Orthonormalize wrote:
> >Are you sure you installed g++ ?
>
> oh yeah, i installed and reinstalled cygwin several times.
>
> >If you want to drop cygwin and use Visual Studio, I can help you with
> >project files.
>
> can you send your .sln and .vcproj files? (me email is
> [EMAIL PROTECTED])
l Message -
From: "Frederic BOUVIER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FlightGear developers discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)
> Orthonormalize wrote:
>
&g
Orthonormalize wrote:
> thanks fred!
>
> >Generally, people use g++ under Cygwin, or use the MS Visual Studio
> >with MS compiler.
>
> i think i might be the first using cygwin/windows/.Net-Vc7 given my
> troubles.
>
> anyway i've tried both g++ and Vc7 and have problems either way.
I have suc
> >
> > honestly have you ever tried building this thing from scratch? again i'm not
> > trying to be harsh but the build process is really quite complicated and i
> > haven't succeeded yet.
>
> You reported earlier problems with plib/ul.h, what did you do to get past
> that and other earlier prob
nly visible when X11 is installed on
Cygwin:
how do i uninstall X11 using cygwin?
thanks,
john
- Original Message -
From: "Frederic BOUVIER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FlightGear developers discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 11:13
Jim Wilson wrote:
> Orthonormalize said:
>
> > now, that said, i've spent over a WEEK trying to build flightgear. only
> > today (i pray) will i finish the task.
> >
> > here are my observations:
> >
> > 1) the autoconf/configure process is extremely fickle. in my opinion there
> > are way too
Orthonormalize wrote:
i'm only saying lynux, windows and mac because those developers (like me)
are probably less advanced than someone using say IRIX. if you're using an
IRIX box then right there i know your smarter than me.
just this morning i'm having trouble building Simgear. i'm using cygwin o
complicated and i
haven't succeeded yet.
john
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Hofman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FlightGear developers discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightg
Orthonormalize wrote:
"FlightGear Codebase Weight Reduction Program, "
i like it already.
first of all, let me preface this by saying i LOVE flightgear. i think it's
the best thing since sliced bread.
also here's a little background: i'm a recently laid off software engineer
(yes i too had me job
Orthonormalize said:
> now, that said, i've spent over a WEEK trying to build flightgear. only
> today (i pray) will i finish the task.
>
> here are my observations:
>
> 1) the autoconf/configure process is extremely fickle. in my opinion there
> are way too many "configurations" for flightgear.
Orthonormalize wrote:
here are my observations:
1) the autoconf/configure process is extremely fickle. in my opinion there
are way too many "configurations" for flightgear. the problem seems in
trying to support every platform "out of the box", fightgear supports no
platform. i know that sounds h
"FlightGear Codebase Weight Reduction Program, "
i like it already.
first of all, let me preface this by saying i LOVE flightgear. i think it's
the best thing since sliced bread.
also here's a little background: i'm a recently laid off software engineer
(yes i too had me job outsourced to india)
David Megginson wrote:
I talked with Curt about removing WeatherCM over a year ago, but I
didn't want to go through with it in case the module sprang back to
life. In the event, it clearly causes a lot of confusion for users and
still isn't functional, as far as I can tell.
As part of the Flig
David Megginson wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
The WeatherCM module isn't actively maintained anymore. Try building
with --without-weathercm
I talked with Curt about removing WeatherCM over a year ago, but I
didn't want to go through with it in case the module sprang back to
life. In the event, it
14 matches
Mail list logo
