Hello guys.
I've asked about this in the past, but I didn't get a definitive
answer. Here's my scenario: I've got a one-to-many mappings where each
side is represented by an entity (not a component). Can anyone tell me
why CheckList insists on inserting the items on the many side before
inserting
Hello guys.
while looking at the code, I've noticed that the CheckZZZ methods are
implemented as extension methods. I must admit that I'm curious: why
did you guys followed this approach?
thanks.
--
Regards,
Luis Abreu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
0 at 12:51 PM, Paul Batum wrote:
> Not sure if I'm on the right track exactly, but there are some overloads for
> CheckList that might help you.
> See this thread:
> http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate/browse_thread/thread/cebc70ff873e4fd2/ce6cc622bc02d9c
>
> O
, then that
means I can't pass null to the IdEntidade in Filiais. But since
Filiais is inserted before Entidades, that means getting a SQL
exception when the test is run. If I remove the foreign key (which I
did to get the complete SQL list), the test passes. But I really don't
want to remo
o. Discriminators default to using the class
> name as the discriminator value.
>
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Luis Abreu wrote:
>>
>> Hello guys.
>>
>> I'm reading the wiki: http://wiki.fluentnhibernate.org/Fluent_mapping
>>
>> and I&
Hello guys.
I'm reading the wiki: http://wiki.fluentnhibernate.org/Fluent_mapping
and I've got a question on the table-per-hierachy mapping shown at the
end of the page.Don't you need to specify the discriminator value for
each derived class? I'm not seein that on the example that is shown.
than
Hello guys,
I've got the following mappings:
public class OcorrenciaMapping: ClassMap {
HasMany(ocorrencia => ocorrencia.Intervencoes)
.Access.AsCamelCaseField(Prefix.Underscore)
.AsBag()
.Cascade
.All()
Hello guys.
I'm converting some old code I had which used mapping visitors to load and
populate the Configurationn object. I was under the impression that this
code:
var configuration = Fluently.Configure( )
.Database( GetDatabaseInfo() )
.Mappi
it's now: LazyLoad() and Not.LazyLoad(), these are available wherever
LazyLoad was before, and also on the subclass.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Luis Abreu wrote:
Yeah, and if i recall correctly, the default is lazy loading, which is not
working for meJ
Thanks agai
shall add that method to my list of changes.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Luis Abreu wrote:
Oh, just remembered…and what about the lazy attribute on the other
properties (references)?
For instance, on collections…I see there is a LazyLoad method but there
isn't a NoLazyLoad met
Subject: [fluent-nhib] Re: Need some explanations about LazyLoad method
Excellent! Glad we got there in the end.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Luis Abreu wrote:
James, thanks for your time! As always, the mistake was mine: the error were
coming from the snapshot classes which also had
,
and all the subclasses also set to false. That works for me.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Luis Abreu wrote:
I'm seeing the lazy="false" on the XML but I'm still getting the same error
if I don't set the default-lazy to false. Btw, here's t
ly, you can use SetAttribute instead.
subclass.SetAttribute("lazy", "false");
I'll look into getting this implemented properly. Let me know if the set
attribute hack works.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Luis Abreu wrote:
Hello again.
You're not going t
Hello again.
You're not going to like this answer... it works for me!
Yep, I don't like that answer :)
Ok, back to my code. First, I'm not using sessionsource because the assembly
is not signed and since it has dependencies on non-signed assemblies I
cannot sign it here. So, I'm just getting th
out Luis? One-to-many? Many-to-many?
Many-to-one?
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Luis Abreu wrote:
Guys, pause please!
Ok, I can see that adding the notlazyloaded method call will put lazy =
false on my class on the generated xml. Now the problem is that when this
xml is loaded I get exceptio
Guys, pause please!
Ok, I can see that adding the notlazyloaded method call will put lazy =
false on my class on the generated xml. Now the problem is that when this
xml is loaded I get exceptions saying that my properties aren't virtual (and
no, they're not and no I don't want lazy lozading on m
Btw, this is a problem I've faced in my mappings. Shouldn't the lazy
attribute that you apply to a class element override that mapping? I'm
asking this because I've had to change the default convention on my mappings
so that I could discard the lazy loading options since it always insisted in
using
rnate.Framework project
references assemblies that aren't signed themselves, which prevents us from
signing it; I don't really want to sign only half of FNH!
I'll see if I can remove the offending assemblies, but I don't know yet.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Luis Abreu
Hello guys,
I've just run na svn update on the fluent solution and it looks like it
still doesn't sign the assembly and adds the APTA attribute by default. I
was under the impression that this had been discussed here and fixed. Can
anyone confirm it? And if that is correct, when can we get that u
+1 for signing and adding the allow partial calllers attribute so that
non-signed dlls can still call use the assembly.
From: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
[mailto:fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Stewart
Sent: terça-feira, 13 de Janeiro de 2009 20:09
To: fluen
Hello guys.
Just one thing regarding the version support and the baseclass inheritance
problem: does it work when you need to customize the mappings? Remember my
version + timestamp (sql server) problem? I had to give up on automapping
because when I added the custom version entry for each of
n for your help!
---
Luis Abreu
From: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
[mailto:fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of James Gregory
Sent: sexta-feira, 9 de Janeiro de 2009 12:14
To: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
Subject: [fluent-nhib] Re: question on auto mapping
Andrew
Ok, that makes sense.
Thanks,.
---
Luis Abreu
From: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
[mailto:fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of James Gregory
Sent: sexta-feira, 9 de Janeiro de 2009 09:39
To: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
Subject: [fluent-nhib] Re: question on
Btw James, one more question:
When using the auto persistence, shouldn't I be able to save the xml to
disk by using the previous code? It's that I get nothing and stopping the
debugger there I see 0 mappings on the persistencemodel
Thanks.
---
Luis Abreu
Fr
Hello James.
Thanks for the help!
Firstly, why is it that you're using a IUserType for your version? What is
the type that your version property has in your entity? I ask that because
Fluent NHibernate has a few options for mapping Versions and Timestamps.
On the class, I have a Byte[] propert
Ok.
Thanks
---
Luis Abreu
From: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
[mailto:fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Stewart
Sent: quinta-feira, 8 de Janeiro de 2009 16:04
To: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
Subject: [fluent-nhib] Re: Automapping a complex inheritance
Btw, one more stupid question. If I have this:
var modeloPersistencia =
AutoPersistenceModel.MapEntitiesFromAssemblyOf()
.Where(
type => type == typeof (Disciplina)
) //comecar com disciplina
.WithConvention(convention =>
Ahh, that makes sense now my fault on the understanding. In that case your
only option is to manually map the Version for each class.
I see...can you give more info on how to do that? I mean, should I add
classmaap derived classes with only the version definition and then merge
them with my au
Hello again.
One quick thing, it seems at the moment, the property that timestamps must
be called version or timestamp, otherwise you'll have to manually map it.
I tried using Timestamp but then NH tries to use datetime. That's why I'm
using a custom user type and it seems like it's working (at
.
---
Luis Abreu
From: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
[mailto:fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Stewart
Sent: quinta-feira, 8 de Janeiro de 2009 14:00
To: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
Subject: [fluent-nhib] Re: question on auto mapping
Hi Luis
you need to inform
into EntidadeBases
table when I use the Persistence Specification to test the mappings.
Can anyone tell me why this happens and how to solve this? Can't I use
inheritance in my classes and auto mapping? Thanks.
---
Luis Abreu
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
31 matches
Mail list logo
