.net/~david/FlightGear-0.9.1/html/
I turned on about every option available, and also built the graphical
class hierarchy.
Regards,
David K. Drum
[
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 13:17, Major A wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this may be out of place given how busy everyone must have been over
> the holidays, and it might have been asked before, but: is it just me,
> or does the 747-yasim segfault fgfs on everyone's computer? I wouldn't
> like to lose one of my favo
Hi,
this may be out of place given how busy everyone must have been over
the holidays, and it might have been asked before, but: is it just me,
or does the 747-yasim segfault fgfs on everyone's computer? I wouldn't
like to lose one of my favourite planes in fgfs...
Other than that, there has bee
Norman Vine writes:
> > GoF book??
>
> esoteric geek speak :-)
> http://hillside.net/patterns/DPBook/DPBook.html
>
> If you can't dazzle em with
Nah, it's just shorter than typing "DESIGN PATTERNS: ELEMENTS OF
REUSABLE OBJECT-ORIENTED SOFTWARE" or "the
Gamma/Helm/Johnson/Vlissades b
Norman Vine writes:
> Actually I was thinking about writing self documenting code
> ie something like
>
> // virtual base class
> class FGProperty : public SGPropertyNode {
> FGProperty () = 0 ;
> }
>
> // type specific derived classes for each property 'type'
> class FGInt : public
Julian Foad writes:
> For those of us with a two-button mouse it's a little awkward; I've
> configured Xwindows to emulate a middle button when I press both together.
It should be very easy to add action areas over the actual displayed
digits -- that way, even one-button-mouse Mac types can be
Julian Foad writes:
> asi-160-knot-hi.xml (used by c172-610x-panel.xml) uses "adjust" and
> "increment" instead of "property-adjust" and "step". I don't believe
> those are valid action tags; what's going on there?
Sounds like holdovers from before the 2D panel instruments could use
standar
> FWIW, the grey panel with the Radeon 7500 and the DRI drivers still
> persists despite the patch to fix this behaviour with the ATI binary
> drivers.
I can add that when I run with 3d panel (--aircraft=c172-3d), I can see both the
dials and indicators on the cockpit, but the indicators jitter a
I understand that many higher-performance aircraft can have quite
violent (and even unrecoverable) stalls, as can some trainers like the
Traumahawk
I have to disagree with that quote.. I did the first 40 hours of my training
in a Tomahawk, and I was never able to get a wing to drop.. I know they
a
19 matches
Mail list logo
