If this issue has already been discussed, please excuse me. I had
done some searches in FLTK forum but nothing is found (the search
function seems broken, doesn't it?)
In Dev-C++ and wxDev-C++, I open their package manager to get a list
of devpaks from "community devpaks" site. When I tried to i
On 20.04.2012, at 19:05, STF wrote:
> If this issue has already been discussed, please excuse me. I had
> done some searches in FLTK forum but nothing is found (the search
> function seems broken, doesn't it?)
>
> In Dev-C++ and wxDev-C++, I open their package manager to get a list
> of devpaks
STF schrieb:
> In Dev-C++ and wxDev-C++, I open their package manager to get a list
> of devpaks from "community devpaks" site. When I tried to install
> version 1.1.9, I got the error message that "The following files were
> not downloaded due to errors: Could not start transferring remote
> file
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 19:34, Matthias Melcher wrote:
>
> On 20.04.2012, at 19:05, STF wrote:
>
>> If this issue has already been discussed, please excuse me. I had
>> done some searches in FLTK forum but nothing is found (the search
>> function seems broken, doesn't it?)
>>
>> In Dev-C++ and wx
> I don't know how "community devpaks" servers are organized, but I see
> that:
Nor do we...
> 1. the 1.1.9 package was done by www.bibosoft.de Do you recognize
> this webiste? Some active contributor to FLTK?
Don't know - maybe that was Dejan's stuff? (Though that's a guess.) He's not
aroun
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 13:56, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
wrote:
>
>> I don't know how "community devpaks" servers are organized, but I see
>> that:
>
> Nor do we...
>
>> 1. the 1.1.9 package was done by www.bibosoft.de Do you recognize
>> this webiste? Some active contributor to FLTK?
>
On 23.04.2012, at 16:07, STF wrote:
> I don't know which "end" you're referring to, but my starting point is
> that of someone living in the 21st century, not someone back in the
> 80's! And my viewpoint is linked to IDE which is the way to go to
> make professional stuff.
>
> It's like cooking
On 23.04.2012, at 17:14, Matthias Melcher wrote:
>
> On 23.04.2012, at 16:07, STF wrote:
>
>> I don't know which "end" you're referring to, but my starting point is
>> that of someone living in the 21st century, not someone back in the
>> 80's! And my viewpoint is linked to IDE which is the wa
On 23 Apr 2012, at 21:07, Matthias Melcher wrote:
> PS: here is a list of some available IDEs. We can never support them all:
>
> DevC++, MinGW Studio, Emacs, XEmacs, VisualC 6, 2005, 2008, 2010, 2012,
> Eclipse, Code::Blocks, Anjuta, Xcode, NetBeans, CodeLite, KDevelop,
> QtCreator, SlickEdit,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 17:14, Matthias Melcher wrote:
>
> You are expecting that we deliver a pre-heated meal for you right onto your
> dining room table.
Nope! It's a pity that you still can't see the analogy. I consider a
programmer like a cook, not a server or food reseller.
> I am sorry,
> > For those following along at home who may not know, the only IDE's we do
> "support" are Xcode and some of the "more or less sort of compatible with
> each other" VS variants.
>
> For OSX only? That's a strange choice. What about Windows?
Huh? Wha...?
Dude - VS means Visual Studio.
That's
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 15:33, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
wrote:
>> > For those following along at home who may not know, the only IDE's we do
>> "support" are Xcode and some of the "more or less sort of compatible with
>> each other" VS variants.
>>
>> For OSX only? That's a strange choi
> Oh, sorry, dude, I didn't get the word "and" right after "Xcode" in
> your message :D I thought you're talking about things in OSX, ^_^
>
> OK, so I should leave Dev-C++ *at the bottom of my drawer* and go to
> VS 2010 Express, right?
Probably - it's not a toolchain I'm all that keen on, but
13 matches
Mail list logo
