David Megginson writes:
We don't distinguish between buildings and terrain, so this would also
cause the plane to fall throught he surface of the earth when taxiing.
In plib you can mark flag objects for inclusion/exclusion from the
intersection test. However, I don't know if the flightgear
Hello,
here is the transcript of a mail conversation I just have with
a guy at SkyscraperPage.com . After asking to the members of its
site, he agreed to let us use their nice and accurate building
diagrams ( see the thread link below, they are enthusiastic ).
So I made 2 models that are visible
Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will post the model to Erik for inclusion in CVS.
This looks really promising. I have a feature request now: _Before_ people
start modelling the Golden Gate it would be tremendously useful if the empty
space below an object would really remain empty.
Martin Spott wrote:
Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will post the model to Erik for inclusion in CVS.
This looks really promising. I have a feature request now: _Before_ people
start modelling the Golden Gate it would be tremendously useful if the empty
space below an object
Frederic BOUVIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I already noted several weeks ago that it is not possible to taxi below the
new KSFO terminal building. It would be a pity if it would not be possible
to fly below The Bridge :-)
I think that this is because the hit test routine looks for the
On Wed 18. June 2003 15:09, you wrote:
Frederic BOUVIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I already noted several weeks ago that it is not possible to taxi below
the new KSFO terminal building. It would be a pity if it would not be
possible to fly below The Bridge :-)
I think that this is
Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's right. You aren't supposed to fly below the bridge anyway. :-)
I can't accept this argument ;-))
BTW, I suppose you all know about the cockpit video of someone flying below
the eiffel tower. I don't know if this video is real, but it looks pretty
I can't accept this argument ;-))
BTW, I suppose you all know about the cockpit video of someone flying below
the eiffel tower. I don't know if this video is real, but it looks pretty
nice
Where is it? Is it on the web somewhere?
One of the best places for flying under a bridge is
Martin Spott wrote :
Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's right. You aren't supposed to fly below the bridge anyway. :-)
I can't accept this argument ;-))
BTW, I suppose you all know about the cockpit video of someone flying below
the eiffel tower. I don't know if this video is
developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] New buildings models
I can't accept this argument ;-))
BTW, I suppose you all know about the cockpit video of
someone flying below
the eiffel tower. I don't know if this video is real, but
it looks pretty
nice
Where
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:00:22 +0200
Martin Dressler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should be able hide your aircraft in Hangar. If I
remember it. Even new hits routine has some support for this.
Madr
I think Norman may know the answer to this one. However,
JSBSim simply gets a terrain height
One of the best places for flying under a bridge is Bristol (UK),
there's a lot of space beneath the Clifton Suspension Bridge (some
250m long, ~75m above the water). Allegedly, hot-air balloons used to
fly underneath the bridge occasionally, but that must have been before
my time. More
Richard Bytheway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would not like to think about flying anything larger than a model
aircraft along the Clifton gorge.
http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=clifton+suspension+bridge
Didn't you know this is the primary application for a simulator like
FlightGear ? ;-)
Major A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where is it? Is it on the web somewhere?
I just put it on ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Devel/eiffel.qt
It's very short but it looks like it were real
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
] New buildings models
Richard Bytheway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would not like to think about flying anything larger than a model
aircraft along the Clifton gorge.
http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=clifton+suspension+bridge
Didn't you know this is the primary application
I just put it on ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Devel/eiffel.qt
It's very short but it looks like it were real
Looks real, but it stops at the wrong place... in any case, I can
easily imagine someone flying through there, given proper clearance by
ATC etc. Not in an Airbus, but
At 6/18/03, Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will post the model to Erik for inclusion in CVS.
This looks really promising. I have a feature request now: _Before_ people
start modelling the Golden Gate it would be tremendously useful
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:33:03 -0500,
Michael Selig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 6/18/03, Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will post the model to Erik for inclusion in CVS.
This looks really
On 18 Jun 2003 15:24:17 GMT,
Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Richard Bytheway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would not like to think about flying anything larger than a model
aircraft along the Clifton gorge.
On 18 Jun 2003 15:24:17 GMT,
Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Richard Bytheway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would not like to think about flying anything larger than a model
aircraft along the Clifton gorge.
I would love to be able to land on a modeled aircraft carrier :D
I used to do touch and go landings on them when I played one of Jane's sims a
few years ago... I was even the commander of my online squadron!
Re's
Lt. Col. WillyB vmf 214 - commander IC
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 09:33,
Jon S Berndt writes:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:00:22 +0200
Martin Dressler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should be able hide your aircraft in Hangar. If I
remember it. Even new hits routine has some support for this.
Madr
I think Norman may know the answer to this one. However,
Michael Selig writes:
Sounds like we need a new property:
detect-building-collisions type=boolfalse/detect-building-collisions
We don't distinguish between buildings and terrain, so this would also
cause the plane to fall throught he surface of the earth when taxiing.
All the best,
At 6/18/03, David Megginson wrote:
Michael Selig writes:
Sounds like we need a new property:
detect-building-collisions type=boolfalse/detect-building-collisions
We don't distinguish between buildings and terrain, so this would also
cause the plane to fall throught he surface of the earth
24 matches
Mail list logo
