=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2007-11-05_16:12:01 (mfranz)
/var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Main/viewer.cxx
revert swapping of x & y offsets in "lookat" mode
This was correct in the old repository and in revision 1.1 of the new,
but then broken in revision 1.2. Af
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2007-11-08_23:52:58 (frohlich)
/var/cvs/SimGear-0.3/source/simgear/scene/util/SGNodeMasks.hxx
Update node masks
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
-
This SF.net em
On Saturday 10 November 2007 23:20, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tonight we carried out our first ride in the backseat of a Buccaneer
> over MP, thanks to some excellent recent work by Melchior and Anders.
> AJ was the intrepid Observer/passenger, and reported himself well
> pleased with the expe
I wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Vivian Meazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 November 2007 23:20
> To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
> Subject: [ANN] - Buccaneer - Back seat ride
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Tonight we carried out our first ride in the backseat of a
> Buccaneer ov
Hi,
Tonight we carried out our first ride in the backseat of a Buccaneer over
MP, thanks to some excellent recent work by Melchior and Anders. AJ was the
intrepid Observer/passenger, and reported himself well pleased with the
experience.
To try it you need the Pilot and Observer on MP in the Buc
On 10/11/2007, dave perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just looked at the changes in cvs. There is a significant problem
> with at least this implementation of one "key" to turn on all the lights
> for all AC. There is no standard followed for how to implement nasal
> electrical systems. The
David Megginson wrote:
> Switches are hard to find, especially (a) if you're not a real pilot,
> or (b) if you're not familiar with the aircraft. A single key to turn
> on all the lights can be very useful for a new user, or even for an
> experienced user who just wants to fly at night and doesn't
gerard robin
> Sent: 10 November 2007 18:37
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS:
> data keyboard.xml,1.99, 1.100
>
>
> On sam 10 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
> > On 10/11/2007, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On sam 10 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
> On 10/11/2007, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can notice the update has been done , before we could give any opinion
> > on the topic.
> > Does it mean , that there is not any other alternative, and the CHOICE is
> > that way nothing
On 10/11/2007, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can notice the update has been done , before we could give any opinion on
> the topic.
> Does it mean , that there is not any other alternative, and the CHOICE is that
> way nothing else :) :) :)
>From my original message:
I just moved
* Jon S. Berndt -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> > * Jon S. Berndt -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> > > The C172x is an experimental model [...] It should not be released.
> I think you missed my point. I was stating that I believe it should be
> removed from FlightGear CVS. It shouldn't have been t
> * Jon S. Berndt -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> > The C172x is an experimental model for use with JSBSim by itself.
> > It's the aircraft model I use to test all the new features. It
> > should not be released.
>
> That only explains why it is in JSBSim's CVS. It does not explain
> why it should
On sam 10 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
> Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data
> In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv32383
>
> Modified Files:
> keyboard.xml
> Log Message:
> Reassign tail-wheel locking from 'l' to 'L' (previously unused), and
> use 'l' to toggle lighting.
>
>
> Index:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 10:59:58 +0100
Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> l ... lights (though most are operated via 3D cockpit switches!)
> L ... tail wheel lock
> Ctrl-l ... liveries (l for liveries is a bit exaggerated, anyway)
>
> m.
>
Im not sure what you mean
I wrote:
> From: Stuart Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Sent: Saturday, 10 November, 2007 1:56:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] New aircraft for CVS - Pitts S1C
>
>
>
> > Melchior wrote:
> > * Stuart Buchanan -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> > > The
* Jon S. Berndt -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> The C172x is an experimental model for use with JSBSim by itself.
> It's the aircraft model I use to test all the new features.
The funny thing is, after I removed the reference to the non-existent
file ...
--- c172x-set.xml 20 Sep 2003 03:5
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, David Megginson wrote:
> So, in summary, I think a single switch to turn on all required
> interior and exterior lights for night flying can be a big win for
> FlightGear.
That sounds reasonable. But maybe a menu entry or setup dialog would be
better for this - after all it
On 10/11/2007, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A stupid question:
>
> Why is it necessary to have a key for lights, isn't it a cockpit feature with
> hotspot, and switch ?
Switches are hard to find, especially (a) if you're not a real pilot,
or (b) if you're not familiar with the aircra
* Jon S. Berndt -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> The C172x is an experimental model for use with JSBSim by itself.
> It's the aircraft model I use to test all the new features. It
> should not be released.
That only explains why it is in JSBSim's CVS. It does not explain
why it should be in FGFS' C
> Melchior wrote:
> * Stuart Buchanan -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> > The included livery is for the well-known fictional beer company,
>
> Hmm ... I'm not sure if that's fictional enough. "20th Century Fox"
> has already sued an Australian brewery for making Duff beer, although
> they aren't
The C172x is an experimental model for use with JSBSim by itself. It's the
aircraft model I use to test all the new features. It should not be
released.
Jon
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Melchior FRANZ
> Sent: Saturday, November
On Saturday 10 November 2007, gerard robin wrote:
> A stupid question:
>
> Why is it necessary to have a key for lights, isn't it a cockpit feature
> with hotspot, and switch ?
I'm guessing because pressing a key on the keyboard resembles the gesture of
pressing a key inside a cockpit of a real a
On sam 10 novembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * alexis bory -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> > Vivian Meazza a écrit :
> > > Sounds reasonable to me.
> >
> > I Agree too.
>
> Umm ... it's only that I had forgotten that Ctrl-c is
> "toggle clickable panel hotspots". So the plan doesn't
> work out
* alexis bory -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> Vivian Meazza a écrit :
> > Sounds reasonable to me.
> I Agree too.
Umm ... it's only that I had forgotten that Ctrl-c is
"toggle clickable panel hotspots". So the plan doesn't
work out exactly like that.
m.
* Stuart Buchanan -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> The included livery is for the well-known fictional beer company,
Hmm ... I'm not sure if that's fictional enough. "20th Century Fox"
has already sued an Australian brewery for making Duff beer, although
they aren't brewing beer themselves, obviou
Vivian Meazza a écrit :
> Melchior FRANZ
> > Hmm ... ok. I'm just not sure if having two separate keys is a good
> > thing. Maybe we should standardize on
> >
> > c ... toggle canopy C ... engage & disengage (toggle)
> > catapult \__"c" as in "carrier" Ctrl-c ... launch catapult
> > / control the
Hi All,
Over the last couple of weeks, I've been working on a Pitts S1C - the classic
aerobatic biplane.
It is available for download at
http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/pittss1c.tar.gz.
Screenshot at http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/pittss1c.jpg
The model and FDM are fairly basic, but
The c172c by John CHECK is broken since a long time.
It references a file that doesn't exist:
Error reading default aircraft: Failed to open file
at $FG_ROOT/Aircraft/c172x/../c172r/c172r-base.xml
And even if one changes that to use ../c172r/c172r-set.xml
it doesn't work:
Could not open t
Melchior FRANZ
> Sent: 10 November 2007 10:00
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Minor keyboard reassignment
>
>
> * Vivian Meazza -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> > Gerard robin wrote
> > > There is only a the little number of persons who use and like
* Vivian Meazza -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> Gerard robin wrote
> > There is only a the little number of persons who use and like
> > the carriers,
I'm not even sure about that. It's one of the frequently asked
questions, and it seems as if everyone of the IRC regulars uses
the carrier once i
Gerard robin wrote
> Sent: 10 November 2007 09:29
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Minor keyboard reassignment
>
>
> On sam 10 novembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> > > L is used to engage in the aircraf
On sam 10 novembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> > L is used to engage in the aircraft carrier's catapult
> > (see $FG_ROOT/Input/Keyboard/carrier-bindings.xml). So
> > around 10 aircraft will overwrite the new lighting binding
> > anyway.
>
> err ..
32 matches
Mail list logo
