On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 01:25:28 +0100, Lech wrote in message
<4d3b7578.9050...@szluug.org>:
> On 01/22/2011 05:49 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > Squeeze is Debian testing and the next Debian stable release, some
> > time this spring, I take it we want Squeeze to ship with FG-2.2.
>
> Hello.
>
> Deb
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 01:17:03 +0100, Csaba wrote in message
:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> >
> > ..are you able to run nouveau on your Nvidia laptop and
> > radeon and radeonhd on your ATI desktop?
>
> I have never tried nouveau but I have tested radeon a few months
On 01/22/2011 05:49 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> Squeeze is Debian testing and the next Debian stable release, some
> time this spring, I take it we want Squeeze to ship with FG-2.2.
Hello.
Debian Squeeze is planned to be released on the 5th/6th of February. So
it's pretty soon now.
And actually
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> ..are you able to run nouveau on your Nvidia laptop and
> radeon and radeonhd on your ATI desktop?
I have never tried nouveau but I have tested radeon a few months ago.
The main problem is, that it is about 10 times slower than the binary
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 01:51:26 +0800, Harry wrote in message
:
> Hello again Arnt,
>
> As you would have guessed I am working my way towards debian live as
> per your advice previously.
>
>
> For now I am leaning my way around Debians way of doing things. Rather
> pleased as I have just compiled
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 19:04:52 +0100, Csaba wrote in message
:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Harry Campigli
> wrote:
> >
> > For now I am leaning my way around Debians way of doing things.
> > Rather pleased as I have just compiled todays SVS against OSG
> > 2.8.8.3 (as advised by Thorsten) o
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Harry Campigli wrote:
>
> For now I am leaning my way around Debians way of doing things. Rather
> pleased as I have just compiled todays SVS against OSG 2.8.8.3 (as advised
> by Thorsten) on Lenny and it appears to run quite nicely. It was however a
> long haul, q
Hello again Arnt,
As you would have guessed I am working my way towards debian live as per
your advice previously.
For now I am leaning my way around Debians way of doing things. Rather
pleased as I have just compiled todays SVS against OSG 2.8.8.3 (as advised
by Thorsten) on Lenny and it appear
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 21:47:47 +0800, Harry wrote in message
:
> Could I ask how the latest git repositories fall in.
>
> For info:
> I have just installed via network the latest version of Debian Lenny
..Lenny is too old for FG-2.2/git, add backports or go Sid or Squeeze.
Squeeze is Debian te
Ok,
Thanks Csaba and Thorsten,
For info I just ran it again and SG compile died on OSG 2.9.11, thats
possibly under standable as they may have changed OSG only minutes ago.
SGOffsetTransform.o SGOffsetTransform.cxx
mv -f .deps/SGOffsetTransform.Tpo .deps/SGOffsetTransform.Po
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Harry Campigli wrote:
>
> If so what is the best version of OSG to install as I have seen numous
> posts here and on forums pertaining to changes of OSG of late?.
>
>
The OSG 2.9.x are developer releases. I think 2.9.11 isn't even released
yet, so that's the bleedi
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Harry Campigli wrote:
>
> What I would like to confirm is, are there any issues with the lastest git
> OSG with respect to the latest SG/FG git sources? Also if anyone has dealt
> with this latest Debian lenny from a FG point of veiw..
Yes, latest OSG from svn is
Could I ask how the latest git repositories fall in.
For info:
I have just installed via network the latest version of Debian Lenny (so I
can buld FG debian liveboot images) after many years of building FG on Suse
distros.
I found a few Debian funnies (to me), a complete new arrangment of X for
13 matches
Mail list logo
