Re: [Flightgear-devel] No Rembrandt here...

2012-04-10 Thread Renk Thorsten
> The first line says it all. Okay... so what does it mean? > I'd first try to reduce the size of the shadow map : > --prop:/sim/rendering/shadows/map-size=1024 No success, problem persists. > or reduce the window size : --geometry=800x600 > to reduce the memory footprint. Same as above, probl

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGbuild for MS Windows

2012-04-10 Thread castle . 64
OK, disregard the previous msg.  got a SimGear build started but it failed.   Enough fun for one day, will attack the error msgs tomorrow..   John - Original Message - From: "castle 64" To: "FlightGear developers discussions" Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 9:04:5

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGbuild for MS Windows

2012-04-10 Thread castle . 64
OK,  got through the configure and generate operations with CMake   version is 2 dot 7 dot 0 ignoring: ^C:/fgbuild/simgear/.git;\\.gitignore;Makefile.am;~$; Library installation directory: lib 3rdparty files located in C:/fgbuild/dependencies BOOST_ROOT is C:/fgbuild/dependencies/boo

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGbuild for MS Windows

2012-04-10 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Hi Olaf, > De: "Olaf Flebbe" > > > > VC2010 express is only able to generate 32bit programs > > > > Regards, > > -Fred > > Hi, > > One can use the Windows SDK > http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=en&id=8442 > GRMSDKX_EN_DVD.iso to generate 64 Bit Windows Executabl

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGbuild for MS Windows

2012-04-10 Thread Olaf Flebbe
> > VC2010 express is only able to generate 32bit programs > > Regards, > -Fred Hi, One can use the Windows SDK http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=en&id=8442 GRMSDKX_EN_DVD.iso to generate 64 Bit Windows Executables. This integrates with VS2010 Express as well.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] updates to nav.dat.gz

2012-04-10 Thread ThorstenB
Am 10.04.2012 21:08, schrieb Martin Spott: > And there's still one thing to consider: Having one central set of > apt./nav.dat files in the Base Package still doesn't address the trend > of the FlightGear project and Scenery development proceeding > asynchronously. But to be honest, it neither wor

Re: [Flightgear-devel] updates to nav.dat.gz

2012-04-10 Thread Björn Kesten
> And there's still one thing to consider: Having one central set of > apt./nav.dat files in the Base Package still doesn't address the trend > of the FlightGear project and Scenery development proceeding > asynchronously. Wouldn't a simple "If custom data is present, use custom data" switch allev

Re: [Flightgear-devel] updates to nav.dat.gz

2012-04-10 Thread Gene Buckle
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Martin Spott wrote: > Gene, as you know, FlightGear's XML structure for taxiway routing and > other scenery-related airport info predates the capabilities of the v10 You're assuming knowledge not in evidence. :) I knew nothing of this xml format, nor how long it had been aro

Re: [Flightgear-devel] updates to nav.dat.gz

2012-04-10 Thread Martin Spott
Gene Buckle wrote: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2012, Michael Sgier wrote: > >> Traffic and parking etc. are handled via xml files in Flightgear different >> to X-Plane. >> But to make changes to the opensource apt.dat forward them to Robin: >> http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?showtopic=58356 >> > Right, b

Re: [Flightgear-devel] No Rembrandt here...

2012-04-10 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Hi Thorsten, The first line says it all. I'd first try to reduce the size of the shadow map : --prop:/sim/rendering/shadows/map-size=1024 or reduce the window size : --geometry=800x600 to reduce the memory footprint. You have a laptop right ? Maybe you have shared memory between the CPU and t

Re: [Flightgear-devel] updates to nav.dat.gz

2012-04-10 Thread HB-GRAL
Am 10.04.12 14:24, schrieb Christian Schmitt: > Hi Yves, > > flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote: > >> update in general? Why is it possible to update apt. and nav.dat in xplane >> every months without (?) inconsistencies and not for FlightGear? Is there >> something that could be changed in the concept

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGbuild for MS Windows

2012-04-10 Thread Frederic Bouvier
I presume you need to start cmake in the correct VS2010 environment. If you try to enter "cl" in the command line and it replies "Command not found", you need to locate vsvars32.bat and run it in your command line session. Jenkins build log, available here (for build 216) : http://flightgear.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGbuild for MS Windows

2012-04-10 Thread castle . 64
OK, think I see the problem. running a "bare cmake shows there is no generator install on this laptop for Visual studio 10, versions 6 through 9 and Win64 are avalable to generate project files but no 10. Loaded  VC10c++ express,  but guess the generator is a different animal. John

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGbuild for MS Windows

2012-04-10 Thread castle . 64
Thanks to all, getting closer,  started to build simgear, did not get very far with following error c:\fgbuild\projects\msvc100\SimGear>cmake "C:\fgbuild\simgear" -G "Visual Studio  10" -DMSVC_3RDPARTY_ROOT="C:\fgbuild\dependencies" -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH= "C:\fgbuild\dependen

Re: [Flightgear-devel] updates to nav.dat.gz

2012-04-10 Thread Gene Buckle
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012, Michael Sgier wrote: > Traffic and parking etc. are handled via xml files in Flightgear different to > X-Plane. > But to make changes to the opensource apt.dat forward them to Robin: > http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?showtopic=58356 > Right, but if you use the v10 format,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGbuild for MS Windows

2012-04-10 Thread Gijs de Rooy
http://wiki.flightgear.org/Building_using_CMake_-_Windows in combination with https://gitorious.org/fg/flightgear/blobs/next/docs-mini/README.MSVC did it for me. Together with some help on IRC ;-) I'll see if I can improve the wiki a bit more. Gijs --

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGbuild for MS Windows

2012-04-10 Thread castle . 64
- Original Message - Hi Geoff >If you tell more exactly, either on this list, or >direct off list, maybe can help more with SPECIFIC >things... Using the wiki tutorial "Building FlightGear- Windows". I'll take a look and give the Cmake -Windows version a try. will give you a sh

Re: [Flightgear-devel] updates to nav.dat.gz

2012-04-10 Thread Martin Spott
flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote: > I know about this inconsistencies, and this of course the core of the > problem. When flightgear reads from one updated scenery source and from > one corresponding data source we wont run into the same problems anymore, I think that's true, but really hard to achi

[Flightgear-devel] No Rembrandt here...

2012-04-10 Thread Renk Thorsten
Just freshly pulled and compiled GIT, fresh FGData master, trying to start with --enable-rembrandt results in garbage on the screen and an impressive list of errors - (I've omitted messages with meaning known to me in the following as well as repetitions). Running without Rembrandt looks fine t

Re: [Flightgear-devel] updates to nav.dat.gz

2012-04-10 Thread Christian Schmitt
Hi Yves, flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote: > update in general? Why is it possible to update apt. and nav.dat in xplane > every months without (?) inconsistencies and not for FlightGear? Is there > something that could be changed in the concept of scenery and data > distribution for FlightGear? Did

Re: [Flightgear-devel] updates to nav.dat.gz

2012-04-10 Thread flightgear
> flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote: > >> Maybe it???s time to establish a new contact to Robin Peel. I sent him >> data too but never got any answer, I sent my data to Martin Spott and >> the airports have never been updated, nore in apt.dat shipped with >> flightgear nore in scenery files derived via

Re: [Flightgear-devel] updates to nav.dat.gz

2012-04-10 Thread Martin Spott
flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote: > Maybe it???s time to establish a new contact to Robin Peel. I sent him > data too but never got any answer, I sent my data to Martin Spott and > the airports have never been updated, nore in apt.dat shipped with > flightgear nore in scenery files derived via terras

Re: [Flightgear-devel] updates to nav.dat.gz

2012-04-10 Thread flightgear
 Hi Chris (Sorry for my quick writings and mispelling and other mistakes) Maybe it’s time to establish a new contact to Robin Peel. I sent him data too but never got any answer, I sent my data to Martin Spott and the airports have never been updated, nore in apt.dat shipped with flightgear nore i

Re: [Flightgear-devel] updates to nav.dat.gz

2012-04-10 Thread Christian Schmitt
flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote: > Hi Crhis, Torsten > > What is really needed at the moment is someone starting to verify if some > changes to "our" apt.dat from the past have to come to recent apt.dat > shipped with FlightGear. Martin Spott prepared an updated apt.dat on the > mapserver, but the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] updates to nav.dat.gz

2012-04-10 Thread flightgear
Hi Crhis, Torsten What is really needed at the moment is someone starting to verify if some changes to "our" apt.dat from the past have to come to recent apt.dat shipped with FlightGear. Martin Spott prepared an updated apt.dat on the mapserver, but the changes in there have to be verified if it’s