Am Mittwoch 28 November 2007 schrieb Stuart Buchanan:
> Melchior wrote:
> ...
> > - unclear wording: "Environment Rate: [+][-]"
> > What is an environment rate? :-)
>
> I thought it was clearer for new users than "Time Warp delta". I've
> changed this to Time Warp.
How about "Sim Time Rate [-]
Hi,
during the last days I tested FG 0.9.11 Pre using several different
scenarios, of course related to my personal interests and therefore only
a subset of FG's possibilities.
Generally spoken, this is a very stable running version on my system
(OpenSUSE 10.2). I could not see any big problems,
* Stuart Buchanan -- Wednesday 28 November 2007:
[http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/timeofday.xml]
Looks good now. Committed.
I'll possibly replace the [Close] button by a window-style
close button in the upper right corner, as this is a dialog
that people may have opened for a while, especiall
* Thomas Förster -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> How about "Sim Time Rate [-][+][Real Time]". I don't think newbies know
> what 'time warp' is
As said in the other email: I didn't criticize "Environment Rate"
to favor "Time Warp". Both might be unclear. I've committed for now,
and we can later c
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
> 4. 3D clouds crash
> Selecting 3D clouds in the rendering menu crashes FlightGear after
> closing the window. When used as a startup parameter FlightGear does not
> run.
> Do I remember right that this is an older problem and depending on the
> video-d
Am Donnerstag 29 November 2007 schrieb Melchior FRANZ:
> * Thomas Förster -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> > How about "Sim Time Rate [-][+][Real Time]". I don't think newbies know
> > what 'time warp' is
>
> As said in the other email: I didn't criticize "Environment Rate"
> to favor "Time Warp". B
On jeu 29 novembre 2007, AnMaster wrote:
> LeeE wrote:
> >
> > Re the secondary flight controls, we need to allow for separate ground
> > steering and rudder control, in addition to differential braking - with
> > tandem and quadracycle landing gear you need to steer independently in
> > cross-win
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Anders Gidenstam wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
>
>> 4. 3D clouds crash
>> Selecting 3D clouds in the rendering menu crashes FlightGear after
>> closing the window. When used as a startup parameter FlightGear does not
>> run.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Georg Vollnhals wrote:
[...]
> 2. Triangle distorted sky also with Anthrax GUI
> Although using the Anthrax-GUI, the sky gets "triangulated" when using a
> submenu with (orange???) input-fields. This "triangle" distortion
> disappears immediatly afte
* Markus Zojer -- Wednesday 21 November 2007:
> I think this snippet of code fits in better in Nasal/controls.nas than
> my local .nas.
> wingSweep = func { [...]
Committed. (Only did the usual cosmetics, like var, named args, etc.)
m.
--
Hi Paul,
I'm afraid I cannot add the items you ask for as they stand. The code only
works with the existing Nimitz_demo.xml. If any other carrier demo is used,
this carrier will be placed in the default Nimitz location by the use of
this dialog. A dialog must be generally applicable, not apply to
On Nov 29, 2007 4:35 AM, Anders Gidenstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
>
> > 4. 3D clouds crash
> > Selecting 3D clouds in the rendering menu crashes FlightGear after
> > closing the window. When used as a startup parameter FlightGear does not
> > run.
>
On jeu 29 novembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I'm afraid I cannot add the items you ask for as they stand. The code only
> works with the existing Nimitz_demo.xml. If any other carrier demo is used,
> this carrier will be placed in the default Nimitz location by the use of
> this dia
Hans Fugal schrieb:
>>
>
> Is there not a way to sanity check the cloud cache size in the plib
> version before going ahead and segfaulting? Like notice that it's 0
> and set it to the lowest valid value. It seems that this would be a
> simple fix, and that there's really no excuse not to do i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
While flying with real weather fetch at ESSA today the sun looked odd. Basically
as it was foggy you shouldn't see the sun clearly. This is last plib cvs
version.
See this url for a picture of the problem:
http://rage.kuonet.org/~anmaster/flightgear
This aircraft thoughtlessly copies over 500 kB sound files
from another aircraft, although the sounds aren't even used!
Don't do that!
203516 2007-11-29 15:26 Spitfire Flyby.wav
41018 2007-11-29 15:26 Spitfire MK IX.wav
173756 2007-11-29 15:26 merlin_rpm2.wav
86940 2007-11-29 15:26 merli
On Thursday 29 November 2007 12:29, gerard robin wrote:
> On jeu 29 novembre 2007, AnMaster wrote:
> > LeeE wrote:
> > > Re the secondary flight controls, we need to allow for separate
> > > ground steering and rudder control, in addition to differential
> > > braking - with tandem and quadracycle
Hi All,
The number of aircraft in CVS continue to grow at a quite incredible rate. We
now have over 170, and there aren't enough hours in the day to fly all of them
the amount of time that they really deserve. I haven't graphed the number of
new aircraft per month, but it certainly feels that n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Why is the cvs up so slow, even when there are no changes? I don't know about
CVS but I think svn at least just send the difference between the old and new
revision. And svn tend to be faster at updating...
/AnMaster
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> Hi All
* Stuart Buchanan -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> I wonder if it would be worth moving all the aircraft to a
> separate repository.
That would mean to download 1 GB of *unchanged* aircraft data just
for the reorganization. I'm not thrilled. (Unless someone offers
a CVS "skeleton". And a script w
* AnMaster -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> Why is the cvs up so slow, even when there are no changes?
> I don't know about CVS but I think svn at least just send the
> difference between the old and new revision.
So does CVS.
> And svn tend to be faster at updating...
And it keeps two instanc
Hello,
Can anyone help with the attached ? I have checked and everything is there and
the permissions are correct. I just really need to get over this hurdle as it
is being used in quite a large Flight Simulator project and im delaying its
progress!
So any help is appreciated!
Thanks,
Will
On Nov 29, 2007 9:33 AM, Melchior FRANZ <> wrote:
> * AnMaster -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> > Why is the cvs up so slow, even when there are no changes?
> > I don't know about CVS but I think svn at least just send the
> > difference between the old and new revision.
>
> So does CVS.
>
>
>
> >
Am Donnerstag, 29. November 2007 14:44 schrieb Hans Fugal:
> Is there not a way to sanity check the cloud cache size in the plib
> version before going ahead and segfaulting? Like notice that it's 0
> and set it to the lowest valid value. It seems that this would be a
> simple fix, and that there's
Melchior wrote:
> * Stuart Buchanan -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> > I wonder if it would be worth moving all the aircraft to a
> > separate repository.
>
> That would mean to download 1 GB of *unchanged* aircraft data just
> for the reorganization. I'm not thrilled. (Unless someone offers
> a
Hi Will,
I'm sorry, but I have no idea where this may be coming from. Maybe David
Megginson can help. AFAIK he's the original author of the tgvpf stuff.
Cheers,
Ralf
> When I try prepare the vmap0 data with the following command -
>
> tgvpf --chunk=w080n40 --work-dir=LandMass --area=Default /v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Stuart Buchanan -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
>> I wonder if it would be worth moving all the aircraft to a
>> separate repository.
>
> That would mean to download 1 GB of *unchanged* aircraft data just
> for the reorgani
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Curtis Olson wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2007 9:33 AM, Melchior FRANZ <> wrote:
>> And it keeps two instances of every single file. That makes
>> 2 GB for all aircraft, rather than CVS' 1 GB. It's easy to
>> be quicker at updating, with this "little" help. A
* Georg Vollnhals -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> 3. Winter textures (partially) broken (same for OSG version)
That was IIRC caused by Erik's texture cache, which saved several
megabytes formerly wasted texture memory, which is an important
improvement. He knows about the breakage of his season fe
* Melchior FRANZ -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> That would be easy, but I haven't even committed it, because it
> has some problems:
Oh, and it doesn't respect the true glide slope angle. It always
uses 3 degree, although some have 3.5. (But then again, I'm not
sure if fgfs makes a difference, s
Melchior FRANZ schrieb:
> * Melchior FRANZ -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
>
>> That would be easy, but I haven't even committed it, because it
>> has some problems:
>>
>
> Oh, and it doesn't respect the true glide slope angle. It always
> uses 3 degree, although some have 3.5. (But then aga
Hi Emmanuel,
thank you very much for this new helicopter. I like the very nice 3 D
model - remembering my youth it was "that" helicopter as used by the
German Army and Boarder Forces.
Testing FG 0.9.11 I noticed a bad display of the main rotor (even
disappears at high rotor rpm) - which is very n
Hi Emmanuel,
like Georg I really like your new work ( and of Maik
too!;-)) very much. The helicopter was very common in
Germany and the most pilots learned to fly a
helicopter on a Alouette II!
There are some things I noticed:
-the rotor animation ( like Georg)
-the instrument at the second row
Hi,
There are some things I noticed and two suggestion:
-If I check "show fps" - it does not appear.
I have to enlarge and to downsize the window, or to
reset FGF for viewing the fps
- stepping clouds at certain weather
-3D-clouds crashing - I hope we will get the sugested
solution
- stutters
On Thursday 29 November 2007 20:38:15 Heiko Schulz wrote:
> There are some things I noticed and two suggestion:
> -If I check "show fps" - it does not appear.
> I have to enlarge and to downsize the window, or to
> reset FGF for viewing the fps
Are you sure you're using the exact --geometry setting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Heiko Schulz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are some things I noticed and two suggestion:
>
> -If I check "show fps" - it does not appear.
> I have to enlarge and to downsize the window, or to
> reset FGF for viewing the fps
FPS counter show nice here but
* Heiko Schulz -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> - stutters with any helicopters at the ground- lifting
> up is a big problem cause to the stutters. If the heli
> is in the air the stutters disappear [...]
Sounds like the effect that volumetric shadows have, on any
complex aircraft near ground, not
I did not use any shadows- still haveing a to weak pc
I remember something heard about that the cause lies
into the collision detect for the ground
Hopefully Tim well be soon ready- can't wait to see
it! :-)
regards
HHS
--- Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> * Heiko Schulz --
I forgot something:
please dump the alpha chanell of your textures - alpha
channels seems to destroy the self-shadowing. And this
is still a very nice faeture of FlightGear! :-)
Great work- I wished we had a real pilot for testing
the Alouette!
Regards
HHS
__
* Georg Vollnhals -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> Could you imagine to put this nasal file into the Nasal folder of the
> upcoming release *deactivated*, ie. named "gstunnel.nas.off" or
> something like that?
Better fix the problems that can be fixed and put it as regular file. :-)
I made the scri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Heiko Schulz -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
>> - stutters with any helicopters at the ground- lifting
>> up is a big problem cause to the stutters. If the heli
>> is in the air the stutters disappear [...]
>
> Sounds like th
AnMaster wrote:
> No comments but I think that would be silly, it depends on your date order
> anyway... With the Swedish format for date (dd/mm -) it is the other way
> around... No one would comment on a possible future 0.11.9 I bet...
I pretty much hope we're at 1.x before it comes to that
--- AJ MacLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
schrieb:
> On Thursday 29 November 2007 20:38:15 Heiko Schulz
> wrote:
> > There are some things I noticed and two
> suggestion:
> > -If I check "show fps" - it does not appear.
> > I have to enlarge and to downsize the window, or
> to
> > reset FGF for viewing
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:48:29 +0100
> From: Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/Arsenal-VG33 - New
> directory, NONE, NONE
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/pla
On Nov 29, 2007 2:56 PM, AJ MacLeod wrote:
> I would strongly disagree with that - with every respect for those who
> were
> affected by the events you mention, it's only a set of numbers (not even a
> date, in any recognisable format), and since 0.9.11 comes right after
> 0.9.10,
> it's only logi
Hey,
* BARANGER Emmanuel -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> > Also, file names with spaces in them are garbage. There should
> > be none of those in CVS.
> AAAHHHRRGGG ! The suprises CVS files which do not for the drive :(
> I erased now. Sorry.
No problem. Not a big one, anyway. I'm happy about ev
On jeu 29 novembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Georg Vollnhals -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> > Could you imagine to put this nasal file into the Nasal folder of the
> > upcoming release *deactivated*, ie. named "gstunnel.nas.off" or
> > something like that?
>
> Better fix the problems that ca
* Curtis Olson -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> Everyone seems to agree that version numbers are an arbitrary
> set of numbers [...]
No, you got that backwards. From reading the thread it was
clear that people consider a sane version number more important
than politics, such as avoiding 0.9.11 beca
gerard robin schrieb:
> On jeu 29 novembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
>> * Georg Vollnhals -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
>>
>>> Could you imagine to put this nasal file into the Nasal folder of the
>>> upcoming release *deactivated*, ie. named "gstunnel.nas.off" or
>>> something like tha
--- Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> * Curtis Olson -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> > Everyone seems to agree that version numbers are
> an arbitrary
> > set of numbers [...]
>
> No, you got that backwards. From reading the thread
> it was
> clear that people consider a sane version
* Georg Vollnhals -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> gerard robin schrieb:
> > It is not Autopilot, however it is an help to pilot, it could
> > be in the autopilot item
Yes, maybe.
* Georg Vollnhals -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> First to say, I made some testflights at EDDW and it works fine i
On Thursday 29 November 2007 21:54:05 Curtis Olson wrote:
> But then most people seem to also follow that up with very strongly held
> opinions about what the version number should be. As we've seen from just
> a few postings in this thread, there is a variety incompatible, yet
> strongly held opi
On Nov 29, 2007 4:13 PM, Melchior FRANZ <> wrote:
> No, you got that backwards. From reading the thread it was
> clear that people consider a sane version number more important
> than politics, such as avoiding 0.9.11 because of the incident.
I think your message at least confirms my point that
Melchior FRANZ schrieb:
>
> * Georg Vollnhals -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
>
>> First to say, I made some testflights at EDDW and it works fine if I set
>> the wind with "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Then I tried to make it easier from the
>> startup and switch the property on with
>> "--prop:sim/render
On Thursday 29 November 2007 21:55, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> Hey,
>
> * BARANGER Emmanuel -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> > > Also, file names with spaces in them are garbage. There should
> > > be none of those in CVS.
> >
> > AAAHHHRRGGG ! The suprises CVS files which do not for the drive :(
> > I
Georg Vollnhals schrieb:
> Melchior FRANZ schrieb:
>
>> * Georg Vollnhals -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
>>
>>
>>> First to say, I made some testflights at EDDW and it works fine if I set
>>> the wind with "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Then I tried to make it easier from the
>>> startup and switch
On Thursday 29 November 2007 23:25, Curtis Olson wrote:
[snip...]
> How about I say it this way ... our version number system has become
> too tedious and ponderous. And are you suggesting that a 10 year old
> mature software product can't be allowed a v1.0 version number? It's
> never going to b
Hello,
Looking at the nice new helicopter Alouette-II, lead me to remember that i had
in my hangar (among a lot of others models :) )
that Alouette-III, which was made to be a "Pedro" for the carrier Foch the
model is high poly (missing some externals details).
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/G
Hi Durk,
looking over my logs, there was quite a bit of traffic downloading the
pre-release version of FG and the base files. Glad I could help. Do you
want to continue with this arrangement or has Curt had a chance to setup
the ftp server for you?
If not I can give you ftp access and perhaps
* Curtis Olson -- Friday 30 November 2007:
[...]
> So if you have a problem, please state it clearly
The problem that I have/had is that you don't say it openly, when you
make such a decision -- that you will call it 1.0, which aircraft it
will contain etc. All we got was a cryptic hint with tong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
LeeE wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 November 2007 10:18, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've added the key assignments currently defined in keyboard.xml to
>> the wiki page, so that we can easily see what assignments people
>> think are missing, a
61 matches
Mail list logo
