Looks lovely, will give her a go later.
Alex
On 19 Feb 2011, at 19:24, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
Hi,
..it's a sweet wee pussycat as far as handling goes, also on roll-out,
where it appears to _try_ carry the full weight of its shadow: ;o)
Hi,
Perhaps some of you have noticed, that some of the aircraft that
come with the standard flightgear package should be changed.
A few examples, we could have a more realistic commercial jet than the
777-200(the FDM is terribly unrealistic), we could have a better
modeled helicopter
we could have a better
modeled helicopter than the BO-105
I am wondering what makes you feel the Bo105 is not as realistic as others. It
has one of the most sophisticated helicopter FDMs in FlightGear which has been
approved by real pilots. Almost every other FDM is based on guessing more
Arnt Karlsen wrote
Hi,
..it's a sweet wee pussycat as far as handling goes, also on roll-out,
where it appears to _try_ carry the full weight of its shadow: ;o)
https://github.com/gasguru/flightgearthings/raw/master/smoke-sheen/fgfs-
screen-001.png
..the sim brakes are ok in KSFO
Hi,
Hi,
Perhaps some of you have noticed,
that some of the aircraft that
come with the standard flightgear package should be
changed.
A few examples, we could have a more realistic commercial
jet than the
777-200(the FDM is terribly unrealistic), we could have a
better
Fred,
Ok I cant figure it, I had quite a few goes at compiling it yesterday and
deleted them all as I went. but the one in question most likely was an old
version. Somethings got mixed up along the way.
So totally disregarding yesterday, today starting fresh I have tried 2 wiki
download links
googling for: android flightgear
i got something on: appBrain
any android user pls buy and post the source. It's only my technical interest
but if we don't get the sources we can sue...
--
The ultimate
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 10:24:10 -, Vivian wrote in message
C289D3CD017047BB8821F52E448C2779@MAIN:
Arnt Karlsen wrote
Hi,
..it's a sweet wee pussycat as far as handling goes, also on
roll-out, where it appears to _try_ carry the full weight of its
shadow: ;o)
Like we couldn't see this coming ;)
As for the 777 , unrealistic according to who ? I'm not against
changing it as one of the default aircraft , there are a lot of other
great choices now , but I do get annoyed with these claims by armchair
pilots who read it somewhere or saw it on
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:49 PM, syd adams adams@gmail.com wrote:
Like we couldn't see this coming ;)
As for the 777 , unrealistic according to who ? I'm not against
changing it as one of the default aircraft , there are a lot of other
great choices now , but I do get annoyed with
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Harry Campigli harryc...@gmail.com wrote:
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/fgrun/fgrun/po'
rm -f fr.gmo : -c --statistics -o fr.gmo fr.po
Do I need to install more than just fluid ?
Try installing gettext package as well. The configure script
Harry,
- Harry Campigli a écrit :
So totally disregarding yesterday, today starting fresh I have tried 2 wiki
download links for fgrun, and the Brisca script, all return with svn 621
which seems to be 1.5.2.
Could you tell me where did you found 1.5.2 ? configure.ac has 1.5.3 since
I know there is one android/flightgear app that serves as a remote control
for flying FlightGear via your android phone--perhaps that is what you
found? It uses the network interface which provides good separation of
application licensing. Also, I've never got source code for any app I've
Fred, Csaba
Thank you both very much for the assitance.
First I installed gettext, it still failed to compile,
then I added --with-fltk=/usr/lib to my configure line and it built with
just one warning.
that being for info :
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/usr/lib/include -I/include/
Fred
In the first line of the NEWS file from that I assume the version number as
I did not see it to refered to elsewhere.
Harry
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Frederic Bouvier fredfgf...@free.frwrote:
Harry,
- Harry Campigli a écrit :
So totally disregarding yesterday, today
On 20.02.2011 15:40, Curtis Olson wrote:
I know there is one android/flightgear app that serves as a remote
control for flying FlightGear via your android phone--perhaps that is
what you found? It uses the network interface which provides good
separation of application licensing.
Yes no.
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:13 AM, ThorstenB bre...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20.02.2011 15:40, Curtis Olson wrote:
I know there is one android/flightgear app that serves as a remote
control for flying FlightGear via your android phone--perhaps that is
what you found? It uses the network interface
Comment at the end of the cached page: pure waste of a buck, just brought
me to their web page.
Curt.
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 9:13 AM, ThorstenB wrote:
On 20.02.2011 15:40, Curtis Olson wrote:
I know there is one android/flightgear app that serves as a remote
control for flying FlightGear
On 20.02.2011 16:18, George Patterson wrote:
This site offered the FlightGear (ProFl*Sim) package for Android until
a few hours ago:
http://de.appbrain.com/app/flightgear/com.flightgear
Anything like this one?
http://www.appbrain.com/app/alni-flightgear-control/org.alni.android.fgfs.control
Two things cross my mind, whilst I know the designers strive to model the
true aerodynamics in the fdm.
1- how many fly these sims on realistic hardware? Would many even go as far
as a set of imitation yoke and pedals?
2- I have spent some time in F28s set up for airport navaid calibration
yes i saw this:
This site offered the FlightGear (ProFl*Sim) package for Android until
a few hours ago:
http://de.appbrain.com/app/flightgear/com.flightgear
Still this is online:http://de.appbrain.com/app/flight-gear/com.perfectflight
let me know if anyone can buy it and show the source. I
On 20.02.2011 17:27, Michael Sgier wrote:
let me know if anyone can buy it and show the source. I really was
surprisedi never would have given this guy such programming knowledge.
In fact i'd want to look at that but am currently stuck at native c++
glut via Android's
NDK. Probably it
On Feb 20, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Harry Campigli wrote:
Two things cross my mind, whilst I know the designers strive to model the
true aerodynamics in the fdm.
1- how many fly these sims on realistic hardware? Would many even go as far
as a set of imitation yoke and pedals?
2- I have
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 12:46 -0500, Peter Brown wrote:
This is very true. I've not explored the parameters of the 777 in FG,
but if you fly the MD-81 with no passengers, 1200 lbs of fuel and crew
weight, it is extremely different than flying with standard fuel load
and passengers. Enough so
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:29:27 +0100, Erik wrote in message
1298230167.1769.4.camel@Raptor:
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 12:46 -0500, Peter Brown wrote:
This is very true. I've not explored the parameters of the 777 in
FG, but if you fly the MD-81 with no passengers, 1200 lbs of fuel
and crew
Memories,
heres an old article on we we were doing in the F28s and airfield surveys,
whilst off topic, it may be of interest.
http://www.airwaysmuseum.com/Flying%20Unit%20navaid%20cal%20article%201990.htm
Item 8 -- (8) good low speed handling and go-around performance from very
low altitude;
26 matches
Mail list logo
