Le 04/01/2012 21:44, Greg Ercolano a écrit :
Ya, looks like it's spending a lot of time calling find_child().
Apparently I never bothered to implement pointers to keep track
of 'next' and 'last' to speed up walking the tree.
Will follow up with a fix for that too
On 01/04/12 11:36, Greg Ercolano wrote:
> On 01/04/12 11:19, David Lopez wrote:
>> Greg:
>> I downloaded the entire release:
>> http://www.fltk.org/software.php?VERSION=1.3.0&FILE=fltk/snapshots/fltk-1.3.x-r9217.tar.bz2
>
> OK, I'll check.
Ya, looks like it's spending a lot of time
Le 04/01/2012 20:36, Greg Ercolano a écrit :
> On 01/04/12 11:19, David Lopez wrote:
>> Greg:
>> I downloaded the entire release:
>> http://www.fltk.org/software.php?VERSION=1.3.0&FILE=fltk/snapshots/fltk-1.3.x-r9217.tar.bz2
>
> OK, I'll check.
I think the issue is when handling the click ev
On 01/04/12 11:19, David Lopez wrote:
> Greg:
> I downloaded the entire release:
> http://www.fltk.org/software.php?VERSION=1.3.0&FILE=fltk/snapshots/fltk-1.3.x-r9217.tar.bz2
OK, I'll check.
___
fltk mailing list
fltk@easysw.com
http://lists.easy
Greg:
I downloaded the entire release:
http://www.fltk.org/software.php?VERSION=1.3.0&FILE=fltk/snapshots/fltk-1.3.x-r9217.tar.bz2
> On 01/04/12 09:06, David FLEURY wrote:
> >> Sorry about disturbing you, but I just tested the code attached in
> > STR #2795 with r9217 under WinXP 32 and its per
On 01/04/12 09:06, David FLEURY wrote:
>> Sorry about disturbing you, but I just tested the code attached in
> STR #2795 with r9217 under WinXP 32 and its performance is unusable.
There shouldn't be anything platform specific about the
optimizations.
>> Is it possible that I am ma
> Sorry about disturbing you, but I just tested the code attached in STR #2795
> with r9217 under WinXP 32 and its performance is unusable.
> With my PC (Intel Core 2 Duo with 2GB RAM) it takes always more than 30
> seconds to a clicked item to get selected.
> The scrolling (using scrollbar) howe
Sorry about disturbing you, but I just tested the code attached in STR #2795
with r9217 under WinXP 32 and its performance is unusable.
With my PC (Intel Core 2 Duo with 2GB RAM) it takes always more than 30 seconds
to a clicked item to get selected.
The scrolling (using scrollbar) however is fas
On 27 Dec 2011, at 17:16, Greg Ercolano wrote:
> On 12/26/11 18:43, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
>> Hi Greg - Just tested the new version, it works great! There's one little
>> bug though: the "connections" between the items are sometimes missing. To
>> reproduce [..]
>
> Yes, replied to yo
On 12/26/11 18:43, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
> Hi Greg - Just tested the new version, it works great! There's one little
> bug though: the "connections" between the items are sometimes missing. To
> reproduce [..]
Yes, replied to your email on 12/25, but for some reason
your orig
On 25 Dec 2011, at 02:24, Greg Ercolano wrote:
> On 12/23/11 11:06, Greg Ercolano wrote:
>> On 12/22/11 12:27, David FLEURY wrote:
>>> You are right, I will see for a Tree Item solution, to avoid regression
>>> somewhere else.
>>> I do not know well enough fltk to have any opinion on this subjec
On 12/25/11 07:05, David FLEURY wrote:
> Your patch runs my test well.
> Well done.
Great -- note small follow up fix in r9217
that fixes a 'connector' problem that Christophe noticed:
http://fltk.org/newsgroups.php?gfltk.general+v:34131
So definitely apply that if
On 12/25/11 09:50, Greg Ercolano wrote:
> On 12/25/11 01:41, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
>>OK, just checked in r9216 which should optimize Fl_Tree
>
>> There's one little bug though: the "connections" between
>> the items are sometimes missing. To reproduce:
>>
>> launch test/tree
>> set "Line
On 12/25/11 01:41, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
>OK, just checked in r9216 which should optimize Fl_Tree
>>quite a bit. David, please give it a try:
>>
> There's one little bug though: the "connections" between
> the items are sometimes missing. To reproduce:
>
> launch test/tree
> set "Lin
> On 12/23/11 11:06, Greg Ercolano wrote:
> > On 12/22/11 12:27, David FLEURY wrote:
> >> You are right, I will see for a Tree Item solution, to avoid regression
> >> somewhere else.
> >> I do not know well enough fltk to have any opinion on this subject.
> >> Just try to make my tests work for my
On 12/23/11 11:06, Greg Ercolano wrote:
> On 12/22/11 12:27, David FLEURY wrote:
>> You are right, I will see for a Tree Item solution, to avoid regression
>> somewhere else.
>> I do not know well enough fltk to have any opinion on this subject.
>> Just try to make my tests work for my own configu
16 matches
Mail list logo
